High School Shooting In Florida

Name one time the Supreme Court has stricken down gun control legislation.

Heller.

Sawed off shotguns were made illegal in 1930s.

I own more than one SBS, along with millions of others.

Along with SBR's and suppressors it's one of the easiest of the more restricted weapons to get.

You don't need to make up lies here.

Assault rifles in 1994. Before you cry your eyes out about how "useless" it was, that's not the point,. The point = LEGAL

Never happened.

It was only legal because it didn't actually ban any rifles.

It just banned rifle accessories.

That's why this isn't an "assault" rifle....even though it's still effectively the exact same thing as the AR-15 with the exact same firepower.

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/frs_15-tfb.jpeg

It's just got "NOT assault rifle" accessories on it.

If you understood what you were talking about, you would understand why it's so fucking retarded.

All kinds of things have been banned over time = legal and constitutional to control what kind of guns we want and don't want

Not in the small arms department.

Not even in big arms department.

Shit you can go buy an A-4 Skyhawk or an F-16 if your pockets are deep enough.


"the US Constitution and Bill of Rights say so" = NRA lies spoon fed to the braindead

No, it's the verifiable reality of the USA.

You tell that same lie a thousand times and it will never get any more true. ;)
 
Last edited:
Do you know what I take from reading your comments?
Defense won't stop this, offence won't happen..... so let's do fuck all.

Thankfully, your teens (you know, the ones who are actually dying) are seemingly ready, willing and able to demand action of some kind - because the comments here reflect the inaction of your legislators.

So, instead of actually trying to come up with a VIABLE solution you throw bombs at the ideas that are possible? Some "warrior queen" you are.

As I pointed out, banning or restricting guns won't work. Those other things I mentioned about arming teachers and enforcing existing laws WILL work. Yet, all you want to do is repeat the efforts that won't do anything because it fits the narrative you've bought into.

It was a GUN FREE ZONE. Guns were BANNED from that place. There weren't supposed to BE any guns there. Yet, somehow one showed up. And 17 died. And all you want to do is try it again? On a larger scale?

What kind of fucked up are you that you can't see that banning guns won't stop a lunatic who wants to kill?

Go ahead, ban guns in America. Let's even say you're successful in getting it passed into law and the majority of people go all Australian and surrender their arms. Do you think that Mexican drug cartels will give up their guns too? Do you think that the Chicago gangs will just voluntarily comply? Do you think that MS-13 will EVEN BOTHER TO CARE?

"Oh, we'll just tack on some extra prison time..." Yeah sweetheart, you do that. And then let's appoint YOU to stand up in front of a camera and explain to the grieving how that "worked" to solve the gun violence problem.

Fucking stupid.
 
The Dred Scott of its day.

A 5-4 decision with violent dissension spearheaded by an activist judge. From 1791 to 2008 there has never been another.


"In the United States, it is illegal to posses a sawed off shotgun that has a barrel length of less than eighteen inches, unless the individual has obtained a taxed permit from the ATF. That permit requires a background check and payment of an excise tax for that weapon."

I own more than one SBS, along with millions of others.

Along with SBR's and suppressors it's one of the easiest of the more restricted weapons to get.

You don't need to make up lies here.
 
It was a GUN FREE ZONE. Guns were BANNED from that place. There weren't supposed to BE any guns there.
Apart from the armed sheriff's deputy on site, you mean? You can never get anything right, can you, Tim?
 
Apart from the armed sheriff's deputy on site, you mean? You can never get anything right, can you, Tim?

So MOAR gov't protection is the obvious answer. Maybe install some more cameras so gov't functionaries can more acurrately report which bodies fell in which order.
 
It was only legal because it didn't actually ban any rifles.

It just banned rifle accessories.

That's why this isn't an "assault" rifle....even though it's still effectively the exact same thing as the AR-15 with the exact same firepower.

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/frs_15-tfb.jpeg

It's just got "NOT assault rifle" accessories on it.

If you understood what you were talking about, you would understand why it's so fucking retarded.

What you need to do is create a pictorial to show the difference. 'Cuz coloring books are easier for children to understand and encompass ideas from.

First pic; "This is a stripped lower receiver. It's just the lower part of the gun frame and has the serial number on it. THIS is what you register when you buy an AR style gun. Scary looking ain't it. Mass death on the shelf."
Second pic; "This is an upper. It has a barrel and the action that cycles and chambers the ammo. If you attach the upper to the lower you have a rifle. NOT an 'assault rifle' just a 'rifle'."
Third pic' "This is 1 set of accessories for the rifle. If you put these accessories on the rifle, it magically changes from 'rifle' to 'assault rifle'."
4th pic; "This is another set of accessories for the rifle. If you use these accessories, it's still a 'rifle'. It's the SAME lower receiver and upper. It shoots the SAME ammo from the same magazines. But it's not an 'assault rifle'."

It might work to show how ridiculous the whole "assault rifle" thing is. Probably won't though, they'll just try to demand that we not be able to buy lower receivers. Like the lowers for AK's that have to be destroyed before those arms can be imported. Even though lower AK receivers can LEGALLY be manufactured from a shovel blade.

Shovel AK - warning strong language/violence/mature audiences only. Alcohol and guns. Very pic heavy, there's even a CAT PIC in there
 
Last edited:
Ah, the word games. An "assault weapon" is any hardware marketed as just right for assaulting people. If it looks and sounds like bad-ass commando deathware, BUY IT!

No, "assault weapons" bans won't work... except it did. Confiscations won't work... except where they have, but not here? I'll say again: bans, confiscations, control of firearms in USA is impossible. Strictly quashing their public use IS possible. Hey, even Wayne LaPierre of the NRA said "There should be no guns in schools, period". Do not allow the public presence of firearms except by authorized personnel in defined situations. Zero tolerance.
 
Ah, the word games. An "assault weapon" is any hardware marketed as just right for assaulting people. If it looks and sounds like bad-ass commando deathware, BUY IT!

No, "assault weapons" bans won't work... except it did. Confiscations won't work... except where they have, but not here? I'll say again: bans, confiscations, control of firearms in USA is impossible. Strictly quashing their public use IS possible. Hey, even Wayne LaPierre of the NRA said "There should be no guns in schools, period". Do not allow the public presence of firearms except by authorized personnel in defined situations. Zero tolerance.

Word games? It's not US playing word games.

You're the one who insists on the meaning of "militia" is something different than what it's been defined as. You're the one who is insisting that something that was PROVEN TO NOT WORK, somehow did despite 17 confirmed pieces of evidence to the contrary. You're the one who's trying to say that weapons bans in other countries have eliminated mass slaughter, except it hasn't. And, finally, YOU are the one who is saying; "Do not allow the public presence of firearms except by authorized personnel in defined situations. Zero tolerance", except that those people who would be carrying arms in the schools WOULD BE "authorized."

It's not us playing the word games here. You want a gun ban. When shown facts and evidence that such a ban didn't and won't work, you move the goal post and continue the talking point while remaining completely oblivious.
 
What you need to do is create a pictorial to show the difference. 'Cuz coloring books are easier for children to understand and encompass ideas from.

First pic; "This is a stripped lower receiver. It's just the lower part of the gun frame and has the serial number on it. THIS is what you register when you buy an AR style gun. Scary looking ain't it. Mass death on the shelf."
Second pic; "This is an upper. It has a barrel and the action that cycles and chambers the ammo. If you attach the upper to the lower you have a rifle. NOT an 'assault rifle' just a 'rifle'."
Third pic' "This is 1 set of accessories for the rifle. If you put these accessories on the rifle, it magically changes from 'rifle' to 'assault rifle'."
4th pic; "This is another set of accessories for the rifle. If you use these accessories, it's still a 'rifle'. It's the SAME lower receiver and upper. It shoots the SAME ammo from the same magazines. But it's not an 'assault rifle'."

It might work to show how ridiculous the whole "assault rifle" thing is. Probably won't though, they'll just try to demand that we not be able to buy lower receivers. Like the lowers for AK's that have to be destroyed before those arms can be imported. Even though lower AK receivers can LEGALLY be manufactured from a shovel blade.

Shovel AK - warning strong language/violence/mature audiences only. Alcohol and guns. Very pic heavy, there's even a CAT PIC in there

Like the poor kid that was expelled for tearing a post-it note into the shape of a gun, the poor kid will be expelled for bringing a coloring book to school with an AR-15 'assault rifle' in it, that nearly killed little Rebekah Sunshine from the fear it instilled.
 
So MOAR gov't protection is the obvious answer. Maybe install some more cameras so gov't functionaries can more acurrately report which bodies fell in which order.

Of course not queefy, like you always say, more guns is the answer. Give everyone guns and level the playing field!
 
Of course not queefy, like you always say, more guns is the answer. Give everyone guns and level the playing field!

Cite, coward?

Not everyone wants to carry, nor should.

You, for example, don't have the temperment. I'm glad you stay away from them for the homoerotic discordance that they trigger for you.

I wouldn't be opposed to you fellating one, however.
 
Last edited:
"I don't have to DEFEND my innane positions; I am Alpha as FUCK and am therefore only required to offend!" - BobsDownSouth

"I, too, have testicles large enough to put in a sock and hide behind!" - Chansen_PalpateTestes
 
"My button's bigger than yours, and even better, mine works." -- Orange Shit-for-Brains


"I don't have to DEFEND my innane positions; I am Alpha as FUCK and am therefore only required to offend!" - BobsDownSouth

"I, too, have testicles large enough to put in a sock and hide behind!" - Chansen_PalpateTestes
 
Cite, coward?

Not everyone wants to carry, nor should.

You, for example, don't have the temperment. I'm glad you stay away from them for the homoerotic discordance that they trigger for you.

I wouldn't be opposed to you fellating one, however.

The law says I can't carry, queefy. Get off the meth. Why do you enjoy men sucking hard phallus objects? Another reason your wife left, perhaps?
 
Of course not queefy, like you always say, more guns is the answer. Let the government have all the guns and slaughter all the people on the playing field!

I fixed your post to reflect the true intent in your cold callous heart.
 
The law says I can't carry, queefy. Get off the meth. Why do you enjoy men sucking hard phallus objects? Another reason your wife left, perhaps?

So, is this an admission that you're a prohibited person who is talking about guns and school shootings?
 
The law says I can't carry, queefy. Get off the meth. Why do you enjoy men sucking hard phallus objects? Another reason your wife left, perhaps?

Did the guard you hid behind let you fondle his "steel penis extension?"
 
So, is this an admission that you're a prohibited person who is talking about guns and school shootings?

"Teh Board Puppetmaster" as he refers to himself in third person is trying in vain to reestablish that his "Skiddles" family of alts are based in Canada, and therefore totally not him in Houston. That's also why he took that gratuitous "You're not Canadian" swipe at SilverGirl.
 
"Teh Board Puppetmaster" as he refers to himself in third person is trying in vain to reestablish that his "Skiddles" family of alts are based in Canada, and therefore totally not him in Houston. That's also why he took that gratuitous "You're not Canadian" swipe at SilverGirl.

I personally don't see the point of an alt. Anyone can get and use software that determines the users IP, VPN's notwithstanding. So, if multiple accounts show up from the same IP, it's probably the same asshole for each account.

And, if we know it, and they know we know it, and we know that they know that we know...GAH! Anyway, why do they keep trying it? What's the point? They're not fooling anyone. Unless it's themselves.

If that's the case, they must be easily fooled. Perhaps that's why they're liberals?
 
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    34.9 KB · Views: 0
Back
Top