Who's frickin running the shop here?

Is it Stemp's first day? Or are there a bunch of slackers taking a long ass coffee break?

As you may be aware a couple of weeks ago, threads I posted in were deleted. Why they were deleted is still unclear. A fluffer PM'd me and said it was for a matter of "taste". If that were the case, then I'd expect to see a butt load more threads deleted, or basically any thread Minkey Boodle posts a pic into (heh heh, nothing against his/her pics, but they are definitely way worse in taste than anything that was mentioned in the thread that got deleted). Anyhoo, it's clear no rules or guidelines were broken that resulted in that thread being deleted. So, if someone did break a rule or guideline, you'd expect the same or worse result, correct? I mean, if entire threads are deleted for "taste", then rule breaking (being a worse offense) should result in at least the same deal.

So obviously someone is totally napping or doesn't know their job. Here's a thread from yesterday:

LovingTongue, don't fall for it! It's a trick!

In the 8th post, a personal address is posted. A clear violation of the rules and guidelines. Yet it's still there.

For anyone unaware of the rules and guidelines:

4. You may not post personal information of other members or, for that matter, anyone else. We do not allow phone numbers, email addresses, private messages or quotes from private emails to be posted on the forum. This rule also covers real names, employment info, and any other personal information that we deem inappropriate.

So it's not a matter that it's not a members address, just the fact that it's real address is a problem. No argument there.

And of course, one thread is easy to miss, but on top of that someone actually made another thread to point it out. I mean come on already, get your feet off the desk and do some damn work.

Ok I am pulling this out from one thread, to discuss it here without totally hijackin

Stuff like this just reinforces my theory that it's all about who ya know. lol.

P. B. Walker said:

Is it Stemp's first day? Or are there a bunch of slackers taking a long ass coffee break?

As you may be aware a couple of weeks ago, threads I posted in were deleted. Why they were deleted is still unclear. A fluffer PM'd me and said it was for a matter of "taste". If that were the case, then I'd expect to see a butt load more threads deleted, or basically any thread Minkey Boodle posts a pic into (heh heh, nothing against his/her pics, but they are definitely way worse in taste than anything that was mentioned in the thread that got deleted). Anyhoo, it's clear no rules or guidelines were broken that resulted in that thread being deleted. So, if someone did break a rule or guideline, you'd expect the same or worse result, correct? I mean, if entire threads are deleted for "taste", then rule breaking (being a worse offense) should result in at least the same deal.

So obviously someone is totally napping or doesn't know their job. Here's a thread from yesterday:

LovingTongue, don't fall for it! It's a trick!

In the 8th post, a personal address is posted. A clear violation of the rules and guidelines. Yet it's still there.

For anyone unaware of the rules and guidelines:

4. You may not post personal information of other members or, for that matter, anyone else. We do not allow phone numbers, email addresses, private messages or quotes from private emails to be posted on the forum. This rule also covers real names, employment info, and any other personal information that we deem inappropriate.

So it's not a matter that it's not a members address, just the fact that it's real address is a problem. No argument there.

And of course, one thread is easy to miss, but on top of that someone actually made another thread to point it out. I mean come on already, get your feet off the desk and do some damn work.

Ok I am pulling this out from one thread, to discuss it here without totally hijackin

Stuff like this just reinforces my theory that it's all about who ya know. lol.

Click to expand...

You are not modarated? Quit whinning.

Umm . .keep crying. heh

Dude.

You really expect there to be even handed enforcement of the rules?

You should write for Fucktard Weekly...you're nom de plume is: Pretty Butterfly

LovingTongue said:

Dude.

You really expect there to be even handed enforcement of the rules?

Click to expand...

Actually yes.

It's a pipe dream... isn't it?

Bob_Bytchin said:

You should write for Fucktard Weekly...you're nom de plume is: Pretty Butterfly

Click to expand...

Punk Bitch sounds better.

Lance is the GB M0DERAT0R. He said so himself.

P. B. Walker said:

Is it Stemp's first day? Or are there a bunch of slackers taking a long ass coffee break?

Click to expand...

Well, you make it plenty obvious you just want to whine and get attention, not get an answer, so just this once I'll grant your wish and give you the attention.

P. B. "Stemp" Walker said:

As you may be aware a couple of weeks ago, threads I posted in were deleted.

Click to expand...

There is a god.

I don't see the problem here with what ya said, PB.

You accurately quoted the Lit rules.
You pointed out a clear violation of the rules. So what's the problem with that?

i read the thread(s) you posted in, and you insinuated that desiqn's 3 yr old daughter had a sticky face, due to rubbing it in her mothers dirty pussy.

your thread crossed over the line due to suggested pedophelia.

get off your soapbox. your speech is so tired.

Does anyone want to bet money that KillerMuffin won't report WARMACHINE's violation of Lit's rules of conduct?

I'll even up the ante and bet her reason is she likes WARMACHINE anddoesn't want to see him get in trouble.

Re: Re: Who's frickin running the shop here?

LukkyKnight said:

Well, you make it plenty obvious you just want to whine and get attention, not get an answer, so just this once I'll grant your wish and give you the attention.

Click to expand...

I gave up on getting answers. Which kinda tells me it's not quite legit. So, I'm left to draw my own conclusions.

honeylick said:

i read the thread(s) you posted in, and you incinuated that desiqn's 3 yr old daughter had a sticky face, due to rubbing it in her mothers dirty pussy.

Click to expand...

^^^^^^ now THAT was funny. I didn't know PB was that hard core.

Now Honeylick, if you can point me to which Literotica rules of conduct PB violated when he made fun of Design's daughter, then I'll concede that your argument is relevant here...

This isn't about whining. It's about pointing out violations of the rules.

honeylick said:

i read the thread(s) you posted in, and you incinuated that desiqn's 3 yr old daughter had a sticky face, due to rubbing it in her mothers dirty pussy.

your thread crossed over the line due to suggested pedophelia.

get off your soapbox. your speech is so tired.

Click to expand...

That's a total lie. I never insinuated that bullshit. I insinuate that she had a smelly cunt.

EDIT: In fact, at least one other poster in the thread said the same.

Either way... that doesn't explain why the thread from yesterday hasn't been deleted? Or are only certain rules important?

And as I've probably said to you before, don't open my threads or put me on ignore if I'm so tired and you don't want to read what I post.

P. B. Walker said:

That's a total lie. I never insinuated that bullshit. I insinuate that she had a smelly cunt.

EDIT: In fact, at least one other poster in the thread said the same.

Click to expand...

Are you, PB, insinuating Honeylick's reading skills are in error?

I think it would be better that you admit dissing Design's daughter, even if you never did. This is not about the facts, this is a popularity contest.
But do be sure to send her Hooked on Phonics next Christmas.

The "Laurel" character is much like Miss Betty on Romper Room or Mr Clean...whenever ownership of the show changes or ratings need a boost, a new actor is brought in the play the role.

The current "Laurel" is a bit less decisive than the previous one, that's all.

LovingTongue said:

Are you, PB, insinuating Honeylick's reading skills are in error?

I think it would be better that you admit dissing Design's daughter, even if you never did. This is not about the facts, this is a popularity contest.
But do be sure to send her Hooked on Phonics next Christmas.

Click to expand...

Well HL can interpret it anyway she wishes. The thread is gone. Nuff said. I'm just saying it's complete bullshit if a thread that doesn't break the rules is deleted, while a thread that totally breaks the rules is allowed to continue.

P. B. Walker said:

Well HL can interpret it anyway she wishes. The thread is gone. Nuff said. I'm just saying it's complete bullshit if a thread that doesn't break the rules is deleted, while a thread that totally breaks the rules is allowed to continue.

Click to expand...

You're right.

That's why these feebs are talking shit now. Everyone knows you're right, but to admit it makes certain friends look bad.

But the fact is, they look bad already.

LovingTongue said:

You're right.

That's why these feebs are talking shit now. Everyone knows you're right, but to admit it makes certain friends look bad.

But the fact is, they look bad already.

Click to expand...

I guess that could be true. I mean, this is very much like High School. lol.

And deleting the thread in question now, would prove I was right... oh gawd forbid.

even if somebody breaks a forum guideline itll only get deleted if someone uses the "report this post" feature and complains about it which is why sometimes some of these things appear to slide.

i'm guessing.

and geez peebs.

P. B. Walker said:

Punk Bitch sounds better.

Click to expand...

Punk Bitch Walker.

glamorilla said:

even if somebody breaks a forum guideline itll only get deleted if someone uses the "report this post" feature and complains about it which is why sometimes some of these things appear to slide.

i'm guessing.

Click to expand...

Trust me, it's been reported. By me, for one.

HeavyStick said:

Punk Bitch Walker.

Click to expand...

One of the new mods everyone. He can put 2 and 2 together.

glamorilla said:

and geez peebs.

Click to expand...

Well a little thread about the possibility of Laurel making me a mod, sure did get PBW's neoprene camel toe all bunched up.