icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 19,722
Just a little too much fire fire hair on fire from you hypocrites
The courts have failed to rule on almost all voter fraud lawsuits, hiding behind excuses like lack of standing, procedural issues, lack of evidence without initiating evidentiary hearings or constitutional indifference **dereliction of duty** to the american people. Failed to complete or initiate any evidentiary hearings to at least look at the evidence.
“With regard to the standing issue, if a member of Congress who is going to object to electors that were fraudulently sent there, and a state has sent two sets, and I don’t have standing to go to court and say the electors act, it has got an unconstitutional provision, if I don’t have standing to do that, nobody does,” said Gohmert, a former judge.
“But the bottom line is, the court is saying, ‘We’re not going to touch this, you have no remedy,'” Gohmert continued. “Basically in effect the ruling would be that you got to go to the streets and be as violent as Antifa and [Black Lives Matter] because”
"Basically in effect" is telling the courts you leave people with no alternative remedy which is a comparison and description of the possible effect on people not a call to violence!
Here's what a real call violence is, Maxine Waters:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/25/politics/maxine-waters-trump-officials/index.html:
“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere."
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...-violence-beginning-with-barack-obama-n863918
NEWS & POLITICS
FLASHBACK: Democrat Leaders Have Encouraged Political Violence, Beginning With Barack Obama!
The courts have failed to rule on almost all voter fraud lawsuits, hiding behind excuses like lack of standing, procedural issues, lack of evidence without initiating evidentiary hearings or constitutional indifference **dereliction of duty** to the american people. Failed to complete or initiate any evidentiary hearings to at least look at the evidence.
“With regard to the standing issue, if a member of Congress who is going to object to electors that were fraudulently sent there, and a state has sent two sets, and I don’t have standing to go to court and say the electors act, it has got an unconstitutional provision, if I don’t have standing to do that, nobody does,” said Gohmert, a former judge.
“But the bottom line is, the court is saying, ‘We’re not going to touch this, you have no remedy,'” Gohmert continued. “Basically in effect the ruling would be that you got to go to the streets and be as violent as Antifa and [Black Lives Matter] because”
"Basically in effect" is telling the courts you leave people with no alternative remedy which is a comparison and description of the possible effect on people not a call to violence!
Here's what a real call violence is, Maxine Waters:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/25/politics/maxine-waters-trump-officials/index.html:
“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere."
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...-violence-beginning-with-barack-obama-n863918
NEWS & POLITICS
FLASHBACK: Democrat Leaders Have Encouraged Political Violence, Beginning With Barack Obama!
Last edited:
