USA Swimming Official Resigns In Protest

It's like they think Democrats are the same as Central American leftist revolutionaries.
 
It's like they think Democrats are the same as Central American leftist revolutionaries.

That is a persistent problem. LWs can tell a libertarian from a paleoconservative from a populist-nationalist from a Christian dominionist from a neocon warhawk -- but RWs looking at the left are blinded by Jonanisn.
 
Last edited:
That is a persistent problem. LWs can tell a libertarian from a paleoconservative from a populist-nationalist from a Christian dominionist from a neocon warhawk -- but RWs looking at the left are blinded by Jonanisn.

Actually, a Gallup poll a few years ago showed that the right is very much aware of what the left's beliefs and aims are, but the left is totally at sea when asked about the right.
 
And each and every one is cheering on the revolutionaries.

You say you want a revolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
You tell me that it's evolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
But when you talk about destruction
Don't you know that you can count me out (in)
Don't you know it's gonna be
All right?
Don't you know it's gonna be (all right)
Don't you know it's gonna be (all right)
You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We'd all love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well, you know
We're all doing what we can
But if you want money for people with minds that hate
All I can tell you is brother you have to wait
Don't you know it's gonna be (all right)
Don't you know it's gonna be (all right)
Don't you know it's gonna be (all right)
You say you'll change the constitution
Well, you know
We'd all love to change your head
You tell me it's the institution
Well, you know
You better free your mind instead
But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao
You ain't going to make it with anyone anyhow
Don't you know it's gonna be (all right)
Don't you know it's gonna be (all right)
Don't you know it's gonna be (all right)
All, all, all, all, all, all, all, all, all, all, all right
All right, all right, all right, all right, all right
 
Actually, a Gallup poll a few years ago showed that the right is very much aware of what the left's beliefs and aims are, but the left is totally at sea when asked about the right.

Cite. You've made yourself totally uncreditable here. Cite or we know you're just lying again.
 
That is a persistent problem. LWs can tell a libertarian from a paleoconservative from a populist-nationalist from a Christian dominionist from a neocon warhawk -- but RWs looking at the left are blinded by Jonanisn.

No, you can't.

You've repeatedly conflated libertarians with anarchist and classical liberals and also regularly conflate social liberals with "progressive" leftist.

You couldn't even accept consensus definition of capitalism.

Actually, a Gallup poll a few years ago showed that the right is very much aware of what the left's beliefs and aims are, but the left is totally at sea when asked about the right.

Yup....

There have been a few that show leftist get practically zero % of their info from moderate or RW sources. As seen here on lit consistently and at large they are PROUD of the fact that they ONLY consume leftist propaganda.

There are still lefties out there convinced Rittenhouse went and bought a machine gun from a store without any ID, then went and sport murdered some black guys because he's a KKK grand wizard AND a high level Nazi in the SS. They're fucking nuts because they live in bizarre leftist media bubbles.

And each and every one is cheering on the revolutionaries.

And supporting the cause/ideology.

It's like they think Democrats are the same as Central American leftist revolutionaries.

Pushing for the same kind of "progress" and centralized authoritarianism.

You just haven't got quite as violent.....yet.... the "mostly peaceful protests" are juuuuuust short of that level of violence. Wouldn't' take much to escalate them to that level though. Hell the price of food and housing alone might make that happen organically and without any incitement.
 
Last edited:
As if. No, they are making women submit to Islamic and trans values.

Which Democrat politician proposed and passed those laws? After getting jammed up with all your lies yesterday do you really want to start today the same way? Doesn't seem very smart.
 
Cite. You've made yourself totally uncreditable here. Cite or we know you're just lying again.

The day you believe Sarge on anything is the day you need to arrange adult supervision.

I did err...it was a UVA study, not Gallup. Mea maxima culpa:

One academic study asked 2,000 Americans to fill out questionnaires about moral questions. In some cases, they were asked to fill them out as they thought a “typical liberal” or a “typical conservative” would respond.

Moderates and conservatives were adept at guessing how liberals would answer questions. Liberals, especially those who described themselves as “very liberal,” were least able to put themselves in the minds of their adversaries and guess how conservatives would answer.


https://ricochet.com/76902/archives...erals-liberals-dont-understand-conservatives/

The UVA study is no long at the link in the piece, but I'm sure you can find it yourself.
 
"Alexa, how much is 2,000 divided by 330 million?"

"It's approximately ZERO."

lol great poll Bud. :D
 
Which Democrat politician proposed and passed those laws? After getting jammed up with all your lies yesterday do you really want to start today the same way? Doesn't seem very smart.

It's every Democrat legislature that is doing it here in the US. It's not Republicans that are forcing women to accept males into their restrooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, prisons, battered women's shelters, etc. It's Democats in every case.

The Left is erasing the very idea of "woman."

Internationally, it's even more glaring. Women in Europe are being forced indoors and raped at numbers never seen there before, all because the Eurotrash Left loves Islamic refugees. Women are instead lectured about how they need to dress less provocatively and refrain from leaving their hair out lest it make feelings of lust swell in the hearts of the Mohammedans.
 
It's every Democrat legislature that is doing it here in the US. It's not Republicans that are forcing women to accept males into their restrooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, prisons, battered women's shelters, etc. It's Democats in every case.

The Left is erasing the very idea of "woman."

Internationally, it's even more glaring. Women in Europe are being forced indoors and raped at numbers never seen there before, all because the Eurotrash Left loves Islamic refugees. Women are instead lectured about how they need to dress less provocatively and refrain from leaving their hair out lest it make feelings of lust swell in the hearts of the Mohammedans.

lol my goodness. You're terrible at backing up your claims and mediocre at deflection.
 
"Alexa, how much is 2,000 divided by 330 million?"

"It's approximately ZERO."

lol great poll Bud. :D

Why don't you go plug those humbers into Sarge's link and see what margin of error you get?

You do realize that most public opinion polls operate with fewer than half that sample size, no?
 
Why don't you go plug those humbers into Sarge's link and see what margin of error you get?

You do realize that most public opinion polls operate with fewer than half that sample size, no?

I do realize that -- that's why you never see me post useless polls to back me up. :cool:
 
lol my goodness. You're terrible at backing up your claims and mediocre at deflection.

All of this is public information and well know. I stand by every word. Do your own research and offer an informed rebuttal. Then I'll engage you.
 
I do realize that -- that's why you never see me post useless polls to back me up. :cool:

I'll help you out here, since you are determined to be ignorant:

A sample size of 2,000 will get you about a 2% margin of error with a 95% CI.

You do know that statistics are actual science, no, and not some dark voodoo dreamt up to confound the masses?
 
I'll help you out here, since you are determined to be ignorant:

A sample size of 2,000 will get you about a 2% margin of error with a 95% CI.

You do know that statistics are actual science, no, and not some dark voodoo dreamt up to confound the masses?

I do. Now tell me where each of those 2,000 people resides and how old each is.

Was this a Peer-Reviewed poll? :D
 
I'm not beholden to refute your lies.

Nor I to provide peer-reviewed support to rebut puerile and mindless gain-saying of information that is widely-known.

I mean, wouldn't it be easy to show just one GOP legislture forcing women to allow men in their midst? Just one?
 
Nor I to provide peer-reviewed support to rebut puerile and mindless gain-saying of information that is widely-known.

I mean, wouldn't it be easy to show just one GOP legislture forcing women to allow men in their midst? Just one?

You're a liar. There's no debate.
 
Back
Top