A fun bit of maths for the boys

aimouse

Really Experienced
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Posts
130
A recent glance round the gym changing room at the cocks on display got me thinking about size.
I've have always considered mine to be a grower not a shower (that's my excuse ;) ) and I wondered whether this was a fair assumption?

So I figured out some maths based on the following 4 simple measurements & the assumption that cocks are approximately cylindrical. (Somebody make me an appointment with the psychiatrist, quick! :rolleyes: )
Le = erect length
Ge = erect girth
Lf = flaccid length
Gf = flaccid girth
Aiming for a percentage growth, we put them into the following equation:

( 100 x Le x Ge x Ge )
-------------------------- = Growth %
( Lf x Gf x Gf )

It turns out that my cock grows by approximately :D 655% (I'm impressed, even if no one else is!)
So, get your tape measures & calculators out boys: is mine "a grower not, a shower" or have I just got a diminutive little pee-pee?


Incidentally, if anyone has a copy of Kinsey and could shed some accademic light on this, I'd be quite interested ...

This is just for fun and not intended to start a debate about whether size really matters!
 
I am laughing as I picture you, implements in hand, taking all these precise measurements. Did you do it yourself or did you have help? I am guessing that the added stimulus from a measurement assistant might tend to skew the results. Unless of course you were in a state of total unconsciousness which might be attained by watching a Britney Spears video. :eek:
 
I'm proud to say I can use a tape measure without supervision or assistance ;)
But your right, getting a flacid measurement was a bit of a challenge, even on my own. It took 3 atempts and about 20 min inbetween to forget about the whole exercise enough to get my cock back down to a properly flacid state.

As for Britney - I don't recall what the song was, honest, but the red rubber cat suit she wore in one of her videos most certainly would not have helped ... well, not with the falcid measurements anyway :p
 
Due to the nature of the material that makes up all (most?) cocks, flaccid length/girth is significantly less constant than erect length/girth. Things like excitement level, temperature, etc, all affect blood flow to an unerect cock. Saying that any given unerect set of dimensions are 'the' measurements for your unerect cock, therefor, are likely to be inaccurate. This makes the "% gain" thing a bit sketchy, at best.

;)
 
Hey man

It's not the size of the waves, it's the motion of the ocean.

J
 
I am laughing as I picture you, implements in hand, taking all these precise measurements... :eek:

You think that's funny! Well picture poor me up here in Alaska. And of course my tools are in the shed (unheated). So out I go at 20 below to measure my pecker just so you will know, try to see and pity poor me as I lay the cold steel on my shrunken we-we. Quick as a wink the cold steel sticks to the poor little friend whom I do love so. I abandoned my quest and rushed back to the nest, to warmth and safety and a well deserved rest!

Needless to say, I was unable to complete the test.

PS. amouse, please forward your address as soon as possible, my attorney needs to contact you about this. And my doctor said that the flaccid state of the penis is too variable to make an accurate calculation anyway. Dayum, all that for nothing!...amouse! if this was a joke I'm going to...
 
That gets you the area of a single "slice" of your wang(unpleasant thought, I know. But bear with me.)


Let me know when you're going to slice your penis so I can go to the movies and that day and miss the drama that's sure to follow. :D
 
I note, with deep regret, that, to date, no one has come up with any measurements. This can only mean one of three things, dear reader:
1. They're all intimidated by my prestigious growth.
2. They're trying to save me from the humiliation of learning that the average cock is at least 10 times larger when erect than when flacid.
3. No one knows how to use a tape measure.

In the mean time ...

mirrors2 Did I forget to use the words "approximate" and "just for fun". You excuse for not submitting your measurement of growth is as lamentable as the inadequacy of you manhood. Lets see if that goads him into coming up with the goods!? Murhahaha.

JamieBPossibly true but, if the waves are going to be big, you need a big boat.

alaskabibear I am sorry to learn of your pain. Unfortunately Aimouse Inc cannot be held responsible for use of tools not supplied by Aimouse Hardware Inc or used in thermal conditions not contolled by Aimouse Environmental Services Inc. If you choose to take your proposed legal action and stick it up your arse, please reffer to Apendix 7A, Para 94, in Application Proceedures for Sepositories, Enimas and Complaints, as published by Aimouse Sodomy Inc before any such action is taken.

NoLeafClover7Your maths teacher would indeed be proud of you ... if only you'd worked through the problem completely.
I think you'll find that
R1 = C1/(2 pi)
A1 = (pi * R1)^2 = (pi * C1^2)/4 * (pi^2(
V1 = L1 * A1 = (L1 * (pi * C1^2))/(4 * pi^2) = (L1 * C1^2)/(4 * pi)
V% = 100 V1 / V2 = ( (100 * L1 * C1^2)/(4 * pi) ) / ( (L2 * C2^2)/(4 * pi) ) = (100 * L1 * C1 * C1) / ( L2 * C2 * C2)
ie, the same as my equation. Quad erat demunstrandum.
 
I am quite certain I will never get a calculation for my husband. If someone is going to be touching his penis, flaccid or otherwise, he expects they will be doing more worthwhile things than taking such scientific measurements. He simply is not as interested in the results for the benefit of science as he is his own more prurient interests.

Go figure. :rolleyes:
 
mirrors2 Did I forget to use the words "approximate" and "just for fun". You excuse for not submitting your measurement of growth is as lamentable as the inadequacy of you manhood. Lets see if that goads him into coming up with the goods!? Murhahaha.

Nono - you're right.

And some non-measured approximations are displayed in my pic thread.

Aside from that, it's freezing at my place right now. This means the % increase will appear nice & high. ;P
 
Oh god...I just have to laugh...I knew men were preoccupied, sometimes excessively, with their penises...but the visual I get from this is hilarious! Now someone just needs to come up with a mathematical formula to measure the depth and what-not of a womans pussy, maybe to measure volume of fluids it will hold...:rolleyes:
Great job, guys, and yes...I think your math teachers would be proud...;)
~shykitty~
 
A recent glance round the gym changing room at the cocks on display got me thinking about size.
I've have always considered mine to be a grower not a shower (that's my excuse ;) ) and I wondered whether this was a fair assumption?

So I figured out some maths based on the following 4 simple measurements & the assumption that cocks are approximately cylindrical. (Somebody make me an appointment with the psychiatrist, quick! :rolleyes: )
Le = erect length
Ge = erect girth
Lf = flaccid length
Gf = flaccid girth
Aiming for a percentage growth, we put them into the following equation:

( 100 x Le x Ge x Ge )
-------------------------- = Growth %
( Lf x Gf x Gf )

It turns out that my cock grows by approximately :D 655% (I'm impressed, even if no one else is!)
So, get your tape measures & calculators out boys: is mine "a grower not, a shower" or have I just got a diminutive little pee-pee?


Incidentally, if anyone has a copy of Kinsey and could shed some accademic light on this, I'd be quite interested ...

This is just for fun and not intended to start a debate about whether size really matters!
Just wanted to say, really enjoyed your pics...pity about the fleshlight, though...lol
 
Back
Top