normal jean
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2004
- Posts
- 1,193
Am I the only one that has noticed?
It seems that lately, comments on this site consist of short boring generic one line summations of the poem's content
I am wondering if maybe Lit is offering some sort of tiny Icon for the person who makes the most useless comments, as it seems like a competition.
I remember a while back when it was pointed out that too many comments consisted of--
good work, excellent, thank you, etc
but this is worse, in my opinion. I always appreciate comments on my poems, any sort of comment that was not vile, vicious, or kissy-assed, but now days, it is worse.
I dont understand the point of a comment that consists of-
for example,
"little red went to see her granny and encountered a wolf...blah, blah blah"
obviously the reader has at least scanned the poem, in most cases, but, usually we do not need a commenter to reduce the poem to a one line analysis that contributes nothing. Just restates the content of the poem in a most boring way.
I delete these insincere comments as they are nothing more than padding for the commenter and his/her comment tally, and if it were possible, I would delete the uselss 5 votes that came with them.
However, I am NOT insinuating that everyone who leaves a lot of comments is only doing so for his/her comment tally. There are those here who leave comments as genuine responses to the poem and could care less the number next to his/her name on the Feedback Portal.
I can think of a few people here right now who always leave comments but sometimes just sign their name and dont bother logging in. I think that the quality of feedback began sliding when the PC feature was introduced. That feature may indeed have caused more comments to be left, more FB relayed, but MORE is not always better.
So, I am curious as to how other poets feel about these "worthless" coments.
Do they mean anything to you as a writer when it comes to helping you see your poem in a better light?
Do these comments help you with your work or do they just make you feel good because a comment was left?
I admit, I have left many a comment that resembled--
I really enjoyed your poem
simply because someone before me might have left a comment that consisted of helpful hints, or a suggestion that I might have wanted to make but someone beat me to it, but lately, I gag when I read these condensed versions of the poem that are useless in any way as constructive crit goes.
I know this thread might anger a few people, maybe more than a few, but I am being honest, expressing my opinion and if it pisses folks off, well, I am sorry for that.
I just wanted to know if anyone at all appreciates these comments in any way at all unless they are thrilled at just being tossed a 5 that means very little, especially when it comes to deciding poem of the month and the way that votes are randomly removed when time comes to post the "winner".
ie-- I had one poem, posted on maria's page , that had 12 votes. It went through at least 6 vote washes to remove "bad" votes, and lost not a single one but when it came to the poem of the month decision, it lost just enough to put it out of the running for that particular month. And I am certain they were not "bad" votes as that poem had 9 comments, from 9 different people and after the December vote wash, it was reduced to 6 votes and still had those 9 comments from 9 different people.... how in the world is that even logical? Beats me...
I was going to post some examples of what I consider worthless comments, but I decided it wouldnt be in best interest of this forum, anyone who reads comments knows what I am referring to.
I would rather not have a comment at all than get one of those Readers Digest version PC's meant for little more than to boost a comment count, so maybe some of you have noticed, I have turned off voting and comments on my work that I have not deleted yet..
If any of you want to give constructive crit, you have my email address and I would be more than happy to discuss the faults of my work with you.

Normal Jeane
It seems that lately, comments on this site consist of short boring generic one line summations of the poem's content
I am wondering if maybe Lit is offering some sort of tiny Icon for the person who makes the most useless comments, as it seems like a competition.
I remember a while back when it was pointed out that too many comments consisted of--
good work, excellent, thank you, etc
but this is worse, in my opinion. I always appreciate comments on my poems, any sort of comment that was not vile, vicious, or kissy-assed, but now days, it is worse.
I dont understand the point of a comment that consists of-
for example,
"little red went to see her granny and encountered a wolf...blah, blah blah"
obviously the reader has at least scanned the poem, in most cases, but, usually we do not need a commenter to reduce the poem to a one line analysis that contributes nothing. Just restates the content of the poem in a most boring way.
I delete these insincere comments as they are nothing more than padding for the commenter and his/her comment tally, and if it were possible, I would delete the uselss 5 votes that came with them.
However, I am NOT insinuating that everyone who leaves a lot of comments is only doing so for his/her comment tally. There are those here who leave comments as genuine responses to the poem and could care less the number next to his/her name on the Feedback Portal.
I can think of a few people here right now who always leave comments but sometimes just sign their name and dont bother logging in. I think that the quality of feedback began sliding when the PC feature was introduced. That feature may indeed have caused more comments to be left, more FB relayed, but MORE is not always better.
So, I am curious as to how other poets feel about these "worthless" coments.
Do they mean anything to you as a writer when it comes to helping you see your poem in a better light?
Do these comments help you with your work or do they just make you feel good because a comment was left?
I admit, I have left many a comment that resembled--
I really enjoyed your poem
simply because someone before me might have left a comment that consisted of helpful hints, or a suggestion that I might have wanted to make but someone beat me to it, but lately, I gag when I read these condensed versions of the poem that are useless in any way as constructive crit goes.
I know this thread might anger a few people, maybe more than a few, but I am being honest, expressing my opinion and if it pisses folks off, well, I am sorry for that.
I just wanted to know if anyone at all appreciates these comments in any way at all unless they are thrilled at just being tossed a 5 that means very little, especially when it comes to deciding poem of the month and the way that votes are randomly removed when time comes to post the "winner".
ie-- I had one poem, posted on maria's page , that had 12 votes. It went through at least 6 vote washes to remove "bad" votes, and lost not a single one but when it came to the poem of the month decision, it lost just enough to put it out of the running for that particular month. And I am certain they were not "bad" votes as that poem had 9 comments, from 9 different people and after the December vote wash, it was reduced to 6 votes and still had those 9 comments from 9 different people.... how in the world is that even logical? Beats me...
I was going to post some examples of what I consider worthless comments, but I decided it wouldnt be in best interest of this forum, anyone who reads comments knows what I am referring to.
I would rather not have a comment at all than get one of those Readers Digest version PC's meant for little more than to boost a comment count, so maybe some of you have noticed, I have turned off voting and comments on my work that I have not deleted yet..
If any of you want to give constructive crit, you have my email address and I would be more than happy to discuss the faults of my work with you.

Normal Jeane