bisexplicit
but i'm a lesbian
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2005
- Posts
- 28,710
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Quiet_Cool said:Weren't those always the rules, and does anyone really follow them anyway?
Basically, who holding the copyright of an individual image would care whether or not said image is used as an avatar? Now, if you're posting pictures from a pay site, and they lose money, that would be a different story...
bisexplicit said:The new part is the explicit images thing...like no close-ups of sex and/or genitals.
bisexplicit said:The new part is the explicit images thing...like no close-ups of sex and/or genitals.
bisexplicit said:The new part is the explicit images thing...like no close-ups of sex and/or genitals.
thank youSeduce said:Dolf, I simply adore your sig![]()

bg23 said:the new rules are the result of some new election laws passed in the US regarding pornography.
take a look at this thread, because it explains much.
boston_bbw said:So I guess if the close up of the waist down is technically covered by anothers mouth there is actually nothing visable right? Pleeasee it took me a long time to find a decent avatar
Image said:For some reason the rebel in me wants to post a picture of myself masturbating![]()
these erect antenithingies look phalic to me *nods*boston_bbw said:Umm.. Dolf where are the genitals on that grasshopper? I just might have to report that.
GeorgeWBush said:It is just the religious right putting there dicks in places they are not wanted.
bisexplicit said:

Seduce said:I might wander around and report all the copyrighted avs and images I dig out.
Nice fun for boring days.
trinityjons said:Well, that will put a cramp in the old Am Pics. I took down my threads a while back. They were considered sort of soft as far as some of the stuff on AmPics but I still had images in there that did not meet these guidelines.
I'm a little unsure of the particular reason for disallowing the more explicit photos however. Is it because of the inability to verify the age of the model, or do the new laws actually cover what types of images may be shown on the internet?