███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

[IrezumiKiss]

Civilians murdered after Trump betrays American allies.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...enter-syrian-border-town-ras-al-ain-civilian/

The Trump-Blessed War in Northeastern Syria Is Already a Full-Blown Disaster

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019...war-in-syria-has-quickly-led-to-disaster.html

Not to worry. Cheeto will be right on it. After he finishes playing on the links.

Yanno, those same golf excursions he used to shit on Obama for doing (even though Obama did less golfing during his full eight years than Cheeto did inside his first) and promised he would be too busy governing the nation and making us great again to waste time golfing.

Yup, he'll git right on it! Winning! MAGA! Fine folks on both sides!

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[bigsly]

You seem to be a very bitter, unhappy person. Constantly back-biting, dealing snide insults. How very unpleasant the weather must be in your psyche. Personally, I'm pleased we are not political allies.

Don't sweat it.

Back in the 1940s, butters and dolf were playmates in merry 'ol England. One day they came across a big, long stuck-up stick and swore their allegiance to each other upon it. Years later, when time had come for each to go their separate adult ways, they decided to break that big, long stuck-up stick in two and shove them sideways up each other's ass so that no matter how great the distance ever between them, they'd always be connected by that stuck-up stick equally up their butts, sideways.

Don't judge them. Pity them.

 

[jp55665566]

Democrats now support endless war?

 

[Aglaopheme]

Democrats now support endless war?

Republicans sure as heck aren’t pro-life. I mean the bodies are piling up.

 

[Aglaopheme]

https://media2.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif

 

[bigsly]

Republicans sure as heck aren’t pro-life. I mean the bodies are piling up.

Excellent point. Over 50 million, in fact, just in the US alone since 1973. Hell, they're even still discovering some of the intentionally murdered...

More fetal remains found stashed in car of dead Midwest abortion doctor
Officials discovered more than 2,200 sets of remains in his Illinois garage after his death last month.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...hed-car-dead-midwest-abortion-doctor-n1064496

Damn Republican anti-lifers!

 

[butters]

floridian republican

not surprised. embarrassed for americans, but not surprised

 

[DeluxAuto]

Excellent point. Over 50 million, in fact, just in the US alone since 1973. Hell, they're even still discovering some of the intentionally murdered...

More fetal remains found stashed in car of dead Midwest abortion doctor
Officials discovered more than 2,200 sets of remains in his Illinois garage after his death last month.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...hed-car-dead-midwest-abortion-doctor-n1064496

Damn Republican anti-lifers!

Who said that abortionist wasn't republican?

 

[jp55665566]

Just a shot in the dark: I'll bet most all the murder-for-dollars practitioners are strong Leftists.

 

[doowdniw]

Plenty ddildo.
And I know a elitist when I see one too.

An elitist would point out incorrect article usage.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Trump Country Begs For Clean Water
FEMA Money Held Up So Flood-Ravaged County Resorts to GoFundMe to Rebuild Its Water System

https://www.dcreport.org/2019/10/04/trump-country-begs-for-clean-water/

 

[BotanyBoy]

Democrats now support endless war?

Yup, they are now the warmonger party.

Republicans sure as heck aren’t pro-life. I mean the bodies are piling up.

Coming from a warmongering pro choice Democrat....that's pretty amusing

Maybe if the (D)'s quit making a point to let the under/uneducated folks how fucking deplorable and shitty they are....they might have a chance to win the WH back.

not surprised. embarrassed for americans, but not surprised

Aren't you from the EU colony formerly known as the UK?

LOL

Just a shot in the dark: I'll bet most all the murder-for-dollars practitioners are strong Leftists.

Nah....leftist don't do work for dollars, the get the state to go stick a gun to someones head and force the labor/goods out of them. Suuuuper progressive.

 

[Rightguide]

You seem to be a very bitter, unhappy person. Constantly back-biting, dealing snide insults. How very unpleasant the weather must be in your psyche. Personally, I'm pleased we are not political allies.

There is no sting in her feathered boa.

 

[phrodeau]

These sort of things happen occasionally.

 

[Rightguide]

Looking back at the Clinton impeachment and the difference between how he was treated by the Republican controlled House at the time. Compare it to how Trump is being treated today:

H. Rept. 105-795 - INVESTIGATORY POWERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY WITH RESPECT TO ITS IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY105th Congress (1997-1998)

"It is the intention of the Committee that its investigation
will be conducted in all respects on a fair, impartial and
bipartisan or nonpartisan basis. In this spirit, the power to
authorize subpoenas and other compulsory process is committed
by this resolution in the first instance to the Chairman and
the Ranking Minority Member acting jointly. If either declines
to act, the other may act alone, subject to the right of either
to refer the question to the Committee for decision prior to
issuance, and a meeting of the Committee will be convened
promptly to consider the question. Thus, meetings will not be
required to authorize issuance of process, so long as neither
the Chairman nor the Ranking Minority Member refers the matter
to the Committee. In the alternative, the Committee possesses
the independent authority to authorize subpoenas and other
process, should it be felt that action of the whole Committee
is preferable under the circumstances. Thus, maximum
flexibility and bipartisanship are reconciled in this
resolution."

"On October 5, 1998, the Committee met in open session and
ordered reported the resolution printed herein by a vote of 21
to 16, a quorum being present.
Need for the Resolution"

"Because the issue of impeachment is of such overwhelming
importance, the Committee decided that it must receive
authorization from the full House before proceeding on any
further course of action. Because impeachment is delegated
solely to the House of Representatives by the Constitution, the
full House of Representatives should be involved in critical
decision making regarding various stages of impeachment. With
the passage of H. Res. 525, the full House has already directed
the release of the Referral from the Independent Counsel, set
the parameters for public release of other related materials,
and directed the Committee to review the Referral and
accompanying materials in order to make a recommendation to the
House."

Also, a resolution authorizing an impeachment inquiry into
the conduct of a president is consistent with past practice.
According to Hind's Precedents, the ``impeachment of President
Johnson was set in motion by a resolution authorizing a general
investigation as to the execution of the laws.'' When the first
attempt to impeach President Johnson failed, the House
``referred to the Committee on Reconstruction the evidence
taken by the Judiciary Committee in the first attempt to
impeach President Johnson.'' 3 Hind's Precedents, Sec. 2408.
The impeachment investigation of President Nixon was
explicitly authorized by the full House. During debate of H.
Res. 803 in 1974, Congressman Rodino, then chairman of the
Committee on the Judiciary, stated:

We have reached the point when it is important that
the House explicitly confirm our responsibility under
the Constitution.
We are asking the House * * * to authorize and direct
the Committee on the Judiciary to investigate the
conduct of the President of the United States * * *.



Such a resolution has always been passed by the
House. The Committee has voted unanimously to recommend
that the House of Representatives adopt this
resolution. It is a necessary step if we are to meet
our obligations * * *.

 

[Rightguide]

In addition:


President's Procedural Rights

Prior to the October 5, Committee meeting, some raised
concerns about ``procedural fairness'' and encouraged the
Committee to adopt rules, similar to those adopted by the
Committee in 1974, which would provide the President with
certain procedural rights. After voting on the Hyde resolution,
the Committee adopted, by voice vote, a number of protections
for the President. The President and his counsel shall be
invited to attend all executive session and open committee
hearings. The President's counsel may cross examine witnesses.
The President's counsel may make objections regarding the
pertinency of evidence. The President's counsel shall be
invited to suggest that the Committee receive additional
evidence. Lastly, the President or the President's counsel
shall be invited to respond to the evidence adduced by the
Committee at an appropriate time. The provisions will ensure
that the impeachment inquiry is fair to the President.
Issues Relating to Defining Standards for Impeachment

The minority and the White House have demanded that the
Committee needs to adopt standards of impeachment before it
proceeds. Standards, however, already exist. They are found in
Article Two, Section Four of the Constitution and include
``Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.''

Our founding fathers did not adopt these words without
debate or forethought. These words are not arbitrary or
capricious. They have meaning to which facts must be applied.
Indeed, the meaning of these words have been applied in the
House of Representatives numerous times, four of which occurred
in the past 25 years. Impeachment precedents, like court
precedents, can be helpful to the Committee as it proceeds and
will help inform the judgment of all Members of the House. It
would be presumptuous of this Committee to state as fact the
manner in which all Members should judge the evidence. All
Members, after a consideration of the facts and the law of
impeachment, must exercise their constitutional responsibility
as they deem appropriate.

https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/105th-congress/house-report/795/1?s=1&r=60

 

[Rightguide]

Compare the foregoing with the way the Democrats have hijacked the impeachment process in their treatment of President Trump.

 

[coati]

Compare the foregoing with the way the Democrats have hijacked the impeachment process in their treatment of President Trump.

Political hardball sometimes means sticking with the letter of the law, especially when you are dealing with a bully like Trump.

Stop your whining about impeachment, and start working on your Senators to say that it is "perfect" for Trump to behave the way he has been behaving, you big baby.

 

[Rightguide]

Political hardball sometimes means sticking with the letter of the law, especially when you are dealing with a bully like Trump.

Stop your whining about impeachment, and start working on your Senators to say that it is "perfect" for Trump to behave the way he has been behaving, you big baby.

Go back to sucking dick and shut the fuck up.

 

[RichardBentwood]

Political hardball sometimes means sticking with the letter of the law, especially when you are dealing with a bully like Trump.

Stop your whining about impeachment, and start working on your Senators to say that it is "perfect" for Trump to behave the way he has been behaving, you big baby.

What laws has President Trump factually broken?

 

[coati]

Go back to sucking dick and shut the fuck up.

Thanks for encouraging my bisexuality, but I will not stop expressing my views.

 

[Rightguide]

Thanks for encouraging my bisexuality, but I will not stop expressing my views.

Like you, your views suck as well.

 

[coati]

What laws has President Trump factually broken?

The articles of impeachment will likely cite violation of his oath of office, i.e. putting his personal interests above the nation's interests by pressuring foreign governments to get involved with domestic political fights affecting the next election.

Other violations could emerge, but that is the one that became apparent at the outset of the inquiry. I doubt that the Senate will convict him because of the majority being held by Republicans.

Nonetheless, it is important for the House to impeach. Trump has been appealing to foreign governments to meddle in our elections at least since he openly entreated the Russians to "Find the missing emails!"

Checks and balances.

 

[Rightguide]

The articles of impeachment will likely cite violation of his oath of office, i.e. putting his personal interests above the nation's interests by pressuring foreign governments to get involved with domestic political fights affecting the next election.

Other violations could emerge, but that is the one that became apparent at the outset of the inquiry. I doubt that the Senate will convict him because of the majority being held by Republicans.

Nonetheless, it is important for the House to impeach. Trump has been appealing to foreign governments to meddle in our elections at least since he openly entreated the Russians to "Find the missing emails!"

Checks and balances.

Which is all bullshit. This will crash and burn like everything else the Democrats and deep state have tried.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Funny how anyone could make a comparison to anything that has transpired in the past in regards to the Trump administration. They’ve no legs to stand on. There are no norms left. There’s no it’s been down this way in the past. That’s all been blown out of the water by Trump, Moscow Mitch, etc, and they’ve been cheered on all along the way.