A Clarification for everyone

[Juliangel]

MP on the Thank you thread I posted two responses.
This on was directed at you:

MP I am not sure but I think you missed the original dates on the post.

I think the point someone was making by bringing the thread to the top was WS was saying 8 months ago that she wasn't happy with the some of the posts on the board and if ever she began turning into one of those old fogie posters and to just slap her if she ever start complaining about "the good old days."

Well she has done that and they were just pointing out what she asked them to do.

I know you are defending your friend and that is great but I think they were just showing her she said she didn't want to start doing what she is doing now.

and this one was directed at Ambrousious:

I do not think they missed your point I think they just did not care to acknowledge it. You made it clearly without being rude or bitchy.

I see that your point was, that in the week you were gone, you started more threads than you would normally start under a different name and no one said a thing about it.

KM says your threads this week have been good one that were thought provoking for everyone yet they still complain so I must agree with you that it is you they have a problem with and not your threads.

Now in both posts the only time I used any word close to bitch was when I told Ambrosious he made his point without being rude or bitchy. I was talking to him through IM's today and I was amazed at how calm he was in his response. It was directed only at him.

If you feel it was directed at you I am here to say I am sorry, it was not. You can take the apology or not that is up to you.

 

[Juliangel]

oh yes and second coming I am not, I only tell y'all the good stuff.

 

[jcgirl]

Damn! I missed all the good stuff

 

[Unclebill]

'Tis sad indeed

oh yes and second coming I am not, ...

You're only coming once? How sad for you! You have my sympathy.

 

[Guest]

You can take the apology or not that is up to you.

She may have read it but I doubt she will respond to you. If she does she will either have to accept the apology and prove she was wrong or she will attack you and prove she is the bitch you did not call her.

 

[Madame Pandora]

Despite the reasoning of Mr or Ms "No Response" (I still have trouble taking seriously anything expressed by someone who can't even sign their HANDLE to a thought), there is something in that post which was TRUE.

If she does she will either have to accept the apology and prove she was wrong or she will attack you and prove she is the bitch you did not call her.

Whatever else I will do, I would never attack an apology.

I didn't respond because I wasn’t convinced of the reasons behind the apology. Rather than post that and open the door for more silliness, I chose to contact Juliangel privately.

I am now convinced, truly, that her comment was not aimed at me, and I am sorry to have interpreted it incorrectly.

Juliangel, not only do I ACCEPT your apology, but, moreover, I recognize that there was no reason for you to apologize in the first place. *I* was wrong, and I am sorry for the words I said and for the manner in which I said them.

I am sorry, Juliangel. Your words were not aimed my way. The fault was mine.

When I am wrong, I have no fear of saying so.

It is worth mentioning that I am not the only one who misinterpreted Juliangel. I don't say that to excuse my mistake, but to explain why I am posting this even though it is already settled between Juliangel and I. I am convinced Julie's comment was aimed at NO ONE except Ambrosious, the subject of her post. To the others who made the same mistake, we were wrong, if you don’t believe it, write her, and I’m certain she will satisfy you as she did me.

MP

 

[Merelan]

Bravo.....

 

[Snoopy]

Good job!