The Trumper List - See if the member you're talking to was / is one

[snugglestruggle]

You're angry.

This is understandable.

My candidate isn't screeching, crying to her labor allies " Why am I not 50 points ahead?" The coronation not going as planned? She needed an inside fix against Bernie and now she can't put away Trump the ringmaster turned politician. LMAO

I don't understand shaming people for using their vote in the manner they see fit. Most of the media is doing this too. I think it's a precedent we will all regret soon enough.

It's all they have, their same old , same old playbook. Not working. Ho hum

all this talk of Trump is very taxing bro!

Stew

Go to your safe room Bro!

I know LadyF; she's highly intelligent regardless of any areas we may diverge philosophically or politically. I'm not deliberately being a dick to her - though I do enjoy debating, period. And will wallow in +important+ semantics when necessary.

You can't deliberately be what you naturally are

So, you just find Trump supporter to be a convenient label to smear people that you don't like because they point out your character flaws such as your inherent racism.

It's interesting to me that Clinton sycophants, such as yourself, will simply simply parrot her Trump smears and smears of trump supporters instead of extolling any of her absent virtues.

Have you considered thinking for yourself? Maybe taking a look at Clinton's policy positions and finding those that you think would be popular enough to encourage others to be as enthusiastic about Clinton as you are?

Let's start with why this is so important to her campaign. Her negatives were earned honestly. They are not some artifact from the Obama campaign and certainly predate Trump entering the race. On the other hand Trump's negatives are largely conflations and distortions by the Clinton campaign. Trying to extend those to Trump supporters or, as in my case Clinton haters is bad tactics, so I hope that her campaiign and lick-spittle useful idiots, such as yourself keep it up.

Not that you've asked my opinion about Trump, which is a pretty simple question to ask, I am not a trump supporter; he's not merely reactionary enough for my taste. Think of every position of his that you hate move the needle about three gradients to the right of that and that's roughly where I would be. Trump is essentially more liberal than Clinton. his only redeeming feature is that he's not a social conservative. Which I personally consider an oxymoron there's no such thing as a social conservative there's nothing conservative about what social conservatives stand for.

Tat'sh not to say that I would vote for Clinton. I wouldn't vote for Clinton if you paid me. I would not even vote for Bill Clinton if you paid me. He at least knows how to be pragmatic and work with the other side of the aisle something that Mts. Clinton will find as out of her skill set as much as the current ineffectual occupant of the White House does.

A side benefit of this little name and shame campaign of yours is it will increase the tendency of people who can't stomach Clinton lying to pollsters which will suppress the Democrat vote because like you they will be doing their victory dance instead of showing up at the polls. Myself I can't really see driving 500 Miles round-trip to my polling station in order to cast a vote for probably Johnson.

This thread was worth reading just for Que's use of lick-spittle. However You're casting pearls before (D) shills.

 

[RoryN]

My candidate isn't

winning.

 

[snugglestruggle]

winning.

Neither is yours, but she is crying, falling down, coughing up lugi's and begging for other people to do what she can't lol.

 

[RoryN]

Neither is yours

Keep telling yourself that - preferably, in this thread, so it stays near the top.

And remember: Trump's failure in November will be your failure, too - an indictment of your idiocy.

 

[Saint Peter]

New York's attorney general ordered Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's charitable foundation to immediately stop fundraising in the state, warning that a failure to do so would be a "continuing fraud."

Damn media. Always reporting stuff.

Fuckers.

 

[snugglestruggle]

Keep telling yourself that - preferably, in this thread, so it stays near the top.

And remember: Trump's failure in November will be your failure, too - an indictment of your idiocy.

My failure? Poor Rory lol. I'm starting to feel just a tiny bit sorry for you, but not much

If Trump fails to win, it will mean a conflict with Russia in the Crimea and the ME going up in flames because Illary has demonstrated her incompetence (despite her 30 years of experience) in foreign affairs.

Domestically it will also be boring, more of the same, further decline of America.

 

[Hypoxia]

FWIW: Art of the Steal: This is How Trump Lost $916M and Avoided Tax: This is how Donald Trump’s accountants and lawyers most likely used the tax code to avoid paying income tax for almost two decades.

The big New York Times scoop that Donald Trump used $916 million of tax losses to enjoy many income tax-free years raised a question the newspaper didn’t try to answer: How did Trump do it?

Trump, the only major-party presidential nominee in four decades to keep all his tax returns secret, insists “there’s nothing to learn from them.”

Yet in one day I figured out how Trump’s advisers almost certainly arranged the massive tax losses, skipped out on a massive income-tax bill, and then fashioned a loophole with more valuable tax benefits than the already liberal tax breaks Congress gives big real-estate owners while sticking others with the bill.

Trump dumped the real costs of all this on investors who saw gold in his brand name, but who lost everything even as he was paid tens of millions of tax-free dollars.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Here it is, for reference / parody purposes - a list of those who have, in their Literotica commentary, outwardly supported Donald Trump. I use "Trumper" to describe his supporters, since that term is used by both left and right-wing publications. After all, let's be fair.

Because of the chaotic nature of responses to this election, it's time-consuming to wade through it all. Also, after the election is over, some will attempt to gloss over and talk past their previous allegiances. Since the Trumpers on this forum have shown during Trump's candidacy that they celebrate key tenets of labeling, profiling, "scarlet lettering" people such as Muslims, tout HUAC, etc., and have no issues with a man who holds these concepts so dearly, I can only assume they will respect this thread.

Post suggestions (and evidence, if necessary) on who should be added. Trumpers: if you wish to be added, let me know. I expect you will want to self-identify.

To be added to / edited when necessary:

AJ / 4est
Snugglestruggle
toubab
BB
Beco
Libsam
Ishmael
NeverEndingMe
Query and alts
PatriotLover
renard_ruse
contrifan32
RUlookingup
eyer
JBJ
Lovecraft68

I'm voting for BIG Johnson.

All I do is answer the idiots who run with every serious charge with the eerie parallels between Trump and Clinton and who did their "misdeeds" in the private sector or the public sector and which one caused casualties with their feckless and unaccountable decision-making.

If you're all in for "Corrupt" Hillary, then it probably seems like support, but to borrow from Harry Truman, all I'm doing is speaking the truth and to the Clintonistas it seems like support.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

FWIW: Art of the Steal: This is How Trump Lost $916M and Avoided Tax: This is how Donald Trump’s accountants and lawyers most likely used the tax code to avoid paying income tax for almost two decades.

Investment is taking risk and gambling.

If you're terrified of losing a big bet you buy bonds or securities...

 

[RoryN]

I'm voting for BIG Johnson.

All I do is answer the idiots who run with every serious charge with the eerie parallels between Trump and Clinton and who did their "misdeeds" in the private sector or the public sector and which one caused casualties with their feckless and unaccountable decision-making.

If you're all in for "Corrupt" Hillary, then it probably seems like support, but to borrow from Harry Truman, all I'm doing is speaking the truth and to the Clintonistas it seems like support.

^^^^^Trumpers who don't want to be identified as Trumpers always say this.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Whatever dude...



I'll support anything that gets Democrat panties wadded even if I won't ever vote for it.

 

[sr71plt]

Investment is taking risk and gambling.

If you're terrified of losing a big bet you buy bonds or securities...

If you lose 900 million dollars in a casino, with casinos set up for the house to win, you're a loser at business (or you are deeply skimming and sticking it to everyone else involved). Who do you think you're fooling.

 

[RoryN]

I'll support anything that gets Democrat panties wadded

Spoken like a true Trumper.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Or else there was a collapse in the entire industry in the region. He wasn't the only casino to lose money/go out of business and the fact is he survived and moved on and WE the people voted for and approved the laws that allowed him to stay in business, and ironically, the same law that the Clintons made use of and many many other major corporations when their market took a hit, people like Apple, for example...

:shrug:

It's a complete non-issue. Nobody died like they died when Barack and Hillary decided Mubarak, Momar, Assad and the troops in Iraq just had to be removed. That series of decisions, like backing off the red line lead to death, destruction, genocide and a humanitarian refugee crises.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Spoken like a true Trumper.

Yeah, this is a childish and fallacious attempt at Trumping with FAUX logic.

I get the same thing when I defend Christians of conscience. Oh, so you're lying about being an Atheist or when I defend idiotic Democrat attacks on Republicans, oh, so you're lying about being a Republican. And now, because I consider Trump the lesser of two evils, yet still evil, then I am practically running the local Trump get-out-the-vote effort.

Fucking moron. You and all your idiotic posse...

 

[Disgustipated]

Yeah, this is a childish and fallacious attempt at Trumping with FAUX logic.

I get the same thing when I defend Christians of conscience. Oh, so you're lying about being an Atheist or when I defend idiotic Democrat attacks on Republicans, oh, so you're lying about being a Republican. And now, because I consider Trump the lesser of two evils, yet still evil, then I am practically running the local Trump get-out-the-vote effort.

Fucking moron. You and all your idiotic posse...

You have no honor, no code, no moral compass. Support your candidate with vigor and without remorse, AJ. You fucking chickenshit.

Oh, isn't it hard to post in this thread? Ya know, Rory so proudly holding the top-spot on your iggy list for "a decade."

 

[RoryN]

Yeah, this is a childish and fallacious attempt at Trumping with FAUX logic.

I get the same thing when I defend Christians of conscience. Oh, so you're lying about being an Atheist or when I defend idiotic Democrat attacks on Republicans, oh, so you're lying about being a Republican. And now, because I consider Trump the lesser of two evils, yet still evil, then I am practically running the local Trump get-out-the-vote effort.

Fucking moron. You and all your idiotic posse...

Being too much of a pussy to admit you want him to win doesn't exonerate you.

(I have a feeling I'll be posting this a lot.)

 

[sr71plt]

Or else there was a collapse in the entire industry in the region. He wasn't the only casino to lose money/go out of business and the fact is he survived and moved on and WE the people voted for and approved the laws that allowed him to stay in business, and ironically, the same law that the Clintons made use of and many many other major corporations when their market took a hit, people like Apple, for example...

:shrug:

It's a complete non-issue. Nobody died like they died when Barack and Hillary decided Mubarak, Momar, Assad and the troops in Iraq just had to be removed. That series of decisions, like backing off the red line lead to death, destruction, genocide and a humanitarian refugee crises.

That doesn't make anyone else who lost $900 million (unless he was deep skimming and sticking it to everyone else) in the industry the world's most brilliant businessman either. It's not an excuse for Trump or a testimony to his business skills.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

When did I claim he was the world's most brilliant businessman?


He might have, but I haven't defended his claim.


I said, he followed the law.


We make the laws...

 

[Que]

FWIW: Art of the Steal: This is How Trump Lost $916M and Avoided Tax: This is how Donald Trump’s accountants and lawyers most likely used the tax code to avoid paying income tax for almost two decades.

Losing money on one project in order to avoid taxes on another is not a winning strategy. You have to actually lose $100,000 to avoid paying $30,000 in taxes.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Being too much of a pussy to admit you want him to win doesn't exonerate you.

(I have a feeling I'll be posting this a lot.)

I don't want him to win. In fact everyday I come here and have to put up with all of the cocksure reasons as to why he won't win.

I don't think she deserves to win in a rational world.

Clearly, this is not a rational world.

I would love for her to lose.

It's that simple.

 

[Hypoxia]

A little more from the article I cited above.

Then there’s Trump’s role in authorizing an alleged quarter-billion-dollar income-tax fraud on profits from the Trump SoHo in Manhattan. The profits were run through a corrupt Icelandic bank under the control of one of the many Russian oligarchs whom Trump has said have paid him tens of millions of dollars and are among his best customers.

Trump’s full tax returns would help us understand how deeply he is involved with the oligarchs, whose fortunes and even lives depend on maintaining friendship with Vladimir Putin, the murderous Russian autocrat whom Trump goes out of his way to praise at every opportunity. Trump’s full tax returns would also tell us about his debts to the Bank of China, owned by the communist rulers in Beijing, and his many deals with Middle East potentates and their retainers.

Knowing how much leverage these foreign power brokers have on Trump is highly relevant since he wants to become commander in chief and possess the powers of federal law enforcement.

Tromp also owes a shitload to Deutsche Bank, failing because if its tricky operations. Expect a Prez Tromp to call off USA investigations into its shenanigans.

Clinton is distressing and distasteful. Tromp is disastrous.

 

[sr71plt]

"When did I claim he was the world's most brilliant businessman?
He might have, but I haven't defended his claim.
I said, he followed the law.
We make the laws..."

You also make a lot of lame excuses.

We don't know if he followed the law or not. He still hasn't released his taxes. Someone should track down all of those individual losses he claimed in 1995 to see if he actually paid the bills that he's claiming the loss on. He's not known to tell the truth about anything.

And if you haven't caught that he declares himself the greatest everything, you haven't been paying attention. But I know you've heard him--you're just one of his basket of deplorables.

Bottom line: Anyone who loses $900 million in a casino venture, which is set up for the house wins, isn't a great (or even competent) businessman and certainly isn't qualified to be president of the United States. He's either an incompetent businessman who has stiffed vendors left and right and thinks bankruptcy is an acceptable option after sucking his businesses a dry or he is a crook who has defrauded people left and right--and the U.S. government (and chumps like you).

Your choice. (Not that you'll make one.)

 

[BotanyBoy]

Clinton is distressing and distasteful. Tromp is disastrous.

It's the ones she doesn't distress who are the most distasteful.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Or else there was a collapse in the entire industry in the region. He wasn't the only casino to lose money/go out of business and the fact is he survived and moved on and WE the people voted for and approved the laws that allowed him to stay in business, and ironically, the same law that the Clintons made use of and many many other major corporations when their market took a hit, people like Apple, for example...

:shrug:

It's a complete non-issue. Nobody died like they died when Barack and Hillary decided Mubarak, Momar, Assad and the troops in Iraq just had to be removed. That series of decisions, like backing off the red line lead to death, destruction, genocide and a humanitarian refugee crises.

Like most of your posts most of what you're saying isn't true. Yes, there was a collapse in the gaming industry in Atlantic City, but Trump had been forced out of his casinos by investors long before that happened.

This is an issue because part of Trump's campaign is that he has the ability to create jobs but when looking at what he did in Atlantic City he lost jobs.