butters
High on a Hill
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2009
- Posts
- 85,794
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...s-nyt-report/ar-AASZ4Fw?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531
it was only by luck that one of the bombs remained unexploded...it was on the 5th floor down in one of the dam's towers and could have weakened the dam enough for it to break
it was only by luck that one of the bombs remained unexploded...it was on the 5th floor down in one of the dam's towers and could have weakened the dam enough for it to break
The attack was conducted despite a military report warning not to bomb the dam as such an attack could cause a flood killing tens of thousands of civilians.
The former officials added that the decision to conduct the strike was made using a procedural shortcut reserved for emergencies, allowing the military to launch the attack without receiving clearance from high up the chain of command.
The former officials spoke on the condition of anonymity as they were not authorized to discuss the strikes. According to the report, some officers viewed the task force's actions as reckless.
The dam strike is part of a pattern the New York Times has seen in Task Force 9's behavior, with the unit routinely circumventing the rigorous approval process usually used for such strikes and hitting ISIS targets in Syria in a manner that repeatedly put civilians at risk.
“Using a 2,000-pound bomb against a restricted target like a dam is extremely difficult and should have never been done on the fly,” Scott F. Murray, a retired Air Force colonel, who planned airstrikes during air campaigns in Iraq, Afghanistan and Kosovo, told the New York Times. “Worst case, those munitions could have absolutely caused the dam to fail.”