What’s your most controversial opinion?

[Bry1313]

I love the GB and Politics Boards....oh...wait....my bad...this is the place people like to live in fantasy land. I apologize....I will let those here live in denial in peace

I mean the true point to address here is, there is no material good that I’d choose over my own balls. The rest of you should feel the same way, regardless of one’s feelings on politics or conspiracy theories.

 

[snexxer]

Ummmmmm...do you know anything about Geological History? What happens to the temperature and CO2 levels before every known ice age? Look at papers involving 2 sources...ice cores...and sediment cores. If you have any issue understanding them...let me know and I will point you towards additional research

I do know. I also know of the 200+ scientists who approached the UN to show evidence it of ice cores with evidence from 8000 years to show co2 isn't the cause but the result of warmer weather. But they we're realistically ignored.

Here, I’ll dispute it, scientists were not predicting an ice age in the 1970’s.

https://skepticalscience.com/ice-age-predictions-in-1970s.htm

So sceptical as always media outlets across the world were warning us all.

Here is a documentary with Leonard Nimoy from 1978.

 

[snexxer]

I mean the true point to address here is, there is no material good that I’d choose over my own balls. The rest of you should feel the same way, regardless of one’s feelings on politics or conspiracy theories.

Jesus a comment like I'd rather cut off much balls is just that a comment.
Like saying I could eat a horse. Ffs.

 

[Bry1313]

I do know. I also know of the 200+ scientists who approached the UN to show evidence it of ice cores with evidence from 8000 years to show co2 isn't the cause but the result of warmer weather. But they we're realistically ignored.


So sceptical as always media outlets across the world were warning us all.

Here is a documentary with Leonard Nimoy from 1978.

You know Leonard Nimoy and the popular media aren’t scientists, right? He’s an actor.

 

[snexxer]

You know Leonard Nimoy and the popular media aren’t scientists, right? He’s an actor.

The documentary was based on scientific theory back then. Now you're arguing semantics.
What next name calling?

 

[Bry1313]

The documentary was based on scientific theory back then. Now you're arguing semantics.
What next name calling?

The scientific consensus in the 70’s was towards warming at a 6 to 1 ratio. The article, with sources cited, explained that to you, which it seems you chose not to read. Have a great day @snexxer, your wishful thinking nonsense can have another audience.

 

[Deleted member 6592667]

Electric cars not being preferable is a reasonable take. "Climate change is bullshit" is a pretty awful take that's blatantly not true.

 

[snexxer]

The scientific consensus in the 70’s was towards warming at a 6 to 1 ratio. The article, with sources cited, explained that to you, which it seems you chose not to read. Have a great day @snexxer, your wishful thinking nonsense can have another audience.

I did read through that one article in Skepticalscientist. All articles cite sources. Doesn't mean they didn't ignore other sources.

I'm not interested in an audience. It went from my opinion to being told I'm wrong. I can provide just as much "proof" against as you can for.
Like this thread states opinions.

Electric cars not being preferable is a reasonable take. "Climate change is bullshit" is a pretty awful take that's blatantly not true.

I disagree with the not true or that its an awful take. But it seems people get bent out of shape with that.

Well its a controversial opinion and its mine.

 

[Deleted member 6592667]

View attachment 2285697

 

[ydahecnot]

The documentary was based on scientific theory back then. Now you're arguing semantics.
What next name calling?

Climate change isn’t real. Gotcha. Are you a covidiot too?

 

[snexxer]

Climate change isn’t real. Gotcha. Are you a covidiot too?

Youve proved my earlier point.
Youve dropped the level of argument down to name-calling.

I didnt insult. I didnt call names. I cited information I've seen, read, and as for the 70s experienced. Like ive said, there is evidence for both sides of the argument, mine is its not real. I've read the information on both side and it doesn't add up.

But hey. Call names instead.

As for covid, having had it, and boosters and being part of the 5g rollout in the uk. What do you think?

Ps, if that was sarcasm from you, it went over my head as I just Love being attacked for opinions.

 

[ydahecnot]

Youve proved my earlier point.
Youve dropped the level of argument down to name-calling.

I didnt insult. I didnt call names. I cited information I've seen, read, and as for the 70s experienced. Like ive said, there is evidence for both sides of the argument, mine is its not real. I've read the information on both side and it doesn't add up.

But hey. Call names instead.

As for covid, having had it, and boosters and being part of the 5g rollout in the uk. What do you think?

So some stuff from the 70s trumps the wide community of scientists today, people who do this for a living now, and there’s no need to develop cleaner energy. Gotcha. Maybe there’s a 1970 Barracuda on Craigslist you can buy

 

[snexxer]

So some stuff from the 70s trumps the wide community of scientists today, people who do this for a living now, and there’s no need to develop cleaner energy. Gotcha. Maybe there’s a 1970 Barracuda on Craigslist you can buy

Why misquote.
I'm saying the 70s said one thing, that proved to be incorrect.
They swapped to global warming renamed climate change because the amount of warming was negligible compared to scientific evidence of over 8000 years in ice core samples.

I never said dont develop cleaner energy, infact I did state there are ways of producing petrol without fossil fuels.

But current technology makes electric cars worse than a petrol car for production and environmental/social impact.

 

[LL_RS]

For me it’s any crimes relating to sexual abuse of children. Death sentence - no second chance.

 

[Bry1313]

Controversial Opinion -

This is the best video involving Leonard Nimoy on the internet

 

[Deleted member 6568729]

There is one in AmPics. It's nice.

There is?!

runs to AMpics

 

[Deleted member 6568729]

Boys...can you all just get along and go post in the sweatpants thread?

 

[snexxer]

Boys...can you all just get along and go post in the sweatpants thread?

Lol I have no problem with anyone.
You don't want me in sweatpants

 

[Deleted member 6592667]

On the Nimoy tip, this one is pretty wonderful.

"I can understand you, I'm Leonard Ninoy."

 

[Deleted member 6568729]

Lol I have no problem with anyone.
You don't want me in sweatpants

I want all of you in sweatpants.

@snexxer @Dribble @Bry1313 @NRJLIVES4ever

 

[Dribble]

I want all of you in sweatpants.

@snexxer @Dribble @Bry1313 @NRJLIVES4ever

You had that chance....sorry sweetie. Love ya too

 

[jaF0]

I'll stick with Dino Drinkers, but they're be as quiet as possible. I hate noise, unnecessary noise. Loud vehicles should be ticketed every day.

 

[Bry1313]

I want all of you in sweatpants.

@snexxer @Dribble @Bry1313 @NRJLIVES4ever

I dont own any gray sweatpants. I’m a disappointment.

 

[SassySheDevil]

There is?!

runs to AMpics

Yes. It doesn't get bumped often enough.

 

[Nicefella]

Jesus a comment like I'd rather cut off much balls is just that a comment.
Like saying I could eat a horse. Ffs.

Now you’re eating horses!!!? Wtf man. PETA is gunna fuck you up!!!