A question about CBT...
- Thread starter nodtveidt
- Start date
incubus'_sub
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2003
- Posts
- 585
Hi & welcome. Please explain what you are asking about rather than expect us to decipher another damned set of obscure initials. Sorry, it's my pet hate & really starting to annoy me.
Now, what was that question again ?
Now, what was that question again ?
nodtveidt
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
- Posts
- 253
Sorry, I guess I kinda figured it'd be a known acronym. 
CBT stands for Cock and Ball Torture. It can be a bit dangerous when not done right (obviously, it's easy to damage that area of the body). Anything from cock whipping to kicking in the balls to pulling on the penis...there's lots of things involved in it. Some doms make use of it but not a lot, from my understanding...I was wondering how many people take part in these kind of activities.
Thanks for the welcome.
CBT stands for Cock and Ball Torture. It can be a bit dangerous when not done right (obviously, it's easy to damage that area of the body). Anything from cock whipping to kicking in the balls to pulling on the penis...there's lots of things involved in it. Some doms make use of it but not a lot, from my understanding...I was wondering how many people take part in these kind of activities.
Thanks for the welcome.
incubus'_sub
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2003
- Posts
- 585
LOL, thanks for the explanantion.
Not having said equipment, I can't answer your question anyway, but I'm sure that someone will be able to.
Not having said equipment, I can't answer your question anyway, but I'm sure that someone will be able to.
soapstar
Really Really Experienced
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2003
- Posts
- 468
incubus'_sub said:Hi & welcome. Please explain what you are asking about rather than expect us to decipher another damned set of obscure initials. Sorry, it's my pet hate & really starting to annoy me.
Now, what was that question again ?
Im glad you said that.
I have recently started a new job and the people only speak in acronyms. Its kind of silly, but also kind of cool once you get the hang of it.
Its another way of showing how "in" you really are.
Also, Im so shallow I like doing it to other people.
RavenSpirit2k4
Domina della Ombra
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2004
- Posts
- 2,456
I've practiced it a bit and I quite enjoyed it.The play I did inluded clothespins, candle wax and a genital whip. Oh, and of course, my fingernails. Unfortunately, cbt is a hard limit with my current submissive.
soapstar
Really Really Experienced
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2003
- Posts
- 468
RavenSpirit2k4 said:
I am completely submissive, but I woud find it totally intriguing to observe this stuff.
I would assume that if it was going to get heavy (I'm thinking tears), then you would have some sort of emotional bond first?
Curious.
Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
I do this, I tend to do it more with people who have already incorporated it into their own mastubation routines, and in some cases I've had to educate (wince, shudder) people who don't know they are doing something stupidly risky and sometimes they are going to keep doing it anyway.
I've used clothespins, clamps, twine, weights, parachutes, had people tie their shoes to their nuts and twirl for me, hot wax, ice, irritants on the peehole, you name it. It's great fun, but care and communication are both good.
Risky? Yeah, sure, so is most of SM. Taking the time to know your risks and how to take only the ones you are comfortable taking is always essential.
I've used clothespins, clamps, twine, weights, parachutes, had people tie their shoes to their nuts and twirl for me, hot wax, ice, irritants on the peehole, you name it. It's great fun, but care and communication are both good.
Risky? Yeah, sure, so is most of SM. Taking the time to know your risks and how to take only the ones you are comfortable taking is always essential.
catalina_francisco
Happily insatiable always
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2002
- Posts
- 18,730
Have delivered some CBT under the watchful eye of my Master. Tried clamps, clothes pins, iced water, wax, light flogging, hands, rope, and the sub in question enjoyed it so mustn't have gone too far. Is definately something which requires care and communication, but as Netzach says, so does most of the things many of us are into.
Catalina
Is definately something which requires care and communication, but as Netzach says, so does most of the things many of us are into.Catalina
MissTaken
Biker Chick
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2001
- Posts
- 20,570
soapstar said:
We engage in CBT quite regularly. I have also played with a friend with CBT and yes, I would agree that the emotional bond between lovers makes the experience more intense and more fulfilling.
Perhaps, as with all things sexual....
Pure
Fiel a Verdad
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2001
- Posts
- 15,135
the issue is whether there's permanent, nontrivial harm. it's wise to know some basic facts, for instancem how long can a body part be deprived of fresh blood supply. (there are those who've castrated themselves intentionally by tying off the testicles for a couple days.)
RavenSpirit2k4
Domina della Ombra
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2004
- Posts
- 2,456
Netzach said:
Oooooh, I'm going to look for that. I've been talking a to a potential client today who is into cbt.
Pure
Fiel a Verdad
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2001
- Posts
- 15,135
Miss T said, //We engage in CBT quite regularly. I have also played with a friend with CBT and yes, I would agree that the emotional bond between lovers makes the experience more intense and more fulfilling.
Perhaps, as with all things sexual....//
With all due respect, alleged 'torture' by someone who loves me is LESS torturous. One key element is 'fear', and that *lessens* with a lover (most types).
If Raven means a *client*--even a stranger-- who wants CBT, that sounds like a more intense situation.
Obviously a 'torturer' must be *careful* and not inflict permanent damage, but s/he need not and preferably, imo, should not be extremely *caring* (i.e, loving.).
It's a bit like surgery. I'd rather have a competent stranger, than my wife.
Perhaps, as with all things sexual....//
With all due respect, alleged 'torture' by someone who loves me is LESS torturous. One key element is 'fear', and that *lessens* with a lover (most types).
If Raven means a *client*--even a stranger-- who wants CBT, that sounds like a more intense situation.
Obviously a 'torturer' must be *careful* and not inflict permanent damage, but s/he need not and preferably, imo, should not be extremely *caring* (i.e, loving.).
It's a bit like surgery. I'd rather have a competent stranger, than my wife.
Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
If Raven means a *client*--even a stranger-- who wants CBT, that sounds like a more intense situation.
Maybe on the reciving end of it. Those little worm boys love that mystery and unknown quantity so damn much.
Now as for ME---
I find my CBT much much more intense with someone I'm eager to climb on and milk dry with my wet pussy after the fact. Call me crazy. And that person is definitely never a client, and usually not a new friend.
Maybe on the reciving end of it. Those little worm boys love that mystery and unknown quantity so damn much.
Now as for ME---
I find my CBT much much more intense with someone I'm eager to climb on and milk dry with my wet pussy after the fact. Call me crazy. And that person is definitely never a client, and usually not a new friend.
catalina_francisco
Happily insatiable always
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2002
- Posts
- 18,730
Elequently said as always N. I agree I would do the same would I had a wet pussy.
Francisco.
Francisco.
Pure
Fiel a Verdad
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2001
- Posts
- 15,135
Netz:
N: Maybe on the reciving end of it. Those little worm boys love that mystery and unknown quantity so damn much.
=====
OK, so we agree that the receiver of CBT has reason to prefer a non-loving, non-caring--but careful--inflicter of CBT.
So let's look from the inflictor's side:
N: Now as for ME---
I find my CBT much much more intense with someone I'm eager to climb on and milk dry with my wet pussy after the fact. Call me crazy. And that person is definitely never a client, and usually not a new friend.
======
This seems to confuse or conflate 'wet pussy' with caring/loving.
I see no reason why a sadist with his/her 'subject' wouldn't get turned on, of course. So 'wet pussy' could occur in either the noncaring or caring case (of genuine legal sadism). (I don't deny that, in many cases, esp. vanilla, the sex--any activity-- is better for a woman if she's in love and feels loved.)
Now you ask me to believe that torture of a loved one gives a superior 'kick.' Well, let's consider the general case, first: A number of sadistic persons precisely do NOT pick loved ones, for a start. Why might that be? Perhaps because of 'fear'. How afraid is your CBT sufferer going to get, knowing you love and care for him? Therefore, is you get off on fear, as is common in a sadist, you will cause LESS fear with a loved one.
As to what you, N, prefer, that's not to be denied; but it may have several explanations: For one, May I suggest it's the 'whole package' that you find superior. I.e., the alleged torture followed by a hot fuck. The latter--in my theory-- perhaps more than compensating for the less-than-ideal torture scenario.
N: Maybe on the reciving end of it. Those little worm boys love that mystery and unknown quantity so damn much.
=====
OK, so we agree that the receiver of CBT has reason to prefer a non-loving, non-caring--but careful--inflicter of CBT.
So let's look from the inflictor's side:
N: Now as for ME---
I find my CBT much much more intense with someone I'm eager to climb on and milk dry with my wet pussy after the fact. Call me crazy. And that person is definitely never a client, and usually not a new friend.
======
This seems to confuse or conflate 'wet pussy' with caring/loving.
I see no reason why a sadist with his/her 'subject' wouldn't get turned on, of course. So 'wet pussy' could occur in either the noncaring or caring case (of genuine legal sadism). (I don't deny that, in many cases, esp. vanilla, the sex--any activity-- is better for a woman if she's in love and feels loved.)
Now you ask me to believe that torture of a loved one gives a superior 'kick.' Well, let's consider the general case, first: A number of sadistic persons precisely do NOT pick loved ones, for a start. Why might that be? Perhaps because of 'fear'. How afraid is your CBT sufferer going to get, knowing you love and care for him? Therefore, is you get off on fear, as is common in a sadist, you will cause LESS fear with a loved one.
As to what you, N, prefer, that's not to be denied; but it may have several explanations: For one, May I suggest it's the 'whole package' that you find superior. I.e., the alleged torture followed by a hot fuck. The latter--in my theory-- perhaps more than compensating for the less-than-ideal torture scenario.
Last edited:
Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
Pure, this isn't jiving with my experience, even as a disaffected purveyor or painful pleasure. Why would so many of my clients seem more into it after forging a semblence of a relationship with me? The ones I keep and really work well with all start out more reserved and more liable to back out of a painful acitivity and slowly become more and more accustomed to the pain and more eager to take more of it, and more emotionally *present* and happy to be so, more in tune with the idea that they are taking the pain on my behalf and more turned on by that idea.
There are definitely many men who go from Mistress to Mistress to Mistress and I think that these are the type you're talking about. Familiarity breeds, well something, and it's not hot.
But I'd say that I see a pretty 50/50 split. And some people prefer the loved one to the competent stranger, because this isn't surgery or science.
There are definitely many men who go from Mistress to Mistress to Mistress and I think that these are the type you're talking about. Familiarity breeds, well something, and it's not hot.
But I'd say that I see a pretty 50/50 split. And some people prefer the loved one to the competent stranger, because this isn't surgery or science.
