ishtat
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2004
- Posts
- 5,749
All four gospels agree on what happened.
Nonsense - They can't even agree who got to the empty tomb first.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All four gospels agree on what happened.
Nonsense - They can't even agree who got to the empty tomb first.
Nonsense - They can't even agree who got to the empty tomb first.
At that time there wasn't a snap chat, instagram and facebook. They kept a lot history going by the oral tradition. (No, not that oral tradition).
I think they realized they had to put this down on paper/parchment - whatever!
Say you were an eyewitness to an event or interviewed witnesses. If the detective took 4 witnesses into separate rooms and interviewed them they would be suspicious if each of the accounts were exactly the same. Why? Because they would assume the witnesses had gotten together to tell the same story. No witness sees the events the same way. That is how people can look at the details of 9/11 and see that it was a terrorist attack and others can think it was a government conspiracy. At the heart of the story though is that planes hit the world trade center. That isn't being disputed.
Nonsense - They can't even agree who got to the empty tomb first.
No. your statement is nonsense - no offense. The Gospels need to be read as complementing each other, not contrasting them as competiting for the truth. Why were other gospels withheld by Rome, and these published to public if they are obviously contradictory? Use your head.
No. Some of the reason is much more than that.
The originals are all lost. They were written mainly in Aramaic. What we have today are translations from the Greek original translation, which was spread thru scribes.
Which makes the matter quite complicated, and difficult.
If you simply copy the same page over and over, when re-reading you are bound to have done mistakes. And if you translate something so mystical, you are most certainly going to translate it badly.
I know that, but no half-smart skeptic is going to believe it.
Don't see why not, it's fairly obvious -- and is one reason why skeptics will not accept that this stuff is the Word of God, when it could not possibly even be the original text.
I know that, but no half-smart skeptic is going to believe it. It's almost like going to a teacher and even though the assignment count's for all of your grades until the end of time you tell her/him you did your homework but you can't find it. It was an A+++ too, but now it sucks when you redid it. It's probably like things in my house. They put the originals somewhere safe and now they have forgotten where they are.
So you have to look at what you do have. I always watch what people put in their posts, but I know other people don't. This is just for people who might be interested in how I look at it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X359UFph8i0
It's called faith in something greater than ourselves.
They do agree. They give different perspectives. Nothing contradicts.
The Bible is one of the most self-contradictory books ever written. For every message there's an almost an exact opposite message somewhere else. Its a cobbled together work with stories stolen directly from other religions. From the codes of Hammurabi to the immaculate conception.
More Evidence Of The Parting Of The Red Sea: http://ilovebeingchristian.com/scientific-proof-god-did-the-miracle-of-parting-the-red-sea-must-see/
They do agree. They give different perspectives. Nothing contradicts.
Ask yourself why do you need faith in something greater than yourself?whats wrong with wrong with having faith in you? Why aren't you good enough for yourself. I love me some me. God doesn't exist. Which is perfectly fine. Not sad or bad or good. It just is.
The Bible is one of the most self-contradictory books ever written. For every message there's an almost an exact opposite message somewhere else. Its a cobbled together work with stories stolen directly from other religions. From the codes of Hammurabi to the immaculate conception.
I got invited to a church. Should I go?
Supposing I don't agree. What's the point?You don't have to agree with the religion to learn from it or at the very least have an informed opinion.
Supposing I don't agree. What's the point?
Those who did, throughout the centuries, and those who do, and knowing the age old wisdoms that no lie lasts.
Are you implying that I maintain that?![]()
No, I just assume it; it is true of most Christians. Were it not, they would convert to Islam.
No dear, not necessarily.