Why does anyone NEED an assault rifle?

Donate generously to the SPCA. 🙂 You can pick up an AR-15 for less than $750 if you shop wisely. Even less if you get a receiver and build it yourself. Americans love them. Even Americans with vaginas. More AR-15s than Ford F-150s. 🇺🇸
Marketing has done well. The commercials with the dead children really sell it. Oh sorry, I'm told those weren't commercials, my bad 👍
 
Donate generously to the SPCA. 🙂 You can pick up an AR-15 for less than $750 if you shop wisely. Even less if you get a receiver and build it yourself. Americans love them. Even Americans with vaginas. More AR-15s than Ford F-150s. 🇺🇸
Making posts like this in a failed effort to "own the libz" will always fail.
 
Again, thanks for your surrender. but please keep on denying that you did. That fits with your M.O. perfectly.

Or you can go back and try and point out the inconsistencies...Your choice....*chuckles*
Dude, seriously you are too stupid to be in this conversation. Select fire means full auto or semi-auto. Burst fire is full auto limited to a specific amount of rounds with a single trigger pull.

The only consistency is your obvious stupidity.
 
Gun control is for the most part a moot issue. There are already more firearms in the United States than there are people. That genie can never be stuffed back inside the bottle.
Were you thinking that posting in bold made this shit true?

Access to guns can be curtailed as can the number of guns accessed. An even better way to approach this at this point would be to limit the availability of ammunition--and to outlaw stockpiling it, arresting, prosecuting, and putting away those who do.

You're just pushing a gun-nut agenda. But, you seem to think that doing it in bold font makes it true. Sad.
 
No, I am barely reading you because you are a disgusting excuse for a human being and aren't worth a close read. And you are wrong in your interpretation of the SC ruling just as the SC was wrong in its Second Amendment interpretation--which can be corrected. The fact is that the United States does NOT have an all-citizen militia. That's simply a
LMAO. Your insults cannot hurt me. I will conceed that there is no "all-citizen militia" because minors cannot participate. But....here's something for your crayon eating ass to chew on. And this is what I meant and you know it.

https://www.gun-tests.com/viewpoints/editorial/i-am-the-militia-and-so-are-you/

I'm not going to bother to direct you to the USSC website, because that's just too big brained for you there, buddy.
 
No, there is no all-citizen militia in the United States because there is no all-citizen militia in the United States. That is obviously a patent lie, because it simply does not exist. There hasn't even been a universal draft for many decades. Who do you think you're fooling?
 
In doing so they conveniently ignored the 'well regulated' part.
Cherry-picking bits they like, much like any superstitious person with their book of rules.
That's my same argument whenever I hear that mass rioting, burning buildings and killing people in the streets is a 1st Amendment issue.
 
That's my same argument whenever I hear that mass rioting, burning buildings and killing people in the streets is a 1st Amendment issue.
Some people make up bits that they wish were there but aren't really.

'Jesus said that I should have guns so I can kill people.'
'Someone said that schools have litter trays for children to pee into.'
'Someone said that burning down buildings is my 1A right'.
'Someone said that voting machines altered millions of votes.'
 
Hardly. I did all that shit in both the military and civilian police. But whatever makes you feel better....
Snowflake, those things along with your penis substitute make you feel better. And that's all you care about.
 
Maybe stop poking these people with a stick and let them be who they choose to be.
The OPs assertions aren't false. There is a malicious and insidious trend going on. The right to be tolerated has been twisted into forced inclusion. Equal opportunity has been twisted into enforced equality of results regardless of merit. These philosophies are unsustainable, corrosive.
Oh look, "Live and let live" has morphed into "forced inclusion". That's the sad state of society right now.

Trans people don't make me call for my fainting couch. Cross dressers don't make me clutch mah pearls. They pose no threat to me, my children or society in general.

But they appear to be an existential threat to Wingnut Nation, which values "Conformity uber alles". The mere fact that non-white, non-male, non-Christian non-English speaking folks exist on this planet seems to fill them with fear and dread.

And finally, your attempt to conflate "Equal opportunity" with "Equal outcome" is ludicrous and not supported by any known facts.
 
Horny gun fetishists don't understand that their lust for gun boners are putting themselves and families at risk.

Injuries and deaths due to firearms in the home

Objective:
Determine the relative frequency with which guns in the home are used to injure or kill in self-defense, compared with the number of times these weapons are involved in an unintentional injury, suicide attempt, or criminal assault or homicide.

Results: During the study interval (12 months in Memphis, 18 months in Seattle, and Galveston) 626 shootings occurred in or around a residence. This total included 54 unintentional shootings, 118 attempted or completed suicides, and 438 assaults/homicides. Thirteen shootings were legally justifiable or an act of self-defense, including three that involved law enforcement officers acting in the line of duty. For every time a gun in the home was used in a self-defense or legally justifiable shooting, there were four unintentional shootings, seven criminal assaults or homicides, and 11 attempted or completed suicides.

Conclusions:
Guns kept in homes are more likely to be involved in a fatal or nonfatal accidental shooting, criminal assault, or suicide attempt than to be used to injure or kill in self-defense.


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9715182/
Three cities run with Democrat Mayors.:rolleyes:
 
...so most of Steel Penis Cult America "settles" for the semi-automatic AR-15, which can kill children as fast as one can pull the trigger. Sure, it's not the same as mowing down a classroom of kids in 10 seconds, but the additional 45 seconds or so that it takes to pull the trigger 30 times is next to nothing when you consider the big picture.

Bottom line: killing 10-20 kids in 10 seconds or 45 seconds is essentially the same.
I posted a video above where a shooter fired 8 revolver pistol rounds on target in less than 2 seconds, and sixteen (includes a reload) rounds on four targets in less than 3 seconds.. Check it out.
 
Bilbo! Where you been you lying commie fuckhead! Look, I know it's hard to face, but believe me, people WILL accept the fact that you're a pedophile if you just admit it to your family and friends. That little boy isn't going to be credible in court, you'll not go to prison.
Are you trying to get froggied?
 
Snowflake, those things along with your penis substitute make you feel better. And that's all you care about.

Bless your heart, sugar..

"Those things", as you put it, were part of the job. No more, no less. I derived no pleasure from it other than the satisfaction of doing the job correctly.

Penis substitute? What the hell are you talking about? I don't have any of those.
 
The bottom line is that those profess to be anti gun are in fact pro gun, they simply have specific preferences for who gets to have them.

It should go without saying that those without guns don't have the ability to take them away from those who do have them.
 
The bottom line is that those profess to be anti gun are in fact pro gun, they simply have specific preferences for who gets to have them.
Well, true in one important sense. I am pro the military having guns--not least because crazies like you are likely to be armed seditionists and I want the military to wipe you off the surface of the earth.
 
Well, true in one important sense. I am pro the military having guns--not least because crazies like you are likely to be armed seditionists and I want the military to wipe you off the surface of the earth.
You want the military to wipe people off the surface of the Earth whom you don't like. That's an incredibly strong argument for people keeping themselves armed, and also a very historically familiar notion.
 
The bottom line is that those profess to be anti gun are in fact pro gun, they simply have specific preferences for who gets to have them.

It should go without saying that those without guns don't have the ability to take them away from those who do have them.
Exactly.

Guns should be with the military and in areas of Law Enforcement. They should not ever be in schools, whether carried by parents, pupils or teachers. They shouldn't be carried by drunks, by people likely to get into petty arguments with their neighbors, or people who think they are defending their family homestead against Amazon delivery drivers.
 
Back
Top