Ban all of the previously and repeatedly banned posters. Especially the perma-banned

[Dribble]

Nobody won, dumbo.

In this entire Eyes thread - Reban posters - Fair game of right clicks
saga
every single one of us were knee-jerk reacting and looking after no.1.

So why play if you cant win?

 

[Pookie]

Should all banned posters be pinched on the spot when they show up again?

Can you imagine a GB without the likes of notIsh, notAJ, notEyesore, notLace, BB and dishrag? I can and it’s glorious.

Without the assholes, you'd never know who farted.

 

[oralaccents]

Without the assholes, you'd never know who farted.

Because liars?

 

[beew]

So why play if you cant win?

Cleaver just started a thread that could have set a dangerous precedent for women on this board.

Neither you, nor zumi, nor others who put their names on the 'yes' list said anything about cleaver's thread.
Yet they dress their board infights under the "I hate misogynists and racists" mantra.

I only told cleaver off because it could have affected Me.

So spare us your whiteknighting bullshit talk.
Everyone is in here for themselves.

 

[Que]

Speak for yourself. I'm here to spread peace and love.

 

[oralaccents]

I'm here to spread lips in laughter and thighs in sighs.

 

[jaF0]

Were I the Admin here, the BBs WOULD be gone. There are ways for it to be done effectively.

And maybe Gav, the non-'Prof'.

 

[oralaccents]

Were I the Admin here, the BBs WOULD be gone. There are ways for it to be done effectively.

And maybe Gav, the non-'Prof'.

I guess using the Ignore button is too easy?

 

[Dribble]

Cleaver just started a thread that could have set a dangerous precedent for women on this board.

Neither you, nor zumi, nor others who put their names on the 'yes' list said anything about cleaver's thread.
Yet they dress their board infights under the "I hate misogynists and racists" mantra.

I only told cleaver off because it could have affected Me.

So spare us your whiteknighting bullshit talk.
Everyone is in here for themselves.

This has nothing to do with women, nor does it have to do with conservatives. It has EVERYTHING to do with the question of why people who break the rules are not permanently banned. You are not important enough to be in the discussion.

 

[oralaccents]

This has nothing to do with women, nor does it gave to do with conservatives. It has EVERYTHING to do with the question of why people who break the rules are not permanently banned. You are not important enough to be in the discussion.

I don't see why any of it should matter to anyone.

Displaced anger, perhaps. Everything all right at home? Work?

 

[Dribble]

I don't see why any of it should matter to anyone.

Displaced anger, perhaps. Everything all right at home? Work?

Why have rules then?

 

[Aglaopheme]

I guess using the Ignore button is too easy?

I guess using your real account is too easy?

 

[Aglaopheme]

again, you ascribe malice to my intent...

take the "female" part out of your equation...
that part should not matter -
unless you desire some "special status" in this...

if indeed your very position were valid.

'look at me til i say stop'
is a... viable position/demand
when we are in the same place and moment
and the interaction is interpersonal.

'look at me til i say stop'
is no longer a viable demand
once you publish.

'stop thinking about whatever you're thinking about'
after exposing one's self (or one's ideas)
loses any viable ownership
once you choose to display
- whatever the context -

do i need your approval to quote anything you might have said...
might have published...
on these boards?

right clicks record published free speech
just as surely
as does any scribble you usher forth
with the [send] button.

i know nothing about you and lance and ltr
and the tin man and the wizard...

i do know
that some butt hurt
resulting from responses to
pics
freely posted on a thread asking to see poster's eyes
resulted in an angry and quite active thread
lit by torch and pitchfork
and petitioning to the queen
for banishments.

i don't like censorship.
nor will i dismiss for anyone
their own responsibility
for whatever they might choose to post.

especially for a gaggle of goons
who have tools a'plenty to ignore
whomever they want;
and the freedom to preserve and/or promote themselves.


i get that there are rules and terms of use here and all that...

regardless:

"i/we don't like this (list of people)...
send them to the corn, mommy!"

is truly, quite lazily - disgusting.

one who freely chooses to publish -
publishes into a market of scrutiny
and competing ideas.
the very act of publishing
creates both a context
and a history.

that is the umbra of consequence - the price -
for publishing any
'look at me'

“Look at him” and all of his ascription. Priceless.

And you're lying.
Again.

Both Lance and toeskr mocked your pic.
Not that I agreed with them, but you're lying.

Poor dishrag fails again.

You two make quite the couple.

 

[oralaccents]

I guess using your real account is too easy?

Is Aglaopheme your real name?

If not, you should ask yourself that question instead of directing your twisted reasoning towards complete strangers on the internet, "honey buns".

 

[beew]

“Look at him” and all of his ascription. Priceless.


Poor dishrag fails again.

You two make quite the couple.

You started this because you were pissed off with Lance's and toeskr's derrogatory comments about the "eyes" thread.
(No, I didn't like those comments either, and I told them so.)

But don't dress up your personal vendetta, as a cute joke or some sort of advocacy prompted by his "Ban face posters" thread.

You don't give two shits if the men in this forum deride other women's avatars, or repost their pics.
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1504369

You only mind it if they comment negatively on YOURS.

 

[oralaccents]

You only mind it if they comment negatively on YOURS.

Shocking revelation.

 

[Aglaopheme]

You started this because you were pissed off with Lance's and toeskr's derrogatory comments about the "eyes" thread.
(No, I didn't like those comments either, and I told them so.)

But don't dress up your personal vendetta, as a cute joke or some sort of advocacy prompted by his "Ban face posters" thread.

You don't give two shits if the men in this forum deride other women's avatars, or repost their pics.
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1504369

You only mind it if they comment negatively on YOURS.

So why haven’t you posted these alleged comments that spurred my vendetta? That would be super easy to do. You can’t because they didn’t happen. Cleaver got his panties in a bunch over nothing and you shoved your hand right inside his tighty whities. Brava!

 

[Aglaopheme]

Is Aglaopheme your real name?

If not, you should ask yourself that question instead of directing your twisted reasoning towards complete strangers on the internet, "honey buns".

Doesn’t know the meaning of account. Sad!

 

[oralaccents]

Doesn’t know the meaning of account. Sad!

Don't beat up on yourself. Let luk do that.

 

[beew]

So why haven’t you posted these alleged comments that spurred my vendetta? That would be super easy to do. You can’t because they didn’t happen. Cleaver got his panties in a bunch over nothing and you shoved your hand right inside his tighty whities. Brava!

You claim that you started this thread "as a counterpunch" to Lance's derogatory thread about face posters.

Bullshit. You encouraged creepy behaviors in the past, and you still do - as long as they don't involve you.

 

[beew]

So why haven’t you posted these alleged comments that spurred my vendetta? That would be super easy to do. You can’t because they didn’t happen. Cleaver got his panties in a bunch over nothing and you shoved your hand right inside his tighty whities. Brava!

Seriously?

You haven't read Lance's "Who's your husband fucking" thread?

Or his thread about the "Eyes" Lounge thread?

 

[Aglaopheme]

Seriously?

You haven't read Lance's "Who's your husband fucking" thread?

Or his thread about the "Eyes" Lounge thread?

Nope. Link ‘em.

 

[butters]

Nope. Link ‘em.

they fail to comprehend how those threads don't show up if you have the person starting them on ignore. i had no idea those threads existed, but nothing that scum does surprises me.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Seriously?

You haven't read Lance's "Who's your husband fucking" thread?

Or his thread about the "Eyes" Lounge thread?

Hey, you were right, my bad. Never saw it I have that moron on ignore. Never read the thread or saw the other one you are talking about.

It was very ugly over there. Gosh damn, aglophag is right up addy's alley and luk's jackoff rolodex. Losers Lounge for sure.

It was funny seeing the mommy's boi trying to flirt, pretending he's relevant somewhere. CandiCame is getting all jelly wanting his attention.
Report Post

 

[beew]

Nope. Link ‘em.

I'm not gonna link a thread that Lance started to bully a poster he doesn't like.
But it prompted derision of most people who posted in the 'Eyes' thread, yourself included:

" Gosh damn, aglophag is [...] Losers Lounge for sure."