Kreepy Kavanaugh

[Dr. Groove]

The issue is not underage drinking, the issue is lying about the legal drinking age. I remember when the legal age went up to 21 in Wisconsin having grown up in Chicago.

Agreed. I can't believe anyone from that era, especially those choosing to drink, could not remember accurately what the drinking age was.

I can tell you the gas station in Wisconsin we drove to to buy beer, because their drinking age was 18, while IL was 21. I wasn't 18 either, but we could fake that better than we could fake 21.

Secondly -Beyond the seemingly irrelevant act of drinking underage, we see a judge, being considered for the highest bench, who speaks to the subject with the same maturity of an entitled prep-school brat being questioned by his parents. Bending the truth, lying, rationalizing and omitting where necessary to avoid being grounded. All that to answer "Did you drink?" "Did you drink too much?" "Have you blacked out." Questions that rise to the level of a High School counselor's intake or a court-ordered alcohol assessment questionnaire. These shouldn't be hard questions, even if they had humbling answers.

He's a liar - through and through.

 

[BBX50]

A useful idiot...

http://www.smosh.com/wp-content/uploads/ftpuploads/bloguploads/laughing-gifs-how-couldyou.gif

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/3b/52/f1/3b52f10bf2035ce08f6d3f8d9f80a638.jpg

 

[BBX50]

https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/2018-09/30/1/asset/buzzfeed-prod-web-01/anigif_sub-buzz-17171-1538285701-1.gif

this person DEFENDED Weinstein

 

[BBX50]

Rape Charges Against 4 California Dentists Dismissed After Video Contradicts Woman’s Story
https://news3lv.com/news/local/four...-dropped-after-video-contradicts-womans-story



Women ALWAYS LIE

 

[BBX50]

Beto: Sorry For Being A Sexist Theater Critic When I Was, Um … 19

Who the fuck cares?

 

[BBX50]

If you follow Twitter closely, you’ll notice that the debate over Brett Kavanaugh moved significantly from the central question of last Thursday’s hearing — did he commit sexual assault? —


to a raging debate over whether he lied about high-school slang, college drinking, and inside jokes,

and whether he was just too “angry” to be a Supreme Court judge.

why?

cause NO ONE believe Ford and the others

so TEAR DOWN GOAL POSTS

build unseen ones

right, ALGO?

 

[BBX50]

POLL: Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll: 60% Want Kavanaugh Confirmed if FBI Dismisses Allegations.

Plus: “69 percent agree with Kavanaugh’s pronouncement and Sen. Lindsey Graham’s (R-S.C.) statement that the proceedings have been a national disgrace.”

 

[BBX50]

Georgetown prof: White GOP senators in Kavanaugh hearing ‘deserve miserable deaths.’ Plus: “Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes.”

Remember, feminism is about equality, not man-hating.

 

[BBX50]

The Goalposts Have Left The Stadium By This Point

 

[Ramone45]

Judge Kavanaugh has been said to have undergone six FBI background checks related to his nomination. What were the focus of those? It is imperative that the current investigation be limited and concluded by Thursday night, and the Senate vote must be held on Friday.

 

[von_Bismarck]

Who slipped a quarter in bozo?

 

[Dr. Groove]

Multiple choice FYP game.

Judge Kavanaugh has been said to have undergone six FBI background checks related to his nomination. What were the focus of those? It is arbitrary that the current investigation be limited and concluded by Thursday night, and the Senate vote must be held on Friday.

Judge Kavanaugh has been said to have undergone six FBI background checks related to his nomination. What were the focus of those? It is conspiracy that requires current investigation be limited and concluded by Thursday night, and the Senate vote must be held on Friday.

Judge Kavanaugh has been said to have undergone six FBI background checks related to his nomination. What were the focus of those? It is treasonous that the current investigation be limited and concluded by Thursday night, and the Senate vote must be held on Friday.

 

[adrina]

Judge Kavanaugh has been said to have undergone six FBI background checks related to his nomination. What were the focus of those? It is imperative that the current investigation be limited and concluded by Thursday night, and the Senate vote must be held on Friday.

Why? Why is it imperative? Why is it imperative to ramrod a scotus nomination through? Why is it imperative that it be concluded by Thursday and voted on Friday?

Saying it is imperative doesn't actually make it imperative.

SCOTUS lasted quite a while with eight justices a couple years ago. Why is it imperative now?

 

[adrina]

Multiple choice FYP game.

All of the above?

 

[Ramone45]

Multiple choice FYP game.

I disagree. Everyone agrees that Judge Kavanaugh is qualified to serve as a Supreme Court Justice. We know all we need to know. You may not agree, but for lack of a better phrase, too bad. As President Obama said, "win an election". Vote, and accept the consequences of your vote. My Senators know my position. They know that if they do not vote for Judge Kavanaugh, I will fully support their opponent in the next election.

 

[Dr. Groove]

I disagree. Everyone agrees that Judge Kavanaugh is qualified to serve as a Supreme Court Justice. We know all we need to know. You may not agree, but for lack of a better phrase, too bad. As President Obama said, "win an election". Vote, and accept the consequences of your vote. My Senators know my position. They know that if they do not vote for Judge Kavanaugh, I will fully support their opponent in the next election.

I disagree. Everyone agrees that Judge Kavanaugh is qualified to serve as a Supreme Court Justice. We know all we need to know. You may not agree, but for lack of a better phrase, too bad.

Set down the hallucinogens. This is not what agreement looks like.

As President Obama said, "win an election". Vote, and accept the consequences of your vote.

Unless the opposing party unethically blocks appointments, and then changes the rules to allow one party to act recklessly against the people. See: Garland.

They know that if they do not vote for Judge Kavanaugh, I will fully support their opponent in the next election.

I guessing you mean the next primary. Otherwise, it's yet another reason to hope for a few sensible Republicans to lose your support.

 

[silver gurl]

I disagree. Everyone agrees that Judge Kavanaugh is qualified to serve as a Supreme Court Justice. We know all we need to know. You may not agree, but for lack of a better phrase, too bad. As President Obama said, "win an election". Vote, and accept the consequences of your vote. My Senators know my position. They know that if they do not vote for Judge Kavanaugh, I will fully support their opponent in the next election.

Who is this everyone?

 

[Kirkrapine]

Everyone agrees that Judge Kavanaugh is qualified to serve as a Supreme Court Justice.

Well, no, everyone does not. He is a lawyer and a federal judge, but he is also an entitled brat and a mean drunk, without the temperament or self-discipline a judge should have.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Who is this everyone?

These people:

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[Aglaopheme]

Internet winner of the day.

https://twitter.com/giant_if/status/1047125775223349248?s=21

 

[contrifan32]

Yes, peach. I would expect a full vetting of myself if I was looking at being seated on the highest court in the land. I would welcome clearing my name. Some folks are investigated ad nauseam. I can’t imagine who, but. I am certain that I recall that happening. Someone so cool under presure.

This is not the new normal, none of this is normal. He is a deeply flawed man. He’s been shown to have lied under oath about things large and small.]

And you don't agree that 6 FBI background checks and full Senate hearings accomplished that. That you are "certain that you recall" sounds familiar to some of the testimony against Kavanaugh.

I believe you are wrong that this is not the new normal, at least for the Democrats. The politics of personal attacks and destruction seem to be just another day in DC. We are all flawed. How do you see him as deeply flawed when so many who have known him for so long have testified of his moral character.

 

[coati]

I disagree. Everyone agrees that Judge Kavanaugh is qualified to serve as a Supreme Court Justice. We know all we need to know. You may not agree, but for lack of a better phrase, too bad. As President Obama said, "win an election". Vote, and accept the consequences of your vote. My Senators know my position. They know that if they do not vote for Judge Kavanaugh, I will fully support their opponent in the next election.

I think it is wonderful that you have joined the legion of duly brainwashed MAGA-heads who are tightening the noose around the neck of your own Repugnican party. Poetic justice.

Keep up the good work! Your party can soon claim credit for both Long Dong Silver and Kreepy Kavanaugh during an age when women are finally making some progress on sexual harassment from pathetic men who have great difficulties with consensual relationships.

 

[adrina]

And you don't agree that 6 FBI background checks and full Senate hearings accomplished that. That you are "certain that you recall" sounds familiar to some of the testimony against Kavanaugh.

I believe you are wrong that this is not the new normal, at least for the Democrats. The politics of personal attacks and destruction seem to be just another day in DC. We are all flawed. How do you see him as deeply flawed when so many who have known him for so long have testified of his moral character.

Moral character? Lying under oath (past and present), displaying contempt for the democratic senators and engaging in overtly partisan behavior is a sign of moral character and makes him fit for SCOTUS?

HRC had 9+. But now you want to say 6 is enough?

That is an interesting perspective.

 

[Ramone45]

Moral character? Lying under oath (past and present), displaying contempt for the democratic senators and engaging in overtly partisan behavior is a sign of moral character and makes him fit for SCOTUS?

HRC had 9+. But now you want to say 6 is enough?

That is an interesting perspective.

You HAVE to agree the Democrat senators have behaved in a contemptible manner, right?

 

[Ramone45]

Set down the hallucinogens. This is not what agreement looks like.



Unless the opposing party unethically blocks appointments, and then changes the rules to allow one party to act recklessly against the people. See: Garland.




I guessing you mean the next primary. Otherwise, it's yet another reason to hope for a few sensible Republicans to lose your support.

You're telling me what an argument looks like? You have no idea. One doesn't subtitute words in another's statement. That's ignorant, and I demand you stop. Secondly, you don't make false accusations...no wait, that IS in fact exactly what you do. I do not take drugs. You all seem to have a playbook.