A clear policy on celberty stories

[Dazzle1]

On today's story list there is a BatGirl story.

A few months ago I had mine rejected with the D.C copywrite excuse, last month a Superman/Wonder Woman/Lois Lane was put on with non consential parts

What is the policy?

 

[Darkniciad]

The stated policy is that non-consentual stories involving copyrighted characters won't be accepted.

If one slips through the cracks, use the "Report Story" button and state that as the reason you're reporting it.

The webmasters are approving 60+ stories a night, which necessitates speed reading. Things will slip through.

Theres also the possibility that the posted story doesn't reach the same bar of non-consent that your rejected story did, in the opinion of the moderators. If that's the case, the report will probably result in no action.

 

[lovecraft68]

The stated policy is that non-consentual stories involving copyrighted characters won't be accepted.

If one slips through the cracks, use the "Report Story" button and state that as the reason you're reporting it.

The webmasters are approving 60+ stories a night, which necessitates speed reading. Things will slip through.

Theres also the possibility that the posted story doesn't reach the same bar of non-consent that your rejected story did, in the opinion of the moderators. If that's the case, the report will probably result in no action.

If they are going to get into "levels" of Non consent things are going to get more confusing than ever.

Maybe Laurel just isn't a Lois Lane fan and didn't care she got it put to her. Who knows?

You know seriously though when a lot of people gripe about underage the answer given is hey there are other sites. This may be the answer to start to to give to these types as well.

As a former comic book store owner and life long collector I still don;t get how they're seen in a sexual way in the first place. But hey to each their own.

 

[snoopercharmbrights]

This points up a real problem with the "Celebrities" category: it makes no distinction between real and (plagiarised) fictional characters.

It would not seem unreasonable to allow plagiarists to inflict whatever they choose on other people's fictional characters, since IPRs are routinely ignored here.

As to real characters (Falwell not withstanding) it may well be that a site owner chooses to impose stricter conditions on fictional stories about real people.