“Porn Again Films”

Brandnewbuddy

Literotica Guru
Joined
Apr 19, 2021
Posts
876
Short version: Former porn studio publicly declares they are have seen the light and will no longer be making smut. Instead they will be making high quality Christian related films. …and it’s all a scam to get past some new censorship laws and get some Christian money.

Could be a framing device with sexed up Bible stories or plots similar to Christian films being the main story. Maybe even have a gag be the opening and closing being scenes of the studio explaining to various investors why a scene is not in fact just porn.

For example: “Is there a reason you had an extended masturbation scene as well as multiple scenes of the actors fucking in increasingly over the top scenarios.”

“Ah, well remember this is about David falling for Bathsheba. He sees her bathing and her being separated from her husband has made her lonely and open to his advances while the scenarios that play out are wild sinful fantasies that David is having. Truly this film is warning of the dangers of lust.”

Then for one of their originals:

“All right so this is just porn. The “plot” is just a couple getting married and then…well, fucking.”

“ah but that is the point! Unmarried viewers will see a couple coming together under the lord’s loving eye and then finding a pleasure far greater after marriage than any passing sinful fling they might have prior to marriage.”

Or:

“I do appreciate that you want to to make a film that shows a lesbian couple having a happily married Christian life. I am very thankful in fact that you featured our church prominently: in theory it’s a good way to show that our particular church is open and supportive of the LGBT community…but well, this is two women just tribbing and using a lot of toys”

“Exactly! One of the only times Lesbians are mentioned in the Bible is for a warning that they are not to make love like men. So in this film: Joann tackles with what it means for her and her new spouse and how they can make love while respecting the Bible. We consulted multiple Bible scholars before filming!”
 
@ChloeTzang this seems to fall squarely within your interests :D

"Without sin, how can one find forgiveness? To be forgiven, we must first do do something which must be forgiven."

I can hear Father Auyeung's words now..... "Gather around, young ladies, and let us talk about the necessity of sinning in order to be forgiven...."
 
Reminds of those crazy fringe churches that used to recruit on campus. 'Fucking for Jesus' they called it. Mostly girls, sometimes guys, who used their bodies to get you inside their church. Porn for Jesus is only a step away. Never did it myself. Once you'd drunk the Koolaid there might have been no way out.
 
Reminds of those crazy fringe churches that used to recruit on campus. 'Fucking for Jesus' they called it. Mostly girls, sometimes guys, who used their bodies to get you inside their church. Porn for Jesus is only a step away. Never did it myself. Once you'd drunk the Koolaid there might have been no way out.
Bummer, all we had were the Hari Krishnas. I might have taken a chance with the Fucking for Jesus chicks. LOL!
 
Maybe even have a gag be the opening and closing being scenes of the studio explaining to various investors why a scene is not in fact just porn.

I would just comment that this is very "Soviet" approach to censorship. You could get almost anything on screen in USSR if you were good at bullshit about how that advance communist ideals, even though the default was to ban anything suspicious or to liberated... lake, there was a case where a famous director had made a full frontal nudity scene of a girl, and argued it's indispensable for the plot and perception, the censorship rejected it, but thanks to his influence he went higher up and at the end was allowed to cut the scene so ONE breast was shown close up. Not both. One. With was, apparently, less inappropriate, in some purely mathematical way, perhaps.
 
Back
Top