Elizabeth Warren proves her ancestry; embarrasses shit out of Trump & Trumpsters

[BBX50]

^^^Brown Slime oozes in

 

[Comshaw]

Actually it's between 1/32 ans 1/512. Then there's this:

"Warren’s Native American ancestor was from 10 generations ago, that would make her less than 0.1 percent Native American.

To put that in perspective, Warren might even be less Native American than the average European American,” the RNC said, pointing to a 2014 study that found that “European-Americans had genomes that were on average 98.6 percent European, .19 percent African, and .18 Native American.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.1ac8cdcae57c

You're a funny guy. I don't need to repeat what's already been said. See the post below.

Well, no: Warren was born in 1949, so her grandparents were likely born prior to 1910 (I'm younger than she is, and three of my grandparents were born before 1910). My guess is that Natives entered her family tree sometime in the 19th century, a common enough experience for "whites" in Oklahoma.


She's never said she's "an Indian." She's said she has Natives in her family tree and that's all she's ever said about it. It's everyone else who is obsessed with it.

Trump: "I will give you a million dollars...if you take the test and it shows you’re an Indian."

Why is Warren now asking that million dollars be paid if she's not claiming to be "an Indian."?

Does this DNA test show Warren to be "an Indian."?

You're as funny as the first guy. Warren claimed First Nation ancestry. The Donald used it as a school yard taunt by expanding her claim from "ancestry" to "Indian" when he made the bet (remember Pocahontas?). Now that what she claimed has been proven, he's reverted to the "Who cares?" defense (which works with his base but no one else) while you have drawn on the faulty logic that he used to begin with (Equivocation fallacy) to defend his comments.

The Donald rarely ever says things that make sense or are logical. If he can keep the base entertained with his school yard taunts and confused with his faulty logic, he's happy.

And in case you are unfamiliar with it:

Equivocation fallacy
In logic, equivocation ('calling two different things by the same name') is an informal fallacy resulting from the use of a particular word/expression in multiple senses throughout an argument leading to a false conclusion.[1][2] Abbott and Costello's "Who's on first?" routine is a well known example of equivocation...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation


Comshaw

 

[BBX50]

When she came to Harvard Law School, she was — believe it or not — considered by some to be a “minority hire.” She listed herself as a minority on a legal directory reviewed by deans and hiring committees. The University of Pennsylvania “listed her as a minority faculty member,” and she was touted after her hire at Harvard Law School as, yes, the school’s “first woman of color.”

 

[BBX50]

even MSNBC is laughing at her

MSNBC Host: I Might Be as Much Native American as Elizabeth Warren
"Best I can gather, according to your paper's reporting, she's 1/1,000th or something like — I think I might be just as Native American as she is."

 

[rae121452]

since donald and his flying monkeys are all living in the 19th century under white hoods, anyway....

One-drop rule
One-drop rule
The one-drop rule is a social and legal principle of racial classification that was historically prominent in the United States asserting that any person with even one ancestor of sub-Saharan African ancestry is considered black, its implications of racial purity being that anyone unable to pass for white in the context of the US racial hierarchy is assigned the lower status of being non-white or colored.

Wikipedia



or indian

 

[BBX50]

or indian

GAZE here

Warren’s story was not that she had a distant progenitor six generations ago who was Native American.

She said her parents had to elope because of the problems it caused in her father’s racist family.


so there goes your "theory"

 

[nowisthetime]

The Yidiot is also in full denial mode as well. What a gas!

By golly, I know L must be asleep or something, that version has been lingering. One would think he would be at version 1000 at this rate.

 

[phrodeau]

So one the one hand, we have someone being totally honest, and on the the other we have someone who lies multiple times a day.

Meanwhile in North Dakota, native Americans are unable to use their ID cards to vote.

 

[BBX50]

By golly, I know L must be asleep or something, that version has been lingering. One would think he would be at version 1000 at this rate.

https://image.shutterstock.com/image-photo/golden-brown-slime-set-on-450w-742408615.jpg

 

[Luk]

Everybody knows that, Smartass.

I'm simply adjusting my lingo for you guys.

Anyone who is even mildly critical of burkas or of Islam's anti-semitism, is automatically labeled as a 'racist' by you guys.

There's never a need for you to dumb anything down, dumbfuck.

 

[phrodeau]

Everybody knows that, Smartass.

I'm simply adjusting my lingo for you guys.

Anyone who is even mildly critical of burkas or of Islam's anti-semitism, is automatically labeled as a 'racist' by you guys.

Got any examples of that?

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Deadbeat Donald won't pay up. Is anyone surprised?

 

[RobDownSouth]

So one the one hand, we have someone being totally honest, and on the the other we have someone who lies multiple times a day.

Meanwhile in North Dakota, native Americans are unable to use their ID cards to vote.

Gotta imagine that the Housesquaw is sorely conflicted on that one....On one hand, he's always yammered loud 'n long for the need to restrict the ability of #ThosePeople to vote, but he's also a #SituationalNativeAmerican and this ND law impacts primarily Native Americans.

 

[bigsly]

You're a funny guy. I don't need to repeat what's already been said. See the post below.






You're as funny as the first guy. Warren claimed First Nation ancestry. The Donald used it as a school yard taunt by expanding her claim from "ancestry" to "Indian" when he made the bet (remember Pocahontas?). Now that what she claimed has been proven, he's reverted to the "Who cares?" defense (which works with his base but no one else) while you have drawn on the faulty logic that he used to begin with (Equivocation fallacy) to defend his comments.

The Donald rarely ever says things that make sense or are logical. If he can keep the base entertained with his school yard taunts and confused with his faulty logic, he's happy.

And in case you are unfamiliar with it:

Equivocation fallacy
In logic, equivocation ('calling two different things by the same name') is an informal fallacy resulting from the use of a particular word/expression in multiple senses throughout an argument leading to a false conclusion.[1][2] Abbott and Costello's "Who's on first?" routine is a well known example of equivocation...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation


Comshaw

Trump says he'll pay Warren a million if she can show she's an Indian. Today Warren is asking for that million to be paid. Any objective arbitrator would simply rule if Warren has actually shown that she's an Indian, or not, for that million to actually be paid. That's all.

But bless your heart for your vain stab at condescending, yet worthless "Equivocation fallacy" mansplaining, anyway.

 

[KeithD]

Deadbeat Donald won't pay up. Is anyone surprised?

He won't even acknowledge it. He'll continue needling her on the point, completely ignoring it's no longer a point. And his supporters (and the Trumpettes on this board) will go right along with him.

Trump doesn't have a shred of honor in his ancestry. The Trumpettes on the board support him because they don't either. It's a new ethnicity. We call it Trumpettes.

 

[phrodeau]

Where's his fixer when he needs him? Maybe he can get a home equity loan on the White House.

 

[bigsly]

The identity-by-DNA issue fascinates me, basically because so many seem to really want to depend on it to tell them what race/ethnicity they really are, even though it's still such an immaturely inconclusive science. Here's an article from The New York Times from 2014:

White? Black? A Murky Distinction Grows Still Murkier
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/25/science/23andme-genetic-ethnicity-study.html

Among its contents:

On average, the scientists found, people who identified as African-American had genes that were only 73.2 percent African. European genes accounted for 24 percent of their DNA, while .8 percent came from Native Americans.

Latinos, on the other hand, had genes that were on average 65.1 percent European, 18 percent Native American, and 6.2 percent African. The researchers found that European-Americans had genomes that were on average 98.6 percent European, .19 percent African, and .18 Native American.

European-Americans had genomes that were on average 98.6 percent European, .19 percent African, and .18 Native American,”

By comparison, Warren's DNA test, which depends on absolutely no Native American DNA (thus no actual Cherokee DNA, either), but rather depends totally on Mexican, Peruvian, and Colombian DNA per Carlos D. Bustamante's theory of tracking DNA by population migration, puts her genome at somewhere between 0.1 percent - 1.56 percent Native American, meaning she's no more Native American than the average Euro-Am and most likely even less so.

So, even with today's ridiculous Warren report release, socialist Elizabeth is just as much or even more of a white cracker than any other white cracker. No doubt why she doth protest too much about it.

 

[SpeareChucker]

She's been lying about this since the University of Pennsylvania she wants us to believe that Harvard never knew abut her claims and hired her as a white woman, and then she turned to a fellow academic for her specious proof because her 23&Me didn't turn up the results she wanted.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/15/elizabeth-warrens-dna-test-proves-she-was-lying/

 

[RobDownSouth]

She's been lying about this since the University of Pennsylvania she wants us to believe that Harvard never knew abut her claims and hired her as a white woman, and then she turned to a fellow academic for her specious proof because her 23&Me didn't turn up the results she wanted.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/15/elizabeth-warrens-dna-test-proves-she-was-lying/

^^^^ Lawdy, the Housesquaw is squealing like a pig. ^^^^

#MoarDenial

 

[SpeareChucker]

Bob, stop using your employer's computer to post on a porn board.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Bob, stop using your employer's computer to post on a porn board.

Housesquaw, get a job.

 

[Kirkrapine]

Caveat elector: Warren is going to run for president in our lifetimes, and if all ya got on her is that "Fauxcahantas" bullshit, ya got nuttin'.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Same people who still believe his Dad only gave him a loan of 1,000,000.

 

[bigsly]

She should take a political DNA test to prove she's not 100% socialist.

 

[von_Bismarck]

She's been lying about this since the University of Pennsylvania she wants us to believe that Harvard never knew abut her claims and hired her as a white woman, and then she turned to a fellow academic for her specious proof because her 23&Me didn't turn up the results she wanted.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/15/elizabeth-warrens-dna-test-proves-she-was-lying/

Lol. AJ will stoop to any level in the service of his partisanship.