Do you think Mueller should be fired?

Should Mueller be fired


  • Total voters
    109
No evidence of such has been leaked, and it would have if it happened. Remember the DNC told the FBI to get lost when they wanted to look at their computers for evidence of Russian hacking the Democrats themselves alleged.

Remember too, the entire basis for the investigation of "collusion" by the Russians and the Trump Campaign was a baseless manufactured dossier, compiled by foreign agents, paid for by the Clinton Campaign, and used by the Obama administration as probable cause to obtain Fisa Court warrants to spy on American citizens to undermine the election in Hillary's favor. In the event she failed to be elected the conspiracy would continue efforts to frame the President and further a silent coup to reverse the election.

Remember Comey and Clapper both testified under oath they did not spy on the Trump campaign, Now they say in public they did but only out of a concern for Russian "collusion" which we now know was a totally manufactured line of bullshit with ZERO evidence of its existence.

https://unrealfacts-656a.kxcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/14773b2971c73b-43.-Pinocchio.jpg
 
It'a amazing the amount of ignorance the opposition operates under.
Like I said
You keep posting that BS but to date you haven't provided a single piece of evidence that Steele, or anyone on his behalf, worked with people claiming to represent the Russian government in their discussions with him.
As for the article, using your logic Trump is colluding with North Korea and China.
Though, come to think of it, his family does do billions of dollars of business with China and there are a lot of coincidental deals for his and his families businesses that have taken place during trade negotiations with them.
But I don't really think they're colluding, it's just using the office of the president to set foreign policy to enhance personal financial gain.
 
Last edited:
This week, one of the Russian companies accused by Special Counsel Robert Mueller of funding a conspiracy to meddle in the 2016 U.S. presidential election was revealed in court to not have existed during the time period alleged by Mueller's team of prosecutors, according to a lawyer representing the defendant.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/30556/disaster-mueller-indicted-russian-company-didnt-ryan-saavedra
I already posted a link to a 2014 article article in Russia about Concord Catering. http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=89136487&postcount=2
 
Has anyone asked Shep if he ever wondered why, if the FBI was only concerned with Russian infiltration, why they didn't have any spy (informants) in the Clinton Campaign?:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: Didn't think so.
It's public knowledge that trump has a long history of illegal activity, both personal and business. He had people on his staff with suspicious Kremlin connections. It makes perfect sense the FBI would hire an informant to connect with some of his staff.


No evidence of such has been leaked, and it would have if it happened.
LMAO You're hilarious.
You know Clinton wasn't spied on because no evidence they were has been leaked.
But it doesn't matter there's no evidence Trump's campaign was spied on, you and Trump know they were. :rolleyes:
 
Remember Comey and Clapper both testified under oath they did not spy on the Trump campaign, Now they say in public they did but only out of a concern for Russian "collusion" which we now know was a totally manufactured line of bullshit with ZERO evidence of its existence.
I'm still waiting for you to post a link to the site with all of the special council's information on the investigation, so everyone can see that there's no evidence.
Why are you keeping it to yourself? Make it public, send it to Wikileaks, something. Let everyone see.
 
So, my question is and always has been: If you were comfortable with the investigations into Benghazi, Whitewater and finally maneuvering a sitting President into lying about a blowjob, if there is nothing for Mueller to find, if the Donald and his cohorts have done nothing illegal, underhanded or dishonest, why all the hoopla and whining about Mueller and the investigation? Why not let it run out and when nothing is found, give it a great big "I TOLD YOU SO YOU DUMB ASSES"?

Or is it that you know deep in your heart that Mueller will find some really bad things. That the Donald and his compadres are in it up to their necks and the Donald, while expounding the wise and appropriate aim of draining the swamp, is the biggest, slimiest alligator in the swamp?

You can't have it both ways. If you believe there is nothing to find and that the investigation is a waste of time, all you have to do is wait until it's over. That would put the Republicans on a very good footing to elect or reelect any number of that party to a plethora of seats in federal and local venues.

On the other hand if down deep you know they are guilty as hell BUT YOU STILL DON'T CARE and your twisted little mind can reconcile the two opposing values please by all means keep right on screaming for the end to the investigation. If it is managed, it will lead to an even greater poisoning of our democracy. If not, the Republicans will be voted out of power for an extend time.

Choose wisely.



Comshaw
 
It's public knowledge that trump has a long history of illegal activity, both personal and business. He had people on his staff with suspicious Kremlin connections. It makes perfect sense the FBI would hire an informant to connect with some of his staff.


LMAO You're hilarious.
You know Clinton wasn't spied on because no evidence they were has been leaked.
But it doesn't matter there's no evidence Trump's campaign was spied on, you and Trump know they were. :rolleyes:

I'm still waiting for you to post a link to the site with all of the special council's information on the investigation, so everyone can see that there's no evidence.
Why are you keeping it to yourself? Make it public, send it to Wikileaks, something. Let everyone see.

There is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing by the President in this matter. This investigation began as a counter-intelligence investigation...which is not a criminal investigation. Incidentally, this was the reason why Sessions did not have to recuse himself when he did. Mueller took over a counter-intelligence investigation based on false evidence manufactured by foreign agents, paid for by the Clinton Campaign and the DNC, to frame an elected President they don't like.

You have aligned yourself with a criminal conspiracy to facilitate a silent coup to alter the outcome of a presidential election. You did this because you're an ignorant follower of a poisonous destructive ideology that continues to be swept from the political leadership roles all across America.
 
There is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing by the President in this matter. This investigation began as a counter-intelligence investigation...which is not a criminal investigation. Incidentally, this was the reason why Sessions did not have to recuse himself when he did. Mueller took over a counter-intelligence investigation based on false evidence manufactured by foreign agents, paid for by the Clinton Campaign and the DNC, to frame an elected President they don't like.

You have aligned yourself with a criminal conspiracy to facilitate a silent coup to alter the outcome of a presidential election. You did this because you're an ignorant follower of a poisonous destructive ideology that continues to be swept from the political leadership roles all across America.
It's clear to most people here that you have been lied to repeatedly and often. Your gullibility is yuge.

There is not and has never been any plot to install Hillary Clinton in Donald Trump's place, or any other kind of "coup." The idea is ridiculous, and is only found in ridiculous sources.

There's a memo you should read, issued by Republicans in Congress, stating that the investigation was begun over Papadopolous's big mouth, and not the Steele dossier.

Jeff Sessions recused himself because he was in contact with Russian operatives that he couldn't adequately cover for.

There is plenty of evidence that Donald Trump has committed crimes. It's a crime to make false statements in a government matter, for one. It's a crime to obstruct justice, and there's circumstantial evidence for that. It's a crime to interfere with an ongoing investigation, which Trump seems to do a few times a week. It's a crime to violate security protocols and to improperly divulge classified information, which happened more than once last year.
 
SOr is it that you know deep in your heart that Mueller will find some really bad things. That the Donald and his compadres are in it up to their necks and the Donald, while expounding the wise and appropriate aim of draining the swamp, is the biggest, slimiest alligator in the swamp?

Donnie acts guilty. Didn't his lawyers ever tell him not to act guilty? Those around him act as if he's guilty. A witness can't 'flip' on you unless you've committed crime. Didn't Donnie's lawyers ever tell him, "If you can't do the time, don't do the crime" ?? Donnie and his team have already admitted crimes and conspiracies. Didn't their lawyers ever tell Team Tromp to shut the fuck up? "No comment" is your friend. Is that too much to grok?

It's all because of a big mistake. Donnie didn't expect to win those 77,000 votes in three counties that put him over the top. He became POTUS by accident. If he'd lost, as expected (and as he did in popular vote), he'd just be another also-ran, with lots of media exposure to boost the Tromp brand.

But no, he had to go and win. Losers usually aren't inspected. Winners are, especially with vivid histories just begging for explication. Who bailed you out all those times, Donnie, and why? So he tries to deflect by blaming the loser for losing and the truth for hurting him. Pathetic.
 
It's clear to most people here that you have been lied to repeatedly and often. Your gullibility is yuge.

There is not and has never been any plot to install Hillary Clinton in Donald Trump's place, or any other kind of "coup." The idea is ridiculous, and is only found in ridiculous sources.

There's a memo you should read, issued by Republicans in Congress, stating that the investigation was begun over Papadopolous's big mouth, and not the Steele dossier.

Jeff Sessions recused himself because he was in contact with Russian operatives that he couldn't adequately cover for.

There is plenty of evidence that Donald Trump has committed crimes. It's a crime to make false statements in a government matter, for one. It's a crime to obstruct justice, and there's circumstantial evidence for that. It's a crime to interfere with an ongoing investigation, which Trump seems to do a few times a week. It's a crime to violate security protocols and to improperly divulge classified information, which happened more than once last year.

The rule he cited that required him to recuse himself, does not require him to recuse himself in the matters of a counter-intelligence investigation, which is all that it was before Mueller was appointed. He was only required to do so in a criminal investigation which it wasn't at the time of his recusal. You are the one operating under ignorance and misinformation.
 
The rule he cited that required him to recuse himself, does not require him to recuse himself in the matters of a counter-intelligence investigation, which is all that it was before Mueller was appointed. He was only required to do so in a criminal investigation which it wasn't at the time of his recusal. You are the one operating under ignorance and misinformation.

Hi, liar!
 
The rule he cited that required him to recuse himself, does not require him to recuse himself in the matters of a counter-intelligence investigation, which is all that it was before Mueller was appointed. He was only required to do so in a criminal investigation which it wasn't at the time of his recusal. You are the one operating under ignorance and misinformation.
I didn't say otherwise. Sessions did recuse himself, and his reason for doing so was clear. The investigation was about Russian interference. Sessions had contact with Kislyak, which he failed to disclose at his confirmation hearing. He stepped on his own dick, and he knew it.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-sessions-statement-recusal
 
Morning? Damn, you even lie about the time of day!
It's always morning somewhere. Even more in mental territory. Some people live constantly in a misty dawn, hearing mourning doves cooing, dew falling, scorpions slithering, repo men approaching. Ah...

We stayed in a colonial city in Chiapas, southernmost Mexico. We knew morning had arrived when the water trucks started their daily rounds at dawn, dragging chains from bumpers over the cobbled streets to prevent sparks, rattling loudly, and playing RAINDROPS KEEP FALLING ON MY HEAD at top volume from shitty horn speakers. Then a local pastor would launch holy exploding sky-rockets, as is the custom. Morning there is memorable.

Our favorite mornings were in Antigua Guatemala. At dawn came the church bells, the rockets, the burning tires, the barking dogs, and maybe a droning religious procession. Those signaled us to crawl over to breakfast.
 
I wish they wouldn't announce these kinds of releases ahead of time. It gives the whiners time to craft their spin.
 
I wish they wouldn't announce these kinds of releases ahead of time. It gives the whiners time to craft their spin.

Rosenstein has had three weeks to have it revised,edited, and probably redacted.;)
 
Back
Top