LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Militia takes over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters in Oregon

It appears that even the people they're supposedly protesting about want nothing to do with them:

But despite the protest Dwight Hammond says he and his son plan to report peacefully to prison on Monday.
His lawyers told Associated Press "neither Ammon Bundy nor anyone within his group/organisation speak for the Hammond Family".
Click to expand...
 
Sean said:
It appears that even the people they're supposedly protesting about want nothing to do with them:
Click to expand...

has nothing to do with American rights to PROTEST against teh Government

GOD BLESS THEM
 
So let's see. The federal government has been trying to buy/steal the Hammonds ranch for years. Revoking lease arrangements and jacking prices.

When a prescribed burn in their land, burns government graze land as well, they are charged as terrorists!!!

When the judge says the 5 year maximum is ridiculous, the Feds appeal it to a Obama owned court....

Yes. This all seems very reasonable.

Fucking sheep.
 
You can't say, "Obama owned court" and "fucking sheep" in the same post without looking like a d-bag.

So, carry on!
 
VaticanAssassin said:
So let's see. The federal government has been trying to buy/steal the Hammonds ranch for years. Revoking lease arrangements and jacking prices.

When a prescribed burn in their land, burns government graze land as well, they are charged as terrorists!!!

When the judge says the 5 year maximum is ridiculous, the Feds appeal it to a Obama owned court....

Yes. This all seems very reasonable.

Fucking sheep.
Click to expand...

They were convicted of arson, moron. Not terrorism. They intentionally set fires on land that belonged to the BLM and did so more than once.

Even the Hammonds aren't protesting this court decision. Just a bunch of would-be douche-bag militiamen. Hell, they couldn't even drum up any local support.

I say go Waco on their stupid asses and clear up the gene pool a bit.
 
putzpotus said:
so you are against PEACEFUL DEMONSTRATIONS are you?


insurrectionists? LINK?
Click to expand...

Peaceful demonstrations don't involve armed men taking over a government facility and threatening violence if the Police try to remove them.

Insurrection is the perfect charge.

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
 
It may be time for a full-blown insurrection. Let those who don't believe in government fight the government. Let's winnow the wheat from the chaff.
 
Ulaven_Demorte said:
Peaceful demonstrations don't involve armed men taking over a government facility and threatening violence if the Police try to remove them.

Insurrection is the perfect charge.

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Click to expand...

The arms are legal

Like all Libz, you have a problem with legal and no problem with illegal
 
"US Attorney Frank Papagni, ESQ uses terrorism statute with minimum 5 year sentences for small fires with less than $100 in damage."

"The men were convicted of arson, but under a provision of an expansive federal law punishing terrorism. They each served prison terms that the sentencing judge thought just, only to be told by appellate judges they had to go back to serve longer."


:rolleyes:
 
Kevin M. Kruse
‏@KevinMKruse
Whoever coined #YallQaeda for the Oregon militia can just take the rest of the week off.
 
From the ending of 'See No Evil, Hear No Evil'


Cop1: I know the law. Now I get to shoot them!

Cop2: -You can't.

Cop1: -What do you mean I can't?

Cop2: Captain, we got the real killer.

Cop1: -You telling me that I can't shoot them?

Cop2: -No, sir, you can't.

Cop1: We went to all this trouble to catch them and now I can't shoot them?

Cop2: It's time to go.

Cop1: But I want to shoot them.

Cop2: We'll get some hot chocolate.

Cop1: Why can't I shoot them?
Click to expand...
 
VaticanAssassin said:
"US Attorney Frank Papagni, ESQ uses terrorism statute with minimum 5 year sentences for small fires with less than $100 in damage."

"The men were convicted of arson, but under a provision of an expansive federal law punishing terrorism. They each served prison terms that the sentencing judge thought just, only to be told by appellate judges they had to go back to serve longer."


:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
The jury convicted both of the Hammonds of using fire to destroy federal property for a 2001 arson known as the Hardie-Hammond Fire, located in the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area. Witnesses at trial, including a relative of the Hammonds, testified the arson occurred shortly after Steven Hammond and his hunting party illegally slaughtered several deer on BLM property. Jurors were told that Steven Hammond handed out “Strike Anywhere” matches with instructions that they be lit and dropped on the ground because they were going to “light up the whole country on fire.” One witness testified that he barely escaped the eight to ten foot high flames caused by the arson. The fire consumed 139 acres of public land and destroyed all evidence of the game violations. After committing the arson, Steven Hammond called the BLM office in Burns, Oregon and claimed the fire was started on Hammond property to burn off invasive species and had inadvertently burned onto public lands. Dwight and Steven Hammond told one of their relatives to keep his mouth shut and that nobody needed to know about the fire.
Click to expand...

By law, arson on federal land carries a five-year mandatory minimum sentence. When the Hammonds were originally sentenced, they argued that the five-year mandatory minimum terms were unconstitutional and the trial court agreed and imposed sentences well below what the law required based upon the jury’s verdicts. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, however, upheld the federal law, reasoning that “given the seriousness of arson, a five-year sentence is not grossly disproportionate to the offense.” The court vacated the original, unlawful sentences and ordered that the Hammonds be resentenced “in compliance with the law.” In March 2015, the Supreme Court rejected the Hammonds’ petitions for certiorari. Today, Chief Judge Aiken imposed five year prison terms on each of the Hammonds, with credit for time they already served.
Click to expand...

http://www.justice.gov/usao-or/pr/e...convicted-arson-resentenced-five-years-prison
 
VaticanAssassin said:
"US Attorney Frank Papagni, ESQ uses terrorism statute with minimum 5 year sentences for small fires with less than $100 in damage."

"The men were convicted of arson, but under a provision of an expansive federal law punishing terrorism. They each served prison terms that the sentencing judge thought just, only to be told by appellate judges they had to go back to serve longer."


:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

They burned 130 acres in 2001 to cover up poaching.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

deckardB26354
FEMA crews under threat from armed militia
Replies
10
Views
301
LLCox
LLCox
Rightguide
Boulder "Free Palestine" Terrorist Is Illegal Alien
2
Replies
43
Views
695
Lance_Castro
Lance_Castro
Rightguide
SCOTUS 8-0 Limits Inferior Courts' Authority in Environmental Matters
Replies
2
Views
111
ll74
ll74
P
There are already calls for vigilantes to round up "brown folks" to imprison in camps
5 6 7
Replies
167
Views
3K
Politruk
P
RobDownSouth
October Surprise! Feds smash one of the largest Fentanyl gangs in America
Replies
10
Views
330
RoryN
RoryN
Back
Top