Days After Santa Fe’s Dem Mayor Bans City Employees Frm Travelling To Anti-LGBT State

[4est_4est_Gump]

He can't so why bother asking?

Ishmael

We probably will not see his return to this thread...

 

[phrodeau]

Here we see a blind person actually leading another blind person.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Hizzoner apparently doesn't have a problem with Qatar's abuse and enslavement of tens of thousands of migrant workers who have one toilet for 50 people.

Liberalism and hypocrisy go together like peanut butter and jelly.

Comfortable compartmentalization of conflicting ideas...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Here we see a blind person actually leading another blind person.

Here, we see nonsense...

It clearly thinks it is some sort of clever.

 

[miles]

Comfortable compartmentalization of conflicting ideas...

They're the definition of fraud.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I would not use the f-word as much as saying brainwashed...

 

[miles]

Bullshit.

Brain dead, not brainwashed.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

*chuckle*

 

[miles]

He better hope he doesn't get thrown off a roof.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Democratically defenestrated...

 

[phrodeau]

Hey busybody, I got people to read your shitty posts a second time.

Now answer my question.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

...

If Mr. Springsteen and others who think like him (like Governor Andrew Cuomo) are fighting for freedom, it might be a good idea for them to know exactly what it is they are fighting for. It might be a good idea to examine if what they are supporting is a human rights issue actually worth being righteously indignant about.

It might even be a good idea to take an up close and personal look at one of the "freedom fighters" with whom he and his righteous band of brothers are expressing "solidarity."

For as it turns out, one of these "freedom fighters" recently bravely invited an up close view of himself by appearing au naturel in a women's locker room in the state of Washington. According to Christian Today, the man undressed in front of women, asserting the right to do so under the state's transgender bathroom policy law. The guy was apparently inspired by the example of another valiant freedom fighter, a male who in 2012 paved the way for progress by lounging naked in a women's locker room that was frequented by girls as young as six.

Such are righteous "freedom fighters" in action? That's the social justice with which the left chooses to stand in solidarity?

That's a Rosa Parks moment?

No, it isn't....

http://www.americanthinker.com/arti...ty_square_with_being_human.html#ixzz45zhcn4a9

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Your "question" did not belong in this thread and is nothing more than ascription.


When did you stop masturbating in public? Or is it that you do not consider the public school playground public property?


That is pretty much exactly what your "question" is.

 

[WalksOnWater]

Always needing to play wannabe gods in place of the Almighty they deny, gnostics declare some cause "righteous" so they can then set-out creating their own wannabe heavens on earth (which can only ever exist, of course, in their utopian minds).

Their imitation heavens, then, must be tyrannically ruled only by their conditions - because they're so "righteous" - and always at the forced punishment/exclusion of others who don't reverently abide by their rules.

They inherit these, their evil dictates, from the eons of twisted, illogical denial of reality their gnostic predecessors have faithfully passed on to them. You CAN have your cake and eat it, too!

A porn site "righteously" cuts off access to it because a state legislature won't abide its political philosophy?

And in doing so hilariously so, they fully deny even those who agree with their political philosophy the very freedom they pose to be championing?

How is that any gnostically different than Thomas Jefferson declaring "that all men are created equal", and then enslaving other human beings anyway?

The gnostic can do nothing else but continue to perpetually plod along his illogical and endless trek toward the utter meaningless that occupies his mind. It is a crime against humanity that he doesn't have the integrity to simply travel alone instead of forcefully including anyone else to goosestep along with him.

 

[phrodeau]

http://www.rstreet.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/you-keep-using-that-word.jpg

 

[Que]

You're wrong again.

About what?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

About what?

Everything.

 

[Que]

Everything.

Oh? How is that?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Oh? How is that?

Because what you said was not accurate.

 

[Que]

Because what you said was not accurate.

What wasn't accurate?

 

[Que]

. . .I'm guessing you mean because sweeping generalizations are always wrong.

. . . Of course. . . in doing so, you stated that I was wrong about, "everything."

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

What wasn't accurate?

See post #42.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

. . .I'm guessing you mean because sweeping generalizations are always wrong.

. . . Of course. . . in doing so, you stated that I was wrong about, "everything."

This is the problem you have.

 

[Que]

This is the problem you have.

So, removing the sweeping generalization and stating that you "Rarely (if ever) take a stated position on an issue." would make that statement accurate?

 

[Que]

See post #42.

Are you unfamiliar with the quote function?