Kreepy Kavanaugh

[Que]

Comey, the totally non-partisan hack to the rescue:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/james-comey-the-fbi-can-do-this/ar-BBNKBt4

The FBI can "do" what?

They could have at least interviewed untainted potential witnesses before Dems leaked the existence and contents of Ford's completely unsubstantiated allegation.

Now they are going to collect 302s from every partisan with an axe to grind or trying to blunt the allegation. Every loon is going to come out of the woodwork.

You will notice that the Republicans on the committed he gave absolutely no Credence nor airtime to the Kranks who claimed that they rather than Kavanagh did the alleged attack.

There's only one side willing to back this ridiculously not just unsubstantiated but impossible to meaningfully investigate allegation.

Convenient for them that there's not one single detail that is refutable.

Well except for there actually being such a gathering with those particular participants none of whom say it did happen.

 

[KeithD]

The FBI investigation most certainly should look into the question of perjury in the many instances available to them in this hearing and Kavanaugh's hearing for his current job--this beyond his actual conduct in high school and college. His lying NOW. It's becoming more and more apparent that he's as much a congenital liar as DonaldGrabEmbythePussy Trump is. The Washington Post today reports that, although he told Senator Harris in Thursday's hearing that he didn't watch Ford's testimony, he did. Such an unnecessary lie, if the Washington Post reference is true.

 

[KeithD]

who in Trumps orbit has been involved with Russia illegally?

Listen, chickenshit, people in Trump's orbit have been indicted and convicted. Every one of them has been involved with Russia illegally. So has Trump. Just stop this stupid lying.

 

[Luk]

The idiots who cannot tell when The Kav and 45 are lying have children who can get away with anything.

 

[Comshaw]

Comey, the totally non-partisan hack to the rescue:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/james-comey-the-fbi-can-do-this/ar-BBNKBt4

The FBI can "do" what?

They could have at least interviewed untainted potential witnesses before Dems leaked the existence and contents of Ford's completely unsubstantiated allegation.

Now they are going to collect 302s from every partisan with an axe to grind or trying to blunt the allegation. Every loon is going to come out of the woodwork.

You will notice that the Republicans on the committed he gave absolutely no Credence nor airtime to the Kranks who claimed that they rather than Kavanagh did the alleged attack.

There's only one side willing to back this ridiculously not just unsubstantiated but impossible to meaningfully investigate allegation.

Convenient for them that there's not one single detail that is refutable.

Well except for there actually being such a gathering with those particular participants none of whom say it did happen.

Two things:
1) It's interesting you can produce cites when it suits your accusations and agenda, but not when you're asked to verify a point.

2)You're sputtering verging on incoherence. Next will be the motorboat syndrome: but,but,but,but,but,but,but,but,but.......

Comshaw

 

[KeithD]

What a caricature you are.

Unmasked what you're up to, didn't I? Of course you don't have a reasoned response.

 

[KeithD]

They were "able to do that" because in their view no conservative Justice is acceptable.

Bullshit. They recently let Gorsuch go through. I give a better than even chance that Kavanaugh goes through, but, even if not, most of the other candidates on the list would get through without this fight. McConnell told Trump that Kavanaugh was the most problematic nominee and not to pick him. Trump did, because he wants to personally own the justice going onto the court, and McConnell was right.

Your assertion is a pile of crap.

 

[doowdniw]

Remember what forum this is. The desired details are of a far more . . . anatomical nature.

She had brown hair.

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

The idiots who cannot tell when The Kav and 45 are lying have children who can get away with anything.

How come your acute lie detector didn't kick in to tell you Karen was a man when you had cybersex with him?

 

[Que]

The FBI investigation most certainly should look into the question of perjury in the many instances available to them in this hearing and Kavanaugh's hearing for his current job--this beyond his actual conduct in high school and college. His lying NOW. It's becoming more and more apparent that he's as much a congenital liar as DonaldGrabEmbythePussy Trump is. The Washington Post today reports that, although he told Senator Harris in Thursday's hearing that he didn't watch Ford's testimony, he did. Such an unnecessary lie, if the Washington Post reference is true.

Always fantasyland with you.

This will be a stack of 302's. Nothing more.

They will be added to Kavanaugh's file. No conclusions or judgements will be offered.

The 302's will be leaked by the Dems and they will seize on this or that as "proving" something. They will demand the hearings be reopened. Again. Having successfully stalled over for three weeks, they hope to do it indefinately.

The Republicans will vote down that idiotic motion.

The vote scheduled on the floor will happen as now scheduled.

Kavenaugh will be confirmed with 53, maybe 55 votes.

Dem's will use this as a midterm election issue and depending on the gullibility of the American public they will either pay for that or not.

 

[KeithD]

Ah, time to try to distract and deflect. Obviously, the thread isn't going well for the Trumpettes.

 

[KeithD]

Always fantasyland with you.

This will be a stack of 302's. Nothing more.

They will be added to Kavanaugh's file. No conclusions or judgements will be offered.

The 302's will be leaked by the Dems and they will seize on this or that as "proving" something. They will demand the hearings be reopened. Again. Having successfully stalled over for three weeks, they hope to do it indefinately.

The Republicans will vote down that idiotic motion.

The vote scheduled on the floor will happen as now scheduled.

Kavenaugh will be confirmed with 53, maybe 55 votes.

Dem's will use this as a midterm election issue and depending on the gullibility of the American public they will either pay for that or not.

What part of my continued expressed opinion that Kavanaugh will likely get confirmed and this investigation won't be conclusively against Kavanaugh or that the crux of the matter isn't what actually happened 35 years ago (although that's where the focus has been you--you, for instance, for the purpose of deflection and distraction) did you choose just not to take on board? What fantasyland of mine about the outcome of this are you referring to? Cite it.


Try a bit of honesty in your postings.

 

[Kirkrapine]

Dem's will use this as a midterm election issue and depending on the gullibility of the American public they will either pay for that or not.

What gullibility? The Dems are entirely in the right here, and the people know it, and you know it.

 

[Que]

Ah, time to try to distract and deflect. Obviously, the thread isn't going well for the Trumpettes.

What part of outlining exactly what the procedure is going forward is distracting and deflecting?

Compare and contrast that with the actual distraction of your just making shit uo.

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

What gullibility? The Dems are entirely in the right here, and the people know it, and you know it.

Manufacturing a character assination? Yes. Everyone knows exactly what's going on.

 

[Que]

What gullibility? The Dems are entirely in the right here, and the people know it, and you know it.

Who are "the people," comrade?

Care to cite a poll where "the people" are buying the whole, it's-job-interview-so-the-accused-must-prove-a-negative narrative?

Go ahead and run as the champions of #metoo.

There isn't a Democrat out there that does not have pictures of them grinning with their arm around Harvey Weinstein and/or Bill Clinton. Weinstein's victims specifically mentioned that he told them no one would believe them because of his stature as being such a pro woman's issue donor.

"The people" that matter know it is all crocodile tears.

 

[Que]

Bullshit. They recently let Gorsuch go through. I give a better than even chance that Kavanaugh goes through, but, even if not, most of the other candidates on the list would get through without this fight. McConnell told Trump that Kavanaugh was the most problematic nominee and not to pick him. Trump did, because he wants to personally own the justice going onto the court, and McConnell was right.

Your assertion is a pile of crap.

They did not "let Gorsuch go through" they thought they had the votes to block him. They foolishly thought that McConnell was bluffing and would not invoke the Reid, nuclear option. They gambled and lost. Stupidly so. Republicans RINOS Awould not have gone nuclear for Kavenaugh under the current situation.

 

[Kirkrapine]

There isn't a Democrat out there that does not have pictures of them grinning with their arm around Harvey Weinstein and/or Bill Clinton.

So what?

Weinstein's victims specifically mentioned that he told them no one would believe them because of his stature as being such a pro woman's issue donor.

Inapplicable in Kavanaugh's case.

"The people" that matter . . .

And who would those be? That sounds rather Straussian, and no good ever came out of the "noble lie."

 

[Kirkrapine]

Putting all this in its proper perspective: In hindsight, I hope nobody here seriously believes or would argue that letting Clarence Thomas on the Court was the right thing to do. That was a regrettable decision, and seating Kavanaugh would be even more regrettable.

 

[Que]

Entire thing is a never-ending tantrum. Flake gives them an inch, now Nadler is saying if he is not satisfied with the results (ie the nomination stalls, obviously) he will push for impeachment after he is seated.

Fuck 'em. Confirm him, let them have their impeachment tantrum.

There is video of nearly all of them talking about how Clinton's behavior and admitted perjury does not rise to the level of impeachment.

 

[Ramone45]

Manufacturing a character assination? Yes. Everyone knows exactly what's going on.

The Democrat Party has self destructed here. THAT's what everyone knows. They are the ones that politicized this proceeding. I'm non-partisan in the sense that I dislike both parties equally. But now I can absolutely say I dislike the Democrats much more. That dope from Rhode Island reading from Kavanaugh's High School yearbook. Fucking unbelievable. My default will be to vote against any Democrat and to financially support the opponent. That is unless something changes, which I doubt it will.

 

[Oblimo]

Care to cite a poll where "the people" are buying the whole, it's-job-interview-so-the-accused-must-prove-a-negative narrative?

Again, you are misrepresenting. Kavanaugh didn’t have to prove anything. The Senate committee decided what fairness required. Ideally, in my opinion, their decision would have been based almost entirely on the credibility of the sworn testimony put before them. [Sarcasm]Instead, Graham died on this hill, raging for the plight of closeted, self-loathing conservatives everywhere and turned the decision into a On the Down Low production of Show Boat.[/Sarcasm]

And then the Senate decided that fairness require an FBI inquiry.

Go ahead and run as the champions of #metoo.

There isn't a Democrat out there that does not have pictures of them grinning with their arm around Harvey Weinstein and/or Bill Clinton.

Actually, there are tens of millions of Democrats who have never been in the same room as those two dirty old men. And I’m not just being snarky. You need to lay off on your monolithicisms and interact with the individuals libruls who are trying to interact with you.

Weinstein's victims specifically mentioned that he told them no one would believe them because of his stature as being such a pro woman's issue donor.

And he was dead wrong, wasn’t he?

 

[Que]

So what?



Inapplicable in Kavanaugh's case.



And who would those be? That sounds rather Straussian, and no good ever came out of the "noble lie."

Says the idiot that claims "the oeople" writ large are with him.

What is wrong with Clarence Thomas? Is he too uppity for you? I can assure you that your statement that NOBODY is glad he us there is false.

 

[Que]

Again, you are misrepresenting. Kavanaugh didn’t have to prove anything. The Senate committee decided what fairness required. Ideally, in my opinion, their decision would have been based almost entirely on the credibility of the sworn testimony put before them. [Sarcasm]Instead, Graham died on this hill, raging for the plight of closeted, self-loathing conservatives everywhere and turned the decision into a On the Down Low production of Show Boat.[/Sarcasm]

And then the Senate decided that fairness require an FBI inquiry.

Go ahead and run as the champions of #metoo.



Actually, there are tens of millions of Democrats who have never been in the same room as those two dirty old men. And I’m not just being snarky. You need to lay off on your monolithicisms and interact with the individuals libruls who are trying to interact with you.



And he was dead wrong, wasn’t he?

"Millions" of Democrats are not running for office you pedantic buffoon.

 

[Oblimo]

"Millions" of Democrats are not running for office you pedantic buffoon.

As I said, I was not just being snarky, I was making a point. You are wasting all our time with your monolithicism.

Kirkrapine was trying to talk to you about the millions of Democrats. You instead starting talking about Democratic politicians’ antics with Weinstein.