Trombonus
A bit older, a lot wiser.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2006
- Posts
- 15,398
As many of you know, my birthday is tomorrow. It's still two hours away for me, but I got to thinking about time zones and for a lot of people it's already the 12th. This chain of thought led me to ponder this hypothetical situation.
Lets say you were born at about 1AM on the East Coast, say somewhere in Rhode Island for example. Now lets say that later on in your life you move to California. You would be switching from Eastern Standard Time to Pacific Standard Time, which means you'd lose 3 hours. So instead of being born at 1AM EST on say a Wednesday, you'd have been born at 10PM PST on the Tuesday immediately before it. So in this case do you celebrate your birthday on the original date or on the new one. Technically the new date would be correct since that was the accurate time of your birth in that time zone. But then of course you would have been celebrating your birthday on the same date for all the previous years of your life. So would you go with the original date, even though technically it's not really your birthday anymore?
Ponder with me.
Lets say you were born at about 1AM on the East Coast, say somewhere in Rhode Island for example. Now lets say that later on in your life you move to California. You would be switching from Eastern Standard Time to Pacific Standard Time, which means you'd lose 3 hours. So instead of being born at 1AM EST on say a Wednesday, you'd have been born at 10PM PST on the Tuesday immediately before it. So in this case do you celebrate your birthday on the original date or on the new one. Technically the new date would be correct since that was the accurate time of your birth in that time zone. But then of course you would have been celebrating your birthday on the same date for all the previous years of your life. So would you go with the original date, even though technically it's not really your birthday anymore?
Ponder with me.