A little something for the modern "liberated" liberal women...

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

June 10, 2011
Morally-Schizoid Liberal Women and Their Weiner Husbands
By Kyle-Anne Shiver

The saddest thing about the whole sordid, societally humiliating Weiner affair, is that it highlights once again the morally-schizoid nature of the modern liberal woman. I've known many of these women -- a great many -- and it never ceases to confound me how smart women can be such ridiculous fools when it comes to choosing men.

On the one hand, liberal women believe wholeheartedly in the idiotic social construct they call, "sexual liberation." They pride themselves on losing their virginity, as though that "accomplishment" had ever been above the challenge-scale of an alley cat in heat.

These liberal women I've known, having given away their female V-card over and over and over again, all the while scour their host of intimate "trial runs" searching for that mythical, Hollywood-construct, Mr. Right. This Mr. Right guy, for whom they are searching, is known to them up front as even more sexually-liberated than they, but this little factoid seems not to register in their liberated little heads as they frantically search for the equally mythical family home with the white picket fence, which somehow never gets hit by any of life's roving tornadoes. One can almost hear them say in unison, "And they all lived happily ever after."

As their relentless biological clocks tick towards fertility's Armageddon, these sexually "liberated" women suddenly become obsessed with their medical checkups, running to the OBGYN with neurotic frequency, to make sure their alley-cat lifestyle has not resulted in any of the dreaded, fertility-destroying sexually transmitted diseases. I've seen some of these women nearly go completely insane as they receive one of those now-common, "So sorry I may have infected you" love notes from a former "lover." It's enough to make wise women cry for them. Yes, we pity them and wonder over and over how our sisters, so smart in so many ways, could be so utterly middle-school-level stupid.

Evidently, the liberal woman is capable of the most severe form of psychological denial known to humankind. Certain that one of the men with whom she has copulated without strings will suddenly morph into a faithfully monogamous creature the minute she can convince one of them to say "I do" in front of a few witnesses, the liberal woman marches blindly down the aisle towards near-certain, adulterous doom. Yet, no amount of honest reason can dissuade liberal women from this self-destructive, moral myopia.

What other term but "morally schizoid" could possibly describe this blatantly contradictory tendency among liberal women?

Having spent their youth casually throwing their own sexual morality to the winds of fairytale "liberation," these liberal women still steadfastly cling to the faithfully monogamous ideal for that sometime-later moment when they actually do desire all the traditional things -- the husband, the kids, the white picket fence -- those pesky female-nature embedded longings, which coincidentally ensure the continuation of the human race.

But these liberal women somehow -- in perfect schizoid manner -- convince themselves that once married, they will be the gratuitous beneficiaries of the monogamous respect they still desire, but have never once demanded or deserved. Intuitively, women know that strict monogamy provides the only real security for themselves and their own offspring. Yet, they continue themselves to spurn the demands of monogamy until the very last minute, believing that fidelity springs forth naturally in miraculous profusion among all "married" humans. Such pure poppycock can only be explained as a mental disorder.

At some point, I expect liberal women to have suffered enough public degradation, enough personal heartache and enough wising up, to finally be willing to face reality. The reality is that "sexual liberation" has always been a social construct without a shred of scientific or rational, much less moral, validity.

...

Men, not monogamous creatures by nature, could not possibly have designed a more misogynistic lure than "women's sexual liberation," if they had put their little heads (positively, no pun intended!) together for a thousand years to come up with it. That women themselves pushed this idiocy onto other women is truly the bottom of the barrel for those falsely claiming the feminist mantle.

If these faux feminists are the modern rule, then I would be forced to admit that men who still contend women are stupid might actually be understating their case....

The American Thinker
__________________
A_J's corollary #3, “The New Age Liberal maintains contradictory positions comfortably compartmentalized. (This is because the New Age Liberal is a creature that believes in consensus as a short-cut to an examination of the facts and a reasoned judgment about said facts.)”

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Huma, tell Bill and Hillary thank you for all us "little heads."

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Was Oedipus a leftie?

The left is a huge, power-hungry, mass-manipulating, community disorganizing, grandiose, world-conquering movement, which always recruits its storm troopers from teenage males. When liberals are in power, so is sexual promiscuity. It's hard to avoid the suspicion that those "idealistic" rebels just want power and free sex, hetero, homo, cats or dogs. Like Anthony Weiner and Bill Clinton.

"Revolution" means overturning the existing order. That would be the "patriarchy," as the feminists like to call it, the Daddies of this world. When he was destroying Cambodia, Pol Pot sent all the teachers he could catch to the death camps. Today, a lot of bored teenagers in high school probably think that's a great idea. Off with the teachers! Down with authority!

When revolutionaries get their way they become Authority with a capital A. It's never the poor and the victim groups who get the benefits. It's the lefties themselves. Talk about unmitigated greed for power and goodies. The rationales for revolution keep changing, but the selfishness and power hunger are always the same.

Maybe Oedipus is the reason why the Left has such a bond with reactionary Islam, which also managed to destroy advanced civilizations after the 7th century: The Persian and Byzantine Empires, for example. Today Muslim suicide bombers are still dreaming of a Paradise filled with sex slaves, as soon as they've blown up some civilized people. Well, teens will be teens, even in 7th century Arabia.

Defiant posters of Che and Mao decorate dormitory walls all over the Western world. Both of those celebrated heroes of the left were cold-blooded killers, though Mao killed forty million more people than Che. But Che talked a good game about his desire to kill off the bourgeoisie...who are always, always just like their own parents. Those hero posters have been on those dormitory walls for decades, because nothing is more repetitive than Oedipal rebellion.

Freud scores big on that one.

James Lewis
The American Thinker

 

[unregistered]

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

I remember seeing Mao tattooed on Mike Tyson, talk about advertising your complete fucking idiocy.

Poster child for headgear...

The left always claims to be new, but it's the oldest power trip in human history. Even monkey clans get together to overthrow the A males. On the left every traditional value is slandered, ridiculed, and finally made illegal.

The giveaway is absolutism. Rational people see pros and cons. The left only sees the Children of Light (themselves) against the Children of Darkness (everybody else). That's why killing comes so easily when the time comes. Satellite photos now show that North Korea has death camps for about 200,000 people. Everybody is just starved and worked to the limits, except for the Kim dynasty, who are the fatties.
No conservatives are as anti-science and anti-technology as the Green left. Global Warming megafraud is a typical product of their lock-step minds. It's planet-saving grandiosity, unbelievably expensive, shot through with corruption and double-dealing, and blatantly false. Mitt Romney believes in Global Warming because he's read about it in the paper. He can't actually have thought about it. It doesn't stand up to skeptical examination.

Conservatives are not against change. Conservatives love new things that are likely to be good. We love our computers. We love modern medicine and advances in beneficial technology. It's capitalism and free thought that keep changing things for the better. Conservatives always try to figure out which changes are good, and which ones are bad. The left infallibly makes the wrong choices. It's the "progressive" thing to do.

Example? The marvelous discovery of deep shale hydrocarbon deposits all over the world, and of technology that can turn them into a vast supply of clean natural gas. The left is desperately looking for excuses to block shale-based natural gas. If they can't stop it, they will try to tax it, and with any luck they will tax it to death. That's progress for ya.

It's the left that rants against our precious gifts from the Industrial Revolution, including abundant food production, medicines, and a thousand other useful inventions. The left is agin' it all, without ever thinking about costs and benefits.

That is the mark of unreason.

James Lewis

 

[sigh]

The right is absolutely obsessed with defining how everyone to the left of them thinks. You gotta wonder how they know.

Morning, boys.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

The right is absolutely obsessed with defining how everyone to the left of them thinks. You gotta wonder how they know.

Morning, boys.

Because I used to be a fully liberated little Socialist...

 

[unregistered]

 

[Saint Peter]

We have to be, the left keeps trying to impose their bankrupt thought process on the rest of us. Morning sweetie.

Just keep paying your taxes.

My cushy government job depends on it.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

We have to be, the left keeps trying to impose their bankrupt thought process on the rest of us. Morning sweetie.

... and their men lead by example...

 

[amicus]

Wow...and I was going to hit the sack a couple hours ago...first busybody, hooked me and now you, Slug, smiles, looks like my garden will go without attention until late afternoon again....ah, well, well worth it, and thank you!

There being a paucity of literate Liberals on the GB, may I make a Modest Proposal that the half dozen or so astute and prolific Conservatives here invade the AH and take a pro active campaign right in their smug little faces? Is that asking too much, perhaps?

I searched for a Thread of mine, "The Feminist Mistake" a play on words for the Betty Freidan book, "The Feminist Mystique", a thread that went about twenty pages long and set the AH Libs on fire, but the search facility seems to ignore me, perhaps if someone else tried? They did their best to ban me over at the AH, even took a vote and then finally began moving my Thread over here....a blessing in disguise, for which I sincerely thank Laurel and Manu.

http://bigjournalism.com/author/kashiver/

The author of the first piece to Posted, pleased to see it is a woman; conservative women seem to be on the uprise of late...I wonder why that is? Used to be only Phyllis Shafly and Ayn Rand...

The articles posted thus far seem much too powerful for any leftie on this forum to even attempt to reply to or refute, which is why I suggest an enforce foray to the AH, thas where the literate libs hang out, go after them in their own caves!

well done!

Regards...

Amicus

 

[unregistered]

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Is that a two thumbs up, or what?







My two favorite groups of women as a young man, Catholic and Liberated...

Here's to pretty girls who went to our heads,
Here's to witty girls who went to our beds,
Here's to them, and here's to you!

Drink with me...,

 

[about_average]

The right is absolutely obsessed with defining how everyone to the left of them thinks. You gotta wonder how they know.

Because the likes of Pat Robertson tells them, and people like him have conversations with God on a daily basis who lets them know exactly what's going on.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Because the likes of Pat Robertson tells them, and people like him have conversations with God on a daily basis who lets them know exactly what's going on.

I'm an Atheist...
__________________
Quit hitting me with your Christian "hate!"
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=759907
A_J, the Minority

 

[about_average]

The articles posted thus far seem much to powerful for any leftie on this forum to even attempt to reply to or refute

Or maybe it's because the majority of the rightie argument is calling someone on the left "Poopy head!"
Of course, the left isn't much better.

 

[about_average]

You're so twenty years ago it isn't even funny.

Apparently you missed the 2008 election three years ago.
John McCain was the GOP presidential candidate, who sucked up to Jerry Falwell to make sure he got the nomination.
Sarah Palin was the GOP vice presidential candidate who said the war in Iraq was a mission from god and that an oil pipeline was god's will.

 

[about_average]

I'm an Atheist...
__________________
Quit hitting me with your Christian "hate!"
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=759907
A_J, the Minority

And that matters why?

 

[amicus]

Are you saying their cave needs an intellectual thermobaric reaming?

~~~

My first thought was to ask Slug's permission to repost his Thread tp the AH, but under my name, they would most likely move it back over here...but, for you denizens of the GB, they might let it ride...dunno....just a thought?

ami

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

~~~

My first thought was to ask Slug's permission to repost his Thread tp the AH, but under my name, they would most likely move it back over here...but, for you denizens of the GB, they might let it ride...dunno....just a thought?

ami

Have fun with it.

My art is disposable...

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

And that matters why?

Just to demonstrate the fruitlessness of arguing by straw man...




My opinions (and the articles that reflect them) don't come from the far right but from my years with the far Left.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Apparently you missed the 2008 election three years ago.
John McCain was the GOP presidential candidate, who sucked up to Jerry Falwell to make sure he got the nomination.
Sarah Palin was the GOP vice presidential candidate who said the war in Iraq was a mission from god and that an oil pipeline was god's will.

And Obama sucked up to the Far Left time after time...

You really have no point.

__________________
“I’m just going to be honest with you. There’s not much we can do next week or two weeks from now... If you’re complaining about the price of gas and you’re only getting 8 miles a gallon, you know [laughingly], you might want to think about a trade-in.”
Barack Hussein Obama, the Green Pres__ent (with no id, uh)
April 2011

http://pajamasmedia.com/tatler/files/2011/04/obama-wide-grin80.jpg

When I was asked earlier about, uh, the issue of coal. Uhhh, y'know, under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket....
We would put a cap-and-trade system in place, eh, that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else's out there. So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It's just that it will bankrupt them because they're gonna be charged a huge sum for all that, uh, greenhouse gas that's being emitted.
Barack Hussein Obama
Editorial board meeting, San Francisco Chronicle
January 2008

"How about just tracking down every single person who said drill baby drill and putting them all in prison. Why don’t we do that?"
Alan Grayson


Q: You favor an increase in the capital gains tax, saying, “I certainly would not go above what existed under Bill Clinton, which was 28%.” It’s now 15%. That’s almost a doubling if you went to 28%. Bill Clinton dropped the capital gains tax to 20%, then George Bush has taken it down to 15%. And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28%, the revenues went down.
A: What I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness. The top 50 hedge fund managers made $29 billion last year--$29 billion for 50 individuals. Those who are able to work the stock market and amass huge fortunes on capital gains are paying a lower tax rate than their secretaries. That’s not fair.
Q: But history shows that when you drop the capital gains tax, the revenues go up.
A: Well, that might happen or it might not. It depends on what’s happening on Wall Street and how business is going.
Source: 2008 Philadelphia primary debate, on eve of PA primary Apr 16, 2008

 

[amicus]

About average...

Quote:
Originally Posted by amicus

The articles posted thus far seem much to powerful for any leftie on this forum to even attempt to reply to or refute

Or maybe it's because the majority of the rightie argument is calling someone on the left "Poopy head!"
Of course, the left isn't much better.

Read the articles, right wing ones, recently posted, and to which I refered, and show me one, 'poopy head' pejorative.

You just don't have the ability to counter the arguments offered.

Your bad.

amicus