Whistleblower

Probably not. I've started tuning out the "news" and am paying more attention to what I'm hearing on the street. What I'm hearing isn't boding well for the dems once you get outside the partisan echo chambers.


Skid Row is firmly against impeachment. Noted.


Anyhoo about that source can harpy point to anything that says a whistleblower report needs to be based on first hand witness’ accounts other than talking points? No.


The most famous whistleblower of all time was Mark "Deep Throat" Felt, who didn't witness a damn thing either. He was just in position to know stuff.

It's such a ridiculous argument, especially when

1. The whistleblower's account of the Zelenskyy phone call was right on the money
2. His complaint was looked into by the IG, who is part of the administration
3. The whistleblower admitted "I don't know" multiple times in the complaint, which one usually doesn't do if they're just making shit up
 
Says the only person on the board who had a racial slur laden white supremacy meltdown this weekend LOL

Rob....arguably the most self unaware "progressives" on the board.



Well BB, an awful lot of talk about being triggered. I think anyone who understands the process of impeachment isn't triggered at all. What is concerning is what the left is doing to our constitutional republic and how the MSM is the conduit. To attempt a coup in plain sight and remove a duly elected president with the help of a pervasive deep state. How Hillary and the gang get away with major crimes against the State and get away with it because of a narrative and double standard pushed by the MSM is just sad. The American people are the losers in this despicable witch hunt. This is a deep state set up, almost seems like a purposeful attempt at the destruction of our republic for the sake of maintaining power. You have to wonder why it's taking so long for the Horowitz and Durham reports and they start putting some of the blame where it belongs and exposing the deep state for the damage they done.
 
Well BB, an awful lot of talk about being triggered. I think anyone who understands the process of impeachment isn't triggered at all. What is concerning is what the left is doing to our constitutional republic and how the MSM is the conduit. To attempt a coup in plain sight and remove a duly elected president with the help of a pervasive deep state. How Hillary and the gang get away with major crimes against the State and get away with it because of a narrative and double standard pushed by the MSM is just sad. The American people are the losers in this despicable witch hunt. This is a deep state set up, almost seems like a purposeful attempt at the destruction of our republic for the sake of maintaining power. You have to wonder why it's taking so long for the Horowitz and Durham reports and they start putting some of the blame where it belongs and exposing the deep state for the damage they done.

Now, wait a minute. I thought the narrative was this impeachment inquiry would be good for Trump, even if a trial occurred in the Senate as a result. Has the "deep state" taken over the Senate, also?

The Deplorables are overcome with desperation and panic. Their cult leader is now threatening civil war. Does all this mean Deplorables no longer think Pelosi did them a political favor by launching the impeachment inquiry?
 
Skid Row is firmly against impeachment. Noted.





The most famous whistleblower of all time was Mark "Deep Throat" Felt, who didn't witness a damn thing either. He was just in position to know stuff.

It's such a ridiculous argument, especially when

1. The whistleblower's account of the Zelenskyy phone call was right on the money
2. His complaint was looked into by the IG, who is part of the administration
3. The whistleblower admitted "I don't know" multiple times in the complaint, which one usually doesn't do if they're just making shit up

It is ridiculous considering Trump (or his administration) has come right out and admitted it.

All to get Biden, which is pretty funny when you think about it.
 
Well BB, an awful lot of talk about being triggered. I think anyone who understands the process of impeachment isn't triggered at all. What is concerning is what the left is doing to our constitutional republic and how the MSM is the conduit. To attempt a coup in plain sight and remove a duly elected president with the help of a pervasive deep state. How Hillary and the gang get away with major crimes against the State and get away with it because of a narrative and double standard pushed by the MSM is just sad. The American people are the losers in this despicable witch hunt. This is a deep state set up, almost seems like a purposeful attempt at the destruction of our republic for the sake of maintaining power. You have to wonder why it's taking so long for the Horowitz and Durham reports and they start putting some of the blame where it belongs and exposing the deep state for the damage they done.


Coups are by definition extralegal. The process for impeachment is literally spelled out in the Constitution you all allegedly worship.
 
Now, wait a minute. I thought the narrative was this impeachment inquiry would be good for Trump, even if a trial occurred in the Senate as a result. Has the "deep state" taken over the Senate, also?

The Deplorables are overcome with desperation and panic. Their cult leader is now threatening civil war. Does all this mean Deplorables no longer think Pelosi did them a political favor by launching the impeachment inquiry?



Impeachment for the sake of impeachment is very destructive and divisive. This process if it makes it out of the house will die in the Senate, and all because you lunes couldn’t get over Hillary’s loss. We will see who the true deplorables are very shortly. Gee, Comrade Sanders wants to do away with billionaires, see anything wrong with that? So; Hillary using Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier to get dirt on a campaign opponent is OK, hypocrites. You lunes will also lose the house.
 
Coups are by definition extralegal. The process for impeachment is literally spelled out in the Constitution you all allegedly worship.

Right wing stupidity is reaching new heights these days.

And to say Trump was set up when his own words and actions are the cause of this is hysterical. He said that call was "perfect" because he thinks he's above the law.

Truly a case of giving someone enough rope to hang themselves.
 
Coups are by definition extralegal. The process for impeachment is literally spelled out in the Constitution you all allegedly worship.


Not talking impeachment, more like fusion GPS, Steele dossier and the Mueller investigation, all deep state.
 
Coups are by definition extralegal. The process for impeachment is literally spelled out in the Constitution you all allegedly worship.

Yea it is, and "Because (D)'z didn't get their way and are really really pissed about it. #ExtraHissyFit #fuckDemocracy" isn't a legit reason to impeach POTUS.
 
Impeachment for the sake of impeachment is very destructive and divisive. This process if it makes it out of the house will die in the Senate, and all because you lunes couldn’t get over Hillary’s loss. We will see who the true deplorables are very shortly. Gee, Comrade Sanders wants to do away with billionaires, see anything wrong with that? So; Hillary using Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier to get dirt on a campaign opponent is OK, hypocrites. You lunes will also lose the house.

Socialist loathe democracy.....;)
 
IF you didn't see, feel, or hear it happen, then YOU don't "know" it happened. Making an accusation on that basis is a lie.


You can twist in the wind all you want, but that's an incontrovertible fact. A lie is a lie.

If I'm reporting what someone told me, I'm reporting what I heard.

Again, if all hearsay is a lie, as you claim, why is it ever admitted into evidence?
 
attachment.php



:cool::rolleyes:
 
If I'm reporting what someone told me, I'm reporting what I heard.

Again, if all hearsay is a lie, as you claim, why is it ever admitted into evidence?

If Timmeh is correct, that would make any and all police reports where the police didn't witness teh crime first-hand "hearsay". Didn't witness the actual burglary? Hearsay.
 
And the list of impeachable offenses just keeps building.

At what point are the Republicans in Congress (and Pence and the Cabinet) going to realize, accept, and take action on the fact that Donald Trump, who is guiltier than sin of a multitude of criminal acts, has gone full-blown bonkers crazy? (I don't expect the Trumpettes on the board to have that much common sense and analytical capability.)
 
Yea it is, and "Because (D)'z didn't get their way and are really really pissed about it. #ExtraHissyFit #fuckDemocracy" isn't a legit reason to impeach POTUS.

Do you think they’ll be upset when things don’t pan out the way they’re hoping?
 
And the list of impeachable offenses just keeps building.

At what point are the Republicans in Congress (and Pence and the Cabinet) going to realize, accept, and take action on the fact that Donald Trump, who is guiltier than sin of a multitude of criminal acts, has gone full-blown bonkers crazy? (I don't expect the Trumpettes on the board to have that much common sense and analytical capability.)

At the point there is proof of one of those impeachable offenses.

And even then why should (R)'s give a fuck?

(D)'s clearly don't give a fuck about the law. :cool:
 
If I'm reporting what someone told me, I'm reporting what I heard.

Again, if all hearsay is a lie, as you claim, why is it ever admitted into evidence?

It rarely is. That's why a hearsay exception is called an exception. About the only time it's allowed when we're talkin about something you heard a living person say is to show state of mind. This is only probative in coming to a conclusion on the why someone did something not whether or not they did something. You're going to have to prove that they did something through actual, admissible evidence.

Why is it that this was such an important thing that you have all of these people allegedly gossiping around this so-called whistle-blower but none of them have directly given testimony? Did The Whistleblower encourage any of them to file a valid whistleblower complaint rather than his bullshit one that they had to change the form in order to accommodate? If not why not? If so, why did they not come forward?
 
Back
Top