Trump is finally...

[zipman]

It’s called unrealistic expectations. He actually expects you to back your personal opinion up with facts without going to look for answers himself. He needs to turn off CNN or NBC and watch Fox News. At least that way he would get professional opinions and proven facts.

Bwahahahahaha!!

Best laugh I've had in a while.

 

[Rightguide]

Comey said the Steele dossier was "salacious and unverified".

Pay attention:

“I first met then-President-Elect Trump on Friday, January 6 in a conference room at Trump Tower in New York. I was there with other Intelligence Community (IC) leaders to brief him and his new national security team on the findings of an IC assessment concerning Russian efforts to interfere in the election. At the conclusion of that briefing, I remained alone with the President-Elect to brief him on some personally sensitive aspects of the information assembled during the assessment.

“The IC leadership thought it important, for a variety of reasons, to alert the incoming President to the existence of this material, even though it was salacious and unverified. Among those reasons were: (1) we knew the media was about to publicly report the material and we believed the IC should not keep knowledge of the material and its imminent release from the President-Elect; and (2) to the extent there was some effort to compromise an incoming President, we could blunt any such effort with a defensive briefing.”

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/os-jcomey-060817.pdf

The assessment he was referring to was the Dossier.

 

[Kantarii]

So you know the concept of a red team was started by Pope Gregory IX in 1234? Cool, I'm impressed.
And good to know you know more about the exercise than Marine Corps Lieutenant General Paul Van Riper and Lieutenant General Burwell B. Bell III.

Tell us again how Bergdahl would have been executed in WWII.

I'm pretty sure Burwell wasn't stating an "opinion".
Or are you conflating two entirely different topics?

I’m not conflating two entirely different subjects. I told you days ago, that the USS, Cole, the marine barracks, and now Burwell are topics I don’t have an interest in discussing. The thread was loosly started about WW3/Iran. That’s the stuff that drew me into the thread, not discussing specific things in the past you brought up.

 

[HisArpy]

Pay attention:

“I first met then-President-Elect Trump on Friday, January 6 in a conference room at Trump Tower in New York. I was there with other Intelligence Community (IC) leaders to brief him and his new national security team on the findings of an IC assessment concerning Russian efforts to interfere in the election. At the conclusion of that briefing, I remained alone with the President-Elect to brief him on some personally sensitive aspects of the information assembled during the assessment.

“The IC leadership thought it important, for a variety of reasons, to alert the incoming President to the existence of this material, even though it was salacious and unverified. Among those reasons were: (1) we knew the media was about to publicly report the material and we believed the IC should not keep knowledge of the material and its imminent release from the President-Elect; and (2) to the extent there was some effort to compromise an incoming President, we could blunt any such effort with a defensive briefing.”

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/os-jcomey-060817.pdf

The assessment he was referring to was the Dossier.

It's an inconvenient truth so a-a just ignores it and then says it didn't happen.

Which is typical for the political narrative from the Left these days. Lie about the truth as long and as often as possible, even when it's obvious that they're lying and they know they're lying.

 

[HisArpy]

Go back and read the thread so you know what you're talking about.

Or shut the fuck up.

dudly, the issue is that you are upset by the words spoken without having ANY understanding of what those words actually meant or why they were said.

Instead, you object to an interpretation sold to you by the Leftist MSM.

You're a fucking buffoon. And Trump's still President.

 

[Kantarii]

dudly, the issue is that you are upset by the words spoken without having ANY understanding of what those words actually meant or why they were said.

Instead, you object to an interpretation sold to you by the Leftist MSM.

You're a fucking buffoon. And Trump's still President.

And to add: there desire to get him out of office knows no bounds.

 

[milehighcityman]

Good luck with that, little fella.

Omar got almost 50% of the primary vote as a first-time candidate in a crowded field of six Democrats.

She represents the fifth most liberal Congressional district in the United States (real liberal, not this BotanyBoy "I am technically a liberal" revisionist horseshit).

She's got as "safe" a seat as you're likely to see in Congress, and is not going anywhere else anytime soon...except perhaps the Senate.

The only way Omar is going to the Senate is as a tourist. While she may (or may not) remain popular in her district she is increasingly not popular in the rest of Minnesota. There is an increasing divide in Minnesota between the city and the rest of the state. This is a normally solid democratic state (the only state to not vote for Reagan in 1984. But Trump almost flipped it. Actually the large candidate field before probably helped Omar, however I believe she will likely win reelection. Regardless, I think she is actually a huge asset to Republicans overall goals if she stays.

 

[Rightguide]

It's an inconvenient truth so a-a just ignores it and then says it didn't happen.

Which is typical for the political narrative from the Left these days. Lie about the truth as long and as often as possible, even when it's obvious that they're lying and they know they're lying.

That's why I only engage him when I'm bored. I have little time for his disingenuous nature.

 

[Kantarii]

That's why I only engage him when I'm bored. I have little time for his disingenuous nature.

And he went to my mob rule thread to stir basically the same shit.

 

[Rightguide]

And he went to my mob rule thread to stir basically the same shit.

The other truth in the info I just posted is that Comey admits to the dossier being "salacious and unverified" after he signed a sworn statement before the FISC that the Dossier he presented them as probable cause for a Warrant was verified. Yes Mr. Comey is in legal jeopardy.

 

[about_average]

Pay attention:

“I first met then-President-Elect Trump on Friday, January 6 in a conference room at Trump Tower in New York. I was there with other Intelligence Community (IC) leaders to brief him and his new national security team on the findings of an IC assessment concerning Russian efforts to interfere in the election. At the conclusion of that briefing, I remained alone with the President-Elect to brief him on some personally sensitive aspects of the information assembled during the assessment.
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/os-jcomey-060817.pdf

The assessment he was referring to was the Dossier.

No, it wasn't, he was referring to some aspects of it, like he clearly said.
The salacious parts, or do you think the whole dossier was about sex?
Or did you never go read the definition of "salacious".

You seem to have a really difficult time with the english language.

Either that or you're being intentionally disingenuous.
Probably both.

 

[about_average]

It's an inconvenient truth so a-a just ignores it and then says it didn't happen.

Oh yay, another person who doesn't know what the words "some aspects" mean.
And you call yourself a lawyer. LMAO.

 

[about_average]

You're a fucking buffoon.

Oh wow, you got me there.

 

[about_average]

I’m not conflating two entirely different subjects. I told you days ago, that the USS, Cole, the marine barracks, and now Burwell are topics I don’t have an interest in discussing.

Funny how you keep quoting me on them, and commenting to others about them.

I swear, you must be taking some serious drugs, you can't keep any of your shit straight.

 

[Kantarii]

Funny how you keep quoting me on them, and commenting to others about them.

I swear, you must be taking some serious drugs, you can't keep any of your shit straight.

I believe I said fuck you. Nothing you say here after is relevant to me.

 

[Kantarii]

He would ignore them if you did. It's a game with him.

Yup.... I’ve already formed my opinion of about his stupid ass now. Absolutely no reason at all to talk to him again. Just let him go on his merry way, thinking he’s entitled to something from me. Problem solved.

 

[about_average]

I believe I said fuck you.

I wouldn't fuck you even with RG's dick.


But to your point, you said you were never replying to me again. That didn't last long LOL

 

[Kantarii]

...going to start WWIII.

Hmmm...who hasn't he pissed off?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/saudi-oil-tankers-attacked-before-entering-persian-gulf-11557725971

Probably the penguins on Antarctica. But no one can confirm or deny that.

 

[icanhelp1]

No, it wasn't, he was referring to some aspects of it, like he clearly said.
The salacious parts, or do you think the whole dossier was about sex?
Or did you never go read the definition of "salacious".

You seem to have a really difficult time with the english language.

Either that or you're being intentionally disingenuous.
Probably both.

Comey's exchange with senator Collins also states; " I didn't use the term counterintelligence. I was briefing him ( president Trump ) about salacious and unverified material. It was in a context of that that he had a strong and defensive reaction about that not being true". It was later that he told Trump he was not under investigation. Later on he briefed that "some parts" of the dossier. The question to be asked is, at what point does the dossier become an unusable source for a FISA. If any part of a document is unverified then the document itself is subject to scrutiny. There is no doubt Comey selected his words carefully and that it leave it unclear whether he meant parts or whole. Also leave the validity of the document itself up for scrutiny. Some parts were questioned in a closed senate session due to sensitive nature of the document.

 

[Rightguide]

Comey's exchange with senator Collins also states; " I didn't use the term counterintelligence. I was briefing him ( president Trump ) about salacious and unverified material. It was in a context of that that he had a strong and defensive reaction about that not being true". It was later that he told Trump he was not under investigation. Later on he briefed that "some parts" of the dossier. The question to be asked is, at what point does the dossier become an unusable source for a FISA. If any part of a document is unverified then the document itself is subject to scrutiny. There is no doubt Comey selected his words carefully and that it leave it unclear whether he meant parts or whole. Also leave the validity of the document itself up for scrutiny. Some parts were questioned in a closed senate session due to sensitive nature of the document.

At the very minute it was submitted, signed as sworn to as being "verified."

 

[icanhelp1]

At the very minute it was submitted, signed as sworn to as being "verified."

That's the issue Trey Gowdy point to.

 

[Tigersman]

trump is finally

going to suck Putin's cock in public.

 

[RobDownSouth]

I wouldn't fuck you even with RG's dick.


But to your point, you said you were never replying to me again. That didn't last long LOL

Neither did either of his marriages, and now he's stuck raising the kids their mothers didn't want in the first place.

 

[Luk]

Neither did either of his marriages, and now he's stuck raising the kids their mothers didn't want in the first place.

Those kids are fucked

 

[Kantarii]

Rob has entered the chat.

.......

Rob has left the chat.