Foley's Filthy chatlogs hit the web. Hastert knew about this!

Cap’n AMatrixca · Oct 4, 2006

Sooooo, the blind squirrel found an acorn?

*spit*

Cap’n AMatrixca · Oct 4, 2006

vetteman said:
I have about fifty racists and one regular poster on iggy, I'm about ready to add another. I hate to say it but RubDown isn't interested in anything resembling the truth.

I have only six, but he's top o' the charts. At first I thought he had something to add to the conversation, but during the Kerry Candacy, he went completely postal and never recovered...

Gil_Favor · Oct 4, 2006

RobDownSouth said:
Spin it however you like, but the vast majority of Americans think if you stick your dick in an underage boy, that's pedophilia.

Really? Amazing when Gerry Studds was banging his little boy toy in the 80s no one seemed to care.

And a 50 year old man sticking his dick in the mouth of a 19 year old intern was deemed "acceptable" behavior by the left.

Foley is a pig, no doubt about it. but the feigned indignation of the left is bullshit.

Ishmael · Oct 4, 2006

Gil_Favor said:
Foley is a pig, no doubt about it. but the feigned indignation of the left is bullshit.

That pretty much nails it. It's all and act and that is becoming clearer with each passing day.

Ishmael

TWB · Oct 4, 2006

This is hilarious, and typical:

Hastert sought to blame Democrats for leaking sexually explicit computer instant messages between Foley and former pages from 2003.

"Democrats have … put this thing forward to try to block us," Hastert told Limbaugh.

The Mutt · Oct 4, 2006

Say it with me, children, all together:

"It's not the third-rate burglary, it's the cover-up!"

KyleW · Oct 4, 2006

TWB said:
This is hilarious, and typical:

Smoke and mirrors. Anything to deflect attention from their own culpability.

Yea it's the dem's fault, all of it. Because they made it public. Best to cover it up.

TWB · Oct 4, 2006

KyleW said:
Smoke and mirrors. Anything to deflect attention from their own culpability.

Yea it's the dem's fault, all of it. Because they made it public. Best to cover it up.

I can hear Rush's blustery agreement now...

garbage can · Oct 4, 2006

Ishmael said:
As more and more of the facts come out it is becoming apparent that it is the press and the Dems that have to answer, "What did you know, and when did you know it?"

Ishmael

Do you actually think the NYT, the Washington Post and the L.A. Times will ask or answer the tough questions?

garbage can · Oct 4, 2006

Cap’n AMatrixca said:
The Left's problem is that when they think they have a scandal, witness Plamegate, they stay on it so hot and heavy that it's like, like, like when you take a two-syllable word and keep repeating it until it has no meaning...

Well, now they have Foley gate, and a potential Hastert gate.

But then, what else do they have to run on?

Please Welcome Nancy Pelosi.... House majority leader.

The Mutt · Oct 4, 2006

Michael Savage says that the poor congressman was seduced by the pagan beasts.

Rush Limbaugh says it was a long standing plot by Democrats to plant 16 year old operatives in the page program to bring down Repugnicans.

The best the dittoes around here can come up with is..... um.... Democrats are perverts too! It's the media's fault! Ted Kennedy!!!!

For the record, I don't care if Foley gets turned-on by 16 year olds. So do I. But I am smart enough not to send them dirty emails from work.

Now, Foley wants us to believe that he only did these naughty things when he was drunk. It effected his judgement. Not a bad excuse, until you read the message that says he has to go now, because there's a big vote on the floor. Nothing too important, I guess. Just the war. That he needs to go vote on. Drunk.

The Mutt · Oct 4, 2006

garbage can said:
Well, now they have Foley gate, and a potential Hastert gate.

But then, what else do they have to run on?
.

You mean besides the fact that the House leadership did nothing about a known sexual predator? Continued to let teens work for him?
Well, there's:

Lies.
Rumsfeld
Cheney
Abramoff
War of choice.
War of choice fought ineptly.
Massive theft and corruption in the Iraq reconstruction.
Failure to protect the homeland.
Suspending Habeas Corpus.
Secret prisons.
Torture.
Katrina response.
Cronyism.
Shredding the Bill of Rights.
Lies.
Religious fanaticism.
More lies.

Did I forget any?

garbage can · Oct 4, 2006

Gil_Favor said:
Foley is a pig, no doubt about it. but the feigned indignation of the left is bullshit.

But it may win them the house.

The tragedy is...... Too many Americans can't see through the smoke and mirrors. They'd hand the house over to the Dems just because there's a pedophile amongst the Pubs.

Do you hand the house over to Pelosi for that reason alone?

garbage can · Oct 4, 2006

The Mutt said:
Did I forget any?

I think you got it covered..................

zipman · Oct 4, 2006

So it seems that the highest level of accountability for this disgraceful action is Foley saying, "I take total responsibility for this even though I'm an alcoholic and, oh yeah, I was molested by a priest when I was young."

Got it.

LadyFunkenstein · Oct 4, 2006

If anyone can spot a dirty chatlog typed while drunk, it is me. I call BS on that.

Yet another lame excuse.

All we need to hear now is that his mother never loved him and his father used to spank him too much.

busybody.. · Oct 4, 2006

it seems a GAY GROUP had this info for a long while and held it

TILL NOW!

HMmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kingterp · Oct 4, 2006

I was so worng when I said fags should not be around kids and teens

The Mutt · Oct 4, 2006

busybody said:
it seems a GAY GROUP had this info for a long while and held it

TILL NOW!

HMmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Who told you this? Your neighbor's dog?

zipman · Oct 4, 2006

Ishmael said:
Not really. The Democrats knew about the emails, and did nothing. The FBI knew about the emails, and did nothing. The press knew about the emails, and did nothing. The emails, by themselves, raise the red flags, but are actually pretty innocuous. A whiff of smoke. They only become damning in the light of the later IM's. Which it appears the press and the dems knew about them well over a month ago. Hastert and the balance of the Repubs knew nothing of those damning exchanges until it hit the press. So in the light of what we know today, who's really guilty of sitting on the damning evidence and why did they do so?

As more and more of the facts come out it is becoming apparent that it is the press and the Dems that have to answer, "What did you know, and when did you know it?"

Ishmael

Do you have a link that shows the democrats knew about the IMs and when they knew? Because so far I haven't seen a shred of evidence supporting this.

unregistered · Oct 4, 2006

unregistered · Oct 4, 2006

LadyFunkenstein · Oct 4, 2006

I find it HIGHLY plausible that a few Democrats knew about the IMs and held them back for a Cocktober Surprise. But we will never know who they are. Maybe the Dems hired their own Rove this year.

The Mutt · Oct 4, 2006

vetteman said:
There will be tons of supporting evidence of Democrat complicity coming into the open right after the election when it will no longer be of interest. Ahahaha.

The Dems are inept enough as it is. Why do you feel the need to make shit up?

busybody.. · Oct 4, 2006

The Mutt said:
Who told you this? Your neighbor's dog?

Its all over the net

if you wanna find out

Foley's Filthy chatlogs hit the web. Hastert knew about this!

Copper Top

Copper Top

Under Par

Literotica Guru

I Love Hineys

Cunnilingus Ergo Sum

King Taint Kicker

I Love Hineys

North by Northeast

North by Northeast

Cunnilingus Ergo Sum

Cunnilingus Ergo Sum

North by Northeast

North by Northeast

Literotica Guru

Photoshopped

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Cunnilingus Ergo Sum

Literotica Guru

unregistered

Guest

unregistered

Guest

Photoshopped

Cunnilingus Ergo Sum

Literotica Guru

Similar threads