The Sanctity of a Private Message

Morcheeba said:
Your association with Leverage only emphasizes this, tennis gurrrrl.

Sorry, but that's just how I feel at this time.

Excuse me but what does JK's association with Leverage have to do with a pm between she and bg?
 
There's gotta be something better than this to fight about. Sadly, I have no suggestions, so carry on.
 
Morcheeba said:
You're no idiot. In fact, you're very very clever. But you should think twice about those you pm and share stuff with in here. That is, unless you want your words to be forwarded to others. Or that you want them to be aired in threads like this.

Shit, how many years have you been a Lit member to not know this?

Something tells me you're fucking around in private for a reaction to action.

Your association with Leverage only emphasizes this, tennis gurrrrl.

Sorry, but that's just how I feel at this time.

I've not engaged in very many pm conversations, honestly, given how long I have been here at lit (active lit forum poster since Feb./05). When I pm, I have always assumed it to be private and not shared. I guess I have been lucky in the past in only pm'ing with people that have integrity (or unlucky, but naive to that fact ... if I have been played the fool by people sharing my pms behind my back).

I was not f'ing around in pvt for any motivation other than to perhaps discover what the heck was with BG and HER snarkiness. There was no secret meaning in the 2 pm's I sent to her.

Clearly you are right, though, I might be well advised to be a little more picky with whom I pm.

In my interactions with Leverage, he has always been respectful and nice. I have seen a lot of his posts and interactions with others and although he brings a lot of the crap upon himself, the fact remains he is often just baiting ... he cannot be held responsible for those that take the bait. As far as he and I go, though, I judge him based on MY interactions with him, and like I said, he's always been fine with me.

(Tennis - I was upset that Hingis got beat in the 2nd rnd of the Korean Tier 4 event. :( )
 
Last edited:
Leverage said:
Excuse me but what does JK's association with Leverage have to do with a pm between she and bg?

Don't be so dense, Miss Lev.

There was a black fat skank, Ms. Sharon, then there was the fat white trailer trash chick (her name escapes me) .... I eventually clued into the fact that they were the same person and I suspected a man to be behind the facades. Eventually, I managed to get the truth out of "leverage" and I suggested that he should try to just post under a new user name, being himself. Thus, Leverage was born.

Raw Humor had suspicions about them all being the same person, but I provided him withj the confirmation he never had. In doing so, though, I made RH swear to secrecy in not revealing me as his source. Similarly, I ask that you please keep this to yourself, or in the very least, if you further post your suspicions, please in no way let it be known that I provided confirmation to you that Leverage was indeed those two trashy girls, not that a lot of people don't already suspect it.

Sadly, as time went on, Leverage has opted to revert more to those previous personnas than being the guy that he showed me that he is. Oh well, I am not his keeper and much of the abuse he takes is of his own doing. I guess he gets his kicks from being controversial.


Some say get your kicks on Route 66, I beg to differ.
 
Morcheeba said:
Don't be so dense, Miss Lev.

There was a black fat skank, Ms. Sharon, then there was the fat white trailer trash chick (her name escapes me) .... I eventually clued into the fact that they were the same person and I suspected a man to be behind the facades. Eventually, I managed to get the truth out of "leverage" and I suggested that he should try to just post under a new user name, being himself. Thus, Leverage was born.

Raw Humor had suspicions about them all being the same person, but I provided him withj the confirmation he never had. In doing so, though, I made RH swear to secrecy in not revealing me as his source. Similarly, I ask that you please keep this to yourself, or in the very least, if you further post your suspicions, please in no way let it be known that I provided confirmation to you that Leverage was indeed those two trashy girls, not that a lot of people don't already suspect it.

Sadly, as time went on, Leverage has opted to revert more to those previous personnas than being the guy that he showed me that he is. Oh well, I am not his keeper and much of the abuse he takes is of his own doing. I guess he gets his kicks from being controversial.


Some say get your kicks on Route 66, I beg to differ.

the other annoying chick was kathyann

Quoted for posterity.
 
JinXed said:
You do realize, from way up on the pedestal that you've placed yourself, that you're just as guilty of doing what you're accusing BG of doing.

Right?
...

No, I don't realize this. I am continually in but a defensive posture in my responses and nothing I utter is like the brash crass attacks she tends to favor.

A pedestal? Is it a pedestal to try and stay out of childish trolling insult attacks, to try (and perhaps fail) to be partially mature? I guess I should be even higher up and simply ignore such trolls, but yeah, I sometimes cannot seem to resist replying / defending myself against such attacks.

... and now look at me saying she started it <embarrassed>, but she DID. lol
 
Jennifer Kaye said:
No, I don't realize this. I am continually in but a defensive posture in my responses and nothing I utter is like the brash crass attacks she tends to favor.

A pedestal? Is it a pedestal to try and stay out of childish trolling insult attacks, to try (and perhaps fail) to be partially mature? I guess I should be even higher up and simply ignore such trolls, but yeah, I sometimes cannot seem to resist replying / defending myself against such attacks.

... and now look at me saying she started it <embarrassed>, but she DID. lol


Considering that you have tossed out insults, whether they're as brash and crass as hers isn't the point - you've still insulted. You're hardly as untarnished as you'd like to believe, or would like others to believe.

You realize that it's completely possible to "defend" oneself without tossing out insults right back, right?
 
JinXed said:
Considering that you have tossed out insults, whether they're as brash and crass as hers isn't the point - you've still insulted. You're hardly as untarnished as you'd like to believe, or would like others to believe.

You realize that it's completely possible to "defend" oneself without tossing out insults right back, right?

Well, I did try. I guess in the face of all her crap, I sunk. You make a good point, which I cannot deny.

Still though, I am not a troll. I can take solace in that.
 
KyleW said:
the other annoying chick was kathyann

Quoted for posterity.

Like I'd delete it, way to go, you!

So it was Kathy Ann and not Jazmin?

Either way, Leverage's fave bitch called him out. In private.

Quote my quote all you want, people.
 
icon13.gif
@ this thread. It seem that you caTs really get your rocks off insulting folks about this and that. To make matters worse, many of you caTs are so engulfed in your "sad little LIT worlds" that you imagine all kinds of unbelieveable scenarios. PM Leverage when yall come back to the real world. Leverage has spoken.

...be easy
 
Morcheeba said:
Don't be so dense, Miss Lev.

<snip>

Some say get your kicks on Route 66, I beg to differ.

one, indeed.
 
Leverage said:
icon13.gif
@ this thread. It seem that you caTs really get your rocks off insulting folks about this and that. To make matters worse, many of you caTs are so engulfed in your "sad little LIT worlds" that you imagine all kinds of unbelieveable scenarios. PM Leverage when yall come back to the real world. Leverage has spoken.

...be easy



Can't you just hear his voice trembling. :D
 
JinXed said:
You do realize, from way up on the pedestal that you've placed yourself, that you're just as guilty of doing what you're accusing BG of doing.

Right?




Man, if only I'd known it was acceptable to publically post pm threats! That would have been a kick a few years ago. heh

Acceptable? Who makes the rules anyway? Those who threaten...LOL!?

People actually go along with the idea....that you need PERMISSION to disclose that you've been threatened in a pm....????

What about a phone call?

Or in a snail mail note or or letter?

Who must give permission for this to be "socially acceptable"?

Good lord.........
 
Last edited:
Morcheeba said:
Like I'd delete it, way to go, you!

So it was Kathy Ann and not Jazmin?

Either way, Leverage's fave bitch called him out. In private.

Quote my quote all you want, people.

If I'm up on my Trailer Trash Trolls, I think Jazmin and Sharon were the black friends and Kathyann was the white chick... They all had fat asses as far as I could tell...

Anyway, I'm confused... It sounded like you just revealed a bunch of private stuff too. Did I miss some irony or emotey thing?
 
Image said:
If I'm up on my Trailer Trash Trolls, I think Jazmin and Sharon were the black friends and Kathyann was the white chick... They all had fat asses as far as I could tell...

Anyway, I'm confused... It sounded like you just revealed a bunch of private stuff too. Did I miss some irony or emotey thing?

Correct.
Jazmin and Sharon were "sisters" at first, then were just friends, and KathAnn was a white girl who wasn't their friend, supposedly unrelated. In addition, their was an Italian neighbor who lived upstairs. I forget her name.

I betcha Raw will remember.

It was always obvious to me that these people were all a man.
 
poppy1963 said:
Acceptable? Who makes the rules anyway? Those who threaten...LOL!?

People actually go along with the idea....that you need PERMISSION to disclose that you've been threatened in a pm....????

What about a phone call?

Or in a snail mail note or or letter?

Who must give permission for this to be "socially acceptable"?

Good lord.........


Sarcasm goes way over your head.

I'll post, say, whatever I want here without concern that it'll upset the lit majority because this place is no longer my life. However my own sense of moral integrity is what stops me from posting and saying certain things and it has very little to do with the people, or any backlash that I might receive.


I'm glad that you got my point, JK.
You can't cry about someone else slinging dirt while you're flicking a bit yourself.
 
JinXed said:
Sarcasm goes way over your head.

I'll post, say, whatever I want here without concern that it'll upset the lit majority because this place is no longer my life. However my own sense of moral integrity is what stops me from posting and saying certain things and it has very little to do with the people, or any backlash that I might receive.

No it doesn't (sarcasm). I am glad to hear you don't take such a "rule" to heart...but many do.

It seems to me it makes more sense that NOT REPORTING implied or stated threats is a breach of moral integrity...and would be a violation of moral and civil laws.
 
bg23 said:
If you're looking to explain or apologise and you want to be discreet, sure, PM. But if it's to make some snide little comment that you're too afraid of ruining your spotless lit rep for to post in public -- well, either you keep it in public or I'll bring it there myself.



Thoughts?

A spotless lit rep? I don't think I've ever seen one, at least nobody with more than 3 posts.
 
Image said:
If I'm up on my Trailer Trash Trolls, I think Jazmin and Sharon were the black friends and Kathyann was the white chick... They all had fat asses as far as I could tell...

Anyway, I'm confused... It sounded like you just revealed a bunch of private stuff too. Did I miss some irony or emotey thing?

Don't be confused - I did reveal some stuff sent to me.

Spank me for it because you know I never do that sorta thing unless I have good reason. But it is funny that this Lev dawg claims to be the top Male Cyber God in here after cybering for dick with his female alts.
 
Back
Top