The Real Collusion Bubble Is About To Burst

[EternalFantasies]

The DNC hack was an inside job. The Russians didn't hack the DNC.

100% True statement. It's source was Assange.

What POS?

Tell me

Its OK

I'll wait

If you're huge, you'll get very thin waiting.

just curious

have you any idea what VOX is?

Surely something better than "the editorial board" = bunch of no body editors, at the tiny wsj.

Didn't mean to interrupt. Please continue. It is entertaining to watch.

The elixir of delusional denial, fueled by pure hot air.

But, yes, it floats. It sure floats. And floats. and atmospheric pressure adds up.

Then...

 

[ChinoMoreno]

Maybe the WSJ editorial board should read the WSJ news pages. Steele wasn't even hired until AFTER the DNC had been hacked by the Russians. The entire reason he was brought on board to begin with was his expertise in Russia.

The idea that it's suspicious that an investigation into Russian espionage would involve Russian sources is ludicrous, but of course Vette is a ludicrous person.

One day the right wing clusterfuck will read past the headlines and do some critical thinking. Today is not that day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either

 

[BBthrives]

I'd say their analysis is right on the money judging by the circle jerk you two have got going on.

Didn't mean to interrupt. Please continue. It is entertaining to watch.

so you DEGENERATE DIRTBAG

not only have you not identified the POS sites

but you cunt acknowledge that VOX is a FAKE NEWS site


you are a TYPICAL FUCKING LIB ASSHOLE

take you holier then thou BS and shove it up yur ass

 

[adrina]

One day the right wing clusterfuck will read past the headlines and do some critical thinking. Today is not that day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either

But they're having so much fun... Hahaha....

 

[BBthrives]

^^^ScumBag

 

[BBthrives]

I really FUCKING DETEST assholes like you

REALLY!

 

[adrina]

See?

I think they're having lots of fun by the looks of it. Well, they're definitely engaged. To the point of preoccupation I'd say. Facts be damned and full steam ahead!

 

[Rightguide]

Not only the press but the seriously misguided liberal demographic as well:


How Team Hillary played the press for fools on Russia
By Paul Sperry

October 26, 2017 | 7:40pm

Hillary Clinton’s campaign didn’t just pay for the Kremlin-aided smear job on Donald Trump before the election; she continued to use the dirt after the election to frame her humiliating loss as a Russian conspiracy to steal the election.

Bitter to the core, she and her campaign aides hatched a scheme, just 24 hours after conceding the race, to spoon-feed the dirty rumors to an eager liberal media and manufacture the narrative that Russia secretly colluded with her neophyte foe to sabotage her coronation.

But it was Hillary who was trying to kneecap Trump, even after he licked her, fair and square, in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan and other blue states.

Exhibit A is the book “Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign,” by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes. In light of this week’s revelation that Hillary’s campaign funded the dirty anti-Trump “Steele” dossier, the book takes on a new significance. It reveals:

“Within 24 hours of her concession speech, [campaign chair John Podesta and manager Robby Mook] assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up. For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public. Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.”

http://nypost.com/2017/10/26/how-team-hillary-played-the-press-for-fools-on-russia/amp/

 

[phrodeau]

Not only the press but the seriously misguided liberal demographic as well:


How Team Hillary played the press for fools on Russia
By Paul Sperry

October 26, 2017 | 7:40pm

Hillary Clinton’s campaign didn’t just pay for the Kremlin-aided smear job on Donald Trump before the election; she continued to use the dirt after the election to frame her humiliating loss as a Russian conspiracy to steal the election.

Bitter to the core, she and her campaign aides hatched a scheme, just 24 hours after conceding the race, to spoon-feed the dirty rumors to an eager liberal media and manufacture the narrative that Russia secretly colluded with her neophyte foe to sabotage her coronation.

But it was Hillary who was trying to kneecap Trump, even after he licked her, fair and square, in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan and other blue states.

Exhibit A is the book “Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign,” by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes. In light of this week’s revelation that Hillary’s campaign funded the dirty anti-Trump “Steele” dossier, the book takes on a new significance. It reveals:

“Within 24 hours of her concession speech, [campaign chair John Podesta and manager Robby Mook] assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up. For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public. Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.”

http://nypost.com/2017/10/26/how-team-hillary-played-the-press-for-fools-on-russia/amp/

A man selling books always tells the truth.

 

[EternalFantasies]

What's funny is that these revelations aren't even "revelations"...

we guessed it from the get-go, and it was clear how they lost their minds, and Soros started a delusional impeachment campaign.

How many times did we say it was liberal media fabrications?

 

[Rightguide]

What's funny is that these revelations aren't even "revelations"...

we guessed it from the get-go, and it was clear how they lost their minds, and Soros started a delusional impeachment campaign.

How many times did we say it was liberal media fabrications?

I think I made several posts in March pointing out the conspiracy within the Obama administration Deep State against Trump and the fact that the Russians did not hack the DNC.

 

[SpeareChucker]

Look, everyone knows that this is a nothing burger. There was no Democrat collusion. This is just a way for Repulotards to try and say, "They did it too!"

 

[SpeareChucker]

I think I made several posts in March pointing out the conspiracy within the Obama administration Deep State against Trump and the fact that the Russians did not hack the DNC.

So, you believe Assange but not your government? I fear for this country. Even with Trump in charge, our bureaucracy still works to protect us from the Republotards.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

I think I made several posts in March pointing out the conspiracy within the Obama administration Deep State against Trump and the fact that the Russians did not hack the DNC.

March 2012

 

[Rightguide]

March 2012

It was this year, Skivvy Steamer. You sound like somebody I already have on ignore under another username.

 

[DrDelirium]

Sure, there was an attempt to 'sow distrust' in the American political system, but it had nothing to do with 'the Russians' either way. Steele is an 'ex' British spook who is, and has been, persona non grata in Russia. He can't go there. There is simply no reason to believe that he even talked to any Russians, there is simply his unsupported word. Perhaps a disgruntled Russian ex-pat waiting table at some London tea-room told him that story about hookers pissing on the bed Obama slept it, or perhaps he just pulled it out of his ass.
And does anyone seriously believe that the American public trusted the political system before the last election? The Dems, the GOP, and the media are doing a fine job sowing distrust in the American political system, any 'help' from Russia would be superfluous.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

It was this year, Skivvy Steamer. You sound like somebody I already have on ignore under another username.

What was you other username, twink

 

[RobDownSouth]

What was you other username, twink

Hint: TWO Navy Crosses

 

[EternalFantasies]

Look, everyone knows that this is a nothing burger. There was no Democrat collusion. This is just a way for Repulotards to try and say, "They did it too!"

So, you believe Assange but not your government? I fear for this country. Even with Trump in charge, our bureaucracy still works to protect us from the Republotards.

Its boring to keep reading the same ass in several new accounts...

1. No, there was collusion, all over the place. Bernie Sanders got his version of the same strategies by the same people.

The push for this was so hard on CNN, that Wolf got a red face very often, Tapper became a complete asshole, and that guy in the morning who also did the debate moderation.... became a complete idiot.

2. Assange and Snowden became hunted outlaws... I dunno

3. The govt is who today? Trump. So, govt says so too.







8. Why the fuck am i replying to this troll replica?

 

[SpeareChucker]

Why are you?

 

[Owwee]

Democrats, Russians and the FBI
Did the bureau use disinformation to trigger its Trump probe?

By The Editorial Board
Oct. 25, 2017 6:49 p.m. ET

It turns out that Russia has sown distrust in the U.S. political system—aided and abetted by the Democratic Party, and perhaps the FBI. This is an about-face from the dominant media narrative of the last year, and it requires a full investigation.

The Washington Post revealed Tuesday that the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee jointly paid for that infamous “dossier” full of Russian disinformation against Donald Trump. They filtered the payments through a U.S. law firm (Perkins Coie), which hired the opposition-research hit men at Fusion GPS. Fusion in turn tapped a former British spook, Christopher Steele, to compile the allegations, which are based largely on anonymous, Kremlin-connected sources.

Strip out the middlemen, and it appears that Democrats paid for Russians to compile wild allegations about a U.S. presidential candidate. Did someone say “collusion”?

This news is all the more explosive because the DNC and Clinton campaign hid their role, even amid the media furor after BuzzFeed published the Steele dossier in January. Reporters are now saying that Clinton campaign officials lied to them about their role in the dossier. Current DNC Chair Tom Perez and former Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz deny knowing about the dossier arrangement, but someone must have known.

The more troubling question is whether the FBI played a role, even if inadvertently, in assisting a Russian disinformation campaign. We know the agency possessed the dossier in 2016, and according to media reports it debated paying Mr. Steele to continue his work in the runup to the election. This occurred while former FBI Director James Comey was ramping up his probe into supposed ties between the Trump campaign and Russians.

More pertinent questions here:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/democrats-russians-and-the-fbi-1508971759

Two things will happen Lawyers will be called and bodies will start dropping, Clinton Crime family in action.

 

[Owwee]

Look, everyone knows that this is a nothing burger. There was no Democrat collusion. This is just a way for Repulotards to try and say, "They did it too!"

Cause CNN told you this or you refuse to admit all the Democrat law breaking that's been going on for over 65 year?

Your that special kind of stupid and a DNC koolaid drinker.

Muslim war crimes, Russian arms sells, etc but no lets throw a fit cause Trump use a word no one in the DNC or Media could look up, ninja please your style is weak and lame!

 

[SpeareChucker]

I wonder how you reached the conclusion that I watch CNN.

 

[Que]

Prescient article.

 

[Rightguide]

The DNC hack was an inside job. The Russians didn't hack the DNC. Dipshit.

Kim Dotcom just verified this on Twitter on the 18th:

https://twitter.com/kimdotcom/status/965295456690454528