For Hashy yes, but for all also...

Trouble with being new to a forum is you don't understand shit about its history so a lot of the back and forth is just a lot of back and forth.:(
 
Trouble with being new to a forum is you don't understand shit about its history so a lot of the back and forth is just a lot of back and forth.:(

The only thing you need to understand is that half of the men who posted in this thread think that they are God's gift to women, just because they have a dick and they post on a porn board.

When in fact these morons are anything But the prizes that they delude themselves into believing.
 
Last edited:
The only thing you need to understand is that half of the men who posted in this thread think that they are God's gift to women, just because they have a dick and they post on a porn board.

When in fact these morons are anything But the prizes that they delude themselves into believing.

Internet discussions can get pretty rough, best thing is a thick skin, the ignore feature or a relentless retaliation with the same. Chivalry can be a challenge when you have women wanting to be men, men posing as women, and on top of that a desire in some to suspend civility altogether. But hey, it is what it is.;)
 
I can't find that thread and im done trying.

I trust wat tyler, but, not enough. i'll need to videoskype myself with hashtag i think to get to the true bottom of that bottom. Coz i suspect what Saint Peter said is probably correct.

In the mean time, wat, oh thanks for this re-appetizer. now I feel like blackberries again.


Here you go, complete with classic hash-edits. :)


http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1201411


Don't know what the sensitive nature of the thread is. Probably just more hashtag histrionics. As you'll see, he just confirmed what many knew.
 
Last edited:
And Emerson40 is a 50 years old married man with dependant children who, instead of helping his wife with housechores and spending time with his children, stalks women on porn boards with inuendoes about anal sex. With full endorsement of his more than dubious friends.
I had the pleasure of being the object of his disgusting erotic fantasies for over a year. I wasn't the only one, tho.

Thing is, I haven't figured out yet of he's heterosexual or a repressed homosexual who believes that I'm a man.

Nevertheless, he has a low IQ, all he does is talk about vaginas, penises or the best lube in the market or C&P's gifs from the net. The only times he tried to engage in political debates, he made an ass of himself.

He has no insight into how repulsive he is.


ETA
But of course, all he does is legit and his family knows about it as describrd in his profile. He actually said that he sips champaign with his wife while he trolls me. He's very intelligent, as one might see.
 
Last edited:
And Emerson40 is a 50 years old married man with dependant children who, instead of helping his wife with housechores and spending time with his children, stalks women on porn boards with inuendoes about anal sex. With full endorsement of his more than dubious friends.
I had the pleasure of being the object of his disgusting erotic fantasies for over a year. I wasn't the only one, tho.

Thing is, I haven't figured out yet of he's heterosexual or a repressed homosexual who believes that I'm a man.

Nevertheless, he has a low IQ, all he does is talk about vaginas, penises or the best lube in the market or C&P's gifs from the net. The only times he tried to engage in political debates, he made an ass of himself.

He has no insight into how repulsive he is.


ETA
But of course, all he does is legit and his family knows about it as describrd in his profile. He actually said that he sips champaign with his wife while he trolls me. He's very intelligent, as one might see.

He appears to see himself as a weasel.
 
That Emerson40 drills chairs to put all sorts of instruments of torture in them, and he's into the sadistic side of BDSM?

Basically all of those who encouraged his stalking are BDSMers, the guys being into sadism and the women submissives.

It would be none of my businness if they didn't try to include me too into their shady mind-games.
They're a bunch that I want nothing to do with.
 
Last edited:
He appears to see himself as a weasel.

He confuses persistence and vulgarity which disgusts people like me, with cleverness.
After several months, you start realising that his posts and gifs are recycled variations on 6 or so themes.

But he thinks he's clever and funny because several Blurt posters think that he is witty and hillarious. Even when he makes jokes about more seniors posters' that they have Alzheimers, they wet their depends and they fart.
Needless to say, I don't see his friends as being a sophisticated bunch either, even tho they're more intelligent than he is.
 
That Emerson40 drills chairs to put all sorts of instruments of torture in them, and he's into the sadistic side of BDSM?

Basically all of those who encouraged his stalking are BDSMers, the guys being into sadism and the women submissives.

It would be none of my businness if they didn't try to include me too into their shady mind-games.
They're a bunch that I want nothing to do with.

It's probably all bullshit. Most likely drilling his hand with his pecker and getting off on your disgust.
 
It's probably all bullshit. Most likely drilling his hand with his pecker and getting off on your disgust.

Well, not lately because I've been ignoring him for months now. He still stalks me because I see his name appearing after mine temporally and or within the same thread, and it's in a way funny because it all looks so impotent and stupid.

Nevertheless, I did it to inform the new guys. :rose:

Now that I had my moment of pleasure by slinging mud at him and team retards, he and one or two more are going back on full ignore, not to be mentioned by myself.
 
Plus I'm not the only female poster who was accused of and trolled with such bizarre accusations.
It's a Lit. tradition.
Many other female posters went through that experience before me, and many will.

If you want to start such a thread asking about it, I bet there will be at least 20 female posters who will relate the most mind- boggling experiences.

Yes, very true!!!! I went through something very similar recently - perhaps you're familiar with this person?

*chuckle*

I think that Phelia gets a boner when he thinks about 4est, because this was just one example of many. And it was milder than the rest.

And yo boys Rob, BND and Adre, keep trying to get laid by whiteknighting for 'women' from behind of a computer, cause I'm sure they all fall for that

Acting tip, honey: real women don't give a shit. But feel free to keep whining about how people are stalking you whilst following me around with my name in your mouth. Bet it tastes good :)
 
"Oh, great, she posted something that happened FIVE HOURS AGO and she thinks she 'won!'"

Meanwhile, back at the ranch:

Similarly, those whom are ugly inside have to spew at everything decent in the attempt to force it to resemble them.

The usual responses in the form of, if you point out their poor behavior and bad manners then you are a whiner and that is supposed to stop you from pointing it out.

https://media.giphy.com/media/Lq3ueCSWjnQPu/giphy.gif

why don't you go take your little sorority degenerates with you like Phelia, Jennifer, J, F, ..., and go all lick that yeast infection on the left of their filthy cunts off of each other

But I'll happily defer to Phelia's little bitch on this one.

Why the hell would I get in a shit-flinging contest with a fucking monkey?

I just made like an intelligent human being and left you free to fester in your misdirected hate. It's not me that you Leftists hate, it's your feeling oh haplessness and impotence when it comes to your ability to direct the lives of others, and in this specific case, win elections...

By beginning a new thread, I actually elevated you to that station which you believe you truly hold, that of the nastiest Leftist bitch/cunt on the website. Did I damn you with praise too faint?

Come back and play with us, AJ!!! You're missing all the fun! New game: I'll give you $500 if you can find a post where I've called you an "indecent" name (I'm excluding "pathetic" since I was literally feeling pity for you, as per the definition of the word. You can do this from your fainting couch, if it will be very stressful for you). Since you feel you've been treated so unfairly, it must be pretty terrible, and I don't want you to think you won't be compensated fairly for your pain and suffering.

But you're not allowed to play that one 'til you shed a little light on the logic behind your Wendy Davis posts - I'm still sooooo confused about that. Weak-minded woman, you see.
 
Last edited:
It's no secret I adore lit chicks who whoop AJ's ass with one hand tied behind their backs.
 
Yes, very true!!!! I went through something very similar recently - perhaps you're familiar with this person?



Acting tip, honey: real women don't give a shit. But feel free to keep whining about how people are stalking you whilst following me around with my name in your mouth. Bet it tastes good :)

You think that I"m "stalking" you now? :confused:
You have a funny understanding of the concept.


The first time that I ever saw your name on this board was when you bumped up an ancient AJ bashing thread and tried to smear his name by quoting a 10 years old post taken out of context. "For the "n00bs", to know who they're dealing with."

I knew what the post was all about, because it was quoted before by one of your mates and taken completely out of context in order to make him look bad. So I had browsed through the thread and realised it was all benign.
I just shed some light imto that, and explained the context.


So pardon me if I'm loyal to people who treated me and others with the utmost kindness, and I can't stand it when people are trying to smear their name.

My only interactions with you occurred a few times when you tried to attack someone, and when you started that thread which 'subtly" suggested that the political posters on the GB should be exiled in a subforum.
 
Last edited:
You think that I"m "stalking" you now? :confused:
You have a funny understanding of the concept.


The first time that I ever saw your name on this board was when you bumped up an ancient AJ bashing thread and tried to smear his name by quoting a 10 years old post taken out of context. "For the "n00bs", to know who they're dealing with."

I knew what the post was all about, because it was quoted before by one of your mates and taken completely out of context in order to make him look bad. So I had browsed through the thread and realised it was all benign.
I just shed some light imto that, and explained the context.


So pardon me if I'm loyal to people who treated me and others with the utmost kindness, and I can't stand it when people are trying to smear their name.

My only interactions with you occurred a few times when you tried to attack someone, and when you started that thread which 'subtly" suggested that the political posters on the GB should be exiled in a subforum.
He can't stands it I tells ya! Regardless of the fact that sensei kimo slobby earned the disrespect he gets daily. 50 people must be wrong and dirty dishrag must be right. This is what happens when pakis get 1st world technology.
 
Back
Top