Lock her up!

coachdb18

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Posts
9,366
So, I’m completing my required anti-bribery training today, and it warns me that paying or promising payments or anything of value to a government official in order to influence their decisions or to gain an advantage constitutes bribery, is illegal, and punishable. Can ANYONE with a straight face POSSIBLY deny the Clinton Foundation was SPECIFICALLY set up for this very purpose? How can ANY company ever have done business with Hillary or her government agencies without violating about a kazillion laws, both governmental and corporate? And this doesn’t even approach touching on the subject of treason, where her influence in selling names of national security personnel to our enemies took place, or sales of assets usable in high crimes against the country were hatched?

Why is she not yet LOCKED UP?
 
So, I’m completing my required anti-bribery training today, and it warns me that paying or promising payments or anything of value to a government official in order to influence their decisions or to gain an advantage constitutes bribery, is illegal, and punishable. Can ANYONE with a straight face POSSIBLY deny the Clinton Foundation was SPECIFICALLY set up for this very purpose? How can ANY company ever have done business with Hillary or her government agencies without violating about a kazillion laws, both governmental and corporate? And this doesn’t even approach touching on the subject of treason, where her influence in selling names of national security personnel to our enemies took place, or sales of assets usable in high crimes against the country were hatched?

Why is she not yet LOCKED UP?

Because she, like you, lives in a nation of men, not of law.
 
Imagine the whining,from coach binky, about Clinton if she had won.
Members of trumps administration will see a jail cell before Clinton. Benghazi!!
 
[Discussions promoting and/or accusations involving pedophilia and/or child sex abuse prohibited per our forum guidelines.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So, I’m completing my required anti-bribery training today, and it warns me that paying or promising payments or anything of value to a government official in order to influence their decisions or to gain an advantage constitutes bribery, is illegal, and punishable.


Hmmm. I wonder if this describes anyone else? Maybe I should buy a Mar-a-Lago membership and find out.
 
A billion taxpayer bucks already spent on investigating Billary and all they got was a blowjob. Prosecutors, congressional committees, FBI, over and over and over, decade after decade, and all they got was a blowjob.

You now know the three possibilities: 1) The investigators were all morons. 2) Billary are criminal masterminds. 3) Billary stayed just inside the law. So, except for that blowjob's consequences, no indictments, no charges; many accusations, many psychotic conspiracy theories, much made-up horseshit. But there ain't no 'there' there.

Damn, you guys are scared of that little woman!! Pussywhipped, ay yi yi.
 
After how many umpteen investigations and committees they haven't found jack.

But you idiots keep banging on this drum.

:rolleyes:
 
What about bush, cheney, rumsfeld and ashcroft?

Surely the perpetrators of the Iraq war should be investigated over anything Hillary did.

None of those you cited took government action for pay or personal gain, while the Clinton’s formed the Clinton Foundation strictly as a financial pay-to-play kickback institution, with the sole and primary intent of both personal financial and political gain.
 
Last edited:
Which amazingly despite your assertion no one has found any evidence of. :rolleyes:
 
None of those you cited took government action for pay or personal gain, while the Clinton’s formed the Clinton Foundation strictly as a financial pay-to-play kickback institution, with the sole and primary intent of both personal financial and political gain.

Halliburton
 
Halliburton

Cheney divested himself of all interests before accepting his government position, so as to separate himself from interfering (or even the appearance of interfering with) his government responsibilities.

Trump has done the same with his own former business interests, and now doesn’t even accept a paycheck for his service, which he donates to charity.
 
Cheney divested himself of all interests before accepting his government position, so as to separate himself from interfering (or even the appearance of interfering with) his government responsibilities.

Trump has done the same with his own former business interests, and now doesn’t even accept a paycheck for his service, which he donates to charity.

Now apply that same line of thinking to Clinton and move on.
 
Should we have let Benedict Arnold ‘go’? Lt William Calley? OJ?

Well seeing as How Arnold was never arrested or charged and lived out the remainder of his life in London as a Brigadier General in the British army.....

But yanno, keep on popping off about your IQ and MENSA membership.
 
Cheney divested himself of all interests before accepting his government position, so as to separate himself from interfering (or even the appearance of interfering with) his government responsibilities.

Trump has done the same with his own former business interests, and now doesn’t even accept a paycheck for his service, which he donates to charity.

I laughed when you said, his service...thats funny as hell..what service has he performed yet
 
Just a question. Wasn't OJ found innocent of the murders?

Can't quite see what you're reaching for with that one.:confused:
 
Now apply that same line of thinking to Clinton and move on.

She divested nothing, but instead made government by bribe and ‘seeking fee’ the only way to get government action/approval, and thereby running the US government like a Zimbabwe warlord
 
Well seeing as How Arnold was never arrested or charged and lived out the remainder of his life in London as a Brigadier General in the British army.....

But yanno, keep on popping off about your IQ and MENSA membership.

*chuckles*

Mensa?

NAMBLA
 
*chuckles*

Mensa?

NAMBLA

Oh, the envy the left displays when they can’t just shove out a talking point that only THEY can be ‘smart’! Oddly, it’s a fact only mentioned once in my bio to allow those interested a few insights to get to know me, but is often often often brought up by board left-wingers. They can’t show me posting and boasting, though they’d like to just accuse it and then run like childish trick-or-treaters. It’s as if they still ride the short bus 🚌
 
Last edited:
Back
Top