A recent glance round the gym changing room at the cocks on display got me thinking about size.
I've have always considered mine to be a grower not a shower (that's my excuse
) and I wondered whether this was a fair assumption?
So I figured out some maths based on the following 4 simple measurements & the assumption that cocks are approximately cylindrical. (Somebody make me an appointment with the psychiatrist, quick!
)
Le = erect length
Ge = erect girth
Lf = flaccid length
Gf = flaccid girth
Aiming for a percentage growth, we put them into the following equation:
( 100 x Le x Ge x Ge )
-------------------------- = Growth %
( Lf x Gf x Gf )
It turns out that my cock grows by approximately
655% (I'm impressed, even if no one else is!)
So, get your tape measures & calculators out boys: is mine "a grower not, a shower" or have I just got a diminutive little pee-pee?
Incidentally, if anyone has a copy of Kinsey and could shed some accademic light on this, I'd be quite interested ...
This is just for fun and not intended to start a debate about whether size really matters!
I've have always considered mine to be a grower not a shower (that's my excuse
So I figured out some maths based on the following 4 simple measurements & the assumption that cocks are approximately cylindrical. (Somebody make me an appointment with the psychiatrist, quick!
Le = erect length
Ge = erect girth
Lf = flaccid length
Gf = flaccid girth
Aiming for a percentage growth, we put them into the following equation:
( 100 x Le x Ge x Ge )
-------------------------- = Growth %
( Lf x Gf x Gf )
It turns out that my cock grows by approximately

So, get your tape measures & calculators out boys: is mine "a grower not, a shower" or have I just got a diminutive little pee-pee?
Incidentally, if anyone has a copy of Kinsey and could shed some accademic light on this, I'd be quite interested ...
This is just for fun and not intended to start a debate about whether size really matters!