How To Get To Heaven When You Die

DO YOU ACCEPT JESUS GIFT OF SALVATION BELIEVING HE DIED N ROSE AGAIN FOR YOUR SINS?

  • YES

    Votes: 48 16.4%
  • NO

    Votes: 148 50.5%
  • I ALREADY ACCEPTED JESUS GIFT OF SALVATION BEFORE

    Votes: 62 21.2%
  • OTHER

    Votes: 35 11.9%

  • Total voters
    293
Status
Not open for further replies.
There are clearly defined criteria to determine separate species, just as there are for genera, orders, phyla, kingdoms, et cetera. International committees of scientists determine what those criteria are, and new species names are subject to peer review. A scientist can't just say there's a new species. It has to be supported by evidence.

The study of viruses has adopted the same terms and procedures as the life sciences for naming things, but viruses are more chemical than biological.

I have been looking since you posted this. I don't see clear cut defined criteria to determine species that go across the board. I am not arguing I just can't find the criteria. Do you have a source?
 
I have been looking since you posted this. I don't see clear cut defined criteria to determine species that go across the board. I am not arguing I just can't find the criteria. Do you have a source?
Good on you for looking it up. :) You're right; the criteria don't go across the board. They differ depending on the groupings the species is part of. Here's one source: http://iczn.org/content/how-can-i-describe-new-species

The ICZN deals with the taxonomy of animals. There are different organizations for plants, bacteria and viruses.
 
The Pope is wrong. He is not speaking for God and is actually contradicting God's word, the Bible.

If that is the case go and have a look at the "Elijah and the Priests of Baal" thread and please explain why God's word demands the murder of 450 priests. I can only conclude that God and his prophet Elijah were pretty unpleasant guys.
 
Which Bible words are these?

Edit MyNotes
22 If men strive and strike a pregnant woman, so that her child comes out, and there is no injury, he shall surely be punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him. And he shall pay as the judges say
23 And if any injury occurs, then you shall give life for life,
24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
25 burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
 
Edit MyNotes
22 If men strive and strike a pregnant woman, so that her child comes out, and there is no injury, he shall surely be punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him. And he shall pay as the judges say
23 And if any injury occurs, then you shall give life for life,
24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
25 burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.

:confused:

How on earth are these the Bible verses that Pope Francis is not following when he says that evolution is true?
 
:confused:

How on earth are these the Bible verses that Pope Francis is not following when he says that evolution is true?

That verse is about abortion or at least shows that abortion is wrong and unbiblical.
As far as the Pope goes: The fact that he isn't following the Bible when it comes to evolution is easy to prove. Read Genesis from the beginning and the account of creation. The animals and adam were direct creations from God. There was no evolution. Adam was created on the 6th day, therefore, the Pope is wrong.
 
That verse is about abortion or at least shows that abortion is wrong and unbiblical.

When were we discussing abortion?

As far as the Pope goes: The fact that he isn't following the Bible when it comes to evolution is easy to prove. Read Genesis from the beginning and the account of creation. The animals and adam were direct creations from God. There was no evolution. Adam was created on the 6th day, therefore, the Pope is wrong.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Whatever you say boss. You are definitely an evangelical nut. hehe. Enjoy!
 
Edit MyNotes
22 If men strive and strike a pregnant woman, so that her child comes out, and there is no injury, he shall surely be punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him. And he shall pay as the judges say
23 And if any injury occurs, then you shall give life for life,
24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
25 burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
If men (doctors) strive and strike a pregnant woman so her child comes out (causes an abortion) he shall surely be punished, according as the woman's husband will lay on him. And he shall pay as the judges say.

So as long as the husband and the judge are fine with it, there's no problem with abortions in the bible.
 
Which Bible?

Just wondering. Which Bible do you guys read/refer to, any particular version or translation?
 
Just wondering. Which Bible do you guys read/refer to, any particular version or translation?

I am going to take this question for what it is. The first bible I got from my boyfriend/now husband was a NIV (New International Version). That bible was really worn so I got a new one and it is NIV also. They do have bibles, if a person wants to study, that has several translations side by side so you can see. :rose:
 
Just wondering. Which Bible do you guys read/refer to, any particular version or translation?
I like the online Blue Letter Bible, because it presents the oldest language texts as well as the modern translations.
 
I am glad to be an evangelical nut who's beliefs are backed up by the actual evidence. Call me what you want. Laugh all you want. K thanks.

The Pope isn't taking out if his behind.

Your interpretation style is similar to that of muslim extremists taking verses literally.
 
If men (doctors) strive and strike a pregnant woman so her child comes out (causes an abortion) he shall surely be punished, according as the woman's husband will lay on him. And he shall pay as the judges say.

So as long as the husband and the judge are fine with it, there's no problem with abortions in the bible.

That's not what the verse says. It says, IF there is no harm done (to the baby), in other words, the baby was born, but alive... then the punishment is up to the father. If the baby dies (abortion) the men are to be put to death. "If any mischief follow" means if the baby dies. So no abortion is not ok in the Bible.

Ex 21:22 ¶ If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
23 And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,
24 Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
25 Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
26 And if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye's sake.
27 And if he smite out his manservant's tooth, or his maidservant's tooth; he shall let him go free for his tooth's sake.
 
Just wondering. Which Bible do you guys read/refer to, any particular version or translation?

The KJV is one of the most widely accepted versions as the most accurate, however, I also use other trusted versions, NIV, ASV and the Holman Bible are some others.
 
The Pope isn't taking out if his behind.

Your interpretation style is similar to that of muslim extremists taking verses literally.

The Pope is just a man and he is a sinner like the rest of us in need of a Savior, Jesus Christ. If the Pope doesn't have a genuine relationship with Jesus Christ, the Pope will not be saved. He has not authority to change God's word, the Bible. If he tries, he will be punished by God. Don't follow the Pope, follow Jesus Christ. You are kind of right. muslim ( terrorists) extremists actually follow their evil religion because they actually follow what the quran actually tells them to do. The Christians who are peaceful actually believe the Bible and are doing what the Bible actually tells them to do. The Pope is a false prophet if he contradicts God's word, the Bible.

mohammad took the Bible and twisted it up to say what he wanted it to say. The Bible was written by the actual eyewitnesses who were actually there. The quran was written by one man hundreds of years after the events who wasn't even there, contradicts the Bible and yet thinks he knows more than those who were actually there. I believe the eyewitnesses who wrote the Bible.
 
The Pope is just a man and he is a sinner like the rest of us in need of a Savior, Jesus Christ. If the Pope doesn't have a genuine relationship with Jesus Christ, the Pope will not be saved. He has not authority to change God's word, the Bible. If he tries, he will be punished by God. Don't follow the Pope, follow Jesus Christ. You are kind of right. muslim ( terrorists) extremists actually follow their evil religion because they actually follow what the quran actually tells them to do. The Christians who are peaceful actually believe the Bible and are doing what the Bible actually tells them to do. The Pope is a false prophet if he contradicts God's word, the Bible.

You are yet to quote the verses that the Pope contradicts in regards to him saying evolution is true.

And if you tell me Genesis, then yes, you are taking things literally just like the one you speak of below.

mohammad took the Bible and twisted it up to say what he wanted it to say. The Bible was written by the actual eyewitnesses who were actually there. The quran was written by one man hundreds of years after the events who wasn't even there, contradicts the Bible and yet thinks he knows more than those who were actually there. I believe the eyewitnesses who wrote the Bible.

Not exactly.
 
The Christians who are peaceful actually believe the Bible and are doing what the Bible actually tells them to do. The Pope is a false prophet if he contradicts God's word, the Bible.

The bible has equally abhorrent tracts in it.

(snip)....The Bible was written by the actual eyewitnesses who were actually there.

Who are these " actual eyewitnesses who were actually there" ?

Woof!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top