Active Shooter Inside YouTube Headquarters

Oh this is a chick who wanted to take down her boyfriend because she was a narcissist, whiny, piece of trash, but play the victim game.

I bet Lifetime will make a film about her. She will be on Snapped 3,2,1 and they will try to milk the sympathy factor. :rolleyes:

Glad this cunt is dead.
 
As usual, Sean is among the first to gather at the scene of the crime.
This stuff seems to hype him up and excite him.

So temperamental! :devil::devil::devil:
 
As usual, Sean is among the first to gather at the scene of the crime.
This stuff seems to hype him up and excite him.

So temperamental! :devil::devil::devil:

Shut the fuck up, Dishrag.

Also, reported.
 
Youtube is part of Google.

Interesting that this happens a week after Youtube started taking down gun-related videos from its servers.

What do you personally find the most interesting about meaningless coincidences?
 
I'm not sure, but they're more interesting than meaningless posters.

Nice to see you engage in some introspection.

Have you thought about how you might be able to make your posts more meaningful? Less snark, more content?
 
Nice to see you engage in some introspection.

Have you thought about how you might be able to make your posts more meaningful? Less snark, more content?
Will you be defending the shooter's second amendment rights tonight or tomorrow?
 
Nice to see you engage in some introspection.

Have you thought about how you might be able to make your posts more meaningful? Less snark, more content?
Perhaps not so coincidental. SFGate is reporting the the shooter's motive was anger over YT's taking videos down and demonetizing videos. It's not clear that she was posting gun related videos, but gun related videos are just part of YT's idiot "censorship" policies.
 
It's not clear that she was posting gun related videos, but gun related videos are just part of YT's idiot "censorship" policies.
Is that anything like Laurel's idiot NO UNDERAGE and NO BESTIALITY policies? A private site can't specify acceptable content? Really?
 
Will you be defending the shooter's second amendment rights tonight or tomorrow?

nice to see you making this a second amendment issue when of course the Second Amendment does not permit anyone to engage in any sort of unlawful activity. But you know that of course.
 
Just in case she's not black, Mexican, or Muslim: thoughts and prayers.

Good job ror flapping your cheeks before you know what the fuck is going on.

But you are quite good at that.
 
The anti-gunners are sure out in force!

Too bad they don't care about people that die by any other means, and don't care about dealing with the underlying cause of why someone would attempt to hurt someone else (lack of adequate mental health care, and hopelessness that's pervasive in trump's america).

Maybe it could be because they themselves are all that hopeless, that they don't trust themselves with firearms?

I mean, if we're going to spend this time making huge assumptions, that seems to be an obvious one.
 
Back
Top