A handy Republican-to-English dictionary

G

Guest

Guest
big government: Any attempt by a duly constituted public authority to regulate or put limits on the power of private corporations or make them responsible for the consequences of their actions, with the exception of the gaming or entertainment industries.

compassionate conservativism: Consists of smiling while cheating women, minorities and the working class out of their share of the nation's productive output. Replaces the term friendly fascism.

class warfare: Epithet used by Republicans to insult and delegitimize observations by Democrats and others of the horrendous and worstening problem of social stratification in the U.S.

conservative: Once widely understood as one who adheres to traditional methods or views, Republicans now use this word to cover a broad range of social agendas, including; consolidation of wealth in the hands of a few; intolerance of all religious traditions except certain sects of Christianity; military budgets that are inappropriately large for peacetime.

death tax: New Republican term used to replace the traditional term "estate tax," one of the traditional mechanisms in a democracy to ensure that a self-perpetuating aristocracy is unable to establish itself then capture and subvert democratic institutions. Fully 98% of the U.S. population is uneffected by the estate tax, which primarily burdens the 200 families in the U.S. with a net worth greater than $1 billion.

deregulation: Formerly meant clearing away legal and other obstacles for the purpose of establishing a competitive marketplace, now used to mean the the transition from de jure legal impediments to competition to de facto impediments such as unregulated and uncontrolled monopolies.

discrimination: Classic whine by white males when they have been told they have to share their money and power with women, minorities, and the poor.

election: When used by Democrats it means a consultation with the citizens of a democracy to determine the people they wish to represent them in public office for a fixed period of time. When used by Republicans it means the opportunity to acquire power by any means whatsoever, including but not limited to mimicking the language democracy as cover for violating its essential underlying principles of one person, one vote.

fair and balanced: Republican term meaning archconservative news source serving as a tool of corporate interests while masquerading as impartial. Examples include Fox News, the Washington Times, the Wall Street Journal, etc.

fairness: The goal of any form of justice, but especially in the area of taxation, that provides overwhelming benefit to Republican constituencies.

faith-based: Euphemism for "religious," used as part of an attempt to circumvent the Constitution's Bill of Rights whose first ten words are "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."

family values: Republican code phrase that attempts to justify homophobia, bigotry, and various other forms of intolerance and fear. Also used to justify tax policies that favor the one-third of U.S. households comprised of families with children over the two-thirds of U.S. households that are either not traditional families or contain no children.

get over it: Warning to the listener that questioning the legitmacy of George W. Bush's claim to the presidency will not be tolerated as topic for American citizens to discuss. As a threat it recognizes the vulnerability of the Bush regime to the growing popularity of the observation that Bush won fewer votes than his opponent in Florida as well as nationwide. Please note, you may also hear this idea expressed as "Stop your whining" and/or "Deal with it."

illegal vote: Any ballot in which the voter did not precisely follow the exact requirements as set forth in the voting instructions, and in the case where the voting instructions were erroneous or unclear any vote for a non-Republican. Note: this rule does not apply to military ballots. (See related term, legal vote.)

legal vote: Any ballot in which a Republican's name can be interpreted as having been indicated by the voter. (See related term, illegal vote.)

less government: Code phrase for policies that give big corporations and wealthy individuals license to employ unscrupulous business practices, produce dangerous products, pollute the air and water, and monopolize the market,
all with total impunity by allowing the business to write the laws.


liberal: Once commonly used to mean"one who is open minded," Republicans have successfully redefined this word to mean dangerous, irresponsible and unpatriotic fanatic.

middle class: When used by a Republican this term refers to the 7% of the U.S. population that earns more than $125,000/year.

non-partisan: A term frequently invoked by President Bush to instruct his political opponents to roll over and play dead so that the Republican or "nonpartisan" approach to public policy can prevail. See also: Partisan.
partisan: In common Republican usage is now defined as any mean-spirited, illegitmate and unpatriotic attempt by non-Republicans to question the current administration's goals or methods, or to call for debate, or to ask for consideration of alternatives.

patriot: Anyone proud to be a Christian, god-fearing Republican, who believes strongly in the immutability of the status quo. See traitor.

perjury: The crime of lying while under oath. Formerly applied uniformly to all citizens, now only applies to Democrats and other non-Republicans.

pro-family: Policies designed to keep women -- other than the daughters resulting from the marriage of two Republicans -- in a state of economic dependency upon men and under the control of abusive husbands.

property rights: Laws designed to protect the interests of the oil, timber, mining and livestock industries and enable them to exploit public lands to secure private profits.

pushers: Dealers of physiologically addictive and mind-altering drugs known to cause disease and death, subject to criminal prosecution unless the substance in question is tobacco or alcohol, in which case the perpetrator should be given influence and authority within the highest echalons of the Republican Party.

routine military operation: An unprovoked sneak attack by an overwhelmingly superior force.

special interest: Formerly this phrase was reserved for economic interests who sought special privilege. In common Republican usage however it has come to mean any citizen or group of citizens who petition their government to respond to their concerns.

states rights: Doctrine for legitimizing racist, sexist and homophobic reactionary forces fighting a rearguard action against the ineluctible forces of democracy that over time make the U.S. increasingly accepting of full citizenship for racial and ethnic minorities, women and homosexuals.

traitor: Godless humanists who may either be domestic enemies of the state (Democrats) or foreign enemies (Communists), and who continuously question the legitimacy of the Bush presidency even after patriots have clearly instructed them to "Get Over It." (Please see Get Over It.)

unconstitutional: Any action that is not favorable to the Republican agenda.

unifier: A person who, after seeing the results of a divided election, vows to bring the people together in a common political agenda, then appoints the most extremist cabinet members and sets out an extremely conservative agenda, forgetting his earlier vows. See also: hypocrite.

welfare reform: Forced reintroduction of uneducated and unskilled workers into the job force to exert downward pressure on wage demands, undercut job training programs and ensure that corporate lobbyists continue to call for an easing of immigration restrictions rather than for improved education and training for American citizens.

from http://democrats.com/
 
Thanks, but I can't take credit for that. Got it off another site. BTW, I love your stories Kerrie.
 
Wow...how original!

Gee, I wonder why our nation is so politically divided.

It couldn't be because some super self-righteous dorks print really funny humorous stuff like this, could it?

Question: Should I spend an hour coming up with an equally hilarious and scathing denouncement of the Democrats?

Naw...I've got laundry to do...
 
Re: Wow...how original!

You don't have to come up with anything. There's books of anti-Democrat jokes from the last 8 years; most of them are way more rude than what I posted. You probably told them yourself to friends and laughed about it, when the shoes on the other foot you cry foul. That's very telling, like the Republicans who get upset about people bashing the President after they spent 8 years bashing a President.

Kerrie, you're the bomb. I mean that.

Problem Child said:
Gee, I wonder why our nation is so politically divided.

It couldn't be because some super self-righteous dorks print really funny humorous stuff like this, could it?

Question: Should I spend an hour coming up with an equally hilarious and scathing denouncement of the Democrats?

Naw...I've got laundry to do...
 
Re: Re: Wow...how original!

Vic Victorious said:
You don't have to come up with anything. There's books of anti-Democrat jokes from the last 8 years; most of them are way more rude than what I posted. You probably told them yourself to friends and laughed about it, when the shoes on the other foot you cry foul. That's very telling, like the Republicans who get upset about people bashing the President after they spent 8 years bashing a President.


Yeah, I could do a search and find something evil to post about Democrats, who, like Republicans comprise about 1/2 of the voting populace.

It would be about as funny as what you posted, so what's the point?

Oh, BTW, I'm curious...besides bashing Dems, what else I did during the last 8 years, since you know me so well?
 
ATA Boy!

I've been trying to get over it these many months but without much success. I've felt ripped off ever since the coronation by the "reactionary five" Supremes. And besides, its so much fun to tweak the typically self-righteous sychophants who listen to Rush Limbaugh. I think the phrase "DItto-Head" fits quite nicely, because its hard to imagine a truly original thought coming from anyone in that crowd. So your voice is welcome, even if in this instance you're sharing someone else's clever, edgy words. Stand tall young man, there's important work to be done! It isn't actually very strenuous work, I'll grant you, because few of the Republican faithful at this site have much staying power. They're more likely to throw a lame put-down at you and walk away. Frankly, I think obsession with sex has addled most of their brains. (That's a joke!) Welcome and have fun.
 
I dont see anything i disagree with.This Vic guy is allright in my book,and to the republicans among us...you tell me...is it proper for Rush Limbaugh to call Clintons daughter a DOG?...He DID. Democrats never said any trashy crud bout Republican Presidents kids in the past,But it was acceptable to trash her?..and i recall all of his audience was laughing...when they should have been horrified,and then all the other low class ones kept repeating it.So i say...Republicans...be glad i am not as low class as you.
 
crystalhunting said:

I dont see anything i disagree with.This Vic guy is allright in my book,and to the republicans among us...you tell me...is it proper for Rush Limbaugh to call Clintons daughter a DOG?...He DID. Democrats never said any trashy crud bout Republican Presidents kids in the past,But it was acceptable to trash her?..and i recall all of his audience was laughing...when they should have been horrified,and then all the other low class ones kept repeating it.So i say...Republicans...be glad i am not as low class as you.

The next time I see Rush, I'll have to remind him that I never gave him permission to speak for all us "low-class" Republicans.

geez...

:rolleyes:
 
Problem Child said:
[QUOTE

The next time I see Rush, I'll have to remind him that I never gave him permission to speak for all us "low-class" Republicans.

geez...

:rolleyes:

Low class Republicans don't need Rush to speak for them, we know who they are every time they open their mouths. Ta Dammm!
 
It was still a low class cruddy thing to say..What would you do if Rush Limbaugh called your daughter a DOG on national TV?..cause he couldnt get your attention directly?..Last i recall...no one said anything so low clas s bout Regeans daughters or his son.
 
This seems to fit in this thread as well as the other I posted this in...

If they had Bill Clinton on TAPE murdering someone, the headline the next day would feature a comment on how Bush missed a vowel in his speech. I honestly believe if they had the proof he killed Vince Foster there would be some NOW supporter on TV within 5 minutes crying that they just leave poor Bill alone. Yet him taking advantage of a star struck 20 year old when he is old enough to know better is just fine and dandy with them. As long as he signs the abortion bills he can rape and pillage all the young women he wants!
 
Suzie..if you had to have an abortion...would you rather go see your doctor...or go see a quack with a coat hanger?...If the Republicans had their way..no wemon would work..and wife beaters would be protected under the law..and having an abortion would mean the coat hanger...think about it.
 
Would you like some cheese with your whine, Suzie?

So the press IGNORES everything Clinton does and picks on Bush for every little thing. Right. You and your conservative pals just keep telling yourselves that. Apperantly you can convince yourselves of anything if you just repeat it enough, and you hear it on Rush Limbaugh.



[Edited by Young Knave on 03-08-2001 at 11:42 PM]
 
Fuck Rush Limbaugh...

crystalhunting said:

It was still a low class cruddy thing to say..What would you do if Rush Limbaugh called your daughter a DOG on national TV?..cause he couldnt get your attention directly?..Last i recall...no one said anything so low clas s bout Regeans daughters or his son.

The part I didn't like about the original post is that it smears ALL republicans, just like your inane comments make a very weak attempt to link all Republicans to Rush Limbaugh.

I don't give a fuck what Rush Limbaugh says. I don't live my life according to what he says, as I'm sure most democrats don't follow what Clinton says as if it were the word of God.

If you want to start a thread about Rush Limbaugh, then fucking do it, but don't stereotype all Republicans as his mindless followers. It just shows your ignorance.
 
I love these conversations! They so easily slip and slide all over the place. It's kind of like mud wrestling where the contestants can never quite get their hands on their opponent.

I for one was not attempting to defend Billy Boy. The man's got just the kind of problems that would qualify him for membership on this site. He can't keep his pecker in his pants. On this site, he'd no doubt be an instant hit with his quick wit and sultry down home style. Its strange that people obsessed with sex who so enjoy this site, have such profound difficulties with this man's libido. But all that's beside the point.

I agree with crystalhunting that the tenor of attacks on Clinton and his family has been remarkably cruel. I also happen to agree with crystalhunting that the many women whose loose morals have led them to this site would be best served by a pro-choice leader rather than the Shrub and his cronies.

(He stands back to wait for the explosion of feminine indignence.)
 
I would have the morals and common sense not to ever want or need an abortion. And I would like for our country to educate others to do the same. And the Republicans have never apposed it in the case of rape, although that is also a moral call. Abortion has became a form of birth control in this country and there is no excuse for that.
 
SuzieSurfin said:
I would have the morals and common sense not to ever want or need an abortion...

If only we had more people like you Suzie we wouldn't have to explore these difficult, contentious moral and social issues. And I understand that the Republicans are doing their best to lead us toward a higher calling. Unfortunately, like most self-righteous people, they invariably have feet of clay. They talk the talk, but have yet to learn to walk the walk. Compassion is what get's lost in righteousness. Knowing the truth for everyone else as well as yourself is the height of what the Greeks called hubris.

hu•bris (hyá2br<=s) n. 1. Overbearing pride or presumption; arrogance: “There is no safety in unlimited technological hubris” McGeorge Bundy
[ Greek excessive pride, wanton violence; See ud- in Indo-European Roots.]
hu•bris2tic (-br<=s2t<=k) adj.
hu•bris2tic•al•ly adv.

And as the bible tells us, "pride goeth before the fall." I'm more comfortable with humility. It seems a far better seedbed for compassion. But then, what do I know? I'm just a pervert like most everyone else on this site.
 
Since Rush has been offered up as our leader let's give the devil his due...

For all who have offered up Rush as a leader of all republicans let's have a look at your Senior Democratic Senator Robert C. Byrd from the great state of West Virginia. who can lead all of you democrats to the promised land...
"Michelle Malkin's most recent column dissects the record of Robert Byrd, the ex-Ku Klux Klansman who now represents West Virginia in the United States Senate. You willnot believe some of the things that she's dug up about this guy's past. Some of the things he's said about blacks are incredibly offensive, and it proves that his use of the N-word - twice - on Fox News Sunday last week was not a slip of the tongue. It was a window into how this man's thinking.

Malkin, who has done so much great research, reveals that Byrd
was more than just a short-term member as he's claimed, and that
he didn't sever all ties when he claimed to. She writes, "Senator
Byrd was a 'Kleagle' - an official recruiter who signed up members
for $10 a head. He said he joined because it 'offered excitement'
and because the Klan was an 'effective force' in 'promoting
traditional American values.' Nothing like the thrill of gathering
'round a midnight bonfire, roasting s'mores, tying nooses, and
promoting white supremacy with a bunch of your hooded
friends."

Byrd claims to have separated himself from the Klan in 1943. Not
so. A letter he wrote to the Imperial Wizard of the KKK in 1946 has
surfaced. In it Byrd wrote, "The Klan is needed today as never
before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia and in every state in the
union."

I've told you before that Senator Byrd filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and that he
opposed the nominations of Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas, but his bigotry
didn't end there. Author Graham Smith, cited in Michele Malkin's column, recently
discovered another letter Senator Byrd wrote after he supposedly quit the Klan, this time
attacking desegregation of the armed forces.

"The ex-Klansman," Malkin writes, "vowed never to fight 'with a Negro by my side. Rather
I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again,
than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to
the blackest specimen from the wilds.'"

Michelle Malkin sums up her column this way: "If this ex-Klansman were a conservative
Republican, he would never hear the end of his sordid past. 'Ex-Klansman who opposed
civil rights and black justices...' would appear in every reference to Senator Byrd. And
even the 'ex-' would be in doubt...left-wing bloodhounds who sniff racism in every crevice
of American life would be barking up a storm over Senator Byrd's latest fulminations.
 
You Knock Me Out Suzie!

You're as slippery as mercury on a glass tabletop. How Robert Byrd got into this conversation I'll never know! I'm sure if you tried even a little bit, you'd find more skeletons in any Southern politician's closet, than girl's names in Bill's black book. So what's the point, my dear? Does the word non sequitur mean anything to you? Your last share strikes me as one, long non sequitur. It doesn't make any sense in this conversation. But you seem to be having fun. Go for it. I'll check back in the morning to see if there's any there there. I have to tell you though, I'm not holding my breath.
 
I will not deny that the Democrats have some shady people in the party,But overall how much has the Republicans ever done for the 80% of people in this country?...not much...Suzie...you know why they never passed the wemons equal right amendment dont you?...cause they want you to sit at home,make babies...and hate anyone who isnt a protestant by Pat Robertsons definition.Do you know how many times i would hear people say that Clinton was the antichrist?...quite a bit actually..Its come to the point where if you disagree with the Republicans...all of a sudden you have become evil...THATS BS!!!!!!!!..and it still is low class how they attack their opponets...attacking the daughter and like...and do you recall how the Republican Senators treated Anita Hill when they were going to confirm a new Supreme court Justice?...Anita was the one who was sexually harassed...NOT Clarence Thomas...over all any woman who supports the Republicans is pratically shooting herself in the foot....OHHH and by the way...i dont see all these anti-abortion people lineing up to adopt black and brown children...God forbid...nor do you see a Republican senator or congressman with his adopted minority child...much less any Republican or Pat Robertson follower.
 
Oh but Nay you see Rush has been offered over and over as our leader. Yet he has NEVER been elected to ANY office by even a single republican. Robert Byrd has been elected not only by his State over and over for more than 50 years, but also given the lofty positions of BOTH Senate majority and minority leader! He is currenty the the most Senior Democrat in the United States, thus the democratic "LEADER" out ranked by no other. If you want to cast stones at those who represent the Republicans at least pick one who has been elected by them! Just as I have done with your current democratic leader Senator Robert Byrd.
 
Well perhaps there is some hope after all...but John Mcain is considered a closet Democrat by most Republicans,and the Republican establishment despises him..doesnt that tell you something?
 
An Interesting Diatribe from the Left

Originally posted by Vic Victorious
You don't have to come up with anything. There's books of anti-Democrat jokes from the last 8 years; most of them are way more rude than what I posted. You probably told them yourself to friends and laughed about it, when the shoes on the other foot you cry foul. That's very telling, like the Republicans who get upset about people bashing the President after they spent 8 years bashing a President.
I find this an interesting perspective. Telling the truth about Clinton is bashing but the lies and character assassination tactics he and his thugs used are okay. Reveals a lot about your character.

And to refer to Clinton as a president is an egregious affront and insult to those who have held the office previously, even to that inept, incompetent, bumbling clown, Jimmy Carter.

Originally posted by crystalhunting
Suzie..if you had to have an abortion ... would you rather go see your doctor ... or go see a quack with a coat hanger? ... If the Republicans had their way ... no wemon would work ... and wife beaters would be protected under the law … and having an abortion would mean the coat hanger ... think about it.
It's fascinating to see that people actually profess to buy this propaganda hook, line and sinker. I can only wonder if you really believe this stuff or if it's just regurgitated for the effect.

Originally posted by Young Knave
So the press IGNORES everything Clinton does and picks on Bush for every little thing. Right.
Congratulations! That's a fairly accurate assessment of your observations over the past several years. It's not hard to keep up if you just observe reality, is it?

Originally posted by genderbender
Its strange that people obsessed with sex who so enjoy this site, have such profound difficulties with this man's libido.
You demonstrate a remarkable ability to ignore and evade reality. It's not the libido with which more than a very few took issue. It was his violation of multiple laws, his abuse of authority to obstruct justice and his perpetual practice of lying. And for me, treason is a biggie!

Originally posted by genderbender
I agree with crystalhunting that the tenor of attacks on Clinton and his family has been remarkably cruel.
The denigration of Chelsea was off base (if it happened). The credibility from the Democratic leaders (an oxymoron, perhaps?) is less than poor based on the fact that their primary political tool is consistently the lie.

The facts disclosed about Bill and Hillary, their questionable at best and likely illegal dealings in Arkansas and his overt criminal actions while in the White House are well deserved; he worked hard to earn them. He put forth a concerted effort to earn his appropriate legacy, the most corrupt administration in the history of America.

Originally posted by genderbender
And I understand that the Republicans are doing their best to lead us toward a higher calling. Unfortunately, like most self-righteous people, they invariably have feet of clay. They talk the talk, but have yet to learn to walk the walk. Compassion is what get's lost in righteousness.
If you really understand this, how about laying out a coherent definitive explanation of the real, substantive differences between the Republicans/Conservatives and the Democrats/Liberals. And could you include a little more extensive explanation of your concept of compassion and who most consistently exhibits it?

Originally posted by crystalhunting
i dont see all these anti-abortion people lineing up to adopt black and brown children...God forbid...
Here's another little thing I find so very interesting. It's the Democrat/Liberal that is always so quick to point out and be obsessed with skin color, ethnicity, etc. It's they who are so aware of the hyphenated-American. Notice it's the Republican/Conservative who think in terms of people and Americans. It's the Democrat/Liberal who thinks in terms of black people, brown people, yellow people, you-fill-in-the-blank-American.

I personally judge people from the more Conservative attitude of their behavior, attitudes, ethics and principles. The color of their skin, hair, eyes, or toenails is not really a concern. It's too bad the Liberal collectivist mindset is so focused on the superficial.
 
Back
Top