mark_j
It's a mad mad world
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2008
- Posts
- 5,729
Hardly. I did all that shit in both the military and civilian police. But whatever makes you feel better....LOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Yall mofos are out playing lazer tag.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hardly. I did all that shit in both the military and civilian police. But whatever makes you feel better....LOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Yall mofos are out playing lazer tag.
Were you thinking that posting in bold made this shit true?Gun control is for the most part a moot issue. There are already more firearms in the United States than there are people. That genie can never be stuffed back inside the bottle.
Laughing at you is not caring about you, Hitchoozhus.You obviously care because all you do is post derogatory shit to me. So you invest plenty. I live rent free in your brain.
LMAO. Your insults cannot hurt me. I will conceed that there is no "all-citizen militia" because minors cannot participate. But....here's something for your crayon eating ass to chew on. And this is what I meant and you know it.No, I am barely reading you because you are a disgusting excuse for a human being and aren't worth a close read. And you are wrong in your interpretation of the SC ruling just as the SC was wrong in its Second Amendment interpretation--which can be corrected. The fact is that the United States does NOT have an all-citizen militia. That's simply a
That's my same argument whenever I hear that mass rioting, burning buildings and killing people in the streets is a 1st Amendment issue.In doing so they conveniently ignored the 'well regulated' part.
Cherry-picking bits they like, much like any superstitious person with their book of rules.
You hear what nobody is saying.That's my same argument whenever I hear that mass rioting, burning buildings and killing people in the streets is a 1st Amendment issue.
Some people make up bits that they wish were there but aren't really.That's my same argument whenever I hear that mass rioting, burning buildings and killing people in the streets is a 1st Amendment issue.
Snowflake, those things along with your penis substitute make you feel better. And that's all you care about.Hardly. I did all that shit in both the military and civilian police. But whatever makes you feel better....
Oh look, "Live and let live" has morphed into "forced inclusion". That's the sad state of society right now.Maybe stop poking these people with a stick and let them be who they choose to be.
The OPs assertions aren't false. There is a malicious and insidious trend going on. The right to be tolerated has been twisted into forced inclusion. Equal opportunity has been twisted into enforced equality of results regardless of merit. These philosophies are unsustainable, corrosive.
Three cities run with Democrat Mayors.Horny gun fetishists don't understand that their lust for gun boners are putting themselves and families at risk.
Injuries and deaths due to firearms in the home
Objective: Determine the relative frequency with which guns in the home are used to injure or kill in self-defense, compared with the number of times these weapons are involved in an unintentional injury, suicide attempt, or criminal assault or homicide.
Results: During the study interval (12 months in Memphis, 18 months in Seattle, and Galveston) 626 shootings occurred in or around a residence. This total included 54 unintentional shootings, 118 attempted or completed suicides, and 438 assaults/homicides. Thirteen shootings were legally justifiable or an act of self-defense, including three that involved law enforcement officers acting in the line of duty. For every time a gun in the home was used in a self-defense or legally justifiable shooting, there were four unintentional shootings, seven criminal assaults or homicides, and 11 attempted or completed suicides.
Conclusions: Guns kept in homes are more likely to be involved in a fatal or nonfatal accidental shooting, criminal assault, or suicide attempt than to be used to injure or kill in self-defense.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9715182/
I posted a video above where a shooter fired 8 revolver pistol rounds on target in less than 2 seconds, and sixteen (includes a reload) rounds on four targets in less than 3 seconds.. Check it out....so most of Steel Penis Cult America "settles" for the semi-automatic AR-15, which can kill children as fast as one can pull the trigger. Sure, it's not the same as mowing down a classroom of kids in 10 seconds, but the additional 45 seconds or so that it takes to pull the trigger 30 times is next to nothing when you consider the big picture.
Bottom line: killing 10-20 kids in 10 seconds or 45 seconds is essentially the same.
Pretend to be superior, it is the bailiwick of the inferior.Laughing at you is not caring about you, Hitchoozhus.
in fact, it's the very essence of indifference. Now, because of my post bait to your ego fish getting hooked on my line, you will keep replying to me rebuffing you.
that isn't caring. That's manipulation.
https://www.icegif.com/wp-content/uploads/evil-laugh-icegif-9.gif
Are you trying to get froggied?Bilbo! Where you been you lying commie fuckhead! Look, I know it's hard to face, but believe me, people WILL accept the fact that you're a pedophile if you just admit it to your family and friends. That little boy isn't going to be credible in court, you'll not go to prison.
Are you trying to get froggied?
Snowflake, those things along with your penis substitute make you feel better. And that's all you care about.
Well, true in one important sense. I am pro the military having guns--not least because crazies like you are likely to be armed seditionists and I want the military to wipe you off the surface of the earth.The bottom line is that those profess to be anti gun are in fact pro gun, they simply have specific preferences for who gets to have them.
You want the military to wipe people off the surface of the Earth whom you don't like. That's an incredibly strong argument for people keeping themselves armed, and also a very historically familiar notion.Well, true in one important sense. I am pro the military having guns--not least because crazies like you are likely to be armed seditionists and I want the military to wipe you off the surface of the earth.
Exactly.The bottom line is that those profess to be anti gun are in fact pro gun, they simply have specific preferences for who gets to have them.
It should go without saying that those without guns don't have the ability to take them away from those who do have them.
Anyone who can own a vehicle (or multiple vehicles) can and should equally have access to guns. Vehicles kill far more people every year than guns do, despite vehicles being designed to be as non lethal and non dangerous as possible.Exactly.
Guns should be with the military and in areas of Law Enforcement. They should not ever be in schools, whether carried by parents, pupils or teachers. They shouldn't be carried by drunks, by people likely to get into petty arguments with their neighbors, or people who think they are defending their family homestead against Amazon delivery drivers.
Yeah, he stoopid and full of murderous hate and criminal violence toward all us 2A types who have posted here. Spews vitriol and then finger points that we are the villains here.You want the military to wipe people off the surface of the Earth whom you don't like. That's an incredibly strong argument for people keeping themselves armed, and also a very historically familiar notion.