The power of the vast right-wing conspiracy-

[Conager]

ABC news ran with a story that National Center for Medical Intelligence (NCMI) reported in November that a possible “cataclysmic event” was in the making in China's Wuhan city. The NCMI – part of the Pentagon's intelligence apparatus – gave a warning to the US government, but it failed to act early to prevent the spread of the Covid-19 epidemic in the country or to prepare for mitigating the damage

The spokesman for the NCMI which is a division of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) which generally avoids publicity is Dr R. Shane Day <----click

Widely publicized in right leaning publications and conspicuously absent in left leaning publications that ran with the initial story was an official statement by Dr. Day in his capacity as the official spokesman for the agency named in the above report categorically denying that any such report exists:

"As a matter of practice the National Center for Medical Intelligence does not comment publicly on specific intelligence matters," he said. "However, in the interest of transparency during this current public health crisis, we can confirm that media reporting about the existence/release of a National Center for Medical Intelligence Coronavirus-related product/assessment in November of 2019 is not correct. No such NCMI product exists."

Aglo maintained that since no one she reads has ever mentioned the initial story being ground to dust, it must still be true.

Classic case of spreading misinformation. Someone somewhere posts it online in a vague manner, and it bounces around until it’s picked up by the “media”. John Solomon called, he wants his technique back.

This is just as bad as the op’s YouTube post.

After some back and forth, she seems to have finally acknowledged that the above quote was valid, but none of the usual nitwits seem up to speed on that. Still.

 

[Rightguide]

ABC news ran with a story that National Center for Medical Intelligence (NCMI) reported in November that a possible “cataclysmic event” was in the making in China's Wuhan city. The NCMI – part of the Pentagon's intelligence apparatus – gave a warning to the US government, but it failed to act early to prevent the spread of the Covid-19 epidemic in the country or to prepare for mitigating the damage

The spokesman for the NCMI which is a division of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) which generally avoids publicity is Dr R. Shane Day <----click

Widely publicized in right leaning publications and conspicuously absent in left leaning publications that ran with the initial story was an official statement by Dr. Day in his capacity as the official spokesman for the agency named in the above report categorically denying that any such report exists:



Aglo maintained that since no one she reads has ever mentioned the initial story being ground to dust, it must still be true.



After some back and forth, she seems to have finally acknowledged that the above quote was valid, but none of the usual nitwits seem up to speed on that. Still.

There is an epidemic of fake news being propagated in order to sabotage the Trump government from governing.

 

[HisArpy]

After some back and forth, [Aglo] seems to have finally acknowledged that the above quote was valid, but none of the usual nitwits seem up to speed on that. Still.

It's simply amazing how willfully uninformed the usual suspects are.

I have hopes for those who are appearing to realize that they've been lied to and are now starting to think for themselves.

 

[Conager]

It's simply amazing how willfully uninformed the usual suspects are.

I have hopes for those who are appearing to realize that they've been lied to and are now starting to think for themselves.

I have seen no evidence of that.

Carville said that he became a Democrat consultant because Democrats persuadables are easier to persuade then Republican persuadables.

Even he was shocked at how close the Dems came to being persuaded to nominate a full-blown socialist

 

[Aglaopheme]

It's simply amazing how willfully uninformed the usual suspects are.

I have hopes for those who are appearing to realize that they've been lied to and are now starting to think for themselves.

Funny he had to move his post off that thread. I posted the quote multiple times, and que just kept right on ranting. There was no back and forth. I lead with the quote. He just lost it, and decided to call me stupid, because I laughed about him posting a forum post and reddit as sources.

 

[HisArpy]

I have seen no evidence of that.

Carville said that he became a Democrat consultant because Democrats persuadables are easier to persuade then Republican persuadables.

Even he was shocked at how close the Dems came to being persuaded to nominate a full-blown socialist

Dummies will always be dummies.

However, there are a few who follow the herd because it's the easy path. But, like all lemming stampedes, there's an ocean waiting and a few, a very few, will see it and say to themselves "Hey, wait just a second..."

There are a couple here on the GB who are starting to notice the sound of waves crashing in the distance.

 

[InsightRiot]

There is an epidemic of fake news being propagated in order to sabotage the Trump government from governing.

Yep, I’m wondering when the tar and pitchforks are going to come for Fake News

 

[Conager]

Funny he had to move his post off that thread. I posted the quote multiple times, and que just kept right on ranting. There was no back and forth. I lead with the quote. He just lost it, and decided to call me stupid, because I laughed about him posting a forum post and reddit as sources.

No, I called you stupid for this idiotic post:

Classic case of spreading misinformation. Someone somewhere posts it online in a vague manner, and it bounces around until it’s picked up by the “media”. John Solomon called, he wants his technique back.

This is just as bad as the op’s YouTube post.

John Solomon, an actual journalist, is not less of a journalist because your "journalist" hacks say so.

 

[HisArpy]

Funny he had to move his post off that thread. I posted the quote multiple times, and que just kept right on ranting. There was no back and forth. I lead with the quote. He just lost it, and decided to call me stupid, because I laughed about him posting a forum post and reddit as sources.

Everyone misses things sometimes. There's no sin or shame in that unless it becomes a habit or a crusade of denial at all costs.

Trump is no saint but the way the Left manipulates the information, and then fabricates data to support their manipulation, makes supporting Trump a much better choice right now than anyone else out there.

The ABC story is a great example of that. The NCMI statement debunked the ENTIRE article, yet ABC still goes with it because they KNOW that most of the anti-Trump crowd won't read past the headline.

It's that kind of manipulation that's been causing the political conflict for the past 3 years.

 

[Aglaopheme]

No, I called you stupid for this idiotic post:



John Solomon, an actual journalist, is not less of a journalist because your "journalist" hacks say so.

That’s why he was canned. Furthermore, that is not at all what you were saying and moving this over here doesn’t change the fact that you lost it.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Everyone misses things sometimes. There's no sin or shame in that unless it becomes a habit or a crusade of denial at all costs.

Trump is no saint but the way the Left manipulates the information, and then fabricates data to support their manipulation, makes supporting Trump a much better choice right now than anyone else out there.

The ABC story is a great example of that. The NCMI statement debunked the ENTIRE article, yet ABC still goes with it because they KNOW that most of the anti-Trump crowd won't read past the headline.

It's that kind of manipulation that's been causing the political conflict for the past 3 years.

I agree with that first part, and can at least admit it when I do. The rest of it not so much. You can’t blame the media for Trump being Trump.

 

[Conager]

That’s why he was canned. Furthermore, that is not at all what you were saying and moving this over here doesn’t change the fact that you lost it.

So much winning!

It was about a page and a half before Comshaw saw past your initial, nutty, conspiracy theory.

Zippy the Pinhead still thinks you showed me up and refudiated my quote.

 

[HisArpy]

I agree with that first part, and can at least admit it when I do. The rest of it not so much. You can’t blame the media for Trump being Trump.

I don't. I blame them for distorting facts and outright lies.

They're not in the business of lying to the people. They're in the business of accurately reporting events.

 

[Conager]

I agree with that first part, and can at least admit it when I do. The rest of it not so much. You can’t blame the media for Trump being Trump.

The ABC story was not Trump being Trump.

It was fake news being fake news.

There only two possibilities for story like that that is clearly untrue. Either someone in the intelligence committee actually fed that phony story to ABC News and should be fired or worse, or the reporters made it up and should be fired.

This does not horrify you?

At a minimum those reporters owe it to their misled readers to burn their sources. You do not let sources lie to you with impunity. This was not an exaggeration or in opinion. This was a source saying there was a report, included details for a report that does not exist and could not have existed based on what anyone knew, when.

This should have been and above the fold straight up protection not a chicken s*** additional information added at the end of the article. They did not even wait 24 hours for that agency to confirm or deny the story. Do you know how cumbersome it is to establish with certainty that a report does not exist in an agency?

You should.

The State Department it still having trouble establishing that they really did comply with actual subpoenas, years later.

This was less than 24 hours.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Their statement is all over the news, actually. That doesn’t make your “sources” any less amusing.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/defense-november-coronavirus-intelligence-assessment-reports-false

So much winning!

It was about a page and a half before Comshaw saw past your initial, nutty, conspiracy theory.

Zippy the Pinhead still thinks you showed me up and refudiated my quote.

This is what you said:

Call the DIA, you dumb-fuck.

You didn’t see it either, even after I posted it three times. Get over yourself.

 

[Conager]

The point of the exercise was successful. A lie makes it around the world before the truth can get it boots on. This lie is still being repeated. This only came up because it was repeated here, and then I wasted lots of time arguing about something that has been completely refuted.

 

[Conager]

This is what you said:

Call the DIA, you dumb-fuck.

You didn’t see it either, even after I posted it three times. Get over yourself.

You posted a fox news citation (that Comsha had specifically said he would not accept, apparently implying that was where I got the quote. I quite reasonably took that as a standard "Faux News!" Line of attack. I had already posted more than enough sources, so I did not rise to your bait.

Especially when it is a follow-up directly to YOUR conspiracy theory about how it starts on a message board and is picked up by the media.

No one would assume YOU are quoting Fox News for their veracitu.

Surely you do not deny that you are a dumb-fuck? You do vote straight-ticket Democrat, right?

 

[Aglaopheme]

Surely you do not deny that you are a dumb-fuck? You do vote straight-ticket Democrat, right?

You’re an idiot, for real. You can’t dig yourself out of this hole.

It’s been entertaining watching you flail, though.

 

[icanhelp1]

The ABC story was not Trump being Trump.

It was fake news being fake news.

There only two possibilities for story like that that is clearly untrue. Either someone in the intelligence committee actually fed that phony story to ABC News and should be fired or worse, or the reporters made it up and should be fired.

This does not horrify you?

At a minimum those reporters owe it to their misled readers to burn their sources. You do not let sources lie to you with impunity. This was not an exaggeration or in opinion. This was a source saying there was a report, included details for a report that does not exist and could not have existed based on what anyone knew, when.

This should have been and above the fold straight up protection not a chicken s*** additional information added at the end of the article. They did not even wait 24 hours for that agency to confirm or deny the story. Do you know how cumbersome it is to establish with certainty that a report does not exist in an agency?

You should.

The State Department it still having trouble establishing that they really did comply with actual subpoenas, years later.

This was less than 24 hours.

Maybe Vindman did it.

 

[hogjack]

Why do conspiracies need to be vast?

There are some damned good conspiracies that are under-sized and small in nature.

 

[Conager]

You’re an idiot, for real. You can’t dig yourself out of this hole.

It’s been entertaining watching you flail, though.

You aren't qualified to call anyone an idiot above maybe luke level IQ.

I'm not the one that believes things that are demonstrably untrue.

You know like when you initially doubted the quote.

 

[hogjack]

The ABC story is a great example of that. The NCMI statement debunked the ENTIRE article, yet ABC still goes with it because they KNOW that most of the anti-Trump crowd won't read past the headline.

Making up stuff is the best kind of journalism. Very freeing and non-binding. Plus, less time getting quotes and doing research. Boring!

 

[Aglaopheme]

I don't. I blame them for distorting facts and outright lies.

They're not in the business of lying to the people. They're in the business of accurately reporting events.

Well, on that we’ll just disagree.

 

[Conager]

Making up stuff is the best kind of journalism. Very freeing and non-binding. Plus, less time getting quotes and doing research. Boring!

. . .and when you get caught you have filler for page b14.

Retractions are passé.

Back in the old days you couldn't slip the previously ommitted information or rebuttal into the article after the fact. You had to start a brand new article on a new day in a new, actual paper to explain how you screwed up. Now you can just slip it into the original article and say, "See?? We put their response in as well!" as if their response does not completely decimate the entire article.

In the old days, you couldn't rehash your original (now discredited) charges as if they had some sort of validity in the course of issuing your retraction or you add looked like a complete douchebag. Now you can do that complete douchebag move while looking like you are just adding supplemental information.

 

[Comshaw]

You posted a fox news citation (that Comsha had specifically said he would not accept, apparently implying that was where I got the quote. I quite reasonably took that as a standard "Faux News!" Line of attack. I had already posted more than enough sources, so I did not rise to your bait.

Especially when it is a follow-up directly to YOUR conspiracy theory about how it starts on a message board and is picked up by the media.

No one would assume YOU are quoting Fox News for their veracitu.

Surely you do not deny that you are a dumb-fuck? You do vote straight-ticket Democrat, right?

I did? Let me say this plainly, succinctly and without stuttering, you my dear sir are a bold faced liar. Plain simple and to the point. Now if you can prove I said it, show me where I did.Go on you know you'd love to make me look silly.

Oh you want me to prove it for you? Okay *cue elevator music* nope can't find it BECAUSE THAT STATEMENT BY ME DOES NOT EXIST!

So now what you gunna do? You know you'd love to make me the liar. So do it. The threads right over there. Easy to access and should take you no more then a few minutes to find the statement you claim I made. Go on, do it. Put egg on my face. Show your buddies how much of a liar I am. go on, if you could you know you would.

I'll be back to see if you even try. You won't. You can't.

Comshaw.