Hey Lovecraft68 I call you out dude

[Sean Renaud]

Rape culture? That doesn't exist, if it did there would a group who would fight against it and they'd be called. . .feminists. So which is it?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

First a woman couldn't do that to a man at all. So actually that's the end of it, but if she did find a way I'd be every bit as livid.

http://www.tucsonnewsnow.com/story/30155267/college-women-rape-college-men-but-few-men-tell

http://thoughtcatalog.com/lorenzo-j...share-stories-of-being-raped-by-a-woman-nsfw/

That's the problem with you male feminist self-haters, you know so much that just ain't true.

Generally speaking they are not they have been documented in most fields in cluding ones like nursing where'd you'd expect it not to be so. And outside of sports can you name anywhere that blacks don't have a wage gap?

Now you're switching goalposts from a (nonexistent) gender wage gap to the (existent) racial wage gap?

 

[Sean Renaud]

I wouldn't have shared that first link since its supports my argument. I only got half way through your second link which was filled with terrible things that piss me off, but I didn't see fingering, maybe it was on there and I stopped prior. Probably not.

They are the same gap. If you don't believe in one you cannot believe in the other. But carry on with your lovely story where everybody in America is treated equally, except men who are just so put upon they can barely survive.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I wouldn't have shared that first link since its supports my argument.

You say women cannot rape men, both links show that women do rape men, and you say it supports you?

Do you even logic?

I only got half way through your second link which was filled with terrible things that piss me off, but I didn't see fingering, maybe it was on there and I stopped prior. Probably not.

They are the same gap. If you don't believe in one you cannot believe in the other. But carry on with your lovely story where everybody in America is treated equally, except men who are just so put upon they can barely survive.

Women cannot be prosecuted for rape in the US because you people made "made to penetrate" not a crime.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I said no such thing. But I can see how in your confused little world you might think that.

I had nothing to do with makin g"made to penetrate" not a crime. But I understand how the logic came about. It is short sighted and ultimately wrong.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I said no such thing. But I can see how in your confused little world you might think that.

So someone else wrote
"First a woman couldn't do that to a man at all."

Was your account hacked?

 

[Sean Renaud]

Funny, you must not of followed the story. . .and you cut off my post before the rest of it. But honesty isn't a thing one expects of you.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Funny, you must not of followed the story. . .and you cut off my post before the rest of it. But honesty isn't a thing one expects of you.

Understandably you have lost the plot again.

Your original comment:

She's an idiot. I hope someone directs her to the current court case with the 6 month punishment and tells her that is the fault of feminists.

As this 6 month punishment you speak of pertains to a rape case, I responded:

If it had been a woman doing that to a man she would have gotten nothing at all, and you'd be happy with that.

At which point you tried to weasel out by saying:

First a woman couldn't do that to a man at all.

Which leads us to the question of whether you understand what "that" means. Considering the context of the conversation, it is impossible for an intelligent person to not realize "that" meant absolutely nothing else besides "rape". In essence, you were saying a woman cannot rape a man. Which means one of two things - you are an idiot or you once again tried to make a statement that was demonstrably wrong. Which is it?

 

[Sean Renaud]

Oh, it's a rape case now? Interesting. I could have sworn that the 6 month sentence had something to do with digital penetration. But your right, a woman could finger a mans butthole against his will. Good thing I left open that "if a woman was creative I'd be no less upset." clause.

Sorry mate, try your next line of bullshit.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://t1.someimage.com/OoiYrq0.jpg

 

[Sean Renaud]

To small, cute drawing though!

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

To small, cute drawing though!

You're as blind as you are dim.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Oh teh noes. Insults.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Oh teh noes. Insults.

But you are a living insult to whatever strange gender scientists ultimately classify you as.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...vening-street-argument-having-girlfriend.html

A gang of four vigilantes battered a man to death with a hammer after getting involved with a street argument he was having with his girlfriend, a court heard today.

Russell Peachey, 35, was allegedly found lying in a pool of his own blood in Grangetown, Cardiff, after a ‘brutal and merciless’ attack that followed a row with his partner Tracey Gill.

Christopher Smith, 41, Dean Beasley, 37, Shamander Singh, 35, and James Williams, 31, are all said to have intervened after overhearing the street row in August.

Aren't you happy, male feminists? Here's some jerkoff material for you!

 

[Sean Renaud]

Which of the four men is getting away with it?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Which of the four men is getting away with it?

Agreed - to a feminist like you, that they didn't get away with it is a total bummer. My bad!

 

[Sean Renaud]

Awww so you don't know which one of them walked free?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://t1.someimage.com/Lj8kcga.jpg

 

[Sean Renaud]

Wow, way too small.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Oh, it's a rape case now? Interesting. I could have sworn that the 6 month sentence had something to do with digital penetration.

Which, when it is non-consentual, is rape. Semantics be damned.

But your right, a woman could finger a mans butthole against his will. Good thing I left open that "if a woman was creative I'd be no less upset." clause.

A woman can forcibly rape a dude in any number of ways. How she does it is irrelevant.

You are now officially rape culture. Congratulations!

 

[Sean Renaud]

That's not semantics, it's a legal distintion unfortunately. You're the one who's been getting on my case for having facts wrong.

I'm rape culture? I fight that shit in my spare time. Keep up the good work champ.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

That's not semantics, it's a legal distintion unfortunately. You're the one who's been getting on my case for having facts wrong.

Yeah so if the Supreme Court said blacks were 3/5 of a person then you'd say "that's a fact, dammit, blacks are only 3/5 of a person!"

Same logic there, Uncle Ruckus.

I'm rape culture? I fight that shit in my spare time.

The only time you fight rape culture is if someone on Call of Duty with "rape culture" as their nickname put you down with a well placed bullet.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Yeah so if the Supreme Court said blacks were 3/5 of a person then you'd say "that's a fact, dammit, blacks are only 3/5 of a person!"

Same logic there, Uncle Ruckus.


The only time you fight rape culture is if someone on Call of Duty with "rape culture" as their nickname put you down with a well placed bullet.

I'd say it was the law because it would be. The only time I fight rape culture is anytime I see it in any form. The only time you fight rape culture is . . .oh wait you don't. You want women to be afraid to go the authorities.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://i.imgur.com/R3mXyxp.jpg