Vacate Watch - Speaker Mike Johnson (R - LA)

Just a minor legal point - he was convicted of sexual abuse and for defamation later. What he did was rape - somehow the law has some grey shades to how much the woman resisted. Otherwise, you got this right.
i might be wrong, but i think i read the reason he didn't get convicted of rape was the fact Carroll was unsure whether it was his finger/s or his dick that he penetrated her with and where he was being tried it has to be agreed that penile penetration occurred: in a lot of other states rape is counted in both instances, and some also include non-con penetration with an object
 
What do you think that means!!!


Was the Capital bombed that a presidential override was necessary. The house was in full session.
You POS!
Apologize!
I directly had conversation with dMallord on that subject matter. The adults in the room were positing solutions to the republican problem. Those were, in his opinion, possible actions to be taken in case American interests were at risk. At no point did he advocate for those to be employed.
Apologize! Now!
Thank you, for helping Icanhelp1 understand the points we discussed. I also made this statement in post #628 to Icanhelp1 directly as the dialogue continued; it points out I wasn't for burning down the house, just explaining the valid and legal options available if dire circumstances require it:

"I understand your stance; it's reasonable if things were normal. But desperate times call for drastic measures. It did during 9-11. It was a national emergency, and at this point, I still affirm my belief we are rudderless in Congress and need to act more quickly to affirm we stand with our allies and that the world sees we are not in a state of paralysis as war rages. It seems President Biden, The Senate, and The Supreme Court are aligned with you and have more patience than I have over this international embarrassment. They are allowing the Republican clown show to play out. [I don't plan to march on Washington to force the issue.] I'll bite my tongue and watch it play out as well. After all, I am a law-abiding patriot."
 
i might be wrong, but i think i read the reason he didn't get convicted of rape was the fact Carroll was unsure whether it was his finger/s or his dick that he penetrated her with and where he was being tried it has to be agreed that penile penetration occurred: in a lot of other states rape is counted in both instances, and some also include non-con penetration with an object

You have to have a dick at least two inches long to be convicted of rape.
 
The best part is that your party's candidate is a convicted rapist and traitor.
Your party is a disaster and can't even fix your Speaker problem.

Where is your personal integrity, dumbass?
The party with a rapist as leader has a member who is under investigation for sexual offences evict the Speaker of the same party so that he could be replaced by someone who has been investigated for being involved in sexual offences.

But, if they say that Democrats are all 'groomers' people will get distracted.
 
She gets shit done.

Republicans don't want to govern and should not be trusted to do so.

Your party is much weaker than it was a month ago because your leaders have made it so.
You keep thinking that.
 
I don't need to think that....it is actual historical record. By not electing a speaker for over two weeks, the public has lost faith in the Republican party.
You aren't the whole of the "public." Instead of a bed-wetting Rino like Emmer, we had to make the moves that allowed us to wind up with a true conservative patriot. He's as conservative, possibly more so, than Jim Jordan.
 
You aren't the whole of the "public." Instead of a bed-wetting Rino like Emmer, we had to make the moves that allowed us to wind up with a true conservative patriot. He's as conservative, possibly more so, than Jim Jordan.
The above is precisely my point. Your party can't get their shit together. You're fighting with each other.

That makes the party weak and denying it makes you even weaker.
 

What Mike Johnson Has Said About Cutting Social Security

New House Speaker Mike Johnson now faces scrutiny over past claims that entitlements threaten U.S. government stability.
Don't be stupid. SS on the existing track is unsustainable. It has to be cut off for younger workers and replaced with 401k-like plans that cannot be raided by the government or forced by the government to invest in government instruments. People would be much better off under that kind of system than present day SS recipients.
 
The above is precisely my point. Your party can't get their shit together. You're fighting with each other.

That makes the party weak and denying it makes you even weaker.
Our party has an imagination. Your party, like the Nazis and the Communists goose steps into the future with one thought, centralized power.
 
Last edited:
If public opinion turns hard against the Dems, then bipartisanship could be a tainted association. Many Pubs clearly expect that turn to happen.

And, since they've been wrong about so many, many things in recent history, that's encouraging. 😎
 
Our party has an imagination. Your party, like the Nazis and the Communist goose steps into the future with one thought, centralized power.
Lol, you're funny.

Deflect deflect deflect. Our party did not cause the issue. Johnson won't make it to New Year's once he crosses Gaetz....and he will.
 
You got that right:

Jewish space lasers
Pedo pizzas
Sandy Hook wasn't real
Racism doesn't exist any longer
COVID is fake
Jan 6th was antifa
The election was stolen...
Carbon water too … or was that the libertarian?
 
Don't be stupid. SS on the existing track is unsustainable. It has to be cut off for younger workers and replaced with 401k-like plans that cannot be raided by the government or forced by the government to invest in government instruments. People would be much better off under that kind of system than present day SS recipients.
Cut off for younger workers? Then who the fuck pays out for the current recipients . Talk about stupid on display...
 
Back
Top