Cunt Conway lies about being part of #MeToo

[someoneyouknow]

"I feel very empathetic, frankly, for victims of sexual assault, sexual harassment and rape. I'm a victim of sexual assault."

Thus spoke Cunt Conway who suddenly says she was the victim of sexual assault. If she was the victim, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. But apparently she never said anything, or it didn't happen. Take your pick.

Conway went on to say:

I don't expect Judge Kavanaugh or Jake Tapper or Jeff Flake or anybody to be held responsible for that. You have to be responsible for your own conduct,"​

Is she saying she's responsible for her supposedly being assaulted? It's not clear from her comment, but she later said:

"I want those women who were sexually assaulted the other day who were confronting Jeff Flake, God bless them, but go blame the perpetrator. That's who's responsible for sexual assault, the people who commit them."​

Which is the whole point, Kellyanne. Kavanaugh has apparently committed an assault and you and the con artist are defending him. And not only defending him but saying what Bill Clinton did, lying about getting a consensual blowjob, is the same as a woman being held against her will and on the verge of being raped.

But Conway wasn't done. She made one last convoluted comment to justify Kavanaugh:

"The hypocrisy is ridiculous and if not one Senate Judiciary Committee member changes his or her vote because of what they learned from the FBI investigation, that tells you all you need to know about what the president and Judge Kavanaugh [have] said is a sham,"​

No, it's not a sham if no one changes their vote. It's called ignoring the facts and voting because of politics. Lindsey Graham has already said he doesn't believe anything happened, before there's even been an investigation, while other Republicans are saying it's no big deal if it did happen.

That's the sham. Ignoring the evidence and putting a lying woman assaulter onto the Supreme Court for political reasons, not because the person is qualified.

Further, the hypocrisy starts at the top with the con artist defending a pedophile (Roy Moore) and a known sexual harassers (Bill O'Reilly) while at the same time he's bragged about assaulting women yet lies he ever said such things despite the words being on tape. That doesn't even get into his multiple affairs while married, and lying about them as well, and the illegitimate child because of one of those affairs.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/white-house-adviser-kellyanne-conway-im-a-victim-of-sexual-assault/

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kellyanne-conway-victim-sexual-assault/story?id=58187504

 

[KeithD]

Thus spoke Cunt Conway who suddenly says she was the victim of sexual assault. If she was the victim, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. But apparently she never said anything, or it didn't happen. Take your pick.

Given what DonaldGrabEmbythePussy Trump said on what Ford should have done at age 15, this should be thrown right back into Conway's face for everyone in the White House front office to see. Did she report her assault to the police at the time and how long has she gone without coming out with the charge?

 

[rae121452]

how "convenient" to suddenly have an in-house expert on sexual assault and its effects. i wonder, if the charge had been incest, if feckless cunt ivanka would have come forward?

 

[KeithD]

Of course Conway's husband is contrary and anti-Trump enough to tweet that she never told him she's been assaulted.

 

[ElectraRex]

I believe her since pretty much all women have been sexually assaulted at some point on some level, but fuck her for using it to try to defend a rapist while working for another rapist.

 

[someoneyouknow]

I believe her since pretty much all women have been sexually assaulted at some point on some level, but fuck her for using it to try to defend a rapist while working for another rapist.

Considering she's the one who came up "alternative facts", nothing she says, or anyone in this regime says, can be taken at face value.

This is one time evidence will need to be presented.

 

[rae121452]

just think, if she had come forward immediately they could have caught her abuser with no problem. i mean, there can't be THAT many guys wandering around with a hardon and a white cane.

 

[Boxlicker101]

So K. C. says she was sexually assaulted. I don't know if she was or not, but the people who have posted on this thread seem to be mostly saying she was not, while believing, with no reservations, the contentions that have been made by some other women.

Apparently, the OP doesn't know what a pedophile is. Roy Moore is not, at least from what I have read about him. If I were a voter in AL, I would have voted against him, but not because of that.

Except for unsupported allegations, there is no evidence K. ever tried to rape anybody, and there is evidence he did not. Likewise, there is no reliable evidence Trump ever assaulted anybody, and one allegation has been disproven. He implies that he has fondled some women, but with their consent, which is not sexual assault.

I consider the FBI investigation to be a waste of everybody's time. They will talk to Ford, who will repeat what she has already said. They will talk to K., who will repeat what he has already said. They will talk to Judge, who will repeat what he said in an affidavit. Nobody else has any first-hand knowledge of what did or didn't happen, especially since the alleged incidents occurred 36 years ago. They might hear from character witnesses and, so far, they have all spoken up for K.

 

[ElectraRex]

So K. C. says she was sexually assaulted. I don't know if she was or not, but the people who have posted on this thread seem to be mostly saying she was not, while believing, with no reservations, the contentions that have been made by some other women.

Apparently, the OP doesn't know what a pedophile is. Roy Moore is not, at least from what I have read about him. If I were a voter in AL, I would have voted against him, but not because of that.

Except for unsupported allegations, there is no evidence K. ever tried to rape anybody, and there is evidence he did not. Likewise, there is no reliable evidence Trump ever assaulted anybody, and one allegation has been disproven. He implies that he has fondled some women, but with their consent, which is not sexual assault.

I consider the FBI investigation to be a waste of everybody's time. They will talk to Ford, who will repeat what she has already said. They will talk to K., who will repeat what he has already said. They will talk to Judge, who will repeat what he said in an affidavit. Nobody else has any first-hand knowledge of what did or didn't happen, especially since the alleged incidents occurred 36 years ago. They might hear from character witnesses and, so far, they have all spoken up for K.

Apparently multiple credible accusers doesn't mean anything to you. So women are only believable if they work for Trump or only if what they're saying furthers what you already believe?

 

[Boxlicker101]

Apparently multiple credible accusers doesn't mean anything to you. So women are only believable if they work for Trump or only if what they're saying furthers what you already believe?

I'm not saying any of the accusers, including Kellyanne Conway are believable. I'm also not saying they are not. I haven't read or heard anything convincing either way, except for the sworn statement by Judge.

 

[KeithD]

Apparently multiple credible accusers doesn't mean anything to you.

You do realize that this is Boxlicker you are referring to, right? Of course it doesn't mean anything to Box. He's a totally lost cause.

 

[ElectraRex]

I'm not saying any of the accusers, including Kellyanne Conway are believable. I'm also not saying they are not. I haven't read or heard anything convincing either way, except for the sworn statement by Judge.

You mean the judge that committed perjury multiple times? Sure, that guy is super credible

 

[KeithD]

You mean the judge that committed perjury multiple times? Sure, that guy is super credible

No, I think he means Mark Judge, from whom we've (and Box has) only seen a letter by the way of his lawyer, which isn't in any stretch of the imagination testimony under oath to either Congress or the FBI. But Box doesn't worry about purposely misleading false details like that as long as he's comfortable with whatever agenda he's pursuing.

 

[Boxlicker101]

No, I think he means Mark Judge, from whom we've (and Box has) only seen a letter by the way of his lawyer, which isn't in any stretch of the imagination testimony under oath to either Congress or the FBI. But Box doesn't worry about purposely misleading false details like that as long as he's comfortable with whatever agenda he's pursuing.

I haven't seen the letter you reference, but I have seen this affidavit signed by Mark Judge: https://100percentfedup.com/judge-k...-speaks-mark-judge-calls-accusations-bizarre/

 

[KeithD]

Yes, that's the letter his lawyer provided. It's a crock of shit that that form of statement has anything to do with being subject to felony. That's not under congressional or FBI oath. You are so easily taken in--but then you want to be.

It doesn't matter anyway. He'll just lie through his teeth just like Brett Kavanaugh is doing. And you'll be satisfied with that too as will the slimeball Republicans controlling the White House and Congress.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Yes, that's the letter his lawyer provided. It's a crock of shit that that form of statement has anything to do with being subject to felony. That's not under congressional or FBI oath. You are so easily taken in--but then you want to be.

It doesn't matter anyway. He'll just lie through his teeth just like Brett Kavanaugh is doing. And you'll be satisfied with that too as will the slimeball Republicans controlling the White House and Congress.

It's a sworn statement, made under penalty for perjury. BTW, I just learned Christine Ford took that polygraph exam right after her grandmother's funeral. Whether or not this would have made any difference is something I don't know, but she would have known the effects of emotions. https://people.com/politics/kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-polygraph-test-grandmother-funeral/

 

[jp55665566]

the viscous Left

your scaring people. you scared me out of voting Dem in the foreseeable future. Minnesota. Klobuchar. << goodbye spineless jellyfish.

 

[KeithD]

Bullshit, Box. You're just the clueless wonder the Trump people love having out there shoveling their shit for them.

And I've seen your posting file, jp. You're full of shit on the left being more vicious than either the Republicans or you yourself.

 

[ElectraRex]

It's a sworn statement, made under penalty for perjury. BTW, I just learned Christine Ford took that polygraph exam right after her grandmother's funeral. Whether or not this would have made any difference is something I don't know, but she would have known the effects of emotions. https://people.com/politics/kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-polygraph-test-grandmother-funeral/

You are either willfully ignorant or profoundly dimwitted.

 

[KeithD]

You are either willfully ignorant or profoundly dimwitted.

Box's talent is easily managing to be both.

 

[Boxlicker101]

You are either willfully ignorant or profoundly dimwitted.

I admit to being ignorant of the working of polygraphs but, as a Doctor of Psychology, Christine Ford would not be ignorant. She chose to take the test immediately after her grandmother's funeral, and I don't know how much her state of mind and her emotions would have distorted the results.

There is also the possibility her mind grossly exaggerated a trivial encounter and remembers it as more than it actually was. I think we all know what drama queens teenaged girls can be.

 

[ElectraRex]

I admit to being ignorant of the working of polygraphs but, as a Doctor of Psychology, Christine Ford would not be ignorant. She chose to take the test immediately after her grandmother's funeral, and I don't know how much her state of mind and her emotions would have distorted the results.

There is also the possibility her mind grossly exaggerated a trivial encounter and remembers it as more than it actually was. I think we all know what drama queens teenaged girls can be.

I'm going with you're flat stupid. You don't know polygraphs. Dr. Ford does by your own admission. So do we trust your completely ignorant opinion on when she should take one or do we trust her very educated opinion? You don't know anything about her emotional state or whether it had any effect on the polygraph. Your opinion on those things means absolutely nothing because you have no information, education or expertise, but you keep saying it like that shit matters.

Your opinions on this are absolutely worthless and based on nothing, so why do you keep sharing them like they matter?

 

[ElectraRex]

Box's talent is easily managing to be both.

He has that old cis/het white guy thing where he thinks his opinions are of utmost importance simply because he said them. It's delusional and pathetic beyond belief.

 

[Boxlicker101]

I'm going with you're flat stupid. You don't know polygraphs. Dr. Ford does by your own admission. So do we trust your completely ignorant opinion on when she should take one or do we trust her very educated opinion? You don't know anything about her emotional state or whether it had any effect on the polygraph. Your opinion on those things means absolutely nothing because you have no information, education or expertise, but you keep saying it like that shit matters.

Your opinions on this are absolutely worthless and based on nothing, so why do you keep sharing them like they matter?

Oh, I would trust her opinion. As I have said, I know nothing about polygraphs. Being knowledgeable on the subject, she would be able to choose the best time to be tested in order to get the result she wanted. Given her background, I am also assuming she would want to derail Kavanaugh's nomination and that she would time her accusation to do so.

I don't absolutely know anything about her emotional state at the time of the test, but I would assume she was feeling emotional immediately following the funeral of a close and beloved (probably) family member. Why else would she choose that specific day for the polygraph, considering over thirty years had passed since the alleged assault?

And, I am entitled to have my opinion and to express it. If you don't like it, don't read it.

 

[rae121452]

when a polygraph is given, the person giving it first asks a series of questions to get a baseline. he'll ask simple "yes" questions and then outrageous "no" questions. everyone reacts differently on a polygraph so they first get a gauge on your responses. during the process, they also ask innocuous questions and outrageous ones to graph responses compared to the vital questions. it's a very inexact science but has some value.