2007 News & Views: Discussion and Announcements for the Survivorphile

Lauren Hynde

Hitched
Joined
Apr 11, 2002
Posts
21,061
Hello, Survivorphiles, and welcome to the 2007 Survivor Literotica Contest. We hope this will be an enjoyable year-long challenge for all of you, regardless of final score. Survivor is above all a great opportunity for authors to challenge themselves and stretch their own limits, encouraging them into writing territory where they wouldn't normally venture.

Last year's edition went very smoothly, so there will only be one change introduced to the rules this year, but an important one:


For the Novels and Novellas category only - all submissions made to the Novels and Novellas category must be 7500 words or more to be eligible for the contest. Any submissions made to the Novels and Novellas category that aren't at least 7500 words, will not be considered for Survivor.

The first valid (with 7500 words or more) submission made to Novels and Novellas, will be worth 6 points, instead of the 3 that the first submission in any other category is worth.

The nine valid submissions subsequently made to Novels and Novellas after the first, will be worth 2 points, instead of the 1 that subsequent submissions in any other category is worth.

Any further valid submissions made to Novels and Novellas after the tenth, will be worth 1 point as usual for all story categories.​

The reasons behind this change should be obvious, I think. The break-point between what is considered a short-story and what is considered a novelette or a novella, especially for on-line reading, is never under 7500 words. The establishment of this minimum tries to guarantee that each submission corresponds, at least to some degree, to the "erotic fiction with a broader scope" description that defines this category, a category that should be the more apt representation of the literary half of Literotica's name.

All other rules and principles are as in previous years. There is a dynamic cap for immunities, which means that by the end of the year, any immunities you won will only be considered valid if you have regular submissions in two categories for each immunity. The use of images in the production of which you were not directly involved, either by creating or by being portrayed in them, will make submissions in the Illustrated and Illustrated Poetry categories ineligible for points. All audio stories must be 750 words or more to be eligible for Survivor, and the accompanying text must be an accurate transcript of the submitted audio.

Every year, there are concerns about multichapter stories and about the quality of some submissions. Once again we must remind all contestants that the only quality control in place is Laurel, at the moment of approval of the submissions. If you read a story that cannot be understood without reading the others in the series, if it doesn't make sense on its own, or if it doesn't correspond, on its own, to the minimum that can be expected for the category it is placed in, please report the story. If you think that any story you read in Literotica is substandard, please report the story. Let Laurel know about it. That's the only way a quality control can be implemented.

The 2007 Survivor Literotica Contest: Rules and Registration thread and the January 2007 Immunities thread are already posted and you can sign up immediately. To avoid confusion, we'll put creation of new ScoreCard threads on hold until 2006 winners are announced on the 5th and all the mess is cleared, but we'll put them up right after that.

Good luck to all!
 
Lauren Hynde said:
Hello, Survivorphiles, and welcome to the 2007 Survivor Literotica Contest. We hope this will be an enjoyable year-long challenge for all of you, regardless of final score. Survivor is above all a great opportunity for authors to challenge themselves and stretch their own limits, encouraging them into writing territory where they wouldn't normally venture.

Last year's edition went very smoothly, so there will only be one change introduced to the rules this year, but an important one:


For the Novels and Novellas category only - all submissions made to the Novels and Novellas category must be 7500 words or more to be eligible for the contest. Any submissions made to the Novels and Novellas category that aren't at least 7500 words, will not be considered for Survivor.

The first valid (with 7500 words or more) submission made to Novels and Novellas, will be worth 6 points, instead of the 3 that the first submission in any other category is worth.

.​

The reasons behind this change should be obvious, I think. The break-point between what is considered a short-story and what is considered a novelette or a novella, especially for on-line reading, is never under 7500 words. The establishment of this minimum tries to guarantee that each submission corresponds, at least to some degree, to the "erotic fiction with a broader scope" description that defines this category, a category that should be the more apt representation of the literary half of Literotica's name.


Previoiusly, it was my understanding that the numerous chapters of a longer work had to be posted all at once, with the combined chapters making up the longer work. With the rule change, will a single, 7500 word entry be accepted as a complete, longer work?

DA
 
Decayed Angel said:
Previoiusly, it was my understanding that the numerous chapters of a longer work had to be posted all at once, with the combined chapters making up the longer work. With the rule change, will a single, 7500 word entry be accepted as a complete, longer work?

DA
Referring to Novels and Novellas, right? That numerous chapters of a longer work had to be posted all at once was Laurel's intention, but to put that intention into practice would have made posting works in progress impossible, so there was some leniency, but also a lot of abuse. That's why this minimum was set for Survivor purposes only. A single 7500-word entry made to Novels and Novellas can be considered a complete work (a novelette). It can obviously also be part of an even longer work, such as a chapter of a novel.
 
Lauren Hynde said:
I'm signing up this year as well. I haven't written anything in two years and need an excuse to get back into gear.

Welcome to the nuthouse! :p
 
nuthouse

they don't let me near the corners ... they say corners are too sharp. Even my crayons are rounded and dull.
 
ScoreCard threads for those who have signed up in the last few days have finally been created, all the welcome messages have been sent, so start tracking those scores, people!
 
Question I can't find an answer to in the FAQs... If I substantially add to or rework a story from last year's survivor contest (like adding another 3000 odd words for example) can I re-submit it for this year's Survivor contest?
x
V
 
It would have to be a pretty substantial reworking, as to make it an entirely different story! If besides the reworking there is an addition of new scenes in the order of those new 3000 odd words, then I suppose it could be considered as if it were a new chapter on a series, so it would be OK.
 
Still Mod?

Hey, Lauren,

Are you still the mod for the contest? And if so, isn't it a conflict of interest to be the moderator and a contestant? Somehow, I don't think it would be fair to the other contestants ... :confused:

Velvet
 
How could being a moderator while being a contestant possibly be unfair to any of the rest of us? It doesn't give her any kind of advantage. I'm very happy with the way she's run the contest the past two years, and I can't imagine anyone else doing a better job.
 
If any contestant sees me being one of the moderators as a conflict of interests, I'm not attached to the job. I don't think that conflict exists, though, or at least it didn't in any previous edition of Survivor when moderators were also participants. Since 2005, the rules were made even cleared and stopped depending on moderators' opinions; and there are two moderators, so if someone sees an issue with one of my submissions, that person can contact Svenskaflicka instead.
 
I think there's more likely to be an issue with your time - moderating as *well* as competing - rather you than me!
x
V
 
Yeah, so far that's what I've been experiencing. LOL. But that's OK, I haven't entered the contest to win it. It's a personal challenge, and my goal is just one submission (non-poetry) every two weeks. Which means I have 5 days to write one before I'm already behind schedule. :rolleyes:
 
Do you have a full-time job as well? I'm struggling to finish a story I've been working on for a month just because of my other commitments wearing me out. Good luck with sticking to the schedule!
x
V
 
I've been having some health issues, so these days I work mostly from home and send it in via internet at the end of the day. It's a two-thirds-time job, I guess, because it's all I can take until I recover fully. The time saved by not travelling back and forth between home and downtown is amazing, though. I just need to learn to use it better. That's my challenge and why I signed up. ;)
 
Fair enough. I'm unwell too so I'm going to have to work from home once I graduate. Am so exhausted atm, just had to research and write a 9,000 word essay and it's due in on Fri. Perhaps I'll be able to finish my story when that's handed in...

x
V
 
Hope it goes well. I find that it helps to really take advantage of the resting hours to rest, and then vary what I do throughout the day: a couple of hours of work, an hour of writing, then back to work, and so on. Also, I try not to let any of the tasks overwhelm me, just break it into small chewable pieces.
 
Yup! Them's my coping tactics too.
You on the road to recovery though?
x
V
 
Just started on some new medication 4 weeks ago - the old one was doing more harm than good by now. Seems to be working. It's always going to be a slow journey, but I think I'm on the right road now. :)
 
If I were competing, I would feel that it would be 'unwise' to have a moderator as a contestant. I don't think that it's fair to the other competitors as the moderator has the ear of the owner of the site.

I also thought that the moderators were supposed to change each year. So Lauren and Svenska should be out this year and two new mods should be nominated in their places.

I've already won this contest and I just think that it's unfair. Why would you want to moderate a contest that you are also trying to win? Seems that things would go very "smoothly" this year considering that the moderator is already racking up the points ...
 
There are two moderators and I'm sure if anyone should try anything on then it would be pointed out fairly soon.

Perhaps there has been a shortage of volunteers.
 
velvetpie said:
If I were competing, I would feel that it would be 'unwise' to have a moderator as a contestant. I don't think that it's fair to the other competitors as the moderator has the ear of the owner of the site.

I also thought that the moderators were supposed to change each year. So Lauren and Svenska should be out this year and two new mods should be nominated in their places.

I've already won this contest and I just think that it's unfair. Why would you want to moderate a contest that you are also trying to win? Seems that things would go very "smoothly" this year considering that the moderator is already racking up the points ...


Stop trying to stir up shit. She's plainly stated she's not trying to win the contest. She simply has set a goal for herself to write in each category.

I still don't see why you think being mod gives her an unfair advantage. What is she going to do? Submissions are listed in plain view for every one to see. Any one of us can check her submissions/points, etc. No one seems to be complaining about it but you.

I don't ever recall there being a limit on how long someone could mod the contest. I daresay Lauren has been the best mod we've had. At least she's not changing an already set rule in mid-contest to the benefit of one of her friends and the detriment of everyone else.
 
CrimsonMaiden said:
Stop trying to stir up shit. She's plainly stated she's not trying to win the contest. She simply has set a goal for herself to write in each category.

I still don't see why you think being mod gives her an unfair advantage. What is she going to do? Submissions are listed in plain view for every one to see. Any one of us can check her submissions/points, etc. No one seems to be complaining about it but you.

I don't ever recall there being a limit on how long someone could mod the contest. I daresay Lauren has been the best mod we've had. At least she's not changing an already set rule in mid-contest to the benefit of one of her friends and the detriment of everyone else.

Amen.

Velvetpie: if you're not competing, why are you so concerned with who will be moderating, if not to just cause problems?
 
Back
Top