How do you feel about the new Lit rules?

Weren't those always the rules, and does anyone really follow them anyway?

Basically, who holding the copyright of an individual image would care whether or not said image is used as an avatar? Now, if you're posting pictures from a pay site, and they lose money, that would be a different story...
 
Quiet_Cool said:
Weren't those always the rules, and does anyone really follow them anyway?

Basically, who holding the copyright of an individual image would care whether or not said image is used as an avatar? Now, if you're posting pictures from a pay site, and they lose money, that would be a different story...

The new part is the explicit images thing...like no close-ups of sex and/or genitals.
 
bisexplicit said:
The new part is the explicit images thing...like no close-ups of sex and/or genitals.

I'm functionally illiterate. Could you read them to me, please?





ok,.....I'm really just lazy.

;)
 
bisexplicit said:
The new part is the explicit images thing...like no close-ups of sex and/or genitals.

*Ahem*

Okay, so I only read half of it...

:rolleyes:

Sue me.

This was stickied on the Amateur Pic Board, yes?

Q_C
 
I might wander around and report all the copyrighted avs and images I dig out.
Nice fun for boring days.

Dolf, I simply adore your sig :)
 
Rules? you kidding me ? I come here to be free of them .. This sucks a fat one .. Woops I can't say that huh? let me rephrase... This orally copulates an obese penis .
 
I had always assumed those were the rules...tis why I have never posted a close-up of anything from the waist down, tis also why I don't use play shots in my pic thread...
 
bisexplicit said:
The new part is the explicit images thing...like no close-ups of sex and/or genitals.


Isn't that kind of silly for a PORN board?
 
So I guess if the close up of the waist down is technically covered by anothers mouth there is actually nothing visable right? Pleeasee it took me a long time to find a decent avatar
 
Rules were meant to be broken...

For some reason the rebel in me wants to post a picture of myself masturbating :D
 
Umm.. Dolf where are the genitals on that grasshopper? I just might have to report that.
 
boston_bbw said:
So I guess if the close up of the waist down is technically covered by anothers mouth there is actually nothing visable right? Pleeasee it took me a long time to find a decent avatar

I think you're OK unless that really is you? :D


BTW, I love it!
 
boston_bbw said:
Umm.. Dolf where are the genitals on that grasshopper? I just might have to report that.
these erect antenithingies look phalic to me *nods*
 
It is just the religious right putting there dicks in places they are not wanted.
 
GeorgeWBush said:
It is just the religious right putting there dicks in places they are not wanted.

And what tiny, little dicks they are...
 
Seduce said:
I might wander around and report all the copyrighted avs and images I dig out.
Nice fun for boring days.

You would, wouldn't you?
 
Well, that will put a cramp in the old Am Pics. I took down my threads a while back. They were considered sort of soft as far as some of the stuff on AmPics but I still had images in there that did not meet these guidelines.

I'm a little unsure of the particular reason for disallowing the more explicit photos however. Is it because of the inability to verify the age of the model, or do the new laws actually cover what types of images may be shown on the internet?
 
trinityjons said:
Well, that will put a cramp in the old Am Pics. I took down my threads a while back. They were considered sort of soft as far as some of the stuff on AmPics but I still had images in there that did not meet these guidelines.

I'm a little unsure of the particular reason for disallowing the more explicit photos however. Is it because of the inability to verify the age of the model, or do the new laws actually cover what types of images may be shown on the internet?


:eek: you had a pic thread and i missed out ??:eek:


<single tear>
 
Back
Top