a strong NEED for an intimate mail partner trumps everything else

[glBock]

I have been exchanging mails for almost a year with one of the loveliest women in the world. There's just a tiny thing wrong with that mail exchange: her need for mailing with me is moderate at best. She has everything she needs, including two RL female lovers.

Should YOU – a woman without enough attention from your partner – feel similar to what I feel sometimes; feel disappointed perhaps about not playing the first fiddle any longer in your relationship, why don't you consider PMing me.

Possibly you and I can figure out together, how to re-arrange priorities in our lives.

 

[MrMikelobe1952]

Warning

He will get nasty if he does not approve of your interests

 

[glBock]

He will get nasty if he does not approve of your interests

While you are at it, Mike, why don't you issue multiple other warnings here for the ladies of Lit, who are unable to read by themselves an ad from fellow they see here. Like for instance:

a big warning: this guy thinks for himself, and he writes heresy and blasphemy statements occasionally. So stay away from him, unless you possess a mind of your own!

 

[MrMikelobe1952]

While you are at it, Mike, why don't you issue multiple other warnings here for the ladies of Lit, who are unable to read by themselves an ad from fellow they see here. Like for instance:

a big warning: this guy thinks for himself, and he writes heresy and blasphemy statements occasionally. So stay away from him, unless you possess a mind of your own!

I thought you had blocked me.

I think you meant for me to say, "thinks only OF himself."

 

[glBock]

I thought you had blocked me.

I think you meant for me to say, "thinks only OF himself."

I wonder Mike, what you get out of bad-mouthing other people here? Don't you have anything else to do, other than filing your particular views on how sincery people's posts are?

 

[MrMikelobe1952]

Typical contributions from gBlock, all taken from his most 20 recent posts:

My suggestion that two obnoxious mischief-makers like you, Kim and Jada, find something better to do

The way I see it, there's absolutely no hope at all that anything useful can ever become of a thread here at Lit that I started, after Kim Gordon gets in the act.

all kinds of people run around here on Lit. And seemingly advice-resistant as well

But have you ever considered writing a better ad instead???

Item #1 you concede not to argue About it. Your doubts are silly anyway, as several women here have attested to already.

#2 (feminism sucks): you'd have to make an effort to understand Esther Vilar's book, or at least the theses and postulates of her. Main one = it is women, who enslave men generally, or try to. Not the other way around.

Now if you like, you can claim the women E.V. talks about are NOT feminists. Here in Germany she carried out several debates in public, with the worst feminist of our county, Alice Schwarzer. So in my simple-minded brain, I equate opponents of Esther Vilar as feminists.

#3 (enjoying sex): anyone who aims to monetize her pussy, generally by snatching a well-off man to get married to, and to enslave him thereby, must necessarily ration out sex before marriage. To increase the value of her pussy Conversely any woman who has such a high sex drive that rationing out sex is out of the question, is not an "Esther Vilar-type" woman.

#4 (I claim established female privileges everywhere): a simple example is Bert's tavern mentioned by Jada several times. Any woman not extremely ugly, or extremely unfriendly, can go there and pick up a man for the night, if she so choses.

Name me one example for a man being able to do that also. Other than visiting a brothel perhaps. But brothels offer at most (overpaid) pseudo-sex, generally.

But female privileges abound everywhere. Here on Lit, a woman needs only to write something like "32 F, cups size C or larger, men, come hither and pleasure me", and shitloads of male idiots show up offering themselves. Imagine a man having such "success".

I am glad You'll be able to remember me for my "clumsiest phrasings", Kim. I wonder about YOUR abiity to come up with elegant phrases continually in language you learned only later in life.

 

[one_love]

Dayum!!!

*grabs some popcorn*

 

[glBock]

my remarks on your comments here, Mike Lobe

I found it strange at first, Mike, that you seem to feel a compulsion, for "taking apart" my ad, making this claim or that regarding my words. But then I noticed – by looking at other posts of yours – that this sort of behavior seems to be a compulsive hobby of yours.

And then your profile gave you away; you wrote you are a psychologist, most likely retired. And now I understand your strange hobby better: Instead of analyzing clients coming to visit your professional practice, you now analyze Litsters, who write ads.

I wonder whether you never learned during the course of your studies, that a psychologist ought to wait getting started, until a client asks him to begin his analysis? I can do quite well without your professional services, Mike, and I am fairly certain, other people will feel better also, when you leave them alone.

What do you think about writing a book instead, for commemorating other people's oddities?

 

[secretlass]

This interaction is pure gold.

 

[fitandfresh]

Hmmm

This is interaction is pure gold.

Isn't it just!

 

[MrMikelobe1952]

Sorry to disappoint those who found this interaction to be enjoyable, but I had no intention of keeping it going.

I may be jumping to conclusions, but the way this guy tends to talk to women, he clearly is carrying around a lot of anger. I'm just diverting a small part of it to me for no apparently good purpose.

Am I jumping to conclusions in suspecting him of being an incel guy? Not sure. He certainly gets angry quickly when women do not meet his ideals. He keeps asking for women of a certain ideal type, rather than attempting to engage with women on their own terms.

I have no real idea of what I am accomplishing by engaging with him. Other than pushing his buttons. Which, as you can see, is very easy.

But, as I said, I have no intention of continuing this discussion.

 

[glBock]

…..

But, as I said, I have no intention of continuing this discussion.

Great idea, Mike; that makes two of us. In case you have not noticed it, I did not write my ad for carrying on a discussion with you.

 

[cara2272]

Sorry to disappoint those who found this interaction to be enjoyable, but I had no intention of keeping it going.

I may be jumping to conclusions, but the way this guy tends to talk to women, he clearly is carrying around a lot of anger. I'm just diverting a small part of it to me for no apparently good purpose.

Am I jumping to conclusions in suspecting him of being an incel guy? Not sure. He certainly gets angry quickly when women do not meet his ideals. He keeps asking for women of a certain ideal type, rather than attempting to engage with women on their own terms.

I have no real idea of what I am accomplishing by engaging with him. Other than pushing his buttons. Which, as you can see, is very easy.

But, as I said, I have no intention of continuing this discussion.

Respectfully, I disagree. It means a lot when good men don't keep silent in face of things like this. Thanks for speaking up.

 

[glBock]

a word to Cara and Mike,

It looks to me that both of you don't like me much, so Mike felt he had to "warn" humankind of a big bad wolf in sheep's clothing. And Cara feels he was right about doing that. I don't want to blame either of you.

On the other hand, I wonder whether y'all ever doubt your own judgement? Could be I am the sincerest man on earth, and you just fail to understand me. And besides that, what good can your warning do? Maybe there are women, who go for a man accused in public just because of that reason. Independent thinking women, for instance.

So it seems to me, carrying on a battle involving virtues and sincerity, has its pitfalls. Maybe Mike wisely excused himself, and only women from SE Europe feel revenge must happen?? For what? Because I once replied to a PM of yours in an unfriendly manner?

To me personally it does not really matter much, whether accusations against me stop here or not. My ad was not a smash success anyway, and in the mean time I have been happily exchanging mails with another sweet woman, who feels a stronger need for me than the woman I mentioned in my ad. Funny that none of you two Lit detectives caught my reference to two very sweet women in my ad. Maybe I do not eat fried innocent female beings for lunch after all??

 

[cara2272]

There's no need to warn anyone about you; your posts speak more than enough.

But you are polluting this place, and I am glad every time people try to fix a bit of it away.

 

[glBock]

OK, one last piece of pollution in this thread:

I retract my original ad. Not that I no longer stand behind what I wrote, but the woman I mentioned -- the one I figured had no strong need for me -- and I are back together again. And we are happier than ever before.

And when I am happy with someone, actually with her woman lover also, it would make no sense at all, searching for yet another mail partner.

 

[MrMikelobe1952]

There's no need to warn anyone about you; your posts speak more than enough.

But you are polluting this place, and I am glad every time people try to fix a bit of it away.

He is really easy to set off, though.

 

[WilliedaFoe]

It looks to me that both of you don't like me much, so Mike felt he had to "warn" humankind of a big bad wolf in sheep's clothing. And Cara feels he was right about doing that. I don't want to blame either of you.

On the other hand, I wonder whether y'all ever doubt your own judgement? Could be I am the sincerest man on earth, and you just fail to understand me. And besides that, what good can your warning do? Maybe there are women, who go for a man accused in public just because of that reason. Independent thinking women, for instance.

So it seems to me, carrying on a battle involving virtues and sincerity, has its pitfalls. Maybe Mike wisely excused himself, and only women from SE Europe feel revenge must happen?? For what? Because I once replied to a PM of yours in an unfriendly manner?

To me personally it does not really matter much, whether accusations against me stop here or not. My ad was not a smash success anyway, and in the mean time I have been happily exchanging mails with another sweet woman, who feels a stronger need for me than the woman I mentioned in my ad. Funny that none of you two Lit detectives caught my reference to two very sweet women in my ad. Maybe I do not eat fried innocent female beings for lunch after all??

Oh good lord! Dude, just this quote alone, shows how insipid your arguments are, come on! Your last "personal" admission? Yeah, that happened *wink, wink*, sure dude.pathetic...