Safeway, what's up aid deese seedless watermelons?

So if I go the well-known conservative route: I can say that as a Choctaw woman I am not in the least offended by Pookie's AV or her words then it must be true for all people of Native blood, right? Good because her AV doesn't offend me.

AJ offends me though.
 
The progressive two-faced twatsicle siding with progressive Pokie yet again? NAH! Say it isn't so!

Why, just a few weeks ago Pokie posted about beheading another poster and when that poster simply quoted Pokie's threat but inserted the two-faced twatsicles name in place of his own, the two-faced twatsicle banned him while again allowing Pokie to keep on posting.

And just days ago the progressive Pokie posted about killing AJ and a poster AGAIN quoted her and AGAIN inserted the two-faced twatsicle's name for AJ's, and the two-faced twatsicle AGAIN banned him while AGAIN allowing Pokie to keep on posting.

These two most recent examples have also been exactly repeated a number of times before with the same poster being banned and the progressives whose exact words he quoted being allowed to continue posting.

And here, now, the progressive, two-faced twatsicle shows up to defend her progressive pal Pokie by again trotting-out her now worn-out and utterly exposed facade of her opinion being anything else but totally partisan and her powers here completely subjective, regardless of the rules?

HA!

As another poster posted last night, the entire Board now knows the two-faced twatsicle is totally biased and arbitrary in how she enforces her own rules on this Board, which makes her facade appearances from now on just that more exhibitionist.

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
 
The progressive two-faced twatsicle siding with progressive Pokie yet again? NAH! Say it isn't so!

Why, just a few weeks ago Pokie posted about beheading another poster and when that poster simply quoted Pokie's threat but inserted the two-faced twatsicles name in place of his own, the two-faced twatsicle banned him while again allowing Pokie to keep on posting.

And just days ago the progressive Pokie posted about killing AJ and a poster AGAIN quoted her and AGAIN inserted the two-faced twatsicle's name for AJ's, and the two-faced twatsicle AGAIN banned him while AGAIN allowing Pokie to keep on posting.

These two most recent examples have also been exactly repeated a number of times before with the same poster being banned and the progressives whose exact words he quoted being allowed to continue posting.

And here, now, the progressive, two-faced twatsicle shows up to defend her progressive pal Pokie by again trotting-out her now worn-out and utterly exposed facade of her opinion being anything else but totally partisan and her powers here completely subjective, regardless of the rules?

HA!

As another poster posted last night, the entire Board now knows the two-faced twatsicle is totally biased and arbitrary in how she enforces her own rules on this Board, which makes her facade appearances from now on just that more exhibitionist.

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

Pokiehontas would've been a cool name change too.

Oh, and Eyer, do you still want to scalp Laurel? :)
 
For the record ...

I had only planned to use this AV for a day or two. I loved the Addams Family movies with Christina Ricci. I saw this one and remembered how bad ass she made Pocahontas in the camp play. But I'm more of an axe killer than an arsonist, so it was only going to be up for a short time. Then someone threw out "Pookahontas" and I couldn't resist the temp name change. Again, just for a short time.

Then AJ became unhinged over it, more because he could make a ridiculous political statement with it about liberals. So in Pookie fashion, I shoved it in his face.

I'll change the AV this weekend to the one I really wanted of Wednesday Addams with a battle axe, along with my nick back to Pookie. But for today, it's fun seeing AJ show himself for what he truly is - a situationally outraged hypocrite.

Oh, and it's interesting how AJ chose a black man instead of a white one for his racist rants. Seemed to come quite naturally to him.

:)
 
1. Progressive Pokie posts about beheading poster A.

2. Poster A then quotes Pokie EXACTLY except for ONLY inserting the progressive, two-faced twatsicle's name for his.

3. Progressive, two-faced twatsicle bans poster A.

4. Progressive Pokie is allowed to continue to post...

Weeks later:

1. Progressive Pokie posts about killing AJ.

2. Poster A then quotes Pokie EXACTLY except for ONLY inserting the progressive, two-faced twatsicle's name for AJ's.

3. Progressive, two-faced twatsicle bans poster A.

4. Progressive Pokie is allowed to continue to post...

And so poster A has been banned the last half-dozen times for simply quoting progressives' very words and simply inserting the two-faced twatsicle's name as exactly described above.

I imagine virtually every regular GB poster now almost fully understands how utterly partisan and two-faced the twatsicle GB moderator is; whether they care or not (whichever side of the partisan coin they squat upon) has never been a concern of mine - establishing the facts of her partisanly progressive, arbitrarily subjective rule of this Board has been the only goal.

And the two-face twat's ire simply shows more the more she understands that is precisely the case, thus her knowing for certain more bannings of the same poster are in the future as that's her ONLY weapon to wield against such utter truth.

Ah, the wannabe tyrannical power simply keeping up with webspace rent payments affords.

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
 
That's why he got the name Cap'n Hypocrite and why idiots like hashtag look like such clueless morons when they comment on things without having a clue about the history of this place or the people who post her.
You just made me wet. :kiss:
 
The two-faced twatsicle threatened to ban me once for completely fabricating in her own mind that I was insinuating she was somehow involved in underage stuff because I took to then calling her "childboss" (because of her immaturely partisan ways of moderating this Board).

She fabricated that charge, indicted me for being into underage stuff myself, and threatened to ban me the next time I called her that.

I made an epic thread calling her out on that - HER LIE - and demanded she either rescind HER LIE by such and such time/date, or BAN me when I would call her childboss again at that time/date - like a good little, two-faced twatsicle she did neither.

Yet, she still continued (and does so to this day) to allow some of her partisanly favored progressive posters here to accuse/insinuate other posters are into underage stuff...

WHAT'S UP WITH THAT?

Despite the ABSOLUTE FACT I've never directly threatened any poster on this Board, the two-faced twat banned me for my satirical thread/post of wondering since animals who viciously kill are put down, maybe mothers IN GENERAL - WITHOUT ANY SPECIFIC REFERENCE(S) AT ALL - who intentionally and tortuously kill the totally innocent and completely defenseless maturing, individual human life inside them simply for convenience should be put down, too.

That's the entire extent of what the two-faced twatsicle is now obviously taking up as her latest "threatening" - LYING - campaign.

While again, meanwhile, she's allowed one of her favored progressive posters to continue to post even after he directly posted to another poster exactly how he'd sexually assault that poster's daughter, and how that poster's daughter would enjoy that sexual assault...

The two-faced twat also banned me then, too, for asking another poster - who was joking around on the same page with the sexual assaulter - how'd she like it if I told her [insert sexual assaulter's exact words here] concerning her own daughter (having no idea whatsoever if she even had a daughter).

Then, just a couple of weeks ago, the two-faced twatsicle banned me again for bringing the sexual assaulter's deed up again, this time including the even worse part...

Yet, she allows the sexual assaulter to keep posting under the same name.

Again, folks: this has nothing to do with whether anyone actually cares or not, or a stab at victimhood sympathy (if I was looking for that, I'd just become a progressive myself) - this is ALL about AIRING THE FACTS of the matter, just like it was when I kept AIRING THE FACTS of the matter of a now infamous GB poster's case...

Which, of course, the two-faced twatsicle originally banned the great and famous eyer for.
 
Can someone remind me again, "What is Einstein's definition of insanity?"
 
Bingo! He supported busybody's hatred for almost a decade.

And if A_J wants to have a melt-down and throw a hissy fit, let him.

I still remember when I spoke out (multiple times) about Rob going after his daughter and using racial slurs that A_J got mad at me and didn't want me "defending" him. Because then he couldn't play the victim card.

That's why he got the name Cap'n Hypocrite and why idiots like hashtag look like such clueless morons when they comment on things without having a clue about the history of this place or the people who post her.

This latest tirade is simply an excuse for Cap'n Hypocrite to spew ethnic slurs as he has done since at least the time I joined Lit.

The Cap'n didn't want you or anyone else defending him (Many, many people berated Rob for his comments, myself included) not only because it would pull his victim card, but because it would prevent him from painting anyone with whom he disagreed as supporting those comments toward his daughter.
 
Originally Posted by hssh345 View Post
I see that RacistDownSouth and his possy are here.


I don't need to know the forum's history or "to have a clue", to know that RacistDownSouth is the most vile poster that I ever met.

Didn't you read the posts that I reported? Personal attacks on family members, posters' ill-health, grieving parents… Those posts were absolutely disgusting.

Listen to hashfag, he wants rob banned because he is offended by his words...lol. Stupid noob is a major league dumbfuck.
 
This latest tirade is simply an excuse for Cap'n Hypocrite to spew ethnic slurs as he has done since at least the time I joined Lit.

The Cap'n didn't want you or anyone else defending him (Many, many people berated Rob for his comments, myself included) not only because it would pull his victim card, but because it would prevent him from painting anyone with whom he disagreed as supporting those comments toward his daughter.

Almost everyone has told rob it isn't cool, he doesn't care what the masses say,the people he attacks have said and done more personal things than what he ever has.
 
Originally Posted by hssh345 View Post
I see that RacistDownSouth and his possy are here.


I don't need to know the forum's history or "to have a clue", to know that RacistDownSouth is the most vile poster that I ever met.

Didn't you read the posts that I reported? Personal attacks on family members, posters' ill-health, grieving parents… Those posts were absolutely disgusting.

They are no worse than your boyfriend busybody has made.

He's wished for my loved ones to be maimed and killed and raped.

So shove your selective outrage up your ass.
 
They are no worse than your boyfriend busybody has made.

He's wished for my loved ones to be maimed and killed and raped.

So shove your selective outrage up your ass.

and I repeat what I said

you are evil

deserve all evil you get
 
So the message here is that if someone else is racist then it's ok to be racist? That makes total sense.
 
Back
Top