Remember this name: E.W. Priestap

[Rightguide]

Alright, let me hop out of this thread and have salty Vetteman have his shine.

Carry on!

Yes, take your lies and hate elsewhere.

 

[Rotadom]

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=53601115&postcount=248

hi vettey!

Yes, take your lies and hate elsewhere.

You just got busted and your first post is calling someone else a liar.

 

[nowisthetime]

You just got busted and your first post is calling someone else a liar.

Comes back into thread just to say, that he is indeed vettemen. He can deny like a convict going to the fryer, but I know for a fact that it is him. See, Vettemen and I go four years back insulting each other's looks. I know that tone. LOL.

What you hiding for, vetteman?

 

[IG_88]

It's not secret he's Vette. He's the only one who denies it because he's too much of a pussy to just admit it and move on. Not like anyone cares cuz everyone already knows.

 

[Rightguide]

I told you in December of 2017 to remember his name:

'E.W. (Bill) Priestap, assistant director of the FBI Counterintelligence Division, made the disclosure to Judicial Watch as part of court-ordered discovery into the Clinton email issue.

U.S District Court Judge Royce Lamberth ordered Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers, and Clinton aides, as well as Priestap, to be deposed or answer writer questions under oath. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”

Priestap was asked by Judicial Watch to identify representatives of Hillary Clinton, her former staff, and government agencies from which “email repositories were obtained.” Priestap responded with the following non-exhaustive list:

Bryan Pagliano
Cheryl Mills
Executive Office of the President [Emphasis added]
Heather Samuelson
Jacob Sullivan
Justin Cooper
United States Department of State
United States Secret Service
Williams & Connolly LLP'

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press...ry-clinton-emails-found-in-obama-white-house/

Those who have been following The Hillary Clinton email conspiracy will understand the significance of the bolded part of the Judicial Watch posting above. More evidence that Obama lied about his knowledge of Clinton's private server and it might be time for him to be deposed.

Oh yes, it's nice to be back. I had a great trip into the Bighorn Range. I'll be returning there in the fall. Absolutely some of the most beautiful country in the United States, imho. After a month in that environment one feels a palpable sense of depression transitioning back into the rat race of SoCal.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Oh yes, it's nice to be back. I had a great trip into the Bighorn Range. I'll be returning there in the fall. Absolutely some of the most beautiful country in the United States, imho. After a month in that environment one feels a palpable sense of depression transitioning back into the rat race of SoCal.

Welcome back, Vette. Your glee club bros here really missed your linebacking assistance.

 

[Rightguide]

This from Judicial Watch:

"Priestap testified in a separate lawsuit that Clinton was the subject of a grand jury investigation related to her BlackBerry email accounts."

“This astonishing confirmation, made under oath by the FBI, shows that the Obama FBI had to go to President Obama’s White House office to find emails that Hillary Clinton tried to destroy or hide from the American people.” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “No wonder Hillary Clinton has thus far skated – Barack Obama is implicated in her email scheme.”

Priestap was ordered to answer the written questions by United States District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth when he ruled in January that Judicial Watch’s discovery could begin in Hillary Clinton’s email scandal. This action came in Judicial Watch’s July 2014 FOIA lawsuit..."

 

[OldJourno]

Check it out. The Broncos just drafted Priestap.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Judicial Watch.

 

[Que]

This from Judicial Watch:

"Priestap testified in a separate lawsuit that Clinton was the subject of a grand jury investigation related to her BlackBerry email accounts."

“This astonishing confirmation, made under oath by the FBI, shows that the Obama FBI had to go to President Obama’s White House office to find emails that Hillary Clinton tried to destroy or hide from the American people.” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “No wonder Hillary Clinton has thus far skated – Barack Obama is implicated in her email scheme.”

Priestap was ordered to answer the written questions by United States District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth when he ruled in January that Judicial Watch’s discovery could begin in Hillary Clinton’s email scandal. This action came in Judicial Watch’s July 2014 FOIA lawsuit..."

That right there is exactly why Comey said what he said.

HRC cut her teeth on the Watergate investigation and spend quite a bit of time considering what Nixon did wrong in his rather pedestrian attempts at having some presidential privacy and executive privileges protected. Nixon also was an amateur at obstruction of justice.

The Clinton Administration with Hillary at the helm of how can we defy subpeonas, obstruct justice, destroy and hide records and avoid answering any uncomfortable question or having any paper trail that's going to harm their legacy did a fair to decent job.

With all that experience under her belt she helped the Obama Administration figure out how to avoid Freedom of Information requests by using pseudonyms and other email platforms to completely violate federal law and to avoid all of the record-keeping requirements that is black letter law.

We know they did it in the IRS we know they did it in the EPA she did it at the Department of State and Obama knew all of them we're doing this. I'm sure at some point they had a little meeting and giggled about how no one's ever going to know what we are doing.

Obama himself obstructed justice in the Fast & Furious Case by both claiming executive privilege which means that holder would have had to have consulted Obama while at the same time claiming he was never consulted about it which means that executive privilege would not apply.

Somebody should make a montage of all the times that Obama talked about how transparent his administration would be in throughout his presidency what he lied about how transparent they were. They were absolutely the most Wallace Administration with regard to governmental accountability oversight and record-keeping requirements. What are universally known as the least accessible Administration to the press in history as well. And that was with the most compliant press in history.

It probably will take a few generations before history will look back at that horrifically corrupt Administration and quit giving him a pass for being historic the way he got his entire life.

 

[Rightguide]

Judicial Watch.

Keep laughing, It's all about to come down on the Obama and his subversives.

 

[OldJourno]

Keep laughing, It's all about to come down on the Obama and his subversives.

I get their stuff. They keep filing FOIA requests and getting more and more information that seems to be of no interest to "legitimate" news outlets. Pretty soon, Judicial Watch will have about half as much information as the current attorney general, one who is interested in the slimy behavior of prior officials.

 

[Rightguide]

I get their stuff. They keep filing FOIA requests and getting more and more information that seems to be of no interest to "legitimate" news outlets. Pretty soon, Judicial Watch will have about half as much information as the current attorney general, one who is interested in the slimy behavior of prior officials.

Word now is although the IG report is scheduled to be released in May or early June, another report on James Comey (possibly the Huber Report) will come out in two weeks. It is said to contain criminal referrals and could involve others in the Obama administration.

 

[phrodeau]

Better up your subscriptions to the “what I like” websites.

 

[Rightguide]

Better up your subscriptions to the “what I like” websites.

It was mentioned here:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...s-comey-coming-in-two-weeks-joe-digenova-says

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/joe...ting-when-fake-news-collides-with-zero-intent

 

[Rightguide]

New revelation in Flynn case, newly declassified hand written notes

Remember his name:

"What is our goal? Truth/admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?"

E.W. "Bill" Priestap

Why isn't this SOB in handcuffs?

 

[Rotadom]

New revelation in Flynn case, newly declassified hand written notes

Remember his name:

"What is our goal? Truth/admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?"

E.W. "Bill" Priestap

Why isn't this SOB in handcuffs?

They obviously think he can be compromised which most likely means they have proof of him compromised in the past.

 

[Rightguide]

They obviously think he can be compromised which most likely means they have proof of him compromised in the past.

It's proof they didn't have anything on him so they're down to framing him instead.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Keep laughing, It's all about to come down on the Obama and his subversives.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/cd357eaf6d8093a90826d6da93483b3f/tenor.gif?itemid=11107775

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/OptimisticSickHoneybadger-size_restricted.gif

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/AncientAliveAmericanlobster-size_restricted.gif

still waiting on that "all about to."

 

[bestone4ever]

It's proof they didn't have anything on him so they're down to framing him instead.

That's not how the headline reads. "Get him to lie" can be interpreted as him being easily coerced into lying to save his own ass.

 

[Conager]

They obviously think he can be compromised which most likely means they have proof of him compromised in the past.

Were you dropped on your head?

They have "proof" which they don't bother to pursue, deciding to entrap him into a process crime instead? Genius!

That's not how the headline reads. "Get him to lie" can be interpreted as him being easily coerced into lying to save his own ass.

Another genius.

Given that they never told him he was being formally interviewed or even under investigation for anything, why would he even suspect he needed to "save his ass" which a non-material misstatement would not do?

This really isn't your best one, by the way. You should start another alt, something with numbers, maybe. "666" is catchy.

 

[Rightguide]

Were you dropped on your head?

They have "proof" which they don't bother to pursue, deciding to entrap him into a process crime instead? Genius!

Getting him to lie is FBI speak for setting up a perjury trap. These two lightweights need to be told to get out of bed and grow up.

 

[Rotadom]

Were you dropped on your head?

They have "proof" which they don't bother to pursue, deciding to entrap him into a process crime instead? Genius!

"Most likely." Reading isn't your strong point. And how many times have there been criminals dead to rights on a lesser charge while the authorities lay back and wait for more charges to brought up? No, I'm not saying anything in particular about the Flynn case, just an overall observation.

 

[Conager]

Getting him to lie is FBI speak for setting up a perjury trap. These two lightweights need to be told to get out of bed and grow up.

. . .and the FBI agents sent to set him up know what that standard needs to be and they reported back that he did not perjure himself. A minor, immaterial misstatement from a subject of an investigation, who is not aware he is a target and has not been advised he is bring actually interviewed under penalty of perjury cannot be prosecuted.

Perjury requires intent. Being wrong is not perjury. Not remembering correctly is not perjury.

Interestingly, saying "I don't recall" dozens of times about things that strain credit that you don't recall, rather than invoking your right not to testify if it would tend to incriminate yourself as protected by the fifth amendment is actual perjury. Just hard to prosecute it.

When and if Flynn is exonerated, these nitwits will claim he "got off" on a "technicality" ignoring the fact that this entire exercise in prosecutorial misconduct was based on a misconstrued technicality and used a bastardization of a law that is never been used to prosecute anyone to curse him to plead guilty do something that he did not actually do. You cannot even ask for, mich less coerce a guilty plea if you know the person is not guilty. You also cannot accept such an elocution if you know that the person is not actually guilty.

 

[Conager]

"Most likely." Reading isn't your strong point. And how many times have there been criminals dead to rights on a lesser charge while the authorities lay back and wait for more charges to brought up? No, I'm not saying anything in particular about the Flynn case, just an overall observation.

That's the only valid part of your post.

You do realize that movies are not legal primers, right?