Hey Lovecraft68 I call you out dude

[LJ_Reloaded]

She's on my team. Note she doesn't say a single bad thing about feminists, just that people like you have slandered the word so much that when you hear it you think "man bulldyke" but that the important part is not to fight among ourselves.

She referred to them as people who don't like men. And she's right, feminists don't like men. I've shown you plenty of examples of that. The man haters are far more a part of your team than Roosh V or Donald Trump is a part of mine.

We didn't slander your movement. Your movement slandered your movement.

 

[Sean Renaud]

No, she said that is the impression that exists and that women deserve equal opportunities and we should stop fighting each other. But you don't believe that she is correct so why did you post that?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

No, she said that is the impression that exists

Nah, she said that's what feminism has become.

and that women deserve equal opportunities and we should stop fighting each other. But you don't believe that she is correct so why did you post that?

I believe in equal opportunity. I also believe in equal responsibility - something you oppose.

When was the last time you ever protested lenient sentencing for women?

 

[Sean Renaud]

Nope that's not what she said, at all. Maybe it's what she said in some other quote that you failed to deliver.

You also believe that equal opportunity already exists which makes her a liar in your book.

Every single time I've seen it I've protested it. When was the last time you protested men deliberately putting women in danger. . .oh wait that's your jam.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Nope that's not what she said, at all.

Ah I forgot about your shitty reading skills.

Every single time I've seen it I've protested it. When was the last time you protested men deliberately putting women in danger.

This thread was based on such.

 

[Sean Renaud]

You meant your shitty reading skills. Her entire quote is pro feminist and then goes out of its way to point out that people get the wrong idea when they hear the word and they need to get the work done.

And I protested it and also pointed out you don't care. Good day sir.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle...ge-house-say-some-feminists-missed-the-point/

The gray paint splattered on the side of Jessica Baxter’s house already had dried by the time she learned of the vandalism to her family’s mural of Bettie Page.

She had seen the same paint on her car days earlier but didn’t think much of it. It wasn’t until her husband, Chris Brugos, saw it on their home in Seattle from the bus last Friday that they discovered paint over the 10-year-old mural of the 1950s pinup model Bettie Page, visible to drivers on I-5 as they approach the Ravenna neighborhood.

“Stop exploiting women’s bodies,” the vandals wrote, signing their work, “some feminists.”

The first thing Baxter, a 37-year-old mother of two, did was cover their message with one of her own, reading “autonomous sexuality is empowerment. Telling a woman to cover up is oppression.”

Own it, Uncle Ruckus. This is feminism. You support feminism, that makes you partially responsible for this. Feminism hurts women, too.

 

[Sean Renaud]

This is vandals, but I have no problem owning it. They are horrible people and should be punished but they are assuming the information is true allies. I am ashamed.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...challenging-federal-sexual-assault-directive/

A recent University of Virginia law school graduate is challenging a federal directive that transformed the way colleges evaluate allegations of sexual assault on campus.

In a lawsuit filed Thursday, the plaintiff — who was accused of and found responsible for sexual misconduct, and who uses the pseudonym “John Doe” in court papers to protect his identity and that of his accuser — argues that a 2011 letter from the U.S. Department of Education was a mandate improperly imposed on universities.

The complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleges that the federal department’s Office for Civil Rights was advancing a laudable goal in an unlawful and unfair way: that its directive bypassed the normal procedure of notifying the public of proposed rules and seeking response before imposing new regulations, a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.

This could end in a devastating defeat for feminism and a major victory for due process rights.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I don't even know what the hell that is even about and your clip provides little insight.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

"As a dude who cares abt feminism sometimes I want to join all men arm-in-arm & then run off a cliff and drag the whole gender into the sea"
- Arthur Chu, https://twitter.com/arthur_affect/status/580823401993912320

 

[Sean Renaud]

Oh no, someone occasionally gets frustrated with the likes of you. Not surprising.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article34487229.html

A Sacramento federal judge ruled Wednesday that an early-release program for female inmates in California’s prisons is unconstitutional and must be expanded to include male inmates.

“When the state draws a line between two classes of persons, and denies one of those classes a right as fundamental as physical freedom, that action survives equal protection review only if the state has a sufficient justification for the classification. Here, the state does not,” U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England Jr. declared in a 35-page order.

The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation “shall immediately cease denying admission to the (Alternative Custody Program) on the basis that an applicant is male,” the judge ordered.

Corrections spokeswoman Dana Simas said the department is reviewing the ruling. “We are evaluating the fiscal and custodial impact of including men in the Alternative Custody Program.”

Ouch. Feminism lost yet again. MRAs kicked their asses in court.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Feminism didn't lose. We all won. Sorry, would you like to try again?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Feminism didn't lose. We all won. Sorry, would you like to try again?

You lost. Feminists oppose early release for men. They only want it for women, which is why they wrote the original law only for women.

MRAs kicked your asses in court and got men to be included.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Nope. Men should always have been included, or it should never have happened in the first place. This was not a loss for feminists.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Nope. Men should always have been included, or it should never have happened in the first place. This was not a loss for feminists.

Feminists always fight for special rights for women. Always.

Feminists even call for an end to prison - for women only.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/wo...t-it-time-to-abolish-most-womens-prisons.html

Only men's rights groups ever advocate for men. Feminists have never stood up for men against discrimination.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Because that's not what feminists do. No black rights activists stands up when whites are discriminated against either.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Because that's not what feminists do.

Feminists fight for women to have more rights than men.

Case in point:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/wo...t-it-time-to-abolish-most-womens-prisons.html

No black rights activists stands up when whites are discriminated against either.

Black rights activists are nothing like feminists. This shows just how ignorant you are of black rights activists.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Nope. I've just reopened the wound of your terrible prejudice against women. But we all know who you are and what you are.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Nope. I've just reopened the wound of your terrible prejudice against women.

But since I have no prejudice and you cannot show any examples, you lose and I win yet again.

And you've hung yourself again by saying that prejudice towards women is somehow defined as opposing this:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/wo...t-it-time-to-abolish-most-womens-prisons.html

But we all know who you are and what you are.

I am part of the majority of people who don't want anything to do with your movement. I'm part of the people who are winning the court cases and legislative battles.

I am the guy with nearly 1500 fans. You are who again? Oh yes, a member of America's second most hated movement and a poster on an insignificant porn board.

 

[Sean Renaud]

This thread is an example of your shining prejudice, as are the other two we're posting in and several more that I've dipped into and some that I have not.

Again, all the good people of the world, the overwhelming majority are with me. There aren't a whole lot of people left who'll openly state that women are garbage and should know their place like you left.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

This thread is an example of your shining prejudice because the voices in my head say it is!

Again, all the good people of the world, the overwhelming majority are with me.

Ah so that's why no one wants to be called a feminist anymore. Nah, the world sees people like you as garbage. No one equates feminism with equality except self deluded losers like you.

 

[Sean Renaud]

People don't want to be called feminists for the same reason people don't want to be called liberals or progressives. You and your kind have done a fantastic job on PR and I applaud you. I wish my team had the gall to get down in the mud with you but sadly we do not.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

People don't want to be called feminists for the same reason people don't want to be called liberals or progressives.

What? Plenty of us want to be called liberals and progressives. Maybe the right wing masters you serve think it's an insult. I call it a badge of honor.

You and your kind have done a fantastic job on PR and I applaud you. I wish my team had the gall to get down in the mud with you but sadly we do not.

LOL still unable to man-up and take responsibility for your own deeds.

You still deny that feminists did this:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/wo...t-it-time-to-abolish-most-womens-prisons.html