hornyhubby48
Experienced
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2017
- Posts
- 39
I am writing this new "search" ad, because my previous one was hijacked by friendly Litsters. I hope this one will avoid that fate.
Main reason for writing it was to give me an opportunity to explain "my" ground rules. But of course I must describe first, WHAT if anything it could get you, if you attempt to follow the rules with me.
The mail exchange I seek with you, a very sensible woman, as I see you, is meant to create companionship for the two of us mainly. Companionship of a kind we are missing in our primary relationships, and/or which we find a welcome addition to our lives.
Why exactly we are missing meaningful companionship is immaterial. What matters only is that both of us look for more than we have right now: a companionship that includes true empathy and caring, for example. In both directions. And which will hopefully lead to some badly needed liking and attraction of one another.
And which will include erotic banter as well, and experiencing lust with each other. Because both of us feel horny inside, and we like to live out our horniness also.
And there's another item we could include in our companionship, if you like. In fact I would very much enjoy if we included it: intellectual intercourse. Are you familiar with the term "sapiosexual"? I consider myself to tick this way, and it would be nice if you did as well.
Now the ground rules I believe we must follow: when each of us decides that we like to get to know one another: we have to feel very strongly the need for responsiveness and fairness. If not, we may as well not get involved with each other at all. I mean that you ought to feel compelled to respond to "things" I mention to you and vice versa. If I convey five thought to you in an e.mail, and you respond to only one and a half of them, that will lead to disappointment n both sides.
In case my mails should bore you, or if you should not enjoy reading them, you have to tell me good bye, of course. No sense for two people communicating who do not enjoy reading each others' mails. But once a "channel" becomes established between us, we ought to desire to use it as well.
The next item, fairness is hard to adhere to for women, really, as I have experienced. Why? Because Mother Nature has designed men and women in a way that tends to provide unfair advantages for women. That's just the way it works, unfortunately, and true emancipation is a constant struggle against the designs of Mother Nature. For both sides! That's the way I feel, and I'll be glad to detail my reasoning to you, if you like to hear it.
I guess that's the essence of what I wanted to write already. Not all that much, really. But essential stuff for me. I hope it is essential for you as well.
Main reason for writing it was to give me an opportunity to explain "my" ground rules. But of course I must describe first, WHAT if anything it could get you, if you attempt to follow the rules with me.
The mail exchange I seek with you, a very sensible woman, as I see you, is meant to create companionship for the two of us mainly. Companionship of a kind we are missing in our primary relationships, and/or which we find a welcome addition to our lives.
Why exactly we are missing meaningful companionship is immaterial. What matters only is that both of us look for more than we have right now: a companionship that includes true empathy and caring, for example. In both directions. And which will hopefully lead to some badly needed liking and attraction of one another.
And which will include erotic banter as well, and experiencing lust with each other. Because both of us feel horny inside, and we like to live out our horniness also.
And there's another item we could include in our companionship, if you like. In fact I would very much enjoy if we included it: intellectual intercourse. Are you familiar with the term "sapiosexual"? I consider myself to tick this way, and it would be nice if you did as well.
Now the ground rules I believe we must follow: when each of us decides that we like to get to know one another: we have to feel very strongly the need for responsiveness and fairness. If not, we may as well not get involved with each other at all. I mean that you ought to feel compelled to respond to "things" I mention to you and vice versa. If I convey five thought to you in an e.mail, and you respond to only one and a half of them, that will lead to disappointment n both sides.
In case my mails should bore you, or if you should not enjoy reading them, you have to tell me good bye, of course. No sense for two people communicating who do not enjoy reading each others' mails. But once a "channel" becomes established between us, we ought to desire to use it as well.
The next item, fairness is hard to adhere to for women, really, as I have experienced. Why? Because Mother Nature has designed men and women in a way that tends to provide unfair advantages for women. That's just the way it works, unfortunately, and true emancipation is a constant struggle against the designs of Mother Nature. For both sides! That's the way I feel, and I'll be glad to detail my reasoning to you, if you like to hear it.
I guess that's the essence of what I wanted to write already. Not all that much, really. But essential stuff for me. I hope it is essential for you as well.
Last edited: