Sandy 'Burglar' uncovered

Peregrinator said:
Well, your hatred of him aside, what do you suppose was in the documents?
It is intensely interesting to speculate on what have been in those documents that would lead a former National Security Adviser to hide them in his pants, secrete them under a construction trailer, and finally spirit them to his office, apparently so he could destroy them. This is, I suppose, a clue:

Berger, with the authorization of former President Clinton, was reviewing National Security Council documents on Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida, Sudan, and related presidential correspondence.

Geez You are a dope! :cool:
 
MakersandIce said:
Definitely criminal.

He should increase it by 100%.


I hate to use this word but.

Retard.

Ya got 2 years and about 20 days left pal.

Dont get us all killed.

Then we will fix your mess.
 
busybody said:
It is intensely interesting to speculate on what have been in those documents that would lead a former National Security Adviser to hide them in his pants, secrete them under a construction trailer, and finally spirit them to his office, apparently so he could destroy them. This is, I suppose, a clue:

Berger, with the authorization of former President Clinton, was reviewing National Security Council documents on Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida, Sudan, and related presidential correspondence.

Geez You are a dope! :cool:
Still doesn't answer my question. You think there's a memo that says, "Ignore OBL, signed, Bill?"

Jackass.
 
vetteman said:
It isn't going anywhere after that except to it's burial in committee.
Hey, Vette, gimme your email addy. I just got something I wanna forward to you.
 
Peregrinator said:
Still doesn't answer my question. You think there's a memo that says, "Ignore OBL, signed, Bill?"

Jackass.
Could have been correpondence with OBL.
 
Peregrinator said:
Still doesn't answer my question. You think there's a memo that says, "Ignore OBL, signed, Bill?"

Jackass.
No, Dummy

The specualtion is this

There were THREE occassions the US drones had OBL in their sight

There were THREE TURN DOWNS by ClitMan and his national "security" team

The spec is

THOSE SIGNED ORDERS WERE DESTROYED!
 
Killswitch said:
Dont forget that everest special on DSC tonite perg.

10 pm. EST
I'll be asleep by then, I hope. I've seen some of it, if you mean the series they've been running.
 
MakersandIce said:
Could have been correpondence with OBL.


Why did bush fly all the bin laden family out of the usa under a no fly zone on private jets imediately after 911?
 
busybody said:
No, Dummy

The specualtion is this

There were THREE occassions the US drones had OBL in their sight

There were THREE TURN DOWNS by ClitMan and his national "security" team

The spec is

THOSE SIGNED ORDERS WERE DESTROYED!
If those orders were destroyed, then what was Burgher taking out of the archives? Ashes?

You make no fucking sense at all.
 
kbate said:
Don't forget a lot of new gun control laws. That is certain.
Kbate, I doubt it, there is more than a few conservative democrats in the house and senate..........Unless Pelosi can whip them in shape.

I now sense that the far left is losing some power..... they're losers.
 
Peregrinator said:
Well, your hatred of him aside, what do you suppose was in the documents?

I don't hate Clinton. As a political operative I have a great deal of respect for him. I have little respect for him as a man though. Didn't have much respect for him as a teenager either, but he was a smooth operator.

If I were forced to hazard a guess, I'd say that the documents recorded a decision made NOT to do something that might have precluded 9-11 from occuring. That would be in keeping with Clintons approach to the International scene re. security. He took no steps that might have been seen as provocative. It would also be in keeping with his basic personality.

Ishmael
 
Peregrinator said:
If those orders were destroyed, then what was Burgher taking out of the archives? Ashes?

You make no fucking sense at all.
destroyed By Shady Burgler

you DO know he destroyed the documents

RIGHT?
 
garbage can said:
Kbate, I doubt it, there is more than a few conservative democrats in the house and senate..........Unless Pelosi can whip them in shape.

I now sense that the far left is losing some power..... they're losers.
Wait until WeeJudyHootyFruityTootyP-YouLeeahOnMe starts campaiging for Repo nomination and pro gun laws.
 
kbate said:
I will bet that the assault weapons bill is re-introduced during the first session.

Lots of bills will be introduced. For no other reason than to stroke the constituencies. Introduction is a far cry from passage and signing into law.

Ishmael
 
Killswitch said:
I hate to use this word but.

Retard.

Ya got 2 years and about 20 days left pal.

Dont get us all killed.

Then we will fix your mess.
It's not my mess. I didn't decide to send in an occupying force. An army shouldn't be deployed to be an occupying force, it should be deployed to decimate the enemy, or at the very least die trying.
 
The same reason ClitMan had the BLACK guy KILLED via a bogus airplane crash!
 
vetteman said:
It isn't going anywhere after that except to it's burial in committee.

Pelosi will make sure it gets to the floor where it will pass the house easily.

In the Senate - it is a toss-up.

Gun control will be a target for the democrats - because they will (and already have) learn that they cannot force the President to end the war immediately.

It is something that appeases their rabid voters and gets great press.

Should it squeak through the senate - Bush will sign it.
 
Ishmael said:
I don't hate Clinton. As a political operative I have a great deal of respect for him. I have little respect for him as a man though. Didn't have much respect for him as a teenager either, but he was a smooth operator.

If I were forced to hazard a guess, I'd say that the documents recorded a decision made NOT to do something that might have precluded 9-11 from occuring. That would be in keeping with Clintons approach to the International scene re. security. He took no steps that might have been seen as provocative. It would also be in keeping with his basic personality.

Ishmael
Generally agress with that book...um...the ex CIA ops guy...can't remember his name or the title. Said that the Clinton admin gutted Ops in favor of electronics and such.
 
kbate said:
Pelosi will make sure it gets to the floor where it will pass the house easily.

In the Senate - it is a toss-up.

Gun control will be a target for the democrats - because they will (and already have) learn that they cannot force the President to end the war immediately.

It is something that appeases their rabid voters and gets great press.
err

harry PINKY reid is

PRO GUN!!!!!!!!!!!!


:rolleyes:
 
MakersandIce said:
It's not my mess. I didn't decide to send in an occupying force. An army shouldn't be deployed to be an occupying force, it should be deployed to decimate the enemy, or at the very least die trying.


Thats why bush is ruining the party and the military. Abazaid is quitting.

And Im damn glad you are not in charge.

Morons. The lot of you Neo Conservatives.
 
busybody said:
destroyed By Shady Burgler

you DO know he destroyed the documents

RIGHT?
I just read that he hid them under a trailer. You know something different?
 
Back
Top