Militia takes over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters in Oregon

[Sean]

Post a picture of your degree and I will answer your question again drunky!

Is it the law? Was it the law when they committed their crime? Yes or no, Barney?

 

[Ishmael]

Well it is only 1:30 am there I believe. Depending on what he has been drinking we have another hour or so.

I put the over under at 7.

I'm not even going to bother counting. He can start all over again tomorrow ya know?

It's obvious he's not going to address the "charges" issue. Doesn't fit his agenda to do so. The Hammond's 'have it coming' as far as he's concerned, coming from a land where the landed gentry are 'aristocracy' and all. I suspect he's never owned land in his life.

Ishmael

 

[VaticanAssassin]

I'm not even going to bother counting. He can start all over again tomorrow ya know?

It's obvious he's not going to address the "charges" issue. Doesn't fit his agenda to do so. The Hammond's 'have it coming' as far as he's concerned, coming from a land where the landed gentry are 'aristocracy' and all. I suspect he's never owned land in his life.

Ishmael

You can take the social classes out of England but you can't take the cottager out of Sean.

 

[Sean]

You can take the social classes out of England but you can't take the cottager out of Sean.

Is it the law? Was it the law when they committed their crime? Yes or no, Barney?

 

[VaticanAssassin]

Is it the law? Was it the law when they committed their crime? Yes or no, Barney?

You keep asking a question that is been answered. So let me return the favor.

Did you beat MWF before or after she stole your lap top?

 

[Sean]

You keep asking a question that is been answered. So let me return the favor.

Did you beat MWF before or after she stole your lap top?

Is it the law? Was it the law when they committed their crime? Yes or no, Barney?

 

[VaticanAssassin]

Is it the law? Was it the law when they committed their crime? Yes or no, Barney?

Have you beaten LTR yet or do you stay sober when she is around?

 

[Sean]

Have you beaten LTR yet or do you stay sober when she is around?

Is it the law? Was it the law when they committed their crime? Yes or no, Barney?

 

[VaticanAssassin]

Is it the law? Was it the law when they committed their crime? Yes or no, Barney?

Ha!!!

In all honesty. You are actually entertaining when you are drunk!!

Well, the next one is close enough to my over/under.

so enjoy your hangover cottager!!

 

[Sean]

Ha!!!

In all honesty. You are actually entertaining when you are drunk!!

Well, the next one is close enough to my over/under.

so enjoy your hangover cottager!!

Is it the law? Was it the law when they committed their crime? Yes or no, Barney?

 

[Ishmael]

Unanswered questions;

How does burning 150+/- acres of grassland 'cover up' poaching?

Given the facts, how do the charges fit the crime?

Indeed, was there a crime even committed?

How can a judge recommit individuals to prison who have already served their sentence as handed down by a court of law?

Ishmael

 

[Disgustipated]

This is fantastic. Barney calling Sean out about degrees and Ishtard calling Sean out for being drunk.

 

[VaticanAssassin]

Unanswered questions;

How does burning 150+/- acres of grassland 'cover up' poaching?

Given the facts, how do the charges fit the crime?

Indeed, was there a crime even committed?

How can a judge recommit individuals to prison who have already served their sentence as handed down by a court of law?

Ishmael

You will have to wait for a Facebook/Twitter picture for these answers from this crowd....

 

[Ishmael]

You will have to wait for a Facebook/Twitter picture for these answers from this crowd....

I see ShitForBrains has joined in, and got it wrong from the git-go.

Ishmael

 

[VaticanAssassin]

I see ShitForBrains has joined in, and got it wrong from the git-go.

Ishmael

I'm sure he doesn't even understand what he got wrong, making it all the more funny.

Complete side track: I have never shot a deer without a clear exit wound. Have you?

Of course I've never hunted deer with anything smaller than 30-06 and have never missed the kill zone. I guess a 5.56 would not exit in the wrong place. But what self respecting hunter would use 5.56....

 

[Ishmael]

I'm sure he doesn't even understand what he got wrong, making it all the more funny.

Complete side track: I have never shot a deer without a clear exit wound. Have you?

Of course I've never hunted deer with anything smaller than 30-06 and have never missed the kill zone. I guess a 5.56 would not exit in the wrong place. But what self respecting hunter would use 5.56....

First of all you're wrong. You took your first deer with a 25-06. The Ruger #1 I gave you.

But to answer your question, yes I have. The older, slower cartridges will stay in the carcass. (ie. 30-30, 35 Rem. etc.) Although they're usually too torn up for ballistic purposes. Besides, that's not how poachers are caught.

First of all the fire would do nothing to cover evidence. Grass fires burn hot and fast. Imagine putting a rib roast in a 900 deg. oven for 5 min. Really wouldn't do much to destroy the roast. Or any other pile of animal carcass.

Poachers are caught in only two ways. Either in the commission or in possession. No fire is going to change those facts. Even if there were a pile of guts in that pasture you're still left with WHO put them there. Like finding a body on the street in downtown. You know a murder has occurred, but you still have to prove who the murderer was. The game people use forensics too these days, including DNA. Everyone in hunting areas know this.

Ishmael

 

[Ishmael]

BTW, you're right. He doesn't know he got it wrong.

Ishmael

 

[VaticanAssassin]

First of all you're wrong. You took your first deer with a 25-06. The Ruger #1 I gave you.

But to answer your question, yes I have. The older, slower cartridges will stay in the carcass. (ie. 30-30, 35 Rem. etc.) Although they're usually too torn up for ballistic purposes. Besides, that's not how poachers are caught.

First of all the fire would do nothing to cover evidence. Grass fires burn hot and fast. Imagine putting a rib roast in a 900 deg. oven for 5 min. Really wouldn't do much to destroy the roast. Or any other pile of animal carcass.

Poachers are caught in only two ways. Either in the commission or in possession. No fire is going to change those facts. Even if there were a pile of guts in that pasture you're still left with WHO put them there. Like finding a body on the street in downtown. You know a murder has occurred, but you still have to prove who the murderer was. The game people use forensics too these days, including DNA. Everyone in hunting areas know this.

Ishmael

I was leading people to ask questions here. Way to give it up....

 

[Ishmael]

I was leading people to ask questions here. Way to give it up....

Well damn AJ, how about a 'heads up' next time?

Ishmael

 

[Sean Renaud]

Unanswered questions;

How does burning 150+/- acres of grassland 'cover up' poaching?

Given the facts, how do the charges fit the crime?

Indeed, was there a crime even committed?

How can a judge recommit individuals to prison who have already served their sentence as handed down by a court of law?

Ishmael

It destroys the evidence. What is complicated about that?

Given the facts which are obviously in question here the charges do not fit the crime.

As the story goes the sentence was deemed too short and it went through the system and was extended. Simple as that.

 

[Ishmael]

It destroys the evidence. What is complicated about that?

Given the facts which are obviously in question here the charges do not fit the crime.

As the story goes the sentence was deemed too short and it went through the system and was extended. Simple as that.

No it doesn't, never has. Read my missive re. how poachers are caught.

Deemed too short ex post facto. This is a blatant attempt to take their property, nothing more, nothing less.

Ishmael

 

[VaticanAssassin]

It destroys the evidence. What is complicated about that?

Given the facts which are obviously in question here the charges do not fit the crime.

As the story goes the sentence was deemed too short and it went through the system and was extended. Simple as that.

Exactly what evidence is it that you think it destroys? Be specific please.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Unanswered questions;

How does burning 150+/- acres of grassland 'cover up' poaching?

Given the facts, how do the charges fit the crime?

Indeed, was there a crime even committed?

How can a judge recommit individuals to prison who have already served their sentence as handed down by a court of law?

Ishmael

Those questions have been answered several times over.

Whether the grassland was burned to cover poaching or not it was not owned by the party burning it. That's illegal. On the second occasion where a Hammond started a fire they were specifically told not to. So yes, a jury of their peers decided that a crime had in fact been committed.

They have not served their sentence.

Glad I could answer these questions for you.

 

[VaticanAssassin]

Look it is the idiot that thinks no demands were made....

Brilliant.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Look it is the idiot that thinks no demands were made....

Brilliant.

A personal attack and not able to discuss ideas. Not surprising at all.