A Master's Orders: become a slut

[Pure]

Here is the Master's demand, of a consenting sub.

"Let me re-emphasize - your supreme mission in life - in order to satisfy your desire for pleasure- is to be submissive to the male. You must never refuse a man's request for sexual favors. In all things you are to please him unless it involves risk of personal injury." ...

"Never refuse to fuck a man or men whenever and where ever he or they so desire."

I'm willing to think that a master, in a suitable established relationship, may order sex with 1 or 5 others, on certain occasions. Limited slutdom. This 'general slutdom' seems different.

Query: Can this situation be described as bdsm, in the sense(s) advocated here--SSC-- allowing for diversity of ways of enacting it. or

Is it an odd power trip by the so-called 'master' ?

or maybe just a strange sexual arrangement that's neither fish nor fowl?

Anyone uneasy with such an order?

---
Pure
=====


Note: the situation is that of a story:

http://www.literotica.com/stories/showstory.php?id=51513

But let's pretend it's real.
Of course stories describe any number of startling events; we like our murder mysteries and, most of us, don't become murderers. My impression however, is that the material in many bdsm stories, at least the 'non-extreme' ones at literotica, is acted out. For bdsm, life imitates art.

 

[Sandia]

Pure

I told myself not to touch this one with a ten foot pole,
but I can't resist saying at least this.

The wonderful thing about stories is
they're not really real.
Anything can happen there;
and there are no real consequenses.

Saying a story is "true" is the oldest writer's
trick
in the world; it makes the story so much better,
don't you think?

--Sandia.

 

[Lancecastor]

Query: Can this story situation be described as bdsm, in the sense(s) advocated here, allowing for diversity of ways of enacting it. Is it 'within the pale'? or

Is it an odd power trip by the so-called 'master' in the story? or maybe

Has the alleged slave, in the story, simply found someone to "force" her to play as she wishes. (Which may be fine; I might go and find someone who will "make" me, at the next party, cover my nude body in pineapple sauce.)

I wonder if anyone else is uneasy with this.

I haven't read the story.

After all, it is one story on Lit.

Am I uneasy with the premise you've described in terms of its adherance to BDSM culture?

Can't say...seems that there's more flavours of BDSM than ice cream at Baskin Robbins. Whatever.

Am I uneasy with the premise IRL for Me...?

Sure, because I'm a bit of a romantic. My grrl is my grrl. Unless She decides otherwise.

Ha!

As for the story's popularity this week....well, The Backstreet Boys are popular, too, as were The Bay City Rollers at one time.

Bigus Dealus.



Cheers;
Lance

 

[Sandia]

The Backstreet Boys are popular, too, as were The Bay City Rollers at one time.

Good point!

I get tired of peeps equating popularity with quality...

--Sandia.

 

[Sandia]

BTW, Pure, I didn't mean to dismiss the issue you raised.

Query: Can this situation be described as bdsm, in the sense(s) advocated here, allowing for diversity of ways of enacting it. Is it 'within the pale'? or

Is it an odd power trip by the so-called 'master' ?

I just don't feel qualified to answer it. Perhaps someone who has more experience could give it a shot.

But I do have a thought or two about risks.
I feel like the biggest risk
I take
every day
is when I get into my car
to go to work. Did you know forty thousand peeps die from cars
every year
in the USA?

--Sandia.

 

[Sir Victor]

Here is the Master's demand, of a consenting sub.

"Let me re-emphasize - your supreme mission in life - in order to satisfy your desire for pleasure- is to be submissive to the male. You must never refuse a man's request for sexual favors. In all things you are to please him unless it involves risk of personal injury." ...

"Never refuse to fuck a man or men whenever and where ever he or they so desire."

I'm willing to think that a master, in a suitable established relationship, may order sex with 1 or 5 others, on certain occasions. Limited slutdom. This 'general slutdom' seems different.

Query: Can this situation be described as bdsm, in the sense(s) advocated here--SSC-- allowing for diversity of ways of enacting it. or

Is it an odd power trip by the so-called 'master' ?

or maybe just a strange sexual arrangement that's neither fish nor fowl?

Anyone uneasy with such an order?

---
Pure
=====


Note: the situation is that of a story:

http://www.literotica.com/stories/showstory.php?id=51513

But let's pretend it's real.
Of course stories describe any number of startling events; we like our murder mysteries and, most of us, don't become murderers. My impression however, is that the material in many bdsm stories, at least the 'non-extreme' ones at literotica, is acted out. For bdsm, life imitates art.

Stumbled across this one Pure, you have many interesting threads.

This theme seems to simply be a flip on tradition where girls are usually taught to keep their virginity until marriage. Here it is flipped with the extreme slut having sex with anyone. Some girls are turned on by this and actually do it:
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=27702030#post27702030

But taken to an extreme one would have to worry about disease and psycho killers out there.

It is not something I look for in a sub, but it can be a turn on.

Seems it was also a theme in "The Story of O" but it was some time ago when I last read it and I could be mistaken.

Quite an old thread here! Would like to hear what practicing sub sluts have to say about it.

 

[EmpressFi]

We talk about it in fantasy... but honestly, I think I'd have a problem with it in real life. I have to submit to someone because they have a penis?

 

[the captians wench]

I wouldn't have a problem with it, if it was something he really wanted. At one point in time it's what I wanted from a master, for him to share his toys and show what a valuble she is.

Jounar is not into sharing at all, and that has a romantisism of it's own. I'm a treasured jewel he wants to keep only for himself. Like a locket, every one can see, but only he knows what's inside.

 

[Netzach]

I'm transposing this into making him a generalized cocksucker to the world, because such are my jollies and I will say it's really impractical while hot on paper.

Life is inspired by art. A lot of hot-on-paper things are such a pain in the ass to actually do that you won't do them unless it's of utmost import.

YMMV.

 

[Yasashii_Kaze]

I would definitely have a problem with this in real life. My biggest issues would be disease and the fact that I'm just not into the whole male superiority thing. However, as a fantasy I can see the appeal. It just isn't one of mine.

 

[licker4450]

I will take a swing at this one piece by piece.

To begin, there is a big difference between a slave and a sub. Just because someone (we will suppose a woman although it could be a male) is submissive does not mean that she gave up all her power. A slave does opt to give all power away. The exchange of power is complete in that scenario.

 

[licker4450]

"Never refuse to fuck a man or men whenever and where ever he or they so desire."

This is untrue. A sub/slave serves the one she submitted to. The acting of making this choice doesnt make one submit to the male species. She is to only serve others at the command of her Master. And that is contingent upon the level of her submission. For a slave, it is part of the deal. For a sub, there might be areas of latitude.

For example, one may submit only in the sexual arena within the bounds of a one-on-one relationship. In this, the male can use her as he likes, but only him. She has not consented to him having her used by others.

 

[licker4450]

"Let me re-emphasize - your supreme mission in life - in order to satisfy your desire for pleasure- is to be submissive to the male. You must never refuse a man's request for sexual favors. In all things you are to please him unless it involves risk of personal injury." ...

A slaves/subs supreme mission in life is to serve the One who she chose to submit to. Again, I have an issue with the "in all things" if that is not an area where the sub has granted the Dom authority. An example is often with family or career. Those areas are typically outside the D/s realm.

 

[ecstaticsub]

My situation is more of the "Limited slutdom" Pure described. I personally love to be ordered to fuck friends of my PYL's whether I have met them before or not. I am not allowed to have any contact with them before or after.

But that is very different than being ordered to fuck any man who would want me. If my PYL was with me and approved each man before hand than I would do it. (and probably enjoy it, too)

However that most likely would never happen. Daddy has become extremely possisive and I have not been ordered to fuck others for quite some time now.

 

[celticsunspiral]

Seems it was also a theme in "The Story of O" but it was some time ago when I last read it and I could be mistaken.

I just got done reading this book for the first time. In the Story of O she had to have sex with anyone wearing a certain ring. Also while in Roissy with any one there, but not with just any person walking down the street.

 

[Daddy2mylilgirl]

I have always enjoyed the idea of showing her off to others or even fucking her in front of others.

But it's definitely a look but don't touch when it comes to her and other guys. That ass is all Mine.

 

[BeachGurl2]

My situation is more of the "Limited slutdom" Pure described. I personally love to be ordered to fuck friends of my PYL's whether I have met them before or not. I am not allowed to have any contact with them before or after.

But that is very different than being ordered to fuck any man who would want me. If my PYL was with me and approved each man before hand than I would do it. (and probably enjoy it, too)

This leans more toward the way I would view this as well. I'm not that interested in being shared with others. But if I were in a relationship of which that was a part, I would lean toward not wanting such a blanket statement. I don't think I'd feel very safe.

 

[YourCaptor]

The hand held STD detector may have to come first.

Then you're gonna have a problem once the word spreads and guys start camping out front.

Your gonna need improved birth control. 99.9% success rate means nothing with these kind of numbers.

And then your gonna land in jail every night for public indecency.

But then that is probably somebody's thing.

Is it BDSM, if master orders it, then yes.

 

[Guest]

Here is the Master's demand, of a consenting sub.

"Let me re-emphasize - your supreme mission in life - in order to satisfy your desire for pleasure- is to be submissive to the male. You must never refuse a man's request for sexual favors. In all things you are to please him unless it involves risk of personal injury." ...

"Never refuse to fuck a man or men whenever and where ever he or they so desire."

Query: Can this situation be described as bdsm, in the sense(s) advocated here--SSC-- allowing for diversity of ways of enacting it. or

Is it an odd power trip by the so-called 'master' ?

or maybe just a strange sexual arrangement that's neither fish nor fowl?

Anyone uneasy with such an order?

Can it be described as BDSM? IMO, yes. Does it fit within the confines of Safe, Sane and Consensual? The potential medical dangers have already been pointed out. Allowing for safer sex practices, it depends on the individual; trying to carry out such a directive could have dire emotional and psychological consequences for certain people.

And a "Master" who doesn't make the welfare of his submissive or slave a top priority (no pun intended) deserves neither title nor submissives or slaves.

 

[ownedsubgal]

wow, can't believe i never come across this thread before. my Master has almost EXACTLY the same edict in place for me, and it has been the case since he first claimed me as his property. the only bit that doesn't apply would be the part about "in order to satisfy your desire for pleasure." Daddy doesn't believe that being a slut has anything whatsoever to do with a physical desire for sex, but moreso to do with simply having a need/craving for sexual use, being unable to say no, being very "easy", and of course very promiscuous. these are qualities he finds appealing in a slave and in a mate, and they are qualities i've had most of my life and he has encouraged.

in real life (to head off any internet come-ons, lol) i am never to refuse a man who wishes to use me sexually, and i am to do my best to please and satisfy him. the only exception to this would be if i felt my safety was highly compromised (not thru any risk of std, but more like potential abduction, physical harm, etc.). and even then i am not to refuse, but simply to run away. so many, many times over the years i have gone to my knees or bent over for complete strangers, people i certainly wouldn't have chosen to be sexual with, but who were men who wished to make use of my body. my Master has instilled in me that serving and pleasing men is among my top purposes in life, he feels it is a skill that should not go to waste, that i have the capabilities to fill a need so therefore should use it.

 

[Marquis]

OSG's comment makes mine kinda moot, but yes, I've heard of this happening before.

In an ideal world I could be into this, but I'm just not made of the right stuff, unfortunately.

 

[YourCaptor]

wow, can't believe i never come across this thread before. my Master has almost EXACTLY the same edict in place for me, and it has been the case since he first claimed me as his property. the only bit that doesn't apply would be the part about "in order to satisfy your desire for pleasure." Daddy doesn't believe that being a slut has anything whatsoever to do with a physical desire for sex, but moreso to do with simply having a need/craving for sexual use, being unable to say no, being very "easy", and of course very promiscuous. these are qualities he finds appealing in a slave and in a mate, and they are qualities i've had most of my life and he has encouraged.

in real life (to head off any internet come-ons, lol) i am never to refuse a man who wishes to use me sexually, and i am to do my best to please and satisfy him. the only exception to this would be if i felt my safety was highly compromised (not thru any risk of std, but more like potential abduction, physical harm, etc.). and even then i am not to refuse, but simply to run away. so many, many times over the years i have gone to my knees or bent over for complete strangers, people i certainly wouldn't have chosen to be sexual with, but who were men who wished to make use of my body. my Master has instilled in me that serving and pleasing men is among my top purposes in life, he feels it is a skill that should not go to waste, that i have the capabilities to fill a need so therefore should use it.

Out of curiosity, if you don't mind answering. How do you keep from becoming a public health hazard?

And how do you get anything done if any man can take you any time?

Maybe we are seeing this from different perspective.

I am confused.

 

[BeachGurl2]

wow, can't believe i never come across this thread before. my Master has almost EXACTLY the same edict in place for me, and it has been the case since he first claimed me as his property. the only bit that doesn't apply would be the part about "in order to satisfy your desire for pleasure." Daddy doesn't believe that being a slut has anything whatsoever to do with a physical desire for sex, but moreso to do with simply having a need/craving for sexual use, being unable to say no, being very "easy", and of course very promiscuous. these are qualities he finds appealing in a slave and in a mate, and they are qualities i've had most of my life and he has encouraged.

in real life (to head off any internet come-ons, lol) i am never to refuse a man who wishes to use me sexually, and i am to do my best to please and satisfy him. the only exception to this would be if i felt my safety was highly compromised (not thru any risk of std, but more like potential abduction, physical harm, etc.). and even then i am not to refuse, but simply to run away. so many, many times over the years i have gone to my knees or bent over for complete strangers, people i certainly wouldn't have chosen to be sexual with, but who were men who wished to make use of my body. my Master has instilled in me that serving and pleasing men is among my top purposes in life, he feels it is a skill that should not go to waste, that i have the capabilities to fill a need so therefore should use it.

I'm curious as to how this would play out, OSG. The practicalities of it, I guess. So if you're out in public, with or without your Master, and a man hits on you, you're required to have sex with him? If someone is visiting or you are visiting someone else and they express interest? Are there rules that govern how it all comes together - do you go somewhere alone with a man you don't know? Are you allowed to use protection of any kind? And if it's someone you don't know and you do go away somewhere alone with him, what if the situation does become unsafe how, at that point, would you escape it? And what would the definition of unsafe be? Sorry for so many questions, I'm just really wondering how this would work in the real world.

 

[ownedsubgal]

Out of curiosity, if you don't mind answering. How do you keep from becoming a public health hazard?

And how do you get anything done if any man can take you any time?

Maybe we are seeing this from different perspective.

I am confused.

please don't be confused, the reality is probably not nearly as extreme as it seems on paper. first off i'm a house slave, i do not work outside the home, or even leave the home alone. the vast majority of the time when i am out and about, i am with my Master. so these days the situations where a complete stranger can come up and use me are fairly infrequent.

there was a time when i did work outside the home, and because of that i had to sexually serve many of my male coworkers, anyone who would approach me in that manner. and because of my submissive nature (i guess?), men often approach me in that manner. also the first year i was owned, Daddy and i did not live together, we were about 2 hours apart. any man i encountered in my day to day life who made those advances towards me was to be taken care of.

these days, things are more likely to happen when i'm out at a club or something with my Master and say he leaves me alone briefly...to go to the restroom or some such. he likes to intentionally leave me vulnerable from time to time, because he knows what will happen. very often men will approach me the moment he's gone and begin touching me, saying naughty things, etc., and i am just to be quiet and obey. it has surprised me somewhat just how blatant/blunt men can be in their interest, we're talking about primarily vanilla men at that. i've had strangers come up to me and just push their fingers into my pussy without a word, or ask if i'll go to the bathroom with them and suck their dick. when this happens, again my place is just to serve.

as far as the std risks, i always have condoms on me, and i'm to encourage men to use them if they are using something other than my mouth. right now swallowing is not permitted of any man outside my Master's circle of Dom friends, but in the past i have been ordered to swallow the juices of any man. Daddy and i are both tested frequently, and in the nearly 8 yrs we've been together have never tested positive for any std or infection.

 

[ownedsubgal]

I'm curious as to how this would play out, OSG. The practicalities of it, I guess. So if you're out in public, with or without your Master, and a man hits on you, you're required to have sex with him?

it's not about something hitting on me, it's about someone either stating or showing clearly through actions that they wish to use me sexually. out and about with my Master right there, as of yet no man has been so bold, but that's not something my Master would allow anyway as they would be taking away from HIS time (and he'd likely also see it as a sign of disrespect).

If someone is visiting or you are visiting someone else and they express interest? Are there rules that govern how it all comes together - do you go somewhere alone with a man you don't know? Are you allowed to use protection of any kind? And if it's someone you don't know and you do go away somewhere alone with him, what if the situation does become unsafe how, at that point, would you escape it? And what would the definition of unsafe be? Sorry for so many questions, I'm just really wondering how this would work in the real world.

if a man is visiting, it's either a client (in which case of course they use me sexually), or it's a guest of my Master's. if a guest expresses interest in me, they will usually ask my Master first if they may use me. but whether they asked or not, if they begin to touch me or something of that nature, i am to serve them. i am never go anywhere with a stranger or allow a stranger to take me anyplace. that is the kind of situation in which my Master would wish for me to run/escape. of course that's still happened a few times, mostly in the very early days, when i did not live with my Master so didn't really know how to handle the situation. someone taking me some place without my Master's permission or knowledge...my location being unknown to my Master...that would be the definition of unsafe. someone brandishing a weapon or making threats of serious harm, that would be unsafe and unacceptable to my Master.

also, just because my Master wishes for me to serve any man who wishes to use me, does not mean that he necessarily wishes for every man to use me. meaning, sometimes he may not want me touched by a particular man, for whatever reason, maybe the situation is not as safe as he'd like it to be, maybe the guy is too young, maybe he is just not the type of man that my Master wants me to serve. in these cases i am still to obey and serve the man, but afterwards my Master may "approach" the man and make it clear that he did something inappropriate and unwanted. and that is a fancy way of saying that he just may kick the guy's arse.

like when i was working and lived in VA, three male coworkers drove me out to a park late at night and gangbanged me. they were violent with me (left bruises), and would not allow me to contact my Master so that he could at least be aware of my location. when they were finished, they just left me on a park bench and drove off, i was fortunate in that a female coworker also happened to be there and took me home. of course i called Daddy as soon as i got home and told him all the details...he was very very proud of me for being a good girl and slut and serving those 3 guys, but at the same time was highly pissed off at the guys for what they had done to me. a couple days later he drove down to VA and gave them quite a scare (and their own bunch of bruises). they never messed with me again. the point in sharing that is that it's my actions and my attitude Daddy is concerned with, not that of the men i serve. it's his place to make judgements as far as whether someone is good or bad, has broken limits or not, and his place to protect me. if someone crosses a line in his view, he will take care of it, but my place is just to serve well.