female lemmings vs. real women

glBock

Loves Spam
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Posts
735
I ask you to look at post #25 first, before you dig into this ad. I learned something at least, since I first posted the following:


That is really what divides (female) mankind into two distict camps. And – as everywhere else in life – the lemmings make up the vast majority. It is possible that in the old days, when people like Equinox had not become Litsters yet, there were fewer lemmings here, and more free-spirited people. But that is no longer the case, I am afraid.

It goes without saying that I abhor lemmings and search for a free-spirited woman only. But such an attitude is not popular here, as lateral thinking has become associated more and more with being queer.

Somehow the fact that many posts here seem full of horniness, obfuscates the lemming nature of many Litsters. As most apparent horniness here is just a masquerade for lemming-like thinking. Hardly much fantasy, much of the horny posts focusing on in-out penetration and stereotype patterns of supposed arousal.

OK, you may ask: what are you going to do about all that? A really good question, and I can't think of many answers; workable answers, I mean. One of them would be to hook up with the kind of non-lemming woman I look for, and then abandon Lit altogether.

But a "small" obstacle needs to be overcome for that: I have to find such a woman first. Much easier said than done. My past experience has been that many non-lemmings are so screwed up in their heads that lemmings almost seem preferable.

Of course YOU have it in your power to overcome my dilemma. All that's needed would be that you agree with my thinking, that you are interested in meeting me, and that you and I hit it off well with one another. Only difficulty here, women like YOU don't come here often to read the Personals. Maybe one of you lemming women knows a woman like I look for; in which case I ask you to point her in the direction of my ad.

Plus another scenario is possible as well: that YOU don't have anything better to do on some quiet weekend, and read the Lit Personals after all.
 
Last edited:
Did he mean lemons?? Perhaps melons?? He’s looking for a woman with big melons??
 
I will probably regret posting this.

1. Literotica is a porn message board. If you’re looking for deep, intellectual discussions, this is not a good place to start. This is not to say that you will never stumble across something more stimulating, but most people who post here (even the smart ones) are doing so because they just want to have some shallow, smutty fun.

2. You get out what you put in. The times I have had good conversations here are when I connected with someone during the natural back and forth of board posts or chats or role plays or PMs. I didn’t start out by announcing “I want someone smart to talk to!” Instead I tried to write things that were interesting and thoughtful, and I was rewarded by people sometimes writing interesting and thoughtful things back to me. (Of course I’ve also been rewarded with hundreds of requests for blowjobs, but ... see point #1.)

3. Arrogance and condescension are never attractive. Even if you are particularly smart or you do have particularly refined sensibilities, continually trumpeting the fact is likely to alienate the very people you do want to talk to. Because I can guarantee you that however smart and refined you think you are, there are other people who are more so (even if only in a limited area of expertise). And the last thing they want to do is engage with a judgmental blowhard who thinks he’s better than everyone else.

Stop trying to find THE ONE. Listen to people, even the “lemmings”. Talk about what interests you. Embrace your trashy smutty side. Have fun.
 
At this point I’m convinced glBlock is attempting some kind of experimental trolling, in search of that most elusive, allusive, and illusive of Holy Grails, the least appealing personal ad of all time.
 
At this point I’m convinced glBlock is attempting some kind of experimental trolling, in search of that most elusive, allusive, and illusive of Holy Grails, the least appealing personal ad of all time.


I;ve chatted with him before.

He's fine.

....................... wait- maybe I suck.

but really, WTF is a lemming?
 
I don’t want to attack this ad too harshly because I suspect there is a very sad person behind this.

The vast majority of women are not lemmings - perhaps your view has been skewed by lit where many interactions with ‘women’ will actually be with men pretending who perhaps behave as they think a woman would in their idealised mental vision, thereby caricaturing us and solidifying the one dimensional view held by some one. The caricature is an ugly thing and misses our many quirks and nuances, the things that really make us, us...

Women are as complex and diverse as mankind, and if ‘the one’ for you does end up reading this, do you really think she would respond to an ad whose opening position is to attack almost her entire gender? I know I wouldn’t, I would be frightened of the deep seated hatred that seems to simmer within you... I certainly wouldn’t want to be the woman terrified of any wrong step that might bring that disillusionment to the fore.

You know, I’ve had some lovely interactions on lit, and I don’t know how many would have happened if I had pulled together a list of prerequisites any lit friend must possess, and I’ve found things I didn’t know I was looking for. I agree with Brightshinygirl, make your interests your starting point and go from there,

Good luck with your search, xx
 
I don’t want to attack this ad too harshly because I suspect there is a very sad person behind this.

The vast majority of women are not lemmings - perhaps your view has been skewed by lit where many interactions with ‘women’ will actually be with men pretending who perhaps behave as they think a woman would in their idealised mental vision, thereby caricaturing us and solidifying the one dimensional view held by some one. The caricature is an ugly thing and misses our many quirks and nuances, the things that really make us, us...

Women are as complex and diverse as mankind, and if ‘the one’ for you does end up reading this, do you really think she would respond to an ad whose opening position is to attack almost her entire gender? I know I wouldn’t, I would be frightened of the deep seated hatred that seems to simmer within you... I certainly wouldn’t want to be the woman terrified of any wrong step that might bring that disillusionment to the fore.

You know, I’ve had some lovely interactions on lit, and I don’t know how many would have happened if I had pulled together a list of prerequisites any lit friend must possess, and I’ve found things I didn’t know I was looking for. I agree with Brightshinygirl, make your interests your starting point and go from there,

Good luck with your search, xx

Not only that but he's married. Note that I'm not judging. Just sayin'.
 
At this point I’m convinced glBlock is attempting some kind of experimental trolling, in search of that most elusive, allusive, and illusive of Holy Grails, the least appealing personal ad of all time.

You've sure got that right!
 
different comments regarding my opening post

BrightShinyGirl, I appreciate your thoughtful comments, thank you. All your three points made sense to me and you got me thinking a bit; thanks again. I don't understand, why you expressed a fear at the start of your post, that you might regret what you wrote.

For you, your comments were "right on the money". I do not see myself as insensitive as you claim I am, but you have a right to your own feelings about me.

As for you others, who felt compelled to leave comments here, I wonder whether none of you ever realized something essential: Your various expressions of a lack of understanding of my thoughts, was precisely a living proof of my contentions, that many Litsters are in fact lemmings.

OK, I don't expect you to understand this either; you did not understand my first post, so why should you understand this one. I hope that you understand at least this: I don't really care, whether you understand my posts or not.
.
 
BrightShinyGirl, I appreciate your thoughtful comments, thank you. All your three points made sense to me and you got me thinking a bit; thanks again. I don't understand, why you expressed a fear at the start of your post, that you might regret what you wrote.

For you, your comments were "right on the money". I do not see myself as insensitive as you claim I am, but you have a right to your own feelings about me.

As for you others, who felt compelled to leave comments here, I wonder whether none of you ever realized something essential: Your various expressions of a lack of understanding of my thoughts, was precisely a living proof of my contentions, that many Litsters are in fact lemmings.

OK, I don't expect you to understand this either; you did not understand my first post, so why should you understand this one. I hope that you understand at least this: I don't really care, whether you understand my posts or not.
.

Your post clearly states

“And – as everywhere else in life – the lemmings make up the vast majority”

And...

“I abhor lemmings”

Do you really not see anything wrong with starting a personal ad, directed at women, where you essentially state you despise most women? Lemming or not, I cannot think of a single woman with even an ounce of self respect that would want to be with a man who openly despises most women - it’s not bloody healthy. You really do need a change in tact...

Once more, good luck, x
 
BrightShinyGirl, I appreciate your thoughtful comments, thank you. All your three points made sense to me and you got me thinking a bit; thanks again. I don't understand, why you expressed a fear at the start of your post, that you might regret what you wrote.

For you, your comments were "right on the money". I do not see myself as insensitive as you claim I am, but you have a right to your own feelings about me.

As for you others, who felt compelled to leave comments here, I wonder whether none of you ever realized something essential: Your various expressions of a lack of understanding of my thoughts, was precisely a living proof of my contentions, that many Litsters are in fact lemmings.

OK, I don't expect you to understand this either; you did not understand my first post, so why should you understand this one. I hope that you understand at least this: I don't really care, whether you understand my posts or not.
.

The way I see it, I don't *need* to understand your thoughts. We are obviously not even remotely close to being on the same wavelength. And if you really *didn't* care, then you wouldn't keep taking cheap potshots at the rest of us.

Lemmings are everywhere. Perhaps you could find some forum that is better suited to you than this one. You seem to keep looking for something here, not finding it, then wailing about it and somehow blaming the people here for not giving you what you want.

WTF?
 
I rarely comment on the personal adds because I don't have the inclination but wow!

Beside the fact that you seem to be looking for someone, by insulting the majority of ladies on lit.
The below statement insults the ones you haven't already insulted.

But a "small" obstacle needs to be overcome for that: I have to find such a woman first. Much easier said than done. My past experience has been that many non-lemmings are so screwed up in their heads that lemmings almost seem preferable.


Now I know I'm not the most desirable or successful of men when it comes to the opposite sex. But fuck me. You might as well have just cut your own cock off. Because I can't think of any woman who will read this and think. "MY DREAM MAN"!
 
To Summarize

He "abhors" lemmings. He's calling Lit women lemmings because none are interested in him. So he hates you all, he tells you that … then he asks you to hook him up with one of your friends? hahahaha this is just gold!
 
Last edited:
Just an observation here, not an insult. I don't connect with 99% of the people I interact with here (other websites as well). I don't blame them for that. I'm a strange guy, so I'm the outlier, not them.

The interesting thing about lemmings is that the whole use of the species name as an insult is based on an urban legend or folk belief. Lemmings in fact do not commit mass suicide by following each other over a cliff to fall to their deaths.

So to say that a group of people are "lemmings" doesn't actually mean anything.
 
As for you others, who felt compelled to leave comments here, I wonder whether none of you ever realized something essential: Your various expressions of a lack of understanding of my thoughts, was precisely a living proof of my contentions, that many Litsters are in fact lemmings.

OK, I don't expect you to understand this either; you did not understand my first post, so why should you understand this one. I hope that you understand at least this: I don't really care, whether you understand my posts or not.

To quote a great thinker of the late 20th Century...
Homer Jay Simpson said:
Just because I don’t care, doesn’t mean I don’t understand.
 
That is really what divides (female) mankind into two distict camps. And – as everywhere else in life – the lemmings make up the vast majority. It is possible that in the old days, when people like Equinox had not become Litsters yet, there were fewer lemmings here, and more free-spirited people. But that is no longer the case, I am afraid.

It goes without saying that I abhor lemmings and search for a free-spirited woman only. But such an attitude is not popular here, as lateral thinking has become associated more and more with being queer.

Somehow the fact that many posts here seem full of horniness, obfuscates the lemming nature of many Litsters. As most apparent horniness here is just a masquerade for lemming-like thinking. Hardly much fantasy, much of the horny posts focusing on in-out penetration and stereotype patterns of supposed arousal.

OK, you may ask: what are you going to do about all that? A really good question, and I can't think of many answers; workable answers, I mean. One of them would be to hook up with the kind of non-lemming woman I look for, and then abandon Lit altogether.

But a "small" obstacle needs to be overcome for that: I have to find such a woman first. Much easier said than done. My past experience has been that many non-lemmings are so screwed up in their heads that lemmings almost seem preferable.

Of course YOU have it in your power to overcome my dilemma. All that's needed would be that you agree with my thinking, that you are interested in meeting me, and that you and I hit it off well with one another. Only difficulty here, women like YOU don't come here often to read the Personals. Maybe one of you lemming women knows a woman like I look for; in which case I ask you to point her in the direction of my ad.

Plus another scenario is possible as well: that YOU don't have anything better to do on some quiet weekend, and read the Lit Personals after all.

BrightShinyGirl, I appreciate your thoughtful comments, thank you. All your three points made sense to me and you got me thinking a bit; thanks again. I don't understand, why you expressed a fear at the start of your post, that you might regret what you wrote.

For you, your comments were "right on the money". I do not see myself as insensitive as you claim I am, but you have a right to your own feelings about me.

As for you others, who felt compelled to leave comments here, I wonder whether none of you ever realized something essential: Your various expressions of a lack of understanding of my thoughts, was precisely a living proof of my contentions, that many Litsters are in fact lemmings.

OK, I don't expect you to understand this either; you did not understand my first post, so why should you understand this one. I hope that you understand at least this: I don't really care, whether you understand my posts or not.
.

/r/iamverysmart + /r/justneckbeardthings = these posts
 
WTF is a lemming?

Lemmings are also these guys, which I think are much more fun, but that's just me :D

https://i2.wp.com/33.media.tumblr.com/14efbd8803ea959d60efc734ecd2928a/tumblr_inline_nhjddpeNx91t0ktpa.gif

Regarding the OP: way to impress the ladies of Lit :rolleyes:

You're making yourself radioactive with the condescending comments towards the ladies. I've spoken to one of the ladies on this thread and maybe she's not perfect (and I'm certainly not), I certainly wouldn't classify her as a lemming, or even a Stepford Wife. The old adage of using honey versus vinegar to attract someone still applies for the most part. Do whatever you think works best for you my friend, but just glancing through your other threads, I'm thinking that your success rate hasn't been terribly high.
 
Guise! Stop feeding the troll. Just walk away from this disaster.

PS. my happy thread is always open for new visitors :devil:
 
miscellaneous musings on this particular post of mine

#1: this post certainly was no masterpiece, I admit that now. Had I engaged my brain for thinking more carefully, I would never have posted it.

#2: choosing the term"lemming" without knowing the definition of it any better, was poor judgement. I should have said "a person without an independent mind"; that would have hit the nail on its head more precisely.

#3: worse yet: the post had no compelling purpose, really. And without a compelling purpose at hand, it simply did not deserve to be posted.
+++++++++
OK, after my short "repentance" just now, some words on the reception of this – admittedly non-masterpiece – post here by many Litsters.

First question that came to me: For which reason do people, who don't like my post, feel compelled to leave a comment here at all? Why not simply skip over it, and engage with someone else, whose thoughts you are able to understand better?

When I assume that someone critical of my post is not simply out to heckle it, she/he must have felt insulted somehow by my post. So what could have been my insults to such readers?

My claim that many Litsters are lemmings, I suppose. Even if I substitute the above correction for the term lemming, it can feel insulting. Especially to people, who do in fact not have a mind of their own. Nobody likes to be reminded of such an affliction, after all.

Second possible insult: expressing my disdain of Lit in public.

Now I must tell all you LIT fans something uncomfortable perhaps, but piece of truth nevertheless: MANY users or members of Lit disdain it as much as I do. I am certainly not alone with my misgivings. And my ad was targeting a woman, who shares my opinion about Lit.

So anybody who feels insulted by me stating that Lit sucks in many ways, must be a real hypocrite or worse yet. When you think about it deeper: it is very narrow-minded, and mighty revealing of one's own weak self-confidence, to expect everybody in the world to concur with your own positive opinion of Lit, isn't it?

What else could reasonable people have felt insulted about?

My position, perhaps, that people who think like me are people I prefer over the opposite? Come on now, America is supposed to be a land of free thought. And Lit even claims to champion free speech. So you cannot be serious, when you blame a man who'd rather communicate with a woman who ticks like himself, can you?

+++++++++++
As far as I can tell, those are about all the possible "insults" hidden within my ad. Now I ask you, does a "molehill" like that, really justify all the heckling and ridiculing that was poured out over me in posts #3, 5, 8, 9, 1o, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23? Especially when some of these "non-master pieces" included mean inuendo or just simply comprehension disabilities on the part of the posters.

If I learned anything out of this messy thread: a supposed "discussion" with true Lit fans always turns into an adventure of sorts!
 
Back
Top